Man Castrates Self: “My Wife Wouldn’t Have Sex With Me”

Look at it on the bright side. Every time somebody mutilates their genitals in this world, we are among the first to know about it.

it even hurts just to read about this story
ouch

It's like the darwin awards, but with more pain and less death

Thank god. More dick mutilation means less retarded console war articles involving "HOLY SHIT LOOK THE PS3 VERSION OF THIS TEXTURE HAS LIKE FIVE EXTRA PIXELS" or whatever the fuck. I hope.

Yea...it would definitely be 'manlier' to try to rape her wife, get sent to jail and then get raped from behind by the other male prisoners.

It's Colombia
I doubt they send to jail there for a rape of a wife.

It's Colombia. I doubt they send people to jail for rape.

Fixed.

Yup in my country they don't go to jail, as a matter of fact ppl take justice in their own hands.

The idea of raping your wife seems rather paradoxical, if you think about it.

How do you rape someone who has sworn (before the eyes of their God, no less, seeing as they are religious) to "be your partner", "in good times and and in bad", to "love and cherish you unconditionally", "until death do us part"?

Seriously? Just because someone has agreed to spend their life with you doesn't mean that they've offered themselves up as a sex slave to you. Just because you marry someone doesn't mean you're obligated to fuck them whenever they want (unfortunately).

Sigh... no, not seriously. Thought that would be obvious enough without spelling it out.

On the other hand, if you'd like to turn those idle musings into a serious discussion, consider this:

If the wife is persistently refusing sexual interaction, it's reasonable to assume that's but the tip of the iceberg of their relationship troubles. I mean, just to be clear: We're not talking about an occasional "I don't feel up to it tonight, honey" here. The man cut his fucking balls off.

Given such circumstances, one might reasonably ask the wife why she didn't just divorce him if she didn't like him anymore to that extent. And what do you think she would have answered, being religious and all?

"We don't believe in divorce. We took our oath before God. It wouldn't be Right(TM) to break our vows."

Or something to that effect. So wait... breaking your vows by getting divorced is wrong. But neglecting your duties as wife to the point of your husband feeling the need to mutilate his genitals in order to keep his own vows... that's perfectly fine?

The more cynical observer might note, at this point, that the real reason the wife wouldn't have divorced him is because she most likely depended on her husband for sustenance. But that only begs the alternate question of:

So wait... expecting a husband to provide a living for his wife with his own hard work, that's perfectly fine. But expecting the wife to, at the very damn least, spread her legs and lie still for a few minutes every once in a while... Oh no, don't you even dare suggest such a thing! How chauvinist and sexist of you!

So, on second thought, yes, seriously. That, or your pick between religious hypocrisy or gender-based double standard. What'll be?

tl; read anyway
somehow got through it without an opinion either way

I agree that the guy went to a terrible extreme to keep his vows. If it had been me, I'd have told her I'd get a divorce and sent her to some relative of hers... But then again, I'm an atheist that just hates dogmatic traditions...

>So wait... breaking your vows by getting divorced is wrong.

Yes, this is wrong.

>But neglecting your duties as wife to the point of your husband feeling the need to mutilate his genitals in order to keep his own vows... that's perfectly fine?

No, this is also wrong.

I'm sure that you already understood that your logic was flawed.

Girl here, i think splat has a point, i'm having the same trouble but reverse, i want to fucking castrate myself so i do not go and fuck around or have any type of sexual urge.

What can i do about it?

holy shit i think i have a crush on splat

0\\\

An idiot, and a very annoying FAGGOT. A chrisfag indeed.

Mindless, Thoughtless, Uneducated prosecution of a group without ANY discrimination of age, ethnicity, gender, nor cause. Internet, the closest things you get to equality. Cause equality for no one is equal.

I'm catholic but fuck that if my wife won't fuck me because she doesn't like me anymore (not for health reasons, etc), I'll find another wife.

People pretending you marry someone for all kinds of reasons except for sex are hypocrites.

People that can not perceive how another person could think or behave differently to them are called bigots.

You are a bigot.

A priest would be here for shota, not loli.

I thought they are usually here for both?

balls not dick. he cut off his balls

Not really. If you do it right, cutting your balls off only hurts for a couple days-- it heals OK and the only real trouble you'll have is that you might feel a bit colder and you might be weaker. It's not hard to live with. On the other hand, refraining from sex when you're a healthy guy who's producing testosterone may be difficult.

your balls make testosterone so without them you would start lose traits that make you male, and you can't get a bonner after a while

In fact the commandments were created by the jews, so the self-mutilation must be permited because they circumcise their boys.

But well, christians are faggots who think and belive whatever they want without a real reason.

thats only those who blindly follow their religion to a T, Without thought. and not just use it as something to try to make their lives and the lives of others around them better.

>But well, christians are faggots who think and belive whatever they want without a real reason.

That's the worst description of a Christian I have heard in quite some time.

Christians have a definite set of doctrine and dogma that they believe in because they believe it will lead to eternal life.

The opposite to what you said.

Actually, if you read the stories carefully, it doesn't say "God told David to do this." Just that he did it.
The word for "kill" in the commandment is "ratsach" in Hebrew. Literally "to pierce violently". It is used once elsewhere to refer to judicial killing, once for accidental killing and once for killing by proxy. So narrowing the definition to "legally unjustifiable killing" doesn't hold up to usage and is mostly a way for people to feel more comfortable about going to war and such.

That said, I'd consider shooting someone to stop them harming my family, and I'd consider divorcing a wife who didn't want me physically anymore. Actually, I did the latter.

After that "If an eye offends thee..." stuff, I just remembered that neither castration nor neutering kills sexual desire in humans. Might mute it a bit, but it won't put an end to it.

Actually, it is pretty effective. There are men who get surgically castrated solely to decrease their libido.

Learned the difference between an ammendment and a commandment yet? Maybe you should try making it to 2nd grade where you'll get to learn about your nation's constitution and how they've had to patch it up with ammendments over time.

FREEDOM OF SPEECH RULES :)

must be this certain anon's first time to surf sankaku..

>Serene

You are inestimably superb.

nah, unfair including sects and weird off-branches. I mean, moslems have that "if you kill one person, it is like you killed every single person", with murder beeing a death-sin, and suicide beeing another one.
So, we still get those freaks with their bombbelts in the mid-east.

O_O Angeloids?!

/me cuts balls.

I can always tell Ikarus to make them grow back once I'm there.

I heard in heaven, pantsu fly through the sky