I already write a long post, but the electricity suddenly went down :(
anyway, If you (or anyone) don't feel 3D effect, or do feel 3D effect but some parts of the image seemed flickering, then you probably viewed it with the wrong method.
So far the images posted on SC is made with cross view method... but the explanation on how to view it (in the anime stereograms article) is for the parallel view method.
With cross view method, the left eye is supposed to see the right image and vice versa. To view the image correctly, you must focus your vision in front of the image (use your finger as a guide and move if back and forth between your face and the image/monitor).
With parallel view method, the left eye see the left image and the right eye see the right image. To view the image correctly, you must focus your vision behind the image.
With both method, you're supposed to see 3 images with the middle one is the stereo one.
If you want to view the above image (or if someone curious why they can't see 3D effect when they can see the 3 images...) you can try this and view it with your usual viewing method...
http://img341.imageshack.us/img341/852/stereoscopicbreastidolp.jpg
Basically I swap the left image to the right and vice versa.. so that image is intended to be viewed with the parallel view method (focus far away).
As a bonus, I also include a swapped image of one of the anime stereogram image which if you view the original using parallel view method it would looked a bit flat...
http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/1477/sexymizugistereogrampar.jpg
There is a slight side effect when you swap the image... The depth is slightly wrong (I noticed a slight added depth to the picture). Not bad though since the picture would pop more :)
I hope everyone can enjoy the stereograms the way it meant to be enjoyed :)
Btw, the asuka tentacle one doesn't have big enough separation and will look flat no matter what viewing method you try.
Try this just for testing...
http://img6.imageshack.us/img6/5476/asiatichybridliliumster.jpg
The correct image should be the flower on top of the grass... the wrong image would resulted in the flower is on the bottom of the grass (kinda like the flower is on a hole).
If you see the top row correct then you're already using cross view.
If you see the bottom row correct then you're using parallel view method.
Its the hand, look at the hands in the picture, the one in the right is back toward her more. also, the nipple on the closest breast is more in front of her so it slight over laps the line created by the contour of her boob. - RichIsArrogant
Msg me on youtube.
This is an image that have both cross view and parallel view on the same image...
http://img6.imageshack.us/img6/5476/asiatichybridliliumster.jpg
The correct result should be the flower is on top of the grass.
If you can view the top row correctly, then you already using cross view method and you don't have to worry about viewing stereogram images posted on SC.
If you can view the bottom row correctly, then you're using parallel view method, thus the wrong method to view the stereograms on SC.
btw, sorry for the double post... it just that I waited for this post to show up like for 3+ hours but it wouldn't show up, so I thought the post had failed... then I post another one which is the 2nd reply I posted above.
She didn't move; it's a stereogram. If you click the link that says "in 2D" above you'll get the entry explaining them, and more importantly, how to see them.
Here's the TL;DR part... each pic is taken from a slightly different position, which ends up showing her from a slightly different angle. It's done to mimic what would be seen by each eye if a human were witnessing it instead of a camera. When the images are restricted properly to each only being seen by the intended eye (whether by forcing cross-eyes or limiting colours), the brain is tricked into believing it's 3D because each eye is seeing exactly what it would be if you were there in person.
Stereograms hurt my eyes after a while, so I shopped it into anaglyph as well. But I didn't think about sharing it; good on ya. Only one problem - your link's broken. Can you repost it?
If you're having trouble seeing these stereographs, I have a guide on my blog: Learn how to see 3D photos like this. [http://neilcreek.com/blog/2008/02/28/how-to-see-3d-photos/]
I just saw my first one. I just kept crossing my eyes back and forth until I saw three pictures and the middle one was 3D. But now my eyes are watering a lot.
i see the same...
I already write a long post, but the electricity suddenly went down :(
anyway, If you (or anyone) don't feel 3D effect, or do feel 3D effect but some parts of the image seemed flickering, then you probably viewed it with the wrong method.
So far the images posted on SC is made with cross view method... but the explanation on how to view it (in the anime stereograms article) is for the parallel view method.
With cross view method, the left eye is supposed to see the right image and vice versa. To view the image correctly, you must focus your vision in front of the image (use your finger as a guide and move if back and forth between your face and the image/monitor).
With parallel view method, the left eye see the left image and the right eye see the right image. To view the image correctly, you must focus your vision behind the image.
With both method, you're supposed to see 3 images with the middle one is the stereo one.
If you want to view the above image (or if someone curious why they can't see 3D effect when they can see the 3 images...) you can try this and view it with your usual viewing method...
http://img341.imageshack.us/img341/852/stereoscopicbreastidolp.jpg
Basically I swap the left image to the right and vice versa.. so that image is intended to be viewed with the parallel view method (focus far away).
As a bonus, I also include a swapped image of one of the anime stereogram image which if you view the original using parallel view method it would looked a bit flat...
http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/1477/sexymizugistereogrampar.jpg
There is a slight side effect when you swap the image... The depth is slightly wrong (I noticed a slight added depth to the picture). Not bad though since the picture would pop more :)
I hope everyone can enjoy the stereograms the way it meant to be enjoyed :)
Btw, the asuka tentacle one doesn't have big enough separation and will look flat no matter what viewing method you try.
Try this just for testing...
http://img6.imageshack.us/img6/5476/asiatichybridliliumster.jpg
The correct image should be the flower on top of the grass... the wrong image would resulted in the flower is on the bottom of the grass (kinda like the flower is on a hole).
If you see the top row correct then you're already using cross view.
If you see the bottom row correct then you're using parallel view method.
I'm looking in the middle and crossing my eyes and I see a third image, but it seems to be the same as the other two...?
If you don't see the difference you're doing it wrong
are you supposed to look on the center when cross eye-ing?
That's one way to achieve the effect.
Who takes their bra off like that O_o???
We need one of these with a model opening her mouth in POV.
The girl is Priscila Sol. She's a pornstar and not a gravure idol.
Its the hand, look at the hands in the picture, the one in the right is back toward her more. also, the nipple on the closest breast is more in front of her so it slight over laps the line created by the contour of her boob. - RichIsArrogant
Msg me on youtube.
Thanks you Artefact!
She looks like Maria Ozawa...
This is an image that have both cross view and parallel view on the same image...
http://img6.imageshack.us/img6/5476/asiatichybridliliumster.jpg
The correct result should be the flower is on top of the grass.
If you can view the top row correctly, then you already using cross view method and you don't have to worry about viewing stereogram images posted on SC.
If you can view the bottom row correctly, then you're using parallel view method, thus the wrong method to view the stereograms on SC.
btw, sorry for the double post... it just that I waited for this post to show up like for 3+ hours but it wouldn't show up, so I thought the post had failed... then I post another one which is the 2nd reply I posted above.
sorry again.
I still like my 2d :(
Thats not even how you take off your bra D: You're doing it wrong!
She looks tangled up in her bra. Somebody save her! D:
in the second pic she moved (look at her right boob.....and take your hand out of your pants and you'll notice that it went closer to the other one)
She didn't move; it's a stereogram. If you click the link that says "in 2D" above you'll get the entry explaining them, and more importantly, how to see them.
Here's the TL;DR part... each pic is taken from a slightly different position, which ends up showing her from a slightly different angle. It's done to mimic what would be seen by each eye if a human were witnessing it instead of a camera. When the images are restricted properly to each only being seen by the intended eye (whether by forcing cross-eyes or limiting colours), the brain is tricked into believing it's 3D because each eye is seeing exactly what it would be if you were there in person.
It's a stereogram, people. Not a spot the differences game.
Regardless, delicious tits are delicious!
Agreed Anon 14:16 *salutes*
what's sterogram....
Take a good look at the right boob in both pics, there you will find the answer.
For those with red/cyan 3D glasses, I've shopped an anaglyphic version of this: http://i50.tinypic.com/mmu9hl.jpg
yes, please fix the link. i can never get my eyes to work on these things when their on computer screens.
Stereograms hurt my eyes after a while, so I shopped it into anaglyph as well. But I didn't think about sharing it; good on ya. Only one problem - your link's broken. Can you repost it?
Either that, or you could post yours?
Well I actually only shopped it up long enough to look at it, and didn't save it. But since Anon isn't coming back I'll do it again.
http://i47.tinypic.com/2v7yr10.jpg
(Dunno why Anon's disappeared but I'll check periodically to make sure this one doesn't)
fG
3D 3D is cool and all, but I find 3D 2D more impressive.
That said, this one was pretty damn good.
Still don't see much of a difference in these things.
Its brighter on left one.
I'm surprised u found a difference in the first place.
stereogram make someone look stupid...
and make your eyes hurt
yeah I feel like a jerk, staring at those pictures, tryin' to figure them out :S
I have to agree. What matter most is how fast we can remove them.
I don't see the difference
It's sticking out :O
looks like Maria Ozawa lol
If you're having trouble seeing these stereographs, I have a guide on my blog: Learn how to see 3D photos like this. [http://neilcreek.com/blog/2008/02/28/how-to-see-3d-photos/]
I just saw my first one. I just kept crossing my eyes back and forth until I saw three pictures and the middle one was 3D. But now my eyes are watering a lot.
Theres no difference between these other then a slight camera angle difference. Cross your eyes to view it in 3D
guys, you're doing it wrong. This isn't a "spot the difference" game.
usually depends on the angle of the picture. some are more obvious (which is good) while others are still almost just as flat as if it were 2d.
look at the bra....the image is more clear....><
the left one looks bigger. and by bigger and meant the boob
Pretty good one
The left side's shadow is more wider than the right one. Look at her left hand.
No, she's vertically rotated. Look at her left breast in the left picture (which shows more) and compare it with the left breast in the right picture.