Australia: “Windows 7 Aids Pedophiles”

windows-7-official-madobe-nanami-wallpaper-3.jpg

The Australian government is accusing Microsoft of protecting child abusers by including powerful encryption in Windows 7.

A member of the Australian government working with “cyber-safety” is outraged that Microsoft is including powerful encryption in Windows 7, better known for its touchscreen support:

“If this new product gives paedophiles protection to keep harming children I would be extremely disappointed. I would expect the company to take moves to rectify this.”

They seem unaware Bitlocker was actually introduced in Windows Vista.

A “cyber-law expert” with the Queensland University of Technology explains how Microsoft is aiding wicked lolicon in vile acts of cyber-sodomy:

“Microsoft has long been criticised for inadequate security – now it has implemented a robust security system that will bring problems along with its good.

There are legitimate reasons for encryption, but there are also criminal reasons.

Ten years ago very few people had access to those encryption devices, now it is becoming extremely mainstream. With so many people using Microsoft, within years most people will have access to this technology.”

He demands laws which would allow the state to lock up evil encryption users who fail to share their keys with the state:

“They need to act quickly and legal powers to force criminals to surrender decryption keys or face a possible jail term.

These laws would help police, law enforcement agencies and anti-terrorist police.”

Australian police themselves can already obtain warrants to secretly install keyloggers, but cannot jail people for refusing to reveal encryption keys – they seek laws emulating those of the UK, where refusal to decrypt information for police is a serious crime.

Under the UK’s draconian Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, police potentially have the power to lock up people who refuse to hand over keys to data they believe to be encrypted, but just how this works when encrypted data is indistinguishable from random noise is something courts have yet to establish.

Americans too find their Constitutional rights subverted when it comes to encryption – in 2009 a judge ordered a man to turn over his encryption keys, ruling after a lengthy series of appeals that this did not constitute self-incrimination, which is protected against by the Fifth Ammendment to the US Constitution.

Thwarted snoopers will doubtless howl all the harder when steganography, where it is all but impossible to demonstrate that encrypted data is even present, becomes more accessible.

Technology also exists which allows a any number of dummy keys to be given to authorities, capable of unlocking fake files in order to thwart such laws, whilst allowing the real encrypted file to go unmolested.

Both of these technologies pose severe problems to such laws, although it seems unlikely this will discourage further attacks on civil liberties by those keen to extend their powers by appealing to child protection hysteria.

However, Microsoft has previously been caught hiding backdoors in its encryption for the benefit of government snoopers, so it appears allowing Microsoft to become the vendor of choice for such technology might actually be their best hope…


    Post Comment »
    259 Comments
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Avatar of Palmtop  Tsundere
    Comment by Palmtop Tsundere
    12:44 28/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Lock makers enable child predators to keep child vicitms sequestered. They should be banned.
    /sarcasm

    Avatar of Aliaus
    Comment by Aliaus
    14:01 28/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    lol Australia complaining about TOO MUCH security, funny. they should just ban the internet, or better yet, ban computers.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:50 28/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    u crazy :O, you wanna kill me or something!

    Avatar of Ken
    Comment by Ken
    20:16 28/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Disconnect from the world... End of Australia...

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:28 28/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Just like Mad Max.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:41 28/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    GG, it been fun

    Avatar of Chen-04
    Comment by Chen-03
    02:17 29/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Just nuke Ausralia - same effect for them, better for the rest of the world.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:12 29/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Let the MAD MAX begin !!

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:57 29/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Ive said it before and ill say it again "Why the fuck am i living in australia"

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:18 29/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Australia is already located too far from the main lands.. lawl

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:05 29/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    i feel bad for our mates down under, everything continually getting regulated more and more... they used to be free too...

    as for the UK... whatever its over for the empire, seems like a situation like "V" is around the corner...

    i do have some old gamer friends from Aus, and they pay outrageous fees for little bandwidth (per GB a month or some other crazy terms if they're lucky) and bad ping, its terrible...

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:42 30/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Damn aussies, banning encryption? Thats jsut silly. What will they ban next, whale meat?

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:23 06/11/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Oi, I was rounding up koalas when me mate found this incredible thing. Did you lot know Google can help you find anything? I hope the govnah' don't ban it right quick.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:26 28/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    They are working on banning the internet. I hate this stupid government.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:34 28/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Same Anon as above. The Australian government not only allowed, but funded a single company to own *all* the telecommunication exchanges *and* sell internet plans. That company, formally part of the government has been privatized now and since before then they have abused their power, but it's now worse. I pay roughly 95 American dollars a month for what is essentially cable speeds that is slowed down to Dial-Up after we download 25 gigabytes. You can actually get 8 gb a month plans with 2mb/s download speed. Oh and did I tell you to the genii over in Telstra, 1 gigabyte = 1000 megabytes, 1 megabyte = 1000 kilobytes, etc.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:22 28/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Sucks for you. I pay the equivalent of 60 US and I get 80GB a month, with cable speeds and reduced to dial-up once it is exceeded. And I am Australian.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:35 28/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Too bad that I get 10 Mb/s and unlimited bandwith.

    Australia seems to have all things backwards. If I bought a ferrari to drive and was only allowed to drive it around my house... I'd be pissed.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:34 28/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    95US a month for 25gb? Dude, you're being royally screwed. TPG do ADSL2+, 150gb for like 60USD. Change ISPs

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:53 28/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Unfortunately, almost all internet plans in australia are like that, extremely expensive for amazingly low speeds or very low bandwidth limits before being dropped to dial up speeds

    I live in Hawaii and pay about 38~40$ a month for about 5000kbps download and 1000 kbps upload (essentially 600kB/s dl 100kB/s ul) with no bandwidth limits whatsoever

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:01 28/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Phone and 20mbit/s internet without a datalimit for 30 euro's a month (something near $20?).
    Gotta love the Netherlands.

    Avatar of Van-d-all
    Comment by Van-d-all
    19:37 28/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    LOL I get 10 Mbps with unlimited bandwidh for ~12$ :O And there I thought we have a shitty inets down here...

    Avatar of Tex_Arcana
    Comment by Tex_Arcana
    20:23 28/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    30 euros is more like $50, these days.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:21 28/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    US. 5mbs :(
    Sweden. 22mbs :)
    Japan. 60mbs :o

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:16 29/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Brazil got 35Mbps for $110, 100% unmetered.

    We got 100Mbps too, for $278, 100% unmetered of course.

    Metered = are for fags.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:18 29/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Oh yeah, and if you don't believe, here you go:

    15Mbps:
    http://www.speedtest.net/result/534222960.png

    35Mbps:
    http://www.speedtest.net/result/575944530.png

    100Mbps:
    http://www.speedtest.net/result/571776125.png

    Avatar of erochichi
    Comment by erochichi
    20:12 29/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Here in southern parts of Stockholm area, Sweden i have in reality about 44-47 Mb speed for 249 Krona= 37 USD for one month. I pay for 50Mb connection. No limits for download. It is possible to dl for more than 1500 DVDs in a month. As it is now, i can`t complain.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:41 30/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I live in the depths of the Russia and I got 5Mbps for $25 per month. Moscow has much better options.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:45 30/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Italy: 20mb (max you can get from tiscali) 30€\month

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:16 15/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Here's something of an idea for those bitching about their net: STOP USING HELLSTRA (Telstra) AND OPTARDS (Optus)! Don't bother with TransACT, unless you're stuck in Canberra/ACT, and can't get good deals from folks like Westnet.

    I pay ~$100 AUD a month for bundled landline and 1.5mbps/256kbps (Theory: 192KB/sec down, 32KB/sec up. Reality: 180KB/sec down, 30KB/sec up.) 65GB/month (25GB Peak/10am to 2am, 40GB Off-Peak/2am to 10am) ADSL1 40-odd clicks outta Wagga from Westnet.
    'Course, having the bulk of the plan between 2am and 10am local time makes it easier to MMO or B.Net with folks over in US & UK.

    Avatar of Seravy
    Comment by Seravy
    08:52 29/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    They should just ban themselves...that way they won't get in contact with computers or anything else they can't tolerate.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:13 20/03/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hears an idea, move out of Australia. I'd go to New Hampshire or Cleveland.

    Avatar of Chris
    Comment by Chris
    14:40 28/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Camera manufacturers aid child predators by allowing them to record their abuse. They should be banned.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:27 28/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    .avi's aid in the distribution of video cp, usage of those should be banned as well

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:16 30/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You're onto something, but you're motives are wrong. AVI is an awful container, and should be banned anyways.

    It would have been already if so many people weren't too poor to upgrade their machines to dirt-cheap quad cores and $100 graphics cards that are "Crysis-ready".

    Avatar of Sylar
    Comment by Sylar
    18:39 28/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    And what about those who create TV and Computer screens? With out the screens no matter how much encrypted data you have, you can't see them.
    Screens should be banned. They help child predators.

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:52 17/03/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    If eyeballs were banned then the predators would just walk into walls and knock themselves out, problem solved, ban the human eye

    Avatar of Darkrockslizer
    Comment by Darkrockslizer
    20:30 28/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Christianity has countless images of cp all around world portraying small naked children with wings in broad daylight, calling them "angels".

    Christianity should be banned.

    Avatar of Splat
    Comment by Splat
    20:55 28/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    "There are legitimate reasons for freedom, but there are also criminal reasons."

    Let's just lock everyone up to be safe. After all, you never know what anyone might do unless you stick them in a cell. Just as a precaution, you know? For security and all that. Think of the children!

    ... People these days make me sick.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:50 28/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    People in any age make me sick.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:52 29/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    they should lock up the smart people since they know how to encrypt in the first place. duh.

    *the new reich begins*

    Avatar of Crowbar
    Comment by Crowbar
    22:51 28/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Earth provides gravity that keeps childpornographers on ... errr ... Earth.

    Blow up Earth!

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:44 30/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Children makes it possible for predators to prey on them in the first place, they should be banned.

    Avatar of Vampire Lord
    Comment by Vampire Lord
    14:50 28/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The human rights aid child predators, they keep getting past 17 years old and become adult predators, life should be capped... or something.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:03 28/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Children aid child predators by... you know... existing.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:29 28/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    ...and children exist because women become pregnant and give birth to them, so does that mean (unprotected) sex should be banned or made illegal too?

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:51 28/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    only between people who can reproduce.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:54 28/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    :| Don't tempt them...that's a real possibility here in the States:|

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:02 29/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    ^ Uhh, no it's not. lol Paranoid much?

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:34 29/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It is part of one of the health care reforms. Government gains total control over who can make babies. They don't like the genetics of one or both parents involved in a pregnancy? They can order (and administer) and abortion. Prenatal testing shows it will be born handicapped, and therefore a burden on the state and its health services? They can order the unborn thing aborted, saving that government health money for productive citizens.

    They also have total control over who raises any and all children, and what they are allowed to be taught.

    Under that particular draft of the health care reform, any and all women have to maintain a constant "check" with their government beauract monitors--- or they are never allowed to have children (state forced sterilization to INSURE they won't ever breed).

    Straight up. Because, you know, the state is responsible for its citizens health care, so the state gets final say over who is allowed to have children, how many, and with who.

    And they will be able to stand on that as law, as the US Supreme Court has ruled many times that the constitution does NOT provide for the right to reproduction, and therefore can be regulated in any fashion the government finds necessary.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:57 28/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    They need to stop Australians from reproducing, since that would aid in increasing the victims of child abuse in Australia.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:09 28/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    How would that INCREASE the victims?

    Astaroth~

    Avatar of Vampire Lord
    Comment by Vampire Lord
    16:18 28/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    More children = more potential victims.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:47 28/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    well yeah but from my (lack of?) understanding he's saying that stopping us from reproducing will increase it.

    Avatar of Duolis
    Comment by Duolis
    19:08 28/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I think you should work your English reading skill a little bit more.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:02 28/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    failed english is fail

    Avatar of Miroku74
    Comment by Miroku74
    05:26 29/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    logical anon is logical.

    Avatar of First Posting Idiot
    Comment by First Posting Idiot
    20:37 28/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Whoever wrote this should have a kangaroo jump in through the window and punch him in the face.

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:59 29/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    australians can suck multiple donkey balls.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:25 29/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    they should also make houses and privately owned land illegal since they can hide children or their vile cp and news papers inside them.








    Post Comment »

Popular

Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments