izayoi-no-hanayome-kurasawa-tamaki-by-ino.jpg

A man who secretly infected his wife with HIV so she would be willing to have sex with him faces a possible 14-year sentence.

The 35-year-old man, an immigrant resident of New Zealand, tested positive for HIV in 2004 when he arrived in the country, though his 33-year-old wife and child were uninfected.

His wife subsequently agreed to stay with him to preserve the family, and initially consented to having protected sex with him. Later she would refuse him sex out of fear of being infected:

“I just wanted to maintain the relationship for the sake of the children. He insisted on staying and he mentioned that he was not worried about sex any more. All he wanted (was) to see the children grow with both parents under one roof.”

However, her husband was apparently so desperate for sex that he concocted a scheme where he would secretly infect her with his own blood whilst she slept so that she would once again willing to sleep with him, and be unable to leave him.

Noticing only a mark on her leg, it was four months before she learnt she was infected, thanks to the results of a medical check-up:

“All he said [was] he was sorry. He said, ‘I used needles on you because I wanted you to be the same as me so that you can live with me and you won’t leave me’.”

Police soon suspected her infection came from the husband as she had repeatedly tested negative for the disease during a year-long abstinence from sex.

The man, who admits the offence, faces up to 14-years in prison on charges of willfully infecting another with a disease.

Via the Sunday Star Times.


    Post Comment »
    179 Comments
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Comment by SnooSnoo
    21:54 06/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Man deserves the death sentence. Think of what the kids will go through in school.
    Random Kids: AHAHAHA!! Both your parents are fucking HIV-carriers!!
    Not to mention it's a fucking incurable disease.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:14 06/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    death sentence? why do you want to let him off the easy way? (I don't understand why most people see death as something worse than let someone suffer for years)

    I'd rather see him in pain for many years in jail (from his sickness and treatment from other prisoners).

    Also he should be banned from possible cures which may be created in the future.

    Avatar of Endeavor
    Comment by Endeavor
    23:25 06/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I guess no one is going to bang his ass... Even if he dropped his soap at showers

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:34 06/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    who knows? there is always some insane guy in a prison!

    also if there isn't, he wanted sex, so no assrape might be a punishment.

    Avatar of Ciscotaku
    Comment by Ciscotaku
    23:47 06/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    He should get the death by 1000 cuts! what an asshole!

    Avatar of Endeavor
    Comment by Endeavor
    00:04 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Then his HIV will spill to the whole crowd who came to see him die...

    Comment by Busy
    00:08 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well, they can put some other things in his ass...

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:37 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    An opportunistic plot by the government to clear up the prison population mayhap?

    Avatar of Darkrockslizer
    Comment by Darkrockslizer
    03:57 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Make him a biological government weapon and send to a country you dislike the most.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:58 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    They already did that with Africa

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:25 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    hah send him to every European country (except Greece). or better yet to Australia. They're worthless anyway ^_^

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:14 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hey, even better, why not force the anon above to rape him? And then just to be sure, force him to rape the anon above.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:42 09/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Even some prisoner beating him up would be risky, you don't exactly want to make him spray blood everywhere if he has HIV. :P

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:07 09/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You don't get it, do you?
    It wasn't the sex he wanted, you idiot.
    The wife told him she was only hanging around because of the children, meaning that she didn't give a shit about him. Why? Because she couldn't get sex, as she was in fear of getting HIV. SHE was the one who wanted sex, and was willing to freaking dump her HUSBAND for the loss of it. She just can't do it with children in the house..
    How sick does that sound? Very.
    The guy didn't do it for the sex, obviously. He did it in hopes that he might be able to satisfy her needs, thus stay with him.
    Women are so shallow and sex-driven these days. Marry a man, and if you can't have sex with him, or the sex is bad, ditch him. Women need to learn that there's more to a relationship then just sex.. >_>

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:42 15/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    lolno, that's being obtuse.
    She ditched him because she was scared of the AIDS. I'm sure anyone would be.

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:13 23/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    anon 18:07, yeah right tell me another solution for the problem? if i was in the wife position i would get divorce asap because first give it some though, your husban cheated on you and he got aids, cheating is a good reason to get a divorce and aids tell me who isn't scared of aids? of course excluding those special 10% of the world population that is immune tell me who isn t scared of aids? the guy was goddam lucky the wife didn t get a divorce. and now she has aids tell me how cruel is that? a incurable disease that shortens the life span and get even worse if the virus mutates inside you.

    that guy truly deservs something worse than death penalty, the poor girl didn t deserv to get infected with Hiv, nobody does

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:13 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    maybe death sentence as in lifelong inprisonment?

    Avatar of Lucky Channel
    Comment by Lucky Channel
    17:00 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well life is 20 years the death sentence is 15-20 and then you die I believe. You have a long time to weight for your death at the end of the tunnel. Much worse then Life in prison because at least you have a goal to get out with life. The death sentence has no bright end

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:27 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Some prisons even have seperate quarters only for infected.

    Maybe they should deliver him to some violent infected gay rapists in prison.

    He definitely deserves it.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:44 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    But why would you make a gift to a violent infected gay rapist ?

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:14 23/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    poor gay bruce deservs some fun

    Avatar of fxc2
    Comment by fxc2
    05:06 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    "That whole prison bitch thing is an American phenomenon." Haven't you guys played GTA4? o.O

    Avatar of Kyon Theorist
    Comment by Kyon Theorist
    06:15 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I used to think that the death sentence was the easy way. Problem is that, in the states at least, prison conditions are better than living outside. I don't support the death penalty but "suffering" just doesn't happen in prison these days.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:51 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    If you think American prisons are good, you should see Canadian.

    Jesus, its like living in a 3 star hotel.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:13 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The Canadian system is based on the Swedish system which is flat-out insane. I saw a TV show where they were touring one of the prisons, which looked like a upscale condo black. The apartments inside were beautiful Scandinavian-design studios with en-suite full bathrooms and kitchens. But it gets better! They are not locked and neither is the building. "Prisoners" just sign in and out whenever they want to stay until it adds up to their full "sentence."
    What a deterrent to crime.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:00 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    OH HAI GUIZ I RAPED A LOLI AND INFCTD HER WITH AIDS AND AM HEER 4 LIEF IMPRSNMT

    KK DUDE, JUST REMBER TO SIGN OUT IF YOU DECIDE TO GO OUTSIDE AND DO IT AGAIN

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:11 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    it costs less to maintain , pus death usually scares people more then lifetime in jail . oh and dont forget the humane prison system would be forced to pay for his medication as his condition disintegrates . death is best option .

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:35 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Actually, the death penalty in some countries cost MORE than a life sentence. Paying for all the court fees, lawyers, and procedures, on AVERAGE, it costs more in some countries to put someone on the death penalty.

    Avatar of Manji88
    Comment by Manji88
    10:18 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The greatest benefit to having the death penalty as an option is that people ARE afraid of it. Serial killers will do things like agree to give the locations of the graves of his victims in order to plead down to Life Without Parole from Death.
    But for it to keep working that way, you have to whack someone every once in a while so they know you're serious. That's why spending $$$ every once in a while to push the guy through appeals and into the chair makes sense.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:41 08/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    *Not to mention it's an incurable fucking desease.

    Avatar of Thatryuwhokickedyourass
    Avatar of babybluez287
    Comment by babybluez287
    22:05 06/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    agreed ... he's sick ... i get his good intentions about the kids but infecting your wife ... what if they both died o.o what of the kids eh ? they'd be all alone and all cause he was desperate for sex ...
    what would they tell the kids ...

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:14 06/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I see no good intentions he was just plain selfish

    Avatar of babybluez287
    Comment by babybluez287
    22:17 06/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    well good intentions of not wanting the kids to grow up with parents split up .... other than that yeah he was plain selfish

    Avatar of ArcheR
    Comment by ArcheR
    22:52 06/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    This has nothing to do with the kids. The article says they reconciled and were staying together. He did did this because she wouldn't have sex with him after they stayed together and it IS selfish to INFECT SOMEONE WITH A VIRUS.

    If you suggest that even if this WAS just about the kids and that it somehow has this nobility to it, then I hope to any higher power there is that you never have children.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:06 09/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You don't get it, do you?
    It wasn't the sex he wanted, you idiot.
    The wife told him she was only hanging around because of the children, meaning that she didn't give a shit about him. Why? Because she couldn't get sex, as she was in fear of getting HIV. SHE was the one who wanted sex, and was willing to freaking dump her HUSBAND for the loss of it. She just can't do it with children in the house.
    How sick does that sound? Very..
    The guy didn't do it for the sex, obviously. He did it in hopes that he might be able to satisfy her needs, thus stay with him.
    Women are so shallow and sex-driven these days. Marry a man, and if you can't have sex with him, or the sex is bad, ditch him. Women need to learn that there's more to a relationship then just sex.. >_>

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:20 23/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    and you need to learn that infecting someone with HIV never NEVER gonna solve any problem in a relationship. and it is't wommen who need to learn but man, if your wife loves to have sex and only have with you then you are lucky but if she refuses sex or only do it like 1 time peer week then you hate her. so yeah it is men who need to learn that and not wommen and you kinda trying to give that disgusting son of a bitch an excuse to infect her. and you said 'The guy didn't do it for the sex, obviously. He did it in hopes that he might be able to satisfy her needs, thus stay with him.' tell me infecting someone with a goddam incurable disease is gonna fix what? WHAT? he shortened her lifespan and now the children have both parents HIV positive does that sounds right to you? hope not

    Avatar of Darkrockslizer
    Comment by Darkrockslizer
    22:17 06/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    He's not sick. He's just a jerk who doesn't care about anyone but himself.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:21 06/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    But he is sick! HIV is one of the worst sicknesses you can ever contract.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:30 06/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Don't worry, HIV is not swine flu, so she doesn7t have to worry at all

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:27 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Until she dies, that is.

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:12 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well hopefully she can afford treatment when and if it becomes aids. They say with proper treatment and doing ti early the average lifespan is about 5 years short of a normal person.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:07 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You have to realize that one of the sickest parts, is that he didn't tell her about it and left it to just a random check up. It took 4 months until she found out. Is that still early ?

    But yea. Magic Johnson is a living testament to that fact. Almost 20 years living with HIV.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:29 06/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I don't mean to defend him or anything, but with today's medicine, a HIV positive person can live a fairly long life without developing AIDS.

    Unlike 15 years ago where a person with HIV could only live less than 10 years after the infection, today a HIV positive individual can live well over 30 years. That is, if one can pay the extortion fee to the pharmacies.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:50 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yeah but its still an asshole thing to do. What would you think if someone just popped a needle in you and gave you the HIV. Wouldn't be fun now would it. Even with all the crap that we have now that could take care of it.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:30 06/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Tell the kid that the parents died because the father wanted sex. Leaving the impression that sex is dangerous... maybe not so good idea?

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:47 06/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You don't die from HIV anymore.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:43 06/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yes you do, moron.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:21 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    No, you don't. HIV screws your immune system. Then opportunist diseases come and kill you.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:11 06/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    There were no good intentions, he was desperate for sex and had fear of abandonment.

    Avatar of BlaqCat
    Comment by BlaqCat
    11:23 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I tend to think he used to kids so she wouldn't leave him,and when she started refusing sex, he started thinking even the kids weren't enough to keep her with him long term. Thus this sick, desperate plot began.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:21 06/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I feel sorry about him actually. He should have been treated in hospital, right? Why he was still wandering around?

    I do understand his desire to have sex, c'mon don't be hypocrite everyone.

    Avatar of ArcheR
    Comment by ArcheR
    22:48 06/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Given the prevalence of HIV, I'm sorry. His desire to have sex is a moot point by any sensible form of logic. Pity doesn't outweigh morality - this man crossed so many lines I can't even begin to count them.

    Treatment for HIV doesn't outweigh this either. His actions are, in my opinion, equivalent to rape. That's a bit far on the morality ruler for most people, however.

    Still, any logic involving children also fails. They successfully negotiated staying together.

    This isn't about hypocrisy. This is just wrong. If he was desperate enough to infect her, then he was desperate enough to find another way. He took what was basically the easiest way out.

    And all of you morons who are talking about the life expectancy of people with HIV needs to know two things:

    First, not everyone has the same chances. Some can die from this quickly depending on what they have and what they later get. And, second, HIV is no picnic even if treated. You can live longer than expected, but it doesn't mean it's going to be as if you never had it. Bottom line: It is still possible to die from it and has many complications.

    That is not legal, ethical, or moral and if you excuse these actions you're just as pathetic as this man who had to infect someone just to get his rocks off.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:28 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I agree, he violated her body by infecting her with his disease. They stayed together so I assume she cared for and trusted him. He betrayed her and gave her a death sentence. Even if she does live a long time with it, she is still going to be living a very different life. And I expect she'll have a very hard time trusting people in the future.

    Not to even thing how this will effect his son's image of people and relationships in the future.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:57 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You are obviously missing the point here. He infected her with HIV just so he could have sex with his wife. Which was a dumb ass idea to begin with. Think of it this way. Your body is pretty much fine you don't really get sick. You've never had any diseases or anything like that then all of a sudden the person that was closest to you gives you HIV which totally fucks up your immune system and the only reason they did that was so they could have sex with you. Now tell me is that a good enough reason to infect someone with a disease? Oh yeah and you obviously don't know what be a hypocrite means so try and lay off the big words now okay.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:32 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Not to mention that the virus will mutate each time it crosses between people. Meaning if they did just go and have sex without caution they'd be mutating their strains back and forth, possibly exchanging drug resistances and creating strains in themselves they'd have a harder time of fighting.

    Avatar of BlaqCat
    Comment by BlaqCat
    00:02 08/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Oh anon, you poor, ignorant child. Firstly, despite the fact that we don't know whether or not it was his fault he contracted HIV (because he could have been cheating on his wife), yes I feel bad for him catching the disease. However, there's no way I'd give someone I cared about such a screwed up disease. If he wanted a sexual release there's always an onna-hole >_>

    Avatar of nocturne
    Comment by nocturne
    04:34 07/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I must be the only person here who wants to know how he got HIV in the first place.







    Post Comment »

Popular

Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments