Canada Bans Talking to Children Online

online-schoolgirl-shock.jpg

A new legal ruling makes talking to children online a possible criminal offence, with the crime of Internet luring no longer requiring any sexually explicit communication or even any intention of meeting the child for prosecution to proceed.

According to a judge with the Supreme Court of Canada, the law against “Internet luring” now “makes it a crime to communicate by computer with underage children or adolescents for the purpose of facilitating the commission of the offences,” an expansion of the previous interpretation which required some intent to actually meet the child.

“Facilitating” is interpreted as including any act which might in some way increase the chances of a child somewhere being exploited.

Anything which exploits a child’s “curiosity, immaturity or precocious sexuality” is also criminalised under the new law, and the judge emphasised that such criminal contact need not be sexual in nature.

The judge maintains that the decision will stop the plague of Internet child molesters dead:

“Those who use their computers to lure children for sexual purposes often groom them online by first gaining their trust through conversations about their home life, their personal interests or other innocuous topics.

This is in keeping with Parliament’s objective to close the cyberspace door before the predator gets in to prey.”

The new ruling was prompted by an earlier case of “Internet luring” in which the perpetrator engaged in sexually explicit chats with a 12-year-old girl, but managed to convince the courts that he had no intention of actually meeting the girl for sex, exploiting an apparent loophole and resulting in his acquittal.

The updated ruling overturns this acquittal on the grounds that the judge’s interpretation of the law was too narrow.

Campaigners for tougher laws “protecting” children are delighted at the prospect of finally being able to lock people up for having the temerity to talk to a child:

“There’s been a very clear message that in fact this is something that is an offence, and as a result, I would think that there will now be more arrests and prosecutions of adults committing these kind of crimes.

If you’re an adult and if you’re having conversations with a child on the Internet, be warned because even if your conversations aren’t sexual and even if your conversations are not for the purpose of meeting a child and committing an offence against a child, what you’re doing is potentially a crime.”

Via CTV.


    Post Comment »
    462 Comments
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Avatar of Insilencio
    Comment by Insilencio
    14:18 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    This law is so murky I don't even know where to begin.

    Avatar of loli-kun
    Comment by loli-kun
    14:22 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    First, they passed that law that treats lolicon material as CP and now... this!?

    As a Canadian, I'm OUTRAGED.

    Avatar of MasterYuke
    Comment by MasterYuke
    09:24 08/12/2009 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    "Anything which exploits a child’s “... precocious sexuality” is also criminalised under the new law ..."
    apparently even if the kid is asking YOU for sex, you can't give it to em.

    Id gladly help, and I'm a US citizen - that's how outrageous this really is!

    Comment by Anonymous

    Oh,where to start yankee asshole?
    1. No public healthcare option.
    2. Entertainment news media.
    3. Gun control laws that are laughable.
    4. A war on drugs, that has done jackshit to save people and is unwinnable.
    5. Afganistan, or Vietnam 2.0
    6. Iraq, or Vietnam 3.0
    7. Fox News, or the Republican proganda show
    8. Doping in professional sports.
    9. Celebutards
    and last but not least,
    10. Reality tv

    so you can bite my maple leaf wearing hockey-playing, watching our olympic teams smoke yours in 2010 scrot bitch

    OWN THE PODIUM!!!

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:24 08/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I smell a troll.

    -Totally unrelated to topic at hand.
    -Rude.
    -Mention to some depraved sexual action.

    5/10. I raged at first, but then I found you.

    Comment by Anonymous

    oh, I am sorry I offended the pedophile, who can't face the ugly truths about his own country. Oops, sorry I am not. Want me to point out a few other ugly truths?
    Let's see....
    11. Fake Reality tv aka The Hills
    12. The Republican Party
    13. The Democratic Party
    14. Bush junior
    15. Bush senior
    16. The KKK
    17. Mormons
    18. the Religeous Right
    19. The NRA
    20. the sub-prime mortgage debacle, that nearly destroyed the world economy.

    Let me know if I left anything out cocksucker

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:11 08/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    oooohhhh the internet Tough Guy speaks!

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:12 08/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    let me guess your going to come and get me?

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:14 08/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Oh so not scared

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:57 08/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    hey anon at 11:02 8/12 how are any of those issues that persons fault? geez not all americans are yankees it just shows that you're a selfish little prick

    Avatar of Rococo
    Comment by Rococo
    13:02 08/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Jeez, yukkuri itte shite, man.
    I always thought canadians were fairly levelheaded and easy going. Regrettably you have points (regrettable in that, yeah, we suck that much, not that a Canadian can be right in conversation) But that doesn't mean you guys are perfect. Moreso, you're being an ass about it. Yeah, MasterYuke's a fag, and maybe a troll. Chill.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:46 08/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    ok Rococo i admit that i might have went overboard but hey we canadians put up with people from other countries joking about us.
    but When somebody says that because of a law that protects kids, but in very broad generalizations, can be interepreted and abused by a crown prosecutor if he tried to.
    but facilitating means that some offender is communicating with kid for the purpose exploiting, however people overreacting saying how parents will not be able to text or IM their kids. teacher will not be able to email homework assignments. Any CP who filed against a parent or a teacher based on that, would be laughed out of court. And then some idiot claiming that Canada is fucked, because of that. I make a point of pointing out what there problems in their countries are. Also anon 12:57, I think you meant ignorant prick, but since you couldn't get that right, well it means you made my point. You Ignorant Prick!!!

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:35 08/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    What do you expect? Of course he/she is angry the anon lives in Canada. I'd be bitter too.

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:53 08/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hey i love Canada, free health care. mountains clear skies winter storms that make you feel alive to see them. Oh yeah, there was that war of 1812 thing were we you know burned down your original White house. We canadians have a lot to be proud of

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:56 08/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Oh almost forgot everybody loves canadians too
    because we don't come across ass egotistical assholes, Going we're #1. As canadians it's like we live next to the neighbourhood douchebag

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:22 09/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    @Anon 14:53, re Canada:

    * "Free" healthcare ain't "free". Someone is paying for it.

    * Canadian scenery and weather - I couldn't agree more.

    * 1812/White House - yeah, that was funny.

    * Governments - LIKE the U.S., Canada's government is fucked up. It's just fucked up in somewhat DIFFERENT WAYS than the U.S. government.

    Avatar of tyciol
    Comment by tyciol
    09:49 12/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The whole US vs Canada thing is outdated guys, you'll never do it as good as HBK and the Hitman. Just drop it: both countries have problems and benefits that the other doesn't. Both could learn from the other. Both are fucked in terms of freedom of speech.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:12 14/03/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    i thought this may be fun to respond to, even if out of boredom.

    1. un important, but does show we are behind
    2. are what people actualy watch, because real news, that "bla bla people died here, bla bla" gets so old and boring so fast its not worth watching, and if you need real news and not local news, online is and always will be better than national news.

    and many of us also hate it when we have to hear a fucking cleberty going to rehab as real news
    3. Gun control in general is bullshit. keep explosives and full automatic weapons out of un licensed hands, but gun laws only effect citizens, not the "bad guys" they are meant to hinder. and remember, America fought for its freedom, and the way things look, its possibly we may need to again in my lifetime (im 22)
    4. A war on drugs is bullshit in the first place. so long as you are not forced to take the drugs and its your choice, the fuck should anyone care, aside form some of the worse drugs like pcp. im very libertarian in my drug views.
    5&6. vitnam was a war on an idea, and unwinable in any form. iraq and afgan have an objective, and are "winnable" granted hard but still. its like if someone killed a person, and than every poliece department in the usa looked for the killer, thats kind of the equivilant, but realy there are more fundamental problems with those two countries that makes it more of a is it worth helping them?
    7. no argument
    8. a non issue, outside of sports where you fight, like boxing and the like.
    9. they are bad
    10. look at non reality tv in other countries, is it any better than our reality tv? not really, the only difference is with reality tv, those people are realy that fucking stupid
    11. cant blame
    12&13 dont see the issue there
    14&15 yea, they sucked
    16. the rest of the world has racism far worse and more wide spread, they just dont kill over it like the kkk did, but in america, its to hard to live as an outed racist, where as other countries outed racism is closer to normal.
    17. they are stupid
    18. see above
    19. they can be a bit nuts, but alot of what they do is to prove a point of its my right, if it wasn't for them, pussies who are afraid of guns would have had them banned by now.
    20. i dont get it.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:13 08/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I am canadian and i am not outraged, and why the fuck would be trying to talk to a minor when there are plenty of single women out there

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:26 08/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's not so much the prospect of not being able to talk to a minor that pisses people off, but it's the prospect of being labeled a miscreant/deviant at will because the police or some jackass can arbitrarily accuse you of something as stupid as 'talking to a child' online.

    It's the fact that the law leaves rooms for so much freaking privacy controversy along with interpretation difficulties. Frankly, the law can easily be abused, and is now a form of censorship more than anything. Their stance is pretty much antagonizing the freaking internet, and that's sure to piss off more than just pedophiles.

    Law and order is great and all, but acting arbitrarily in the name of the greater good of the people is a freaking abuse of power.

    I for one think that if they're that fucking concerned about their 'kids', they should put an age restriction on the internet claiming no retards under the age of 18 may use the internet. Of course, they can't do that, because the internet is now integrated into the motherfucking education system.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:23 09/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well look at it this way. I used to play WoW. I started playing when I was 16. Technically I'm still a minor in canada, and would be included in that law. Does that mean my guild can't talk to me? (This was when WoW came out btw)

    Laws like this are incredibly abusable, and a step in the wrong direction.

    Avatar of tyciol
    Comment by tyciol
    12:02 12/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hell, my brother uses the internet and he's 17, do I need to wait another year before I can IM him even though he's in the next room?

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:40 15/03/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    stop samefaggin ugaiz

    Avatar of bolt
    Comment by bolt
    14:30 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    hmm.. hey canada (and all the rest of the so called civilized world) maybe o say.. THE PARENTS! should be the ones that take care of the children.. and get the Damn government out of our lives!

    I parents actually did the parenting thing.. the problem would go away cuz there wouldn't be any kids to chase.. Draconian.. i remember a group of people that left there country to get away from persecution.. now.. we're the freakin source of it...

    when is Mars open for colonization? I'd like to book my ticket!

    Avatar of Lucky Channel
    Comment by Lucky Channel
    16:56 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I can easily a Childrens Youth Minister being put in jail for not keeping up with current events, and trying to help troubled teens online.

    Avatar of Darkrockslizer
    Comment by Darkrockslizer
    19:25 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yeah, according to this law psychologists giving advice to teens who have reached puberty or parents explaining what is sex to their kids online is a crime too.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:23 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    jailbait

    Comment by Schrobby
    22:24 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    All helplines against sexual abuse for children and teens in Canada have to be closed now because they are talking to children online. LOL

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:26 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Teachers all over the world are arrested for emailing their students homework or extra homework !

    Dad gets arrested for talking to his daughter on MSN from work reminding her to buy groceries !

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:02 08/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    THEN BAN CHILDREN FROM THE INTERNET!!!!

    Avatar of BlaqCat
    Comment by BlaqCat
    01:14 08/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I admit, this last one made me lol.

    On another note, we are quickly becoming a more, and more pathetic society. Is it really a good thing to make adults so paranoid about even speaking to children? I feel like I'm going to be arrested for even smiling/waving at one x_x...

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:26 08/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yep. If I see a kid in trouble, I'll just keep walking. Seeya :\

    Avatar of Pyrolight
    Comment by Pyrolight
    02:13 08/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    While the law is way too broad don't forget it came about from "loophole abuse". Stupid as it may me the law didn't pop up out of the blue.

    Someone tried to abuse the system and everyone suffers. It will be interesting to see how often this new law gets challenged. There is just way too much grey in it.

    Avatar of Chen-04
    Comment by Chen-03
    03:51 08/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The real irony of this is, that real perpetrators don't even use the net. They wait before schools and stuff.

    And I agree with the Anon from 01:02 08/12/2009. It's much easier to lock kids away from the web. I never understood why they could use it anway. The net has like the most hideous things of the world and all of them are easily findable by google. It's not going to work to keep the danger form your children, you need to keep your children from the danger.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:09 08/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    01:14 and 1:26, doesn't Japan already have problems with that?

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:17 08/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    This already happened in Nova Scotia. A couple in their 70's waved at a kid while driving by, and were questioned for attempted abduction.

    Avatar of tyciol
    Comment by tyciol
    12:03 12/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Damn, Schrobby you just won this debate

    Comment by Dark Mage
    19:49 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    After colonizing Mars lets drop an asteroid on Canada.

    Or if they wise up and over throw the pussies,do gooders, and Satan sucklers running their country and ship them off to an island lets bomb said island.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:18 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    And you, sir, could win the stupidity award. Other countries like yours, whichever it is, will be and is as ridiculous as your vision of Canada by the simple fact that it is filled with humans, and humans in general have a bad reputation, wherever they come from and wherever they reside at the moment.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:46 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You would seriously disagree with a Char being a Char?

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:30 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    @20:18 anon:
    Canada is mostly inhabited by the french. Do you SERIOUSLY consider the french to be human beings?
    I agree with Char.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:47 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    @22:30 anon:
    "Mostly"? Haha. Oh wow.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:08 08/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Asteroid, Char? Have you run out of colonies already?

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:27 08/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    How about.. Only the Supreme Court of Canada for start..?

    Anyway. +1 an asteroid drop.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:19 08/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    lol "mostly"? 20% is not mostly...

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:19 08/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    French Canadians are not French. They're people who were kicked out of France cause they weren't French enough.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:27 08/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Fuck you loli-phedophile luring-kids into your van asshole because you live in your parents basement, I am really sorry you have no game you rotten-cockfuck. I think you shouldn't have Jackshit to say when your country can't come up with a fucking public healthcare option. Look to your own before critizing how other countries are asshole

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:29 08/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    wow, 22:30 you has less knowledge about canada then you do about sex

    Avatar of First Posting Idiot
    Comment by First Posting Idiot
    22:00 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    What if the Canadians are playing Halo ODST or some other Micro$oft tea bagging shooter and accidentally say the wrong thing to a 13 year old racist? Can they be arrested?

    Instead of fucking with everyone using these "feel good" laws, the courts should just re try the scum bag and leave the rest of us the fuck alone.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:15 08/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    So you can go after martian kids?

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:24 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    What if your a teacher replying to your students question?
    does that mean GG?

    Avatar of CoreFlood
    Comment by CoreFlood
    15:32 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    This sort of thing makes me feel ashamed to be canadian >.>

    Avatar of Hugegnome
    Comment by Hugegnome
    15:54 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Next step, ban the usage of the internet for anyone under the age of 18, problem fixed. Online gaming may actually become tolerable

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:25 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    ^This plz

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:48 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I argee with all those replies above, I'm now ashamed to be Canadian and gaming would be better, if it was 18+ internet.

    Avatar of Table-wanna-be
    Comment by Table-wanna-be
    17:08 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Less kids hacking our FPS games? Sounds like a good deal to me.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:34 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You all are dumbasses, I mean seriously an 18+ internet? Are your heads so far up your asses that you find SENSE IN THAT?

    Not all people below 18 are annoying, whiny, or idiotic. Hell, I wouldn't even find it surprising if most of them had more common sense than HALF the adult/so called "MATURE" internet users. I know for a fact that most of my underage friends are a whole hell lot mature than my friends who are "mature" as you would say it.

    Anyway, this whole issue REEKS of big brother tactics. I mean what the hell are they going to do? Actually track your IP? Have a government worker in your house all day? Have your ISP record everything you do, even when you AREN'T on internet? Or even stalking you?

    Sooner or later Canada is going to be come a communist country if idiotic laws like this continue to be passed. I mean do some research on the subject, it always starts with laws like this to see if the citizens will tolerate it.

    Come to think of it, this sounds like some of the same shit that Obama is trying to enforce here in the US. Seems that Governments all over the world are wanting more power than they actually NEED.

    I mean seriously people really need to use the common sense that they KNOW THEY HAVE, but refuse to pay attention to.

    Also, crap like this could EASILY be avoided if modern parents actually gave a flying flip what their kids are doing on the internet, instead of just giving them a laptop/desktop and saying "Have fun!"

    People today are brain dead and stupid.

    Avatar of Mikorio
    Comment by Mikorio
    18:40 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    12 year old anon much?

    HYPOCRITE.

    Rather than a ban of internetz, why not just a ban of chat rooms? Where else would they get 'em then?

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:47 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    @17:34
    I agree that now all 12yo kids are annoying. But you sure are. And do try to be less obvious when you troll next time.

    On another note. The new law makes practically anyone aged >= 18 a criminal if they play any social computer game online.

    "Coming up next - an evil pedophile has been arrested for daring to play WoW with a child."

    Avatar of TheBeast
    Comment by TheBeast
    18:51 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    looks like anon@17:34 is one of those under 18. you can always tell because they try as hard as they can to use big words and talk political. i suppose it is just the passion of youth. either way, you don't have to get all bent out of shape. it's not like what hugegnome said would become law. i think maybe if the chatrooms were bumped up to adult status, and the web browser net-nannies stopped access to them without a password things would be safer. but then even myspace and facebook could be used to talk with kids, however, when searching for friends on myspace it won't show anyone under the age of 18. so, i think you would have to know them first.

    Avatar of Crowbar
    Comment by Crowbar
    18:54 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Re Hugegnome:

    > Next step, ban the usage of the internet for anyone, problem fixed

    There, fixed it for you. =)

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:58 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    theres a saying, "people who talks complicated stuff, complicatedly are either stupid...or those who talk about simple stuff to complicate things are morons"...and yes 18+ internets please...

    we have nothing but porn on the internet...just a quick google can give you tons of porn site to go to....internet should be for 18 and above

    but the question is how can we actually implement this law?

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:27 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Or just add, 1 hour a week IT to schools, where they could teach about the ways to use the internet..

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:38 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You shouldn't talk with kids, at least if you're canadian...

    Avatar of TNinja
    Comment by TNinja
    20:03 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well, as how the internet have grown up, it might be a good idea to make the internet +18. But I still think it's bad that the internet should be +18 just because people can't stop posting porn everywhere and molesters luring out heir prey.

    It's like banning children from entering the kitchen because there's knives there.

    Honestly, I'm not sure what to do with this internet world.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:25 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    @Anon 18:58:

    Nice approximation of the Hiratsuka Raichou (from Kyouran Kazoku Nikki) quote.

    @All:

    It will be the ultimate excuse for doing nothing. Example:

    "Welcome to the Smell Corporation Technical Support Chat Room / Support Forum. I'm sorry, but we cannot assist you with your problem because this Chat Room and this Forum operate via the Internet, and you cannot prove that you are eighteen or older, so we cannot legally converse with you.

    Have a nice day, and thank you for choosing Smell.

    P.S.: This message was issued by an automated computer, not by an actual live human being, so there is no "person" to prosecute under Canada's 'Internet Luring' law."

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:59 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    to anon 17:34

    what the hell are they going to do? Actually track your IP? Have a government worker in your house all day? Have your ISP record everything you do, even when you AREN'T on internet? Or even stalking you?

    have you ever heard of echelon?

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:48 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    They should ban all people under the age of 18 from using the internet. I agree those that are under 18 are too annoying. I work at a gaming shop and everytime a bunch of first year high school kids are always yelling so damn loud that the businesses next to us would hear us. Sometimes these kids behaviors go through the roof, where all the sudden they would run around in our small tiny store and BAM they hit the wall with all my games, then they would walk like out like they didn't do nothing wrong. Bad thing is my manager and the police guy next to him said "That he would have to arrest me for talking back to them!?!?" and I was like are you f***ing joking?!?!?!? and he wasn't. So people older than them would have to let them throw out their frustrations through destruction while we can't do anything to the little pricks!?!?!? F@#$!

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:16 08/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Anon17:34 here.

    I was not trolling and I was not defending anyone. I was just pissed off by a law like this since I have many friends who are below the age of 18 in Canada. I however am a 16 year old US Citizen.

    I was not trying to troll, hell I don't even know what "Trolling" actually is. I was just stating my opinion. Plus it was around 2AM, I was tired, frustrated and just overall pissed off when I was given the link to this article.

    I basically just took out all my anger and frustration from yesterday on the people I had replied too.

    And think about an 18+ internet those of you who say its the ideal thing. I mean really put some thought into it, if that happened schools would no longer be allowed to have computer access for students. And you'd be taking away a form of free speech, which in the US in unconstitutional.

    Avatar of Sylar
    Comment by Sylar
    08:04 08/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    And what to you idiots suppose we should do for an 18+ Internet. Give our ID number before entering every site? Yeah that would be hepfull to big brother. We all gonna be in nice little boxes now.
    And anyway let's not forget that we were teenagers a few years back and we sure as hell would have hate it if they didn't let us connect online.
    Let's not forget where we where before we grew up because then the 55 year olds that want anime loli pics and anime ban from the internet are also right because they grew up and think we are little shitards for liking those things.

    Avatar of tyciol
    Comment by tyciol
    18:54 12/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Obviously we shouldn't take away the internet for minors, but we should TRY to, to make the point that it's unfair to adults to make it illegal to exchange bits and bytes with their computers.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:01 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    rape!

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:21 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well it's sorta a decent law I guess. A statistic listed here on a previous article shows Canada having the highest amount of rapists that had loli material within a given population. Australia pretty much matches this as well.

    Comment by Dark Mage
    19:51 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Wha did you type that with or without Stan's c--- in your mouth?

    Avatar of Chris
    Comment by Chris
    21:38 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Who's Stan and why is his cock in Anon's mouth?

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:16 08/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Why are you two blowing each other?

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:54 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    anyone ever hear the quote "lies , dam'd lies , and statistics"?
    we need a death penalty for pants wetting hand wringing dogooder bleeding heart liberal pinhead
    f***wits...

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:18 08/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I thought that the Conservative party was running Canada right now?

    As I posted on ZDNet:

    Politicians are already implying that the only people who use the Internet, are "Pedophiles, Pirates & Terrorists".

    Get ready for the next wave of drivel:
    "Pedophiles, Pirates & Terrorists are voting in elections. We'd better ban all future elections!"

    lehnerus2000

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:25 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's no longer like banning knives because they COULD be used to stab somebody. No, this law is more like banning all metal because it COULD be used to make knives.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:01 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    That's a brilliant strategy.

    We should make oxygen illegal for politicians to breathe, because that oxygen might have traces of marijuanna in it.

    Do the world a favor, smother a politician.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:33 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Oxygen = not air..

    Air can have traces of marijuana, oxygen can't...

    But higher concentration of oxygen kills, so it's still a valid suggestion ;)

    Comment by Dark Mage
    19:54 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Also said oxygen filled room must have lots of flammables and paper inside it at all times.
    Politicians shall be required to ware polyester cloths as well.

    All heat inside said room will be via open flames or hot wire resistance heaters.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:44 08/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Anon is wrong. A bottle of oxygen can have traces of marijuana in it.

    Pure oxygen on the otherhand can't.

    "This is a bottle of H2O, with traces of Sodium Chloride within."

    Comment by Nin
    21:09 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I love that simile so much. Good job.

    Avatar of tyciol
    Comment by tyciol
    18:55 12/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    That's an excellent analogy 17:25

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:16 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Actually I'm pretty sure Sankaku Complex is not a lawyer because the first paragraph is in direct conflict with the second. The first paragraph says just talking to kids is against the law, the second actually doesn't say this. It says any means of communication (computer) by which an offense (any) is influenced then it counts as a crime. Talking to a child is not a crime. This is basically allowing the Canadian government to press two charges or multiple charges against a criminal in the case that another charge is not obtainable.

    This is done in nearly every criminal case in the world it's called stacking the charges, you might get a ticket for speeding then on top of that might get wreck-less driving, then on top of that endangering innocents, then when you get to court the prosecutor will drop everything but the speeding if you plead guilty.

    This is one of those deals.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:19 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    However, just to support the sheer ludicrosity of this ruling, the actual rules text effectively states that parents are now banned from talking to their kids by way of instant messaging.

    "Oh hi honey- how was your field trip?"

    *Thirty police officers bust into Daddy's office and arrest him for facilitating to exploit a minor*

    And the best part? It's completely and totally loophole legal. It'll happen- some smuck will be on a business trip or something and talking to his seven year old daughter about her school trip or the like- and the police will determine that this falls under the umbrella of the law- and arrest the man as the HORRIBLE PEDOPHILE THAT HE IS!

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:22 09/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    emailing your kids to see how they are is not exploiting, you dumb fuck. I know police officers and they say that if they had something like that come across their desks,
    a email message from a father to a daughter, or mother to a son, they would just toss it in the trash, because they are family. Also if a doctor's or therapist's office emails a an appointment. time same thing. Because it is a legitimate reason to be contacting your kids or patients. Sorry the law has eliminated your potential luring tools but hey that's how the pedo gets bounced.

    Avatar of tyciol
    Comment by tyciol
    18:57 12/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Way to misrepresent the argument Anon: yes most responsible cops will toss out innocent shit, but eventually you're going to get a dick and a case with some grey area and shit is going to happen, it will.

    Avatar of Artefact
    Comment by Artefact

    Internet luring is itself a crime though. You don't need to do anything else to commit it.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:17 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    funny , am i now lolicon for talking to my little brother on msn ?

    Comment by Schrobby
    22:30 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yes, you are now a shota rapist! LOL

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:48 08/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    So.. People are no longer allowed to talk to their own children, nephews, or nieces online anymore in Canada?

    How about texting on cellphones or direct face to face conversations through web cams?

    Does the law fall on online social networks like Facebook or Twitter as well? It's not a direct chat, more like a forum system. Do they count?

    What's next? Regular phone conversations?

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:54 08/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Oh, I almost forgot to mention the kids on online/multiplayer games, such as MMO, Xbox Live, Playstation Network, WiiSpeak, Ventrilo, TeamSpeak, etc.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:55 08/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Technically you're already violating this law just from playing MMORPGs.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:54 09/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    stop being a fucking idiot

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:10 09/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    So.. I'm being an idiot for pointing out the realistic problems involving this law that any logical person with a brain can see, and the potential loose interpretation by the lawmakers, lawyers and the authorities?

    Only morons with an extremely narrow mind are unwilling to see there's problems here, and when the law you support so much is turned around against you, I hope you'll enjoy the long judicial process.

    Online Chat Alternative Methods:
    - Web cam (Direct face to face chat.)
    - Massive Multiplayer Online Games (Same system as an online chat, but with more children in the environment.)
    - Xbox Live, Playstation Network, WiiSpeak, Ventrilo, Teamspeak, etc. (Direct online voice chat systems.)
    - Facebook, Twitter, etc. (Online social networks.)

    These are all considered as online chats as well and all of these are popular chats systems for children. MMOGs are especially popular among children and adults alike, if a guild ever wants to hold a meeting together with everyone, it can be loosely interpreted as luring as well.

    If you read this law clearly, relatives or even guardians of the child can be persecuted by this law, as long as it's an online chat. Even if you're playing an online game with another child is considered a legal violation of this new law. If you're already confused, then talk to a lawyer to explain it to you with diagrams.

    Next time if you want to call someone stupid, explain your reason on why you think the viewpoint is wrong, other than a blatant name calling without a clear thought in your head. All you've done is present your own ignorance and inept thought process.












    Post Comment »

Popular

Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments