Winny Creator Found Innocent

"but it takes another person's human curiosity to cause the use of the bomb"

That is not human curiosity, that is malicious intent. Its invention could pass as curiosity but its use cannot be forgiven...

Semantics, but I generally agree.

The only exception would be if they were using the bomb in a desert or some such for research purposes.

Though one would hope we've learned basically all there really is to learn already, and there no longer is any legitimate reason to set one of those things off.

-

Anyway, if someone did attempt to nuke some place, I get the feeling that this Isamu Kaneko character (the guy this article is about) would dress in spandex and fly halfway across the globe in an instant, grab the bomb by hand and launch it off into space for us.

Seriously, that guy looks like he gets shit done.

too bad had we not nuked Japan, they would have been invaded by both americans and the russians, millions of casualties one the allies side, and millions more casualties on the japanese side. Japan would have been split into a communist and non communist part ike germany, and anime and all these other japanese things you love today wouldnt be around

Just forget the "sides" and the "ifs", no mater who is the enemy, I (or most of the people) can't imagine myself giving the order to drop those bombs on all that people... what "would be" is by no means an excuse to this massacre.

You are comparing apples and oranges, using only the "tool" concept. On top of that, you are comparing an amoral computer programme with a weapon; one out of many, which suggests that the particular weapon was chosen more for shock effect than a logical comparison. Since sensationalism has now been revealed as the goal rather than a fair comparison, the arguement is false, illogical and specious.

BTW, if you refer to the nuclear weapons, your logic is doubly flawed:
-the weapon had only been used twice in the 65 years since its creation; how does this compare to blades, slug throwers, poison gas, etc.?
-whenever the weapon has been 'improved,' at least in modern times, it was either by detonating a real weapon underground or by using computer simulation. How often have the previous listed weapons 'improved' in computer simulation, rather than applying it to its intended victim?
-the weapon, in its two uses, resulted in the deaths of 120,000 humans (I will not go into future deaths due to ionization radiation). For only being used twice, that makes the weapon 'cleaner' that the incindiary bombings of Dresden, Coventry or Tokyo; whereas the death toll due to the above listed weapons has exceeded the millions in each category, with no sign of letting up.

And they say nuclear war would be (future indeterminate - could be - is better) unrestrained

a guy was bashed to death with a toaster, FUCK YOU TOASTER + GUY WHO CREATED TOASTERS!

"it can't be help" is the only reason and an end you can ever use for that scenario. NEVER. forget. that.

Anon :36 makes me lol.

All I did was to put in the word "paedophile" in the Oxford dictionary, I cannot be held responsible for why lolis are getting raeped

Correct, because in this scenario it is "it couldn't be helped."

Remember the military, it was made to protect citizens and look what the government use it for.

Remember the government, it was made to lead people and look what the politicians use it for.

Remember Sankaku, it was made to be a blog and look what Equality use it for.

Remember Equality Now? It was made to combat sexism but look at what women use it for.

ccccccombo breaker!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

WIN anon 20:01

Why? They were too dumb to build the bomb, it was stolen from the nazis.

You forgot the second part.

Rurushu(Lelouch) (18 Years Old. Area 11)

there never right or wrong, just thinking make it so

Correction there mate:

"It is neither good nor bad, but thinking makes it so."

W.Shakespeare

from: Hamlet Act 2

Agreed. +9000