Transsexual Fatally Bites Off Lover’s Penis


A male-to-female transsexual has been arrested after biting off her lover’s penis, apparently infuriated by his infidelities.

The 33-year-old male-to-female transsexual, a resident of northern Thailand, had lived together as “man and wife” with “her” 23-year-old male partner, but acrimony arose over the young man’s visits to the boat races, and his good looks, which he apparently exploited to seduce other transsexuals.

The pair began to quarrel, with the transsexual knocking the man down and in her rage proceeding to bite off his penis.

Her victim soon expired, and she summoned police, who arrived to find the bloody mouthed murderer sitting near the corpse, the penis of which was all but torn off.

She admits the charges, explaining she could countenance neither his cheating nor his laziness.

Thailand is known for an usually high population of transsexuals, though penis biting incidents are mercifully uncommon.

Via the Bangkok Shuho.

    Post Comment »
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Avatar of Ukonkivi
    Comment by Ukonkivi
    05:48 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Sadly, no matter how much news like this shows up, it won't stop guys from saying things like "a guy who gets laid is ALWAYS lucky".

    Comment by Anonymous
    Comment by Anonymous
    05:35 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    A tranny will always be a man or woman, whatever gender they were born with.

    It doesn't matter what they want to be called or what people call them, they're either a he/she and can't change it.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:10 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Gender and sex are two different things. Now go look up "Klinefelter's Syndrome" (XXY) and "hormone wash" (this happens in utero, before the external sex organs begin to develop, and doesn't necessarily correspond to what the later development of sex organs might suggest prima facie). You may learn something.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:26 19/02/2016 # ! Neutral (0)

    the hell u talking about . bullshit

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:24 08/09/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    Thank you. Gender only applies to languages (it's a classification system for words) and sex is only for living creatures, again thanks for having the sense to know that.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:29 08/09/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    And before I shut up, that picture made my wee wee hurt, seriously though, a true transsexual is someone who is hermaphroditic. If you're born a boy, you're a boy a girl, you're a girl, it doesn't matter if you get surgery, also there is no patriarchy, never has been, DON'T LISTEN TO FEMINIST LIES!

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:28 08/09/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    Me again, gender doesn't always match up with sex, for instance german for girl is Mädchen, a neuter word, not feminine, and there can be more than just masculine feminine or neuter:
    Most languages usually have from 2 to 4 different genders, but some are attested with up to 20.[2][5][6] Common divisions include:[citation needed]

    masculine / feminine
    masculine / feminine / neuter
    animate / inanimate
    human / non-human
    human / animal / inanimate
    male / other
    form wikipedia, too lazy to do further research, by the way there are only two sexes: male female.

    Comment by Anonymous
    Avatar of Holly
    Comment by Holly
    05:05 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    But this is what gets ratings, almost everyone here loves to make fun of transsexuals, as if they didn't have enough problems in their life.

    Avatar of Reichi
    Comment by Reichi
    07:16 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    That image is sickening. D:
    And honestly, why do people bite penises off? That's the worst self-defense mechanism ever!

    Avatar of Shuu
    Comment by Shuu
    08:04 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Not against rape it's not. You'd be surprised how many idiots actually believe the shit porn feeds them that the girl will suddenly become all obedient once they shove their pen0r in her mouth...

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:45 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    'sup Equality Now.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:31 08/09/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    And girls that rape someone? Do we "castrate" them?

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:47 13/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    And further on this ...

    How has the world become so masochistic?

    Why is it now popularly believed that war is never justified, and that killing in self-defense is equivalent to murder, and that capital punishment is "barbaric?"

    Why do people call for the US to pull out of Iraq, leaving the situation there infinitely worse than it was when they went in? For the record, I opposed the invasion, but now that it has happened, if the US leaves before stabilizing the nation, it will only result in more trouble, rather than less.

    Why do people call for the US to pull out of Afghanistan, leaving Osama bin Laden free to continue his terrorism?

    I grant that most wars these days are fought for less than honorable causes, but was the war against fascism in 1939-1945 unjustified? What about the more recent warfare in the Balkans? Is genocide something we can simply ignore? Where is the ethics in that?

    Why do people call for "gun control" and "knife control" and other nonsensical "solutions" to the issue of violence, instead of recognizing the right of a person to defend himself/herself and his/her family?

    How did all killing become viewed as "murder?" Would you, if someone were coming at you with a knife intent on castrating you, simply allow them to do so, or would you do everything you could -- including resorting the use of deadly force -- to prevent it from happening? Is the concept of "motive" no longer considered, but instead the world has devolved into legalistic focus on the act itself?

    As for capital punishment, I believe in the idea in principle, but I usually oppose it in practice, due to the unreliability of supposed evidence used to convict. I would not call it "barbaric," but I would characterize the practice as "too sure of 'facts' that may not be actual."

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:27 13/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    What kind of twisted mind can possibly imagine that the only people who think that castration is an appropriate punishment for rape must be radical feminazis? Honestly, it used to be suggested often in the mainstream.

    Yes, there are a small handful of neurotic harpies who stick their noses into all sorts of places where they have no business, stir up crap, push an agenda that is completely out of touch with reality. We can justly include Equality Now among those nutjobs.

    However, not all feminists are wackos, and not all who support the idea of castration for rape are even feminists. I'm certainly no feminist, but, if (and only if) the evidence against a person accused of rape were undeniable, I believe castration would be highly appropriate.

    Avatar of Fonzer
    Comment by Fonzer
    08:01 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    probably becouse it is the most vunlabre place you can get a man without any weapons or hard hits.
    And he can die easily from it.

    Avatar of Netstryke
    Comment by Netstryke
    15:19 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    *in fetal postition in the corner*

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:59 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    wtf...isnt pitou suppose to be a male chimera ant??....oh i c wut u did thar....

    if you guys dont know pitou is from hunter x hunter, chimera ant arc

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:49 09/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    This makes me wonder if theres an afterlife.
    odd I know but I can't help but hope that if there is he get's his little freind re-attached there.
    Of course it does make for an interesting conversation in the afterlife:
    Man 1: so, how did you die?
    Man 2: Heart attack.
    Man 1: how about you man 3?
    Man 3: peacefully in bed aged 92
    Man 1: how about you Mcnopenis?
    Mcnopenis: crazy transsexual girlfreind bit my penis off.
    Man 1,2&3: O_O

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:53 09/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    That's very Fucked up, also the pic, it scares me

    Avatar of Icy-nee-san
    Comment by Icy-nee-san
    22:53 09/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Not something I wanna hear about first thing in the morning xD

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:54 09/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)'s messed up the guy had to go out like that..

    Comment by Anonymous
    Comment by Anonymous
    02:19 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I don't want to make this come out as a "feminist hater" which is very prevalent around here, but most feminist groups share views very similar to EQNow. That's not to say there are not feminists who really fight against oppression, but they are pretty rare to come by.

    I for one, have always disliked feminism, for being a social movement that only some members of society benefit. A movement that truly wants to promote emancipation cannot and should not limit itself in such a way.

    Not that I condone all of this feminist bashing (which makes the rest of us look bad), but you can't deny the fact that they are asking for it. (sorry, couldn't miss this pun)

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:22 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The sheer fucking ignorance of some of these comments is appalling. A m2f TS is a she, and any guy who is so threatened by her choice to stop fighting who and what she is as to make such ignorant comments as some of those here is, frankly, insecure in his own sexuality.

    If the "biter" in this case had been a "genetic girl" (and I use that supposedly differentiating term loosely, since there are a number of different motivations for sexual transition from "male" to female, including genetic conditions like Klinefelter's syndrome -- in which a person is born with two X chromosomes and a Y chromosome), would you be any less shocked? Would it make the deed any more tolerable? In that case, would you then be accusing her of being a neurotic harpy feminazi? Are you still incapable of admitting that the male in the situation might have done something that might merit some sort of retaliation, still locked in the patriarchal mentality of the Abrahamic religions, in which any sexual "crime" results in punishment to the woman, but never the man? Go do some studying on the issues and grow the hell up instead of spouting such predictable and fallacious bullshit.

    As for this attitude of targeting the male crotch being supposedly restricted to Thailand, are all of you so young that you've never heard of Lorena Bobbit? Every woman on earth, aside from those in societies where they are forbidden to learn, knows very well how sensitive the penis is, and some of us know about its symbolism (and occasional use) as a "weapon." It has been a favorite target of women who have been cheated on, around the world.

    And as for the question of "since when," this sort of retaliation is not at all new, and used to be vetted quite often as a serious suggestion as to an appropriate punishment for rapists, as well as philanderers.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:35 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's not a she. It's a he, sorry.

    And I'm a girl saying that.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:22 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    And you come to that conclusion based on what argument, exactly?

    Let me provide you with some scientific facts.

    In the 12th to 14th week of pregnancy, a developing fetus will get a wash of hormones over its brain, which lasts for 2 weeks. Boy babies get a flush of testosterone, girl babies get a flush of estrogen -- USUALLY. It doesn't always work that way, however. When it doesn't, the result is a gender identity different from chromosomal sex and/or external sexual characteristics (and note that chromosomal sex may or may not be consistent with external sexual characteristics, but I'll discuss this further below). During the time of this "hormone wash" of the fetal brain, the genitals are still in development (they begin to develop at week 6-8, and are not fully developed until week 16-18).

    Put simply, a fetus in the early stages of development is neither male nor female (at least mentally/emotionally -- identity-wise, if you will), but is instead capable of being either. At a certain point in development, a hormonal wash is generated by a feedback loop between the developing fetus and the mother. If that "wash" is androgenic then the fetal brain develops into male, and if it's estrogenic, female. The fetus' chromosomal make-up does not itself *cause* this differentiation, it merely has some influence over the factors that do.

    Inter-sexed individuals are by definition proof that sometimes this process doesn't go as planned (and yes, "proof," because the logical contradiction of an "All S are P" type statement requires only one example to prove otherwise, and we have a hell of a lot more than one example).

    Dr. Milton Diamond demonstrated that there is more than one "sexing" going on during fetal development. The brain, being more complicated and developing at a slower rate than much of the rest of the body, is "sexed" at a different point. He believed, and later *proved*, that this resulted in actual physiologic differences in the brain - both animal and human. This was a potentially terminal flaw in the earlier notion that gender identity was wholly learned.

    In the case of Dr. Diamond, when working with Dr. Sigmundson on a specific case, the situation was of a boy who had been injured in the genital region as a newborn, and was *assigned* female sex and gender, given what appeared to be a vagina, etc (and had even developed breasts naturally upon attaining puberty), but upon growing up, eventually transitioned back to maleness, after discovering what had happened. This situation is not as rare as you may think, but it's not quite the "classic" or "textbook" case of a "Transsexual," any more than is the case of the well-known actress/model "Tula" (Caroline Cossey), who has Klinefelter's Syndrome (however, instead of having XXY chromosomes like most with this condition, Cossey is XXXY).

    But back to the "inter-sexed" individuals (again, not "Transsexuals" in the classic sense, but people who were born with "ambiguous" genitalia, or whose genitals were somehow damaged early in life, and then *assigned* to a gender that was incongruent with their chromosomal makeup), two years prior to the publication of the work by Drs. Diamond and Sigmundson, the first and only long-term follow-up study of reassigned intersexual children at John Hopkins had been done by Dr. Bill Reiner, a former pediatric urologist turned child psychologist. His study had shown that out of six such individuals all six were closer to male than their reassigned female roles and two had spontaneously (that is, without being told what had been done to them) switched sexes. Despite every attempt to make girls out of them, all six somehow knew they were boys and openly stated that. What had been done to them hadn't helped them, hadn't solved any problems real or perceived.

    The cases of intersexed people and those with chromosomal "oddities" should be sufficient evidence that the ideas of "gender" and "sex" are quite a bit more complicated than is generally assumed (note well, "assumed"), but let's go back to that fetal brain "hormone wash," because it is here that we find what is nowadays the generally-accepted view among medical professionals dealing with cases of TG/TS patients. You see, for reasons nobody understands, occasionally, the "wrong" hormones will wash the brain of the developing fetus. There *are* various hypotheses -- the most widely-stated hypothesis I have seen is the suggestion that some type of trauma or other high-stress situation involving the mother may produce this result. However, this is acknowledged to be a theory only, and there are other theories as well. Like I said, nobody understands why it happens. But it definitely does happen. Once born, these children grow up in a situation where they *feel* somehow "out of place," and most have some idea from a very early age that the reason for this feeling has to do with their gender identity (although of course they would not put it in those terms at age 3-5, which is usually the age at which they later report having first realized that their physiological sex was different from their psychological gender identity). They may "wish" that they had been born physiologically female (or, if physiologically female, that they had been born physiologically male). They may pray to be changed into what they feel that they should be, or even pray to have their feelings "corrected" (since in many societies, they are indoctrinated with the lie that these feelings are somehow "wrong" or "sinful," etc). Most of them do not embrace these feelings, unless they live in a very supportive and understanding environment. Indeed, most are encouraged to repress the feelings, indoctrinated with religious dogma and social bias, even punished if they do not behave/dress/move/speak as they "should." Most do their best to hide the truth of who they are from all those around them, terrified of being branded as "gay" and then persecuted for it. They *learn* to be very good actors and actresses, concealing the truth as much as possible, even from their closest family members and friends, but always, deep within, there is that nagging, yearning ache, that pathos, that absolute *need* to be true to who they really are, and stop pretending to be what they are not -- and to be free to be who they are and no longer forced to live a lie. Many attempt, or at least contemplate, suicide more than once in their lives. Some "succeed" in killing themselves. A few manage to survive and cope long enough to do what they know they must do, and that is to have their external sex transformed in order to correspond with their internal gender, but this transition is never an easy thing (except in places like Thailand, where the primary religion includes the teaching that the first humans were three sexes: female, male, and kathoey), and never inexpensive (I mean this in more than finanacial terms, although I mean it in that way as well -- there are a very small number of places in the world where there is financial assistance available for making the transition -- the costs may include loss of friends, being disowned by family, loss of job, social and religious ostracism, etc).

    But you go on assuming and insisting that your unexamined biases are correct, and meanwhile the TG community will continue to suffer, struggle, and exist. Some will survive, and some will even manage, against all odds (including your ignorant and irrational prejudices), to become true to themselves. I salute those who make it, and those who try but fail, and those who cannot even make the attempt because of the dysfunctional societies in which they live, or because they finally chose to end things rather than continue to be subjected to ignorance, irrationality, and prejudice.

    Maybe eventually the world might actually progress a little bit on some of these issues, but not as long as people continue to assume (and pontificate based on their assumptions) instead of admitting their ignorance and then attempting to correct their lack of knowledge.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:51 28/05/2010 # ! Neutral (0)


    Comment by Anonymous
    10:35 18/12/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    LOL I know I scrolled past all the professors rant lol

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:52 11/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Still haven't learned anything, have you?

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:24 11/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    If by "learning something," you intend to suggest that I should conform to the "soundbite" mentality afflicting most contemporary "journalism" and contributing to the attention deficit in contemporary society (which itself only promotes the same irrationality, ignorance, and prejudice that I have condemned above), then no, I have not conformed and have neither desire to nor intention of doing so.

    Perhaps if, instead of being intimidated by a "wall of text," someone actually took the time to put forth even mild effort to follow a train of thought that lasts longer than 5 seconds, that someone might benefit. However, listening actively is a technique that is usually encouraged only in girls, psychotherapists, and (occasionally) clergy, so it it little wonder that some of those posting here have the attitude that they "can't be bothered."

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:44 11/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It is, unfortunately, a very complex reality, which cannot be summed up in a few words. If any hope of understanding is to be realized, then some detail is required in the explanation.

    One of the main points I hope to get across is that there are a variety of reasons for someone to transition from being externally male to being externally female. Among those are physiological and psychological motivations, as well as medical history.

    To assume that she is and will always be "he" is to be guilty of bias and ignorance. We simply do not know why the "biter" in this case chose to transition. Perhaps she has one of those chromosomal conditions like Klinefelter's Syndrome, perhaps she was born with ambiguous genitalia and the physician made the wrong decision, perhaps her brain was washed with estrogen instead of testosterone in the womb, perhaps the hormone wash of the brain in utero was late (this can also affect "brain gender," since, until the brain is washed with testosterone, the developing brain and body will continue to get low doses of estrogen) -- there are, as I said, several possibilities.

    In some cases, the clitoris is enlarged and the ovaries descended, with the labia malformed so that the appearance of the genitals is masculine, when in reality they are feminine and cannot function "properly" as male organs (by which I mean they don't produce testosterone or sperm).

    Ultimately, it is a question of identity, and not a question of having a Y chromosome, having a penis, having testes, having facial/body hair.

    The only "freaks" involved in this discussion are those who can't (or won't) think outside the box into which they were put by social brainwashing.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:47 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    So long as you keep your posts under 50 words, maybe people will pay attention.

    Comment by HyperKnuckles99
    02:28 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It hurts just looking at it.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:53 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The guy that had his testies and penis removed to be come a guy without testies and a penis was still stronger than the guy he was dating who still had his organs. The drugs they feed the ones that lost their organs must be pretty high on the steroid level, which would show how rhoid rage could have caused this to happen. Don't matter what slice the Dr. puts on someone, those born a male are still male.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:23 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Umm, post-op MTFs usually get high levels of ESTROGEN ... so if you HAVE to blame it on hormones, blame constant pseudo-PMS instead of 'roid rage.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:21 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Umm, post-op MTFs usually get high levels of ESTROGEN ...

    Avatar of max301
    Comment by max301
    01:40 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Is the picture necessary??
    Of Course.....

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:35 11/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Finish Him! Fatality!

    Avatar of darknetwork
    Comment by darknetwork
    11:29 22/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    penis biter! they should consider this new villain in game

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:27 17/10/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    you cud du that with me i dont want my pens i heit it

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:31 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    oh my god!! she bit kenny!!

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:46 22/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I want to have playful teeth on my dick - gives me a kick.
    But i want to be in simulated danger, not in real - thank you for letting me keep my meat ...

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:37 18/12/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Doesnt matter who or what did this and why...they need to be eliminated for such a gruesome act.

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:30 10/12/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    I wold love for u to bit my dick off

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:29 21/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    this case should be categorized as extreme Vore

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:15 01/11/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    lol at the pic:P

    Avatar of GodOfSpeed
    Comment by GodOfSpeed
    07:51 11/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Wow wtf, how does he even manage to bite off the penis? WTF LOL

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:30 11/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I am not sure which amazes me most, the actual article or the appropriateness of the image...

    Post Comment »


Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments