Microsoft Plans Blu-ray for Xbox 360

xbox360-blu-ray-sort-of-annnounced.jpg

Microsoft’s chair throwing overlord Steve Ballmer has stated in an interview that the company plans a Blu-ray drive as an accessory.

When asked whether the Xbox would be getting Blu-ray, he stated it would be available as an extra:

“Well, I don’t know if we need to put Blu-ray in there — you’ll be able to get Blu-ray drives as accessories.”

This presumably refers to an external optical drive unit connected to the console, an arrangement a number of previous consoles have experimented with, generally with limited success.

Lesser Microsoft flacks refused to confirm the statement, but would not deny it either:

“Our immediate solution for Blu-ray-quality video on an Xbox 360 is coming this fall with Zune Video and 1080p instant-on HD streaming. As far as our future plans are concerned, we’re not ready to comment.”

Via GameSpark.

Update:

Microsoft specifically denies the BD drive as a misunderstanding:

“Steve was referring to Blu-ray accessories for the PC.

As we have said in the past, we have no plans to introduce a Blu-ray drive for the Xbox 360. In fact, the future of home entertainment starts this fall when Xbox 360 becomes the first and only console to offer instant-on 1080p streaming HD movies.

With a library of thousands of TV shows and movies to choose from, Xbox 360 owners can instantly watch the movies they want, when they want, in the highest form of high definition.”

Reassuring news indeed for all those American households with 100mbps Internet connections…


    Post Comment »
    144 Comments
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Avatar of TorqueAOD
    Comment by TorqueAOD
    Avatar of Csalbertcs
    Comment by Csalbertcs
    06:16 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    If they are going to get Blue-Ray for 360, they will need moar Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers.

    Avatar of giascle
    Comment by giascle
    07:41 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I

    LOVE

    THIS

    POST YEEEEAAAAAAAAAAHH

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:51 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    they think adding crap onto failure would help sell? they need to focus on next gen with extensive testing to make sure theres no RROD. but i guess they want to strangle the cat until its finally dead.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:47 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    nah, it's more like an alternative to those who already have an 360, but want to watch blue-ray. But I'll be laughing at microsoft's ass when they price it over 150 dollars, cause might as well buy a ps3 at that price, and also with just low end blue-ray players going at 100 dollars these days, they are most likely bound to fail. again.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:01 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    No reason for ps3 anymore. (Puts ps3 in trash can)

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:35 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    No reason for you anymore. (Puts Anon :01 in trash can)

    Avatar of Ken
    Comment by Ken
    20:00 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    the reason i dun but ps3 cuz there's no fake game available yet... so this is not a good idea...

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:07 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Replying here just so it can be seen..
    http://majornelson.com/archive/2009/10/22/we-have-no-plans-for-blu-ray-on-xbox-360.aspx

    Comment by Anonymous
    Comment by Anonymous
    08:51 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's a Microshit.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:02 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    that must be really small sh!t, 1 nanometer?

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:04 24/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    an example of people who sleep in class. doesn't know differences of micrometer and nanometer. i guess he doesn't even know picometer too

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:13 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    what's so funny? they did the same thing with HD DVD, that went down, makes good enough sense that they'd go to the new format

    sure did take them a while though

    Comment by flaskis
    01:47 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I still mourn the HD-DVD which had a more open view on the whole media than Bluray.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:13 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    BluRay is more than just movies, and all the extra features HDDVD had are now incorporated in bluray.

    HD DVD had some shitty codec anyway, so why do you care?

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:47 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    HDDVD and Blu-Ray use the same codec, dumbass. They both use h.264. BluRay started out with the shitty VC-1 codec.

    Avatar of Csalbertcs
    Comment by Csalbertcs
    03:52 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Owned.

    Avatar of Dirty_Dingus008
    Comment by Dirty_Dingus008
    04:56 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    VC-1 was the whore's ass in codecs that has only redeemed itself on the Blu-ray by companies willing to dump tons more data into the discs to equal the beauty of AVC.

    Warners played both sides during the "war" and released all of its films thru VC-1 and I still think they've been fucking up every one they still release to this day now. The stand alone 'The Matrix' was nice to an extent.. but still.

    Same shit with the battle between dolby digital and DTS of which dolby had to cook up another format called "dolby digital" to finally equal the basic DTS. I love DTS and some of the games I've played do also like Uncharted 1 & 2 and Ninja Gaiden (PS3).

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:16 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    hello children :)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_high_definition_optical_disc_formats

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:09 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Actually, a lot of early blu-ray discs used MPEG-2, so it's no wonder they looked like shit. I don't know how much VC-1 is used, but i hope it isn't, to be honest.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:41 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    In my estimation the BlueRay vs. HD-DVD format war was very insignificant. With Technology like High Speed internet connections and large amounts of digital Storage Space both widely available and cheap. The only reason Online Distribution hasn't taken off is because these companies want to sell me a Stupid piece of plastic that takes up space in my living room.

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:33 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yeah, Digital Distribution FTW. Then Piracy is gonna take off thanks to it.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:17 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    with digital distribution, there are fewer overheads to consider eg: where to store thousands of discs post manufacture as compared to storage of a single file on a computer.

    add to the equation the cost of producing said discs and the cost of employing all the people involved in their production compared to just the creator/s of the original file and you see that the latter doesn't have quite as high a production and storage cost, meaning the marketing of such material can be much cheaper, maybe as low as a third or possibly a quarter of what it costs for a film today.

    with the cost of films being that low, the end consummer really has to look at the cost of pirating such material, what would be the point, if everyone could afford to download it in the first place...

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:56 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Too bad the HDDVD vs. Bluray war was another form of the Beta vs. VHS war.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:42 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Forget the past in this debate. As they both stand currently, Blu Ray is vastly superior. This kind of thing is part of Sony's 10-year life cycle.

    Think about it. Sony got a few years of the Blu Ray fan base(however small it is) ahead of time while Microsoft was Jizzing itself over Halo releases. Now, Microsoft is going to advertise Blu Ray like total hypocrites.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:20 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Nope.

    Like the "lesser Microsoft flack" said, they'll continue to mainly advertise streaming video services.

    Avatar of Myballz
    Comment by Myballz
    13:01 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    HD-DVD had 30 GB (dual layer)while sony had Blu-Ray Disk had 50 GB (dual-layer)

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:55 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    they should blu ray n64

    Avatar of Dirty_Dingus008
    Comment by Dirty_Dingus008
    05:50 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    OutStanding! Rock it ON!

    We all can play GoldenEyes again in glorious 720p by putting that 2 Megabit game into a TWENTY-FIVE GIG disc!!!

    Fuck! We can have the ENTIRE library on oONE disc!

    Let go anon, the '64 is so '90s.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:36 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    what's wrong with playing the entire console's library in a single disc, you won't have to stand up to change the disc.... harhar...

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:56 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Oh the irony...

    Avatar of Sigil
    Comment by Sigil
    01:58 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The irony of the winning format of a format war being adopted? Yeaaaah. Not really ironic at all but it's ironic you think your pointing out irony when your really not.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:36 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Oh the tautology...

    Comment by Schrobby
    02:59 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    An additional drive won't make that much of a difference. M$ has to release a new xBox with internal BluRay that can do FullHD.

    If it's compatible with the old one that thing sure would sell. The PS3 would have serious problems with such a competitor...

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:42 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Sony owns the bluray format so if Microsoft uses it they will have too pay royaltys to sony for it.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:23 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The Blue-ray Association owns the Blu-ray standard and not only is Microsoft a member of this group they are Directors of the group (along with 19 other companies including sony)

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:49 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Board of Directors
    The Blu-ray Disc Association website describes the role of the Board of Directors as follows:
    Companies participating in the Board of Directors are active participants of the format creation and key BDA activities. They are selected from the Contributors by election. The board sets an overall strategy and approves key issues. A board member can participate in all activities and attend all meetings. The Blu-ray Disc Founder companies will make up the initial Board of Directors. Annual fee: $ 50,000

    Please for that Annual fee you too can join the board. The board is they just to be on the "IN" tech. Like MP3's. None of the Music companies own the rights to it but they use it anyway as a online format. It's the "IN" tech.

    Sony still gonna get paid from MS.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:57 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hey that my idea damn T.T
    Thanks Mr Bill Gates the legendary Master Thief.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:24 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Innovation cannot be owned, it becomes widely adopted/available (interpret loosely). Not to mention blurays dev was being carried by MULTIPLE companies.

    Sony has no say in who can use the blu ray format. I laugh everytime I read a comment that even remotely suggests that they do or that some1 is "stealing" a format medium.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:32 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    how the fuck old are you to make a stupid joke like that

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:41 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    how the fuck old are you to understand this is a joke ? stupid anon 23-10-2009 02:32

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:51 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    More like Master Chief am i rite ?

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:05 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I wouldn't know, as I've never seen him cook.

    Get it?

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:21 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Pwned... hard...
    xD

    Avatar of Sigil
    Comment by Sigil
    01:57 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I doubt many people will bother to buy it, an external blue ray drive is no different to just buying a seperate blue ray player and I doubt MS will have the best or the fastest reading blue ray player (or best price for that matter). Either way it's not going to effect the games so it's just for HD movie lovers really who probably would just buy a PS3 since it has no games and lots of blue ray lol.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:23 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    If it's like everything else Microsoft makes, expect it to break within 3 years.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:13 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Maybne in yours deformed hands ;]

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:23 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    my earz fell down wfrom your horriple speakings....

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:40 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's either stupidity or blindness that could cause you to think the PS3 has no games. That statement might have been somewhat true in 2006 and even early 2007 to be generous, but things have changed. It's annoying to see the same tired statement being repeated time and time again simply out of habit.

    Avatar of Sigil
    Comment by Sigil
    03:04 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yeah yeah cos when PS3 got Uncharted (which I'm not into myself actually) and demons souls suddenly everything changed and it went from no games to millions.

    I'm not actually a fanboy but I like to annoy the people on this site since they're mostly PS3 fanboys that insult the 360 anyway so why not insult there console back for fun?

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:19 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    troll? still dont get why they dont include ratchet and clank mgs4 and god of war3. and you why i only said 3 games cuz they are all different genres of games. ahem one game for the 360 halo. all are the same shooters

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:15 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    RRRRRAAAAGGGGEEEE my PS3 fanboy!!

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:00 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    "just buy a PS3 since it has no games and lots of blue ray lol"

    360 fanboy spotted.






    Post Comment »

Popular

Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments