Geisha Bondage Ad Banned for “Submissive Pose”

kimono-tatami-hentai-kinbaku-shibari-bondage.jpg

An artistic ad featuring a bound geisha was banned based on a handful of complaints, with advertising censors condemning it as “condoning sexual violence against women” and observing that “she seemed upset” and was depicted in a “submissive pose.”

bisazza-hentai-shibari-geisha-bondage-tiles.jpg

The photo itself shows a mildly bound geisha, and is by world famous photographer Nobuyoshi Araki, whose works grace several art galleries.

The exquisite mosaic tiling the geisha rests on is actually the product advertised – Bisazza is an Italian tile maker, and the adverts were carried in several high-end home decor magazines.

The UK’s Advertising Standards Authority, which has the power to ban adverts which offend its puritanical sensibilities, acted on the basis of 6 complaints and condemned the “demeaning” ads, saying the geisha was “shown in a submissive pose, appeared visibly upset and was shown with her kimono pushed up to expose her thigh.”

It asserts the ads condone rape:

“Notwithstanding the highly stylised nature of the ads, we considered the creative treatment could be seen to imply that sexual violence had taken place or was about to take place.”

It has banned the offending ads completely, though some similar ads escaped.

The company responsible defends the “artistic and beautiful” campaign as featuring “no nudity, innuendo, wounds or scenes of excessive perversion.”

The UK has of course recently banned most fetish porn, though the actual acts depicted remain quite legal so long as the person photographing them is actually involved in the sex…

Via the BBC.


    Post Comment »
    94 Comments
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Comment by Anonymous
    05:22 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Submissive is always good

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:31 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I wish people would take this seriously. If you don't stand up for freedom of expression now, it's going to be taken away. How do you think so many banning laws have been passed with studies proving the Opposite of what all these butthurt cencorship groups are saying.

    Because enough of us aren't speaking up. And since Equality Now isn't listening, we need to go to the people they go to to be heard.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:39 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    We need a leader.... my candidate is Lelouch Lamperouge

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:55 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Agreed! ALL HEIL LELOUCH!

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:17 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlgQ5h2ySJ0

    Avatar of Maikeru
    Comment by Maikeru
    09:08 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    FABULOUS !

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:26 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    イェスマイロルド

    Avatar of Icy-nee-san
    Comment by Icy-nee-san
    09:38 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I nominate Haruhi to piss off all the people who hated Endless 8

    Avatar of Tex_Arcana
    Comment by Tex_Arcana
    10:02 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Not a freedom of expression issue, per se.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:20 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Tex, "freedom of expression" means your right to create and publish content of any form, regardless of how other people feel like it, and as long as it does not violate the law. This is equivalent to "freedom of speech" but is often used in the context of created works, rather than plain speech.

    Consequently, a country that issues bans based on subjective 3rd party views cannot be considered free. They always start with things that are socially unacceptable (porn, jews) and then move to other things such as "offensive" political messages which "cause social disturbance", protests and the opposition.

    Avatar of Soljashy
    Comment by Soljashy
    21:13 05/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    イェスマイロルド

    This actually says "Yes my lol'd."

    Use ロード for "lord".

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:21 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Fuck the britz anyway, they ways think they're so much better than the yanks yet their country is turning way sooner into a totalitarian than the 'amerikkkans' they so eagerd to mock. I'll enjoy watch them burn in hell.

    Avatar of Daiyousei
    Comment by Daiyousei
    14:36 30/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    *implies you'll also be there*

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:37 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    If only the UK had Freedom of Expression to begin with. Unfortunately no one can oppose the government because we lack Freedom of Speech.

    Comment by Schrobby
    07:29 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I like my girls submissive...

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:42 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You people need to realize that this sort of thing might be admissable if it wasn't for the extreme popularity and the rediculousness of things like Queen's Blade and all the other full blown rape games, videos, and images. While I agree completely that it doesn't make much sense, people know of the extreme shit, and then aren't happy to allow something innocent like this. You rape what you sow.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:18 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Cry more, crazy man.

    They banned it due to "Politicaly Correctness" which says that NOTHING is acceptable if it offends just one person in your country.

    It has nothing to do with what goes on in Japan (or is exported). Odds are that it is just a couple of overly sensitive women who complained because they don't like that they are welcome, and sure as hell don't like that for women to have sex, they have to submit to their partner. Anything that reminds them in the slightest of this, offends them.

    Avatar of Shuu
    Comment by Shuu
    12:56 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Did you just compare Queen's Blade to "rape games, videos, and images"?
     
    Are you retarded? The society depicted in Queen's Blade is a fucking matriarchy, with men reduced to powerless, unimportant bystanders (exceptions notwithstanding) too insignificant to show more than 1 or 2 of them per episode, usually as simple townsfolk or other forms of noninvolved bystanders...
    Women are depicted as strong and powerful in every sense of the word. It's every feminist's wet dream...

    Avatar of dukemagus
    Comment by dukemagus
    11:12 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    sheesh! equality now don't know what means sarcasm... they can start world war III because of you!

    Avatar of DixNeuf
    Comment by DixNeuf
    Comment by Anonymous
    07:59 04/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    fuck censorship

    Comment by Anonymous
    Comment by Anonymous
    12:20 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    2d-raep would look&sell better. Equality now would ignore this shit since it ain't 2d.

    I'd say brits are normal to react at this point. Prefer hardcore stuff to be limited to 2d since it makes it more tolerable.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:47 04/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    fuck that they should focus on this crap and leave our 2d alone!

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:31 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I was extremely offended. Material this far over the line makes beer commercials seem like nothing. Good thing I'm not the only one butthurt and we can stop this abomination.

    Comment by Busy
    05:35 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    All the ads about shaving products for woman are way more...eww...18+

    Avatar of Tiedupinknots
    Comment by Tiedupinknots
    05:37 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    WOW Now that's what I call sarcasm!!!!

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:50 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    he was dead serious, you know.

    Comment by Schrobby
    07:31 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    If he really (I think not) was serious he's a shining example of an asshole.

    Avatar of Miroku74
    Comment by Miroku74
    05:33 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well, it's the UK's sandbox, advertising-wise, but still....

    Jesus-Fucking-CHRIST! >< They're more prudish than our 'feminists' and moralfag population here in the US! Didn't the Puritans LEAVE the UK because they were too lax?! o_0 Or did some of them sneak back in while no one was looking?

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:42 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The latter seems more likely. The Pilgrims started their colony in 1620, the English Civil War lasted from 1641–1651, and Cromwell's religious beliefs were Puritan in nature.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:15 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    No, because the UK is the most politically correct country in the world. Seriously, they would even ban their own St. George's Cross fearing it might offend the muslims.

    It's over. UK is finished.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:34 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I can get 6 people to complain that the United Kingdom exists.

    If I can get them to write to the UK government do you think they'll cater to those 6 people and disband their ****ing moralistic jackass country?

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:09 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    This is pretty win.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:23 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Go for it! The UK is busy breaking itself down and apart anyway. This would just hasten it.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:34 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I always find hilarious how puritanists think that by closing their eyes all evil will go away...

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:25 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    And how they think no one could ever _like_ being bound up, spanked (she looks like she wants), and taken hard (definitely she wants).

    But no~... She's bound up against her will and is about to get raeped.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:38 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I don't know, she doesn't look too upset to me. Maybe a little bored, but it looks like shes smirking a little. So all in all I think she was just annoyed at how long the photo shoot was taking.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:57 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    if you look closely, you can indeed make out a slight bit of acted submission/pain/reproach. but it's very slight and any sane human can make out that it's not real.
    the justification is typical too: we see that it's not offensive at all, but we ban it anyway. just because.

    how about, say, 7 people complain that they do NOT find the ad offensive and want it back on display?

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:40 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Okay, the brit shits are starting to piss me off

    Comment by Anonymous
    Comment by Anonymous
    06:13 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    They should just stick with their trannys.

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:55 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hey don't blame us for the retarded bullcrap this nanny state pushes on us. We didn't even elect Gordon Brown. I am actually going to complain that I don't find the ad offensive and who knows maybe they'll stop this stupid charade. gotta admit it's unlikely that they'll do it.

    Anyone else who lives in the UK please do the same.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:50 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    fucking feminazis!!! freedom of expression is dead.

    Comment by Busy
    05:51 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Actually it was men who decided that since at the ASA mainly men work.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:57 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well, they aren't going to avoid getting a bad rep unless they actually stand up and do something for free speech. So tough shit, feminazis.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:31 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Actually it was feminazis who lobbied for a policy/code of practice change in how the ASA handles advertisements. Obviously the organization's leaders (men) of the ASA decided to lube up and bend over and taste some feminazi cock.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:42 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    +1

    Avatar of echelon64
    Comment by echelon64
    05:56 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Rape bad, child sex changes good?

    Avatar of Gatsby
    Comment by maga
    05:58 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    "visibly upset"?

    She looks more bored then anything else and since when is showing your thigh considered something perverse? What is this the 1800s?

    Avatar of Fonzer
    Comment by Fonzer
    06:00 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I blame people dirty minds thinking that it was that wrong,since people don't think well sometimes.The way they think what will happen or what happened is not right,the pic shows you only that moment there is no before or after moment.
    I find this artistic,nothing more nothing less.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:07 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    While I don't really agree with the banning, it's just a piece of tastless errr ...art?





    Post Comment »

Popular

Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments