Man Infects Wife with HIV “So She Would Have Sex with Me”

izayoi-no-hanayome-kurasawa-tamaki-by-ino

A man who secretly infected his wife with HIV so she would be willing to have sex with him faces a possible 14-year sentence.

The 35-year-old man, an immigrant resident of New Zealand, tested positive for HIV in 2004 when he arrived in the country, though his 33-year-old wife and child were uninfected.

His wife subsequently agreed to stay with him to preserve the family, and initially consented to having protected sex with him. Later she would refuse him sex out of fear of being infected:

“I just wanted to maintain the relationship for the sake of the children. He insisted on staying and he mentioned that he was not worried about sex any more. All he wanted (was) to see the children grow with both parents under one roof.”

However, her husband was apparently so desperate for sex that he concocted a scheme where he would secretly infect her with his own blood whilst she slept so that she would once again willing to sleep with him, and be unable to leave him.

Noticing only a mark on her leg, it was four months before she learnt she was infected, thanks to the results of a medical check-up:

“All he said [was] he was sorry. He said, ‘I used needles on you because I wanted you to be the same as me so that you can live with me and you won’t leave me’.”

Police soon suspected her infection came from the husband as she had repeatedly tested negative for the disease during a year-long abstinence from sex.

The man, who admits the offence, faces up to 14-years in prison on charges of willfully infecting another with a disease.

Via the Sunday Star Times.

Leave a Comment

179 Comments

  • That woman is sick, even more than the guy.
    She basically said she was only with him because of the children, and that she didn’t want to be with him because of the SEX!
    This just proves how sex-driven women are. A relationship isn’t all about sex, and I can’t believe a girl wouldn’t want to be with her husband because of the loss of it.. The guy didn’t do it for the sex, he did it in hopes she wouldn’t leave him. <3

  • Funny how he faces up to 14 years, trying to infect someone with HIV should be like attempted murder.. granted its not immediate, but eventually it’ll have the same effect, he should get life imprisonment. Or maybe they figured he wouldn’t live that long.

  • Bronxdragon says:

    Keep that family together? You just doomed the fuckin mother. Now what happens if one of you gets boosted up to the AIDs catagory and you both kick the bucket. That bastard deserves a ass kicking. He didn’t wanna suffer alone so he fucked up his wife. Shameless bastard!

    • You don’t get it, do you?
      It wasn’t the sex he wanted, you idiot.
      The wife told him she was only hanging around because of the children, meaning that she didn’t give a shit about him. Why? Because she couldn’t get sex, as she was in fear of getting HIV. That’s fine. But SHE was the one who wanted sex, and was willing to freaking dump her HUSBAND for the loss of it. She just can’t do it with children in the house.
      How sick does that sound? Very.
      The guy didn’t do it for the sex, obviously. He did it in hopes that he might be able to satisfy her needs, thus stay with him.
      Women are so shallow and sex-driven these days. *Sigh* Marry a man, and if you can’t have sex with him, or the sex is bad, ditch him. Women need to learn that there’s more to a relationship then just sex. >_>

  • so anybody checked the Sunday Star Times link artefact posted and noticed how hiv infected people keep infecting other people -_-.

    I already heard,read somewhere about people that have hiv,so they look for other people that have hiv and have sex with those.Becouse you can’t get anymore infected then you already are.
    So people with hiv,if you don’t know this you can still have sex with people who also have hiv.

  • This is a loaded headline, though I don’t blame Artefact for following what all the so called “professional” media outlets are saying by cherry picking his quotes.
    This obviously goes far beyond the sex and more like the result of a desperate man who felt his relationship was falling apart. First to go in a failing marriage is the sex, then everything follows. There was probably far more tormenting him than just his sexual urges.

    • This matters none. It was his fault he cheated on her in the first place, that’s how he got HIV. What he’s done is the same as cutting off your own hand and demanding a friends hand be sewn on because of your own folly.

      Guilt is there for a reason, and he deserves every piece of guilt dealt to him, more now than ever with what he’s done.

  • Lol, that guy already got his punishment.
    The woman he loves will never look at him again, but he’ll know that she’ll die a long and painful death. His children will grow up hating him. he lost his friends, he can’t look in the mirror anymore.

    Poor bastard, he did something very wrong and is now punished his whole life. I wonder how many people here call themselves christian (I’m not one btw.) – You can’t even forgive, hypocrites.

    What you sow is what you reap.

  • Tell that to the women in Africa who are raped and infected because many of the rural men believe that having sex with a virgin will cure you of HIV. And their government that does little to teach otherwise because they think HIV is a disease the whitewest manufactured to use against them.

    • The husband used condoms, was his wife who rejected to have sex at all with him. Don’t know if it was because she is frigid or because she already had a lover. Thanks for the first INTELLIGENT post on this thread.

      • Its still the husbands fault though. He even said himself that he didn’t care about the sex just as long as his family would stay together. Then he goes and pulls this stupid shit saying that if his wife was infected as well she would have sex with him. Which was a total dumb ass and hypocritical move to begin with. Also here’s another thing. How the hell did he get HIV in the first place. His wife and kid didn’t have it so where could it have come from? Either he was the one that was cheating or he somehow got it while doing drugs. Besides his wife has every right to reject sex to decrease the chance of getting the disease as well. You can’t just deny them of there free will like that. There’s nothing that says just because your married to someone you have to have sex with them.

  • Note that he is an immigrant, and that the NZ authorities did not bar him from entry despite his clearly pre-existing medical condition, which they would now have to subsidize treatment for. Not only are the authorities putting NZ residents at risk from infection, they are also squandering taxpayer money. This is the real scandal.

    The 2nd question is where the immigrant family is from. Obviously this detail is being obscured for PC reasons, but really, some profiling might have screened the man out and prevented this tragedy.

  • I find it absolutely hilarious how little credit give to the role of sexual relations between people.

    This is tragic, simple as that. The guy just wanted to be with his wife. Does that condone him? No, and he shall be punished either way. But all this blind, unprecedented rage, please. Morality is not perfect.

    Plenty of people cheat. Is it a deal breaker? Most of the time it is. But some couples are able to get past that. It does not make it right, but it should not be held as a death sentence.

    It was great they tried for the kids, but the guy should have realized he would not be able to handle living under the same roof with the woman he loved, and decided to go with a weekend meeting thing.

    But as things are, he made a mistake, and he shall be punished in more ways than one. He deserves that, but not animosity from strangers.

    • Sorry but he deserves every little bit he gets. He was just being a selfish asshole that wanted sex. So what he infected his wife so she would have sex with him? Okay then how about he goes and infect the kids as well. Then they’ll all be one happy HIV infected family. Now there all the same.

      • You don’t get it, do you?
        It wasn’t the sex he wanted, you idiot.
        The wife told him she was only hanging around because of the children, meaning that she didn’t give a shit about him. Why? Because she couldn’t get sex, as she was in fear of getting HIV. That’s fine. But SHE was the one who wanted sex, and was willing to freaking dump her HUSBAND for the loss of it. She just can’t do it with children in the house.
        How sick does that sound? Very.
        The guy didn’t do it for the sex, obviously. He did it in hopes that he might be able to satisfy her needs, thus stay with him.
        Women are so shallow and sex-driven these days. *Sigh* Marry a man, and if you can’t have sex with him, or the sex is bad, ditch him. Women need to learn that there’s more to a relationship then just sex.. >_>

  • Geez, that pure dude just wanted a little sex, cut him some slack. He already has to deal with HIV. 14 years just for infecting someone, wtf.

    But it would be cool if he then would go around in prison infecting everybody. Hell, it would even be funnier if he did it outside of prison, just for the lulz. Who needs morals anyway if you have HIV. And like the pirate he is, he will share it with anyone.

    /cynism

    • Cut him some slack? Are you fucking serious? He intentionally infected his wife with HIV. Now tell me what would you do if someone did that to you? Giving someone a disease just because he wanted sex is one of the dumbest things Ive fuckin heard of. Also his reasoning for doing it is shot to shit as well.

      • Anon 16:07, please, shut the fuck up.
        You don’t get it, do you?
        It wasn’t the sex he wanted, you idiot.
        The wife told him she was only hanging around because of the children, meaning that she didn’t give a shit about him. Why? Because she couldn’t get sex, as she was in fear of getting HIV. SHE was the one who wanted sex, and was willing to freaking dump her HUSBAND for the loss of it. She just can’t do it with children in the house.
        How sick does that sound? Very.
        The guy didn’t do it for the sex, obviously. He did it in hopes that he might be able to satisfy her needs, thus stay with him.
        Women are so shallow and sex-driven these days. Marry a man, and if you can’t have sex with him, or the sex is bad, ditch him. Women need to learn that there’s more to a relationship then just sex.. >_>

  • The agreement is through sickness and health. Not health only if you get a sickness I’m walking. That’s logic of marraige and the contract terms.

    You can’t sit in a marraiage and then deny your husband sexual intimacy. Now I will be lenient and say you can stop the intercourse, but you still have to provide an alternative sexual suggestion.

    You cannot deny a man completely. Now having protected sex was great. That was a comprimise. If she wanted to stop that to they neeeded to be an alternative.

    Not only that the man could have went out and started spreading around town instead he tried to keep it in the family so to speak. I’m not condoning what he did but logically there’s a wife not obeying the marraige laws and contract she agreed to.

    So I totally understand his decisio and justification to infect her. I DO NOT condone or agree with his decision to do it secretly and then hide it from her for four months. That’s criminal and he should punished.

    However I believe the man was coherant and would have been willing and open to sexual alterrnatives had the wife not shut down an isolated herself.

    I think the wife should also face some sort of punishment/sanction for the emotional abuse/stress she placed on her husband. Then again with being infected she recieved a death sentence, so maybe not.

    • It’s a romantic thought, but a marriage vow isn’t the same as a legally binding contract. The laws and contract are pretty much limited to getting tax breaks and hospital visitation rights. He wasn’t honest to her in the first place, either because he previously knew he had a possibly fatal sexually transmitted disease but didn’t share this information, or by gaining this disease, possibly through cheating even, and hiding it. These are reasons enough to walk, never mind the disease.

      Secondly, she never actually left him.

      Third, plenty of married couples do not have sexual relations. They’re not required for marriage, although they do make things easier.

      Fourth, as you learned in your high school health class, protected sex is not guaranteed to ward off STDs.

      We don’t know the circumstances surrounding how the man got HIV. If he was born with it through his mother and therefore was not at fault for having the disease, then what you said about the woman’s behavior is probably true– she could have been more open in finding sexual alternatives, although genital contact is out of the question (so perhaps something with toys, although some couples aren’t comfortable with that kind of thing). However, if he obtained it through infidelity (which may be quite possible, considering that in all of their previous sexual escapade, she escaped uninfected), she’s certainly not obliged to him at all. However, in no case is she obliged to continue to have sex with him.

      • I think she should be obliged. When people are single they can have sex with as many people whenever wherever and not think twice. When you get married you only get that person. sexual aggression or non aggression shouldn’t be penalized.

        If that’s a problem don’t get married.

        I fail to understand why his libido should be penalized. However I also will agree with you to an extent.

        If her sexual libido decreased because of HIV thats penalization to him. If her libido was always low then he’s penalizing her.

  • I wonder how he contracted HIV in the first place. He had the kid with his wife before immigrating to NZ, but only he was positive for HIV. That means that after he had the kid with his wife, he must’ve done something to get HIV.

    So like, maybe he cheated on his wife AND gave her HIV.

    I pity the woman.

  • Uhhh…isn’t it supposed to be the other way around? A wife who got injected with HIV by her lover would make her RELUCTANT to have sex with him. She might spread it to him.

    But then again, if she did have sex with him, it’d be karmic, poetic justice.

    He must’ve seen the South Park episode “Tonsil Trouble”.

  • ShatteredSkies says:

    Imagine this sick fck would even wanted to infect his kids, so everyone would equal. Probably he had this in mind, anyway you gotta be pretty fcked up in the head to do something like this.

  • It’s really pathetic if you think about it, the woman agreed to put up with his disease and stay with him for the family’s sake. He could probably go out and have sex with as many random hookers and she would still be there the next morning washing his shit stained briefs.

    Well, he’ll be sure to have all the sex he could possibly want and more once he gets in jail, it’s not like he’ll be the only one with HIV in there.

    • You don’t get it, do you?
      It wasn’t the sex he wanted, you idiot.
      The wife told him she was only hanging around because of the children, meaning that she didn’t give a shit about him. Why? Because she couldn’t get sex, as she was in fear of getting HIV. That’s fine. But SHE was the one who wanted sex, and was willing to freaking dump her HUSBAND for the loss of it. She just can’t do it with children in the house.
      How sick does that sound? Very.
      The guy didn’t do it for the sex, obviously. He did it in hopes that he might be able to satisfy her needs, thus stay with him.
      Women are so shallow and sex-driven these days.. Marry a man, and if you can’t have sex with him, or the sex is bad, ditch him. Women need to learn that there’s more to a relationship then just sex.. >_>

  • You’d think when a guy gets HIV he’d have to start reflecting on his life and the several years he has left, especially since he has a family.

    But nope, all he thought about was getting laid. Speaking of which, now he does have a reputation and now he has almost no chance of getting laid. He really didn’t think this through did he?

  • That’s what you get for marrying a retard and having children with him.

    She deserved it 100% and I don’t pity her one bit. Fucking retard whore. Now if only the children could get somehow infected as well, so the whole retard family gets removed from the gene pool, now that would be good news.

    • But the problem is that people with AIDS are not automatically “removed from the pool”. They are allowed to live, and I think that’s where the real problem lies. People with AIDS, or any other spreadable disease, should be shot immediately. Their own fault for being infected, why should humanity bear with them and waste money and resources on a cure or prolonging their petty lives. Well, that would be the most logical solution, but as long as religion and all the other unnatural and illogical morals exist, idiots will always be against it. Well, it’s just a matter of time, in the past there were idiots who did rain dances, and the same idiots now are religious and “good”, in other words, retarded.

      • I do think it should be pointed out that HIV/AIDS is a disease which is *almost* 100% preventable, unlike most others. That blunt fact needs to be figured into the equation. Most of the people who have this disease in essence gave it to themselves through engaging in high-risk behaviours. It has gotten an absurd amount of money thrown at it for nothing more than political reasons. (Even today it is considered shockingly un-PC to point out the simple truth that if you are heterosexual, practise safe sex, and don’t use illegal IV drugs your chances of catching HIV are about the same as being struck by lightening.)
        Spending that money on research into new antibiotics or cancer cures would have saved vastly more lives.

      • Ever gotten a cold in your life?

        Bam.

        AIDS is harder to spread than more common stuff like the flu or pneumonia or mono, too.

        By your “logic,” you’re killing more people than the diseases would themselves, and given the high prevalence of disease (most people get the chicken pox during childhood, for example). You’d make the death rate outpace the birth rate so quickly that the human race could no longer continue Also, people with AIDS or other diseases who are responsible about containing themselves can still contribute to society, so by killing them off indiscriminately, from a purely rational standpoint, you’re decreasing the amount of economic output of society anyway, so the survivors left would suffer a lower quality of life.

        The opposite of your way of thinking isn’t “religion” or “morality,” it’s “common sense.” Social Darwinist types make atheists look bad.

        • @Anonymous 06:03 07/12/2009:
          The cold cannot be deadly. Unless you live naked on the street or something. The flu can be deadly, that’s given.

          I like how you completely missed the point. I never referred to someones ability to resist diseases or something. I was talking about people stupid enough to get a disease. I believe that are different things. Again, what smart person in history has caught a deadly disease like AIDS? I believe none, maybe one at maximum. Point is, intelligent people know how to avoid diseases, that generally means, avoid retarded places, avoid retarded people and similar.

          If someone is stupid enough to get a deadly disease, I believe they would also raise their children stupidly. And their low intelligence, I believe, will also lead to probably stupid children.

          You also completely missed the problem of overpopulation! The fucking world isn’t infinite, there is no place for infinite people. Someone has to go, some people have to fucking die. And if someone has to die, then amongst those people should be the goddamn retards who caught the deadly diseases. That’s called logic.

          The world doesn’t work like in your books and in fairy tales, you need to get real. I understand it seems cruel, because you’re raised on religion and fairy tales, but that’s how nature and the world simply work. Death is as natural as birth, and if I was someone with a deadly disease, not wanting to let go, I would be fucking ashamed. Hogging all that money, time and effort of scientist, for me little useless piece of shit? Never. I would rather kill myself. That’s how a conscious, responsible person would think.

          One last thing, next time you reply to someone, try to actually address his/her points, so the person doesn’t have to repeat him/herself! Or just kill yourself you waste of oxygen and water.

        • @ Anonymous 05:29 07/12/2009 :
          I hope you’re trolling and not that fucking retarded.
          The common cold can be very deadly, same with the common flu. Most of us here are fortunate to not only have stronger immune systems but also live in areas with advanced science.
          Also, natural selection and genes do not work the way you think they do. Just because someone has a weaker ability to handle one certain disease doesn’t mean their genes are worthless. Natural selection results in trade-offs. People who have a natural advantage against one disease may be more prone to another – meaning that in areas with barely any occurrences of the first disease having that genetic makeup will be a negative trait, while as in areas with the first disease those people will be more likely to prosper.
          Read any fucking biology book, you moron. Even the recent popular science book “The Greatest Show on Earth” works.

        • First off, you can’t compare a cold and AIDS.

          Cold’s are actually healthy since you can’t really die from them and they only make your immune system stronger. They are natural and a part of human life.

          AIDS on the other hand is a dirty monkey disease that shouldn’t even exist. There are 33.3 million people estimated to have HIV. Killing them all off you would help solve the problem of overpopulation and since they were stupid enough to get AIDS, I’m pretty sure they didn’t have any important job. Or do you remember a scientist, inventor or engineer with AIDS? Oh yea.

          The amount of money, effort and time wasted for those people is immense. AIDS would kill someone off within a month if it wasn’t for the medication and therapy. So it’s a lot of money to keep those retards alive. And in the end, if no one had AIDS anymore, it wouldn’t spread, it wouldn’t exist.

          The most logical solution is just to kill off everyone with AIDS. Nature says in another way: Those with aids failed survival of the fittest, they shouldn’t be fucking alive. They are bad genes, just fucking get rid of them before their retarded children make another similar disease.

          Also, how stupid do you actually have to be to get AIDS? Even if someone else purposely gave it to them, they were only able because those persons trusted them, which is a sign of stupidity.

          Oh god how I hate retards.

      • I’m not sure what fails harder. How much you missed the first anon’s ridiculous point to shove in your own, or the fact that your point is just as ridiculous.

        You equate religion with illogical morality but condone shooting someone with a contagious disease that can only be transmitted (for the most part) sexually?

        Either way, it’s still Fail.

    • Yeah same here though I think the same shit that everyone’s talking about should have been done to Cartman as well. He’s such a little dickhead. Used to like it back then around when the show started but then I realized how much of a little piece of shit he is. Still watch the show though.

    • You’re not alone. It was hard for me to not smile will reading this because I kept imagining Cartman saying “I’m not just sure, I’m HIV positive.”

      Hopefully this man gets ass raped constantly in prison. There are a lot of people with AIDS/HIV in prison so they shouldn’t be afraid to rape him.

  • Damn, i can not even imagine what the family (especially the kids) must be knowing through knowing that both parents will be gone on a few years and not only that but it was theyr own father who gave theyr mother a long and painful passing.

    • You don’t get it, do you?
      It wasn’t the sex he wanted, you idiot.
      The wife told him she was only hanging around because of the children, meaning that she didn’t give a shit about him. Why? Because she couldn’t get sex, as she was in fear of getting HIV. That’s fine. But SHE was the one who wanted sex, and was willing to freaking dump her HUSBAND for the loss of it. She just can’t do it with children in the house.
      How sick does that sound? .. Very.
      The guy didn’t do it for the sex, obviously. He did it in hopes that he might be able to satisfy her needs, thus stay with him.
      Women are so shallow and sex-driven these days. Marry a man, and if you can’t have sex with him, or the sex is bad, ditch him. Women need to learn that there’s more to a relationship then just sex.. >_>

    • You don’t get it, do you?
      It wasn’t the sex he wanted, you idiot.
      The wife told him she was only hanging around because of the children, meaning that she didn’t give a shit about him. Why? Because she couldn’t get sex, as she was in fear of getting HIV. SHE was the one who wanted sex, and was willing to freaking dump her HUSBAND for the loss of it. She just can’t do it with children in the house.
      How sick does that sound? Very.
      The guy didn’t do it for the sex, obviously. He did it in hopes that he might be able to satisfy her needs, thus stay with him.
      Women are so shallow and sex-driven these days. Marry a man, and if you can’t have sex with him, or the sex is bad, ditch him. Women need to learn that there’s more to a relationship then just sex. >_>

    • You don’t get it, do you?
      It wasn’t the sex he wanted, you idiot.
      The wife told him she was only hanging around because of the children, meaning that she didn’t give a shit about him. Why? Because she couldn’t get sex, as she was in fear of getting HIV. SHE was the one who wanted sex, and was willing to freaking dump her HUSBAND for the loss of it. She just can’t do it with children in the house.
      How sick does that sound? Very.
      The guy didn’t do it for the sex, obviously. He did it in hopes that he might be able to satisfy her needs, thus stay with him.
      Women are so shallow and sex-driven these days. Marry a man, and if you can’t have sex with him, or the sex is bad, ditch him. Women need to learn that there’s more to a relationship then just sex.. >_>

  • ……………………………………..________
    ………………………………,.-‘”……………….“~.,
    ………………………..,.-”……………………………..“-.,
    …………………….,/………………………………………..”:,
    …………………,?………………………………………………\,
    ………………./…………………………………………………..,}
    ……………../………………………………………………,:`^`..}
    ……………/……………………………………………,:”………/
    …………..?…..__…………………………………..:`………../
    …………./__.(…..“~-,_…………………………,:`………./
    ………../(_….”~,_……….~,_………………..,:`…….._/
    ……….{.._$;_……”=,_…….“-,_…….,.-~-,},.~”;/….}
    ………..((…..*~_…….”=-._……“;,,./`…./”…………../
    …,,,___.\`~,……“~.,………………..`…..}…………../
    …………(….`=-,,…….`……………………(……;_,,-”
    …………/.`~,……`-………………………….\……/\
    ………….\`~.*-,……………………………….|,./…..\,__
    ,,_……….}.>-._\……………………………..|…………..`=~-,
    …..`=~-,_\_……`\,……………………………\
    ……………….`=~-,,.\,………………………….\
    …………………………..`:,,………………………`\…………..__
    ……………………………….`=-,……………….,%`>–==“
    …………………………………._\……….._,-%…….`\
    ……………………………..,<`.._|_,-&“…………….`\

      • kajunbowser says:

        Hell, give him 14 years in jail, with two conditions: 1) don’t give him any meds, and 2) isolate him from the rest of the prison population. It’s (technically) a limited life sentence, as he’ll die from complications due to HIV by that time, theoretically at least.

        • You don’t get it, do you?
          It wasn’t the sex he wanted, you idiot.
          The wife told him she was only hanging around because of the children, meaning that she didn’t give a shit about him. Why? Because she couldn’t get sex, as she was in fear of getting HIV. That’s fine.. But SHE was the one who wanted sex, and was willing to freaking dump her HUSBAND for the loss of it. She just can’t do it with children in the house.
          How sick does that sound? Very.
          The guy didn’t do it for the sex, obviously. He did it in hopes that he might be able to satisfy her needs, thus stay with him.
          Women are so shallow and sex-driven these days. Marry a man, and if you can’t have sex with him, or the sex is bad, ditch him. Women need to learn that there’s more to a relationship then just sex.. >_>

  • This is just bullshit. If the “wife” din’t wanted sex with him it was because she is frigid or haves a lover.

    And if the guy infected her with AIDS is not because he wanted to sleep with her again, but because he was looking foe vengance after being rejected.

    What a couple of sickfucks.

        • You don’t get it, do you?
          It wasn’t the sex he wanted, you idiot.
          The wife told him she was only hanging around because of the children, meaning that she didn’t give a shit about him. Why? Because she couldn’t get sex, as she was in fear of getting HIV. That’s fine. But SHE was the one who wanted sex, and was willing to freaking dump her HUSBAND for the loss of it. She just can’t do it with children in the house.
          How sick does that sound? Very.
          The guy didn’t do it for the sex, obviously. He did it in hopes that he might be able to satisfy her needs, thus stay with him.
          Women are so shallow and sex-driven these days. Marry a man, and if you can’t have sex with him, or the sex is bad, ditch him. Women need to learn that there’s more to a relationship then just sex.. >_>

  • Sick assholes like this guy should get the death penalty via no treatment for his AIDS and all his money to his wifes treatments since it’s likely he’ll be dead from complications within the first 10 years in prison anyway.

    • I feel sorry about him actually. He should have been treated in hospital, right? Why he was still wandering around?

      I do understand his desire to have sex, c’mon don’t be hypocrite everyone.

      • Oh anon, you poor, ignorant child. Firstly, despite the fact that we don’t know whether or not it was his fault he contracted HIV (because he could have been cheating on his wife), yes I feel bad for him catching the disease. However, there’s no way I’d give someone I cared about such a screwed up disease. If he wanted a sexual release there’s always an onna-hole >_>

      • You are obviously missing the point here. He infected her with HIV just so he could have sex with his wife. Which was a dumb ass idea to begin with. Think of it this way. Your body is pretty much fine you don’t really get sick. You’ve never had any diseases or anything like that then all of a sudden the person that was closest to you gives you HIV which totally fucks up your immune system and the only reason they did that was so they could have sex with you. Now tell me is that a good enough reason to infect someone with a disease? Oh yeah and you obviously don’t know what be a hypocrite means so try and lay off the big words now okay.

        • Not to mention that the virus will mutate each time it crosses between people. Meaning if they did just go and have sex without caution they’d be mutating their strains back and forth, possibly exchanging drug resistances and creating strains in themselves they’d have a harder time of fighting.

      • Given the prevalence of HIV, I’m sorry. His desire to have sex is a moot point by any sensible form of logic. Pity doesn’t outweigh morality – this man crossed so many lines I can’t even begin to count them.

        Treatment for HIV doesn’t outweigh this either. His actions are, in my opinion, equivalent to rape. That’s a bit far on the morality ruler for most people, however.

        Still, any logic involving children also fails. They successfully negotiated staying together.

        This isn’t about hypocrisy. This is just wrong. If he was desperate enough to infect her, then he was desperate enough to find another way. He took what was basically the easiest way out.

        And all of you morons who are talking about the life expectancy of people with HIV needs to know two things:

        First, not everyone has the same chances. Some can die from this quickly depending on what they have and what they later get. And, second, HIV is no picnic even if treated. You can live longer than expected, but it doesn’t mean it’s going to be as if you never had it. Bottom line: It is still possible to die from it and has many complications.

        That is not legal, ethical, or moral and if you excuse these actions you’re just as pathetic as this man who had to infect someone just to get his rocks off.

        • I agree, he violated her body by infecting her with his disease. They stayed together so I assume she cared for and trusted him. He betrayed her and gave her a death sentence. Even if she does live a long time with it, she is still going to be living a very different life. And I expect she’ll have a very hard time trusting people in the future.

          Not to even thing how this will effect his son’s image of people and relationships in the future.

    • babybluez287 says:

      agreed … he’s sick … i get his good intentions about the kids but infecting your wife … what if they both died o.o what of the kids eh ? they’d be all alone and all cause he was desperate for sex …
      what would they tell the kids …

      • I tend to think he used to kids so she wouldn’t leave him,and when she started refusing sex, he started thinking even the kids weren’t enough to keep her with him long term. Thus this sick, desperate plot began.

      • I don’t mean to defend him or anything, but with today’s medicine, a HIV positive person can live a fairly long life without developing AIDS.

        Unlike 15 years ago where a person with HIV could only live less than 10 years after the infection, today a HIV positive individual can live well over 30 years. That is, if one can pay the extortion fee to the pharmacies.

        • Yeah but its still an asshole thing to do. What would you think if someone just popped a needle in you and gave you the HIV. Wouldn’t be fun now would it. Even with all the crap that we have now that could take care of it.

        • Anonymous says:

          and you need to learn that infecting someone with HIV never NEVER gonna solve any problem in a relationship. and it is’t wommen who need to learn but man, if your wife loves to have sex and only have with you then you are lucky but if she refuses sex or only do it like 1 time peer week then you hate her. so yeah it is men who need to learn that and not wommen and you kinda trying to give that disgusting son of a bitch an excuse to infect her. and you said ‘The guy didn’t do it for the sex, obviously. He did it in hopes that he might be able to satisfy her needs, thus stay with him.’ tell me infecting someone with a goddam incurable disease is gonna fix what? WHAT? he shortened her lifespan and now the children have both parents HIV positive does that sounds right to you? hope not

        • You don’t get it, do you?
          It wasn’t the sex he wanted, you idiot.
          The wife told him she was only hanging around because of the children, meaning that she didn’t give a shit about him. Why? Because she couldn’t get sex, as she was in fear of getting HIV. SHE was the one who wanted sex, and was willing to freaking dump her HUSBAND for the loss of it. She just can’t do it with children in the house.
          How sick does that sound? Very..
          The guy didn’t do it for the sex, obviously. He did it in hopes that he might be able to satisfy her needs, thus stay with him.
          Women are so shallow and sex-driven these days. Marry a man, and if you can’t have sex with him, or the sex is bad, ditch him. Women need to learn that there’s more to a relationship then just sex.. >_>

        • This has nothing to do with the kids. The article says they reconciled and were staying together. He did did this because she wouldn’t have sex with him after they stayed together and it IS selfish to INFECT SOMEONE WITH A VIRUS.

          If you suggest that even if this WAS just about the kids and that it somehow has this nobility to it, then I hope to any higher power there is that you never have children.

  • Man deserves the death sentence. Think of what the kids will go through in school.
    Random Kids: AHAHAHA!! Both your parents are fucking HIV-carriers!!
    Not to mention it’s a fucking incurable disease.