china-national-day-60th-anniversary-parade-military-women-5

china-national-day-60th-anniversary-parade-tanks-3

china-national-day-60th-anniversary-parade-missles-19

China has celebrated its 60th anniversary of communist domination with a huge show of military force, with a colourful parade of tanks, soldiers and even nuclear weapons rolling through central Beijing.

China’s premier Hu Jintao clung to empty Marxist rhetoric as he watched as 200,000 people and hundreds of military vehicles participate in the grand parade:

“The development and progress of New China over the past 60 years fully proved that only socialism can save China and only reform and opening up can ensure the development of China, socialism and Marxism.”

State media boasted of the sophistication of China’s latest military hardware, saying 52 new “indigenously developed” weapons were on display for the first time.

china-national-day-60th-anniversary-parade-armored-vehicles-10
china-national-day-60th-anniversary-parade-armored-vehicles-11
china-national-day-60th-anniversary-parade-armored-vehicles-12
china-national-day-60th-anniversary-parade-armored-vehicles-2
china-national-day-60th-anniversary-parade-armored-vehicles-3
china-national-day-60th-anniversary-parade-armored-vehicles-4
china-national-day-60th-anniversary-parade-armored-vehicles-5
china-national-day-60th-anniversary-parade-armored-vehicles-6
china-national-day-60th-anniversary-parade-armored-vehicles-7
china-national-day-60th-anniversary-parade-armored-vehicles-8
china-national-day-60th-anniversary-parade-armored-vehicles-9
china-national-day-60th-anniversary-parade-armored-vehicles
china-national-day-60th-anniversary-parade-cadets
china-national-day-60th-anniversary-parade-floats-2
CHINA-NATIONAL DAY-CELEBRATIONS-PARADE (CN)
CHINA-NATIONAL DAY-CELEBRATIONS-PARADE (CN)
CHINA-NATIONAL DAY-CELEBRATIONS-PARADE (CN)
CHINA-NATIONAL DAY-CELEBRATIONS-PARADE (CN)
CHINA-NATIONAL DAY-CELEBRATIONS-PARADE (CN)
CHINA-NATIONAL DAY-CELEBRATIONS-PARADE (CN)
CHINA-NATIONAL DAY-CELEBRATIONS-PARADE (CN)
CHINA-NATIONAL DAY-CELEBRATIONS-PARADE (CN)
china-national-day-60th-anniversary-parade-military-women-3
china-national-day-60th-anniversary-parade-military-women-4
china-national-day-60th-anniversary-parade-military-women-5
china-national-day-60th-anniversary-parade-military-women-6
CHINA-NATIONAL DAY-CELEBRATIONS-PARADE (CN)
CHINA-NATIONAL DAY-CELEBRATIONS-PARADE (CN)
CHINA-NATIONAL DAY-CELEBRATIONS-PARADE (CN)
CHINA-NATIONAL DAY-CELEBRATIONS-PRADE (CN)
CHINA-NATIONAL DAY-CELEBRATIONS-PARADE (CN)
CHINA-NATIONAL DAY-CELEBRATIONS-PRADE (CN)
CHINA-NATIONAL DAY-CELEBRATIONS-PARADE (CN)
CHINA-NATIONAL DAY-CELEBRATIONS-PARADE (CN)
CHINA-NATIONAL DAY-CELEBRATIONS-PARADE (CN)
CHINA-NATIONAL DAY-CELEBRATIONS-PRADE (CN)
CHINA-NATIONAL DAY-CELEBRATIONS-PARADE (CN)
CHINA-NATIONAL DAY-CELEBRATIONS-PARADE (CN)
CHINA-NATIONAL DAY-CELEBRATIONS-PARADE (CN)
CHINA-NATIONAL DAY-CELEBRATIONS-PARADE (CN)
CHINA-NATIONAL DAY-CELEBRATIONS-PARADE (CN)
CHINA-NATIONAL DAY-CELEBRATIONS-PARADE (CN)
CHINA-NATIONAL DAY-CELEBRATIONS-PARADE (CN)
china-national-day-60th-anniversary-parade-missles-19
CHINA-NATIONAL DAY-CELEBRATIONS-PARADE (CN)
CHINA-NATIONAL DAY-CELEBRATIONS-PARADE (CN)
CHINA-NATIONAL DAY-CELEBRATIONS-PARADE (CN)
CHINA-NATIONAL DAY-CELEBRATIONS-PARADE (CN)
CHINA-NATIONAL DAY-CELEBRATIONS-PARADE (CN)
china-national-day-60th-anniversary-parade-missles-25
CHINA-NATIONAL DAY-CELEBRATIONS-PARADE (CN)
china-national-day-60th-anniversary-parade-missles-3
CHINA-NATIONAL DAY-CELEBRATIONS-PARADE (CN)
CHINA-NATIONAL DAY-CELEBRATIONS-PRADE (CN)
CHINA-NATIONAL DAY-CELEBRATIONS-PARADE (CN)
CHINA-NATIONAL DAY-CELEBRATIONS-PARADE (CN)
CHINA-NATIONAL DAY-CELEBRATIONS-PARADE (CN)
CHINA-NATIONAL DAY-CELEBRATIONS-PARADE (CN)
china-national-day-60th-anniversary-parade-missles
CHINA-NATIONAL DAY-CELEBRATIONS-PARADE (CN)
china-national-day-60th-anniversary-parade-naval-cadets-3
china-national-day-60th-anniversary-parade-naval-cadets

CHINA-NATIONAL DAY-CELEBRATIONS-PARADE (CN)
china-national-day-60th-anniversary-parade-tanks-2
china-national-day-60th-anniversary-parade-tanks-3
china-national-day-60th-anniversary-parade-tanks

CHINA-NATIONAL DAY-CELEBRATIONS-AIR SHOW (CN)

China insists its huge military buildup is peaceful in intent, but with the past 60 years having seen China attack Vietnam, Taiwan, Tibet, India, Russia and the UN in Korea, many wonder just what it intends to do with this vast arsenal.

Via Xinhua.


    Post Comment »
    731 Comments
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Comment by Anonymous
    18:51 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    China will surpass US militarily in ~20 years. Admit it, USfags.

    CHINA STRONG

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:03 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    To the very first comment.

    Are you retard? It has already been passed!

    They have 1 million soldier men, while U.S. have just one or two poor faggots.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:48 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    since China and Pakistan are friends. I support china!!

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:59 18/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    you are good men

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:09 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    with their lego tanks?

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:56 27/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    China so small, makes small things look not so small.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:16 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Tienzhou STRONG!

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:27 08/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Anonymous is a child with no mother

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:01 21/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    As a Chinese, I very proud, then I want to say. See the comments of your I smiled. Don't know whether to laugh your ignorance. Or say you are S B. Junk Americans think things in it. In my eyes you birds are not only in China, not more than 10 years of economic in accordance with wood schedule can be you the United States of america. Like many Chinese technology technology. I think you are not even the United States of america. China slowly in China only 10 years beyond the United States economy beyond the United States only 50 years of military basic can be completely over the United States of America in the. Like you these American waiting to be slaughtered. With the global anti American appeal lay strong. I believe that the United States of America in the global military power, a year than a year

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:22 22/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    We all want to live free and happy, but we insist on living in fear of others. We must educate people about the importance of life, not death. The way to live in peace with one another and nature. We have become detached from our own Earth, which will outlive us all. China's power will not bring happiness to the world, nor China. We must put down our weapons, brothers and sisters. There is no need for weapons to kill each other. This is not the way we want to live. Fear is a negative driving tool, not contentment. Think before you write about China's power. If you are angry at my message, it is because someone has told you not to think for yourself and know what is right. Wake up, sheep!

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:36 27/11/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    why all those warring comments? Instead of spending trillions into military hardware, I think the world should develop to free AV and real life eroge to all of us... Yeah we will be shooting every night but it won't kill... XD

    Comment by Schrobby
    21:12 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Look at that! What a nice target to drop some nukes on...

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:17 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    not that significant as ur asshole

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:08 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    gg

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:38 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    gg + 2

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:47 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's unlikely CHina will be economically superior much less militarily superior to america in 20 years. Reports put China's economy surpassing America's in more like 40 years, assuming china's robust growth. By which time the chinese may have a competent and comparable military that lacked the large economic heft amer had up to then enjoyed. Still, equal or surpassing military strength wouldn't be necessary to make 'China strong'. A relative diminishment of Amer military strength in Asia via Chinese strengthing would do enough to deterrent amer involvement in Chinese affrairs assuming the costs of war with china were too great a cost. So china wouldn't need to surpass amer but just diminish it's tactical advantages, which it is already doing and not by convential means but asymmetrical means. All in all, times in history were major power shifts occured whether economically or militarily saw wars hammer out a new balance of power so a likely confrontation between amer and china may occur. On the other hand, China's large population and untaped economic and military potential will be quickly sabotaged by it's aging population. While it is the largest fastest growing economy in the world with constant perceptions of challenging american hegemony, their population is demographically stagnant and will see a hug wave of aging retirees hit their economic system about the time it's supposed to surpass amer economically. currently, all industrializing and advanced states require large amts of capital and energies to support continually longer living and expensive costing older persons. simply it'll be a huge drag on further growth. assuming that dynamic is still viable in 40 years.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:53 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    the politicians may like to strong arm each other to gain support from the masses but in truth, the us and china's fates are so intertwined that noone is likely ever going to attach each other. theres just too much business to be done!

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:27 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Never underestimate the depths of human stupidity/folly.

    Avatar of Tito-Machete
    Comment by Tito-Machete
    00:13 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    true. at this point the US owes China billions in loans. so why would the want to attack their imperialistic ''enemy''? the US imports so much stuff that it represents almost 60% of all China's exports.
    there is so much money to be made if they are at peace then war between them. attacking each other would only cost them and no profits would be gained. the only people who would gain something is the country's who would lend them cash after the war to rebuild. so they rather arm other country's to wage war, then be in war them self's. a conflict its self has no real value. the true value, is in the debt that it creates. You control the debt, you control everything.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:47 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Am I the only one that thinks that most of those new things, look like either toys, sometihng out of a video game, or what you would see trying to fight off Godzilla.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:00 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    They might look like toys, but inside some of those barrels are SA-300 series SAM missiles each 10m long. Enjoy having a missile half the height of Gundam chasing your plane at mach 3.5. None survived that yet and just SA-6 shot down American stealth fighter in Serbian war.The weird looking APC might be amphibious which is suitable for their terrain.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:41 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    So the ridiculously retarded looking toy-like exterior which could potentially make someone die from either laughter or puking are just disguises? Ingenious! 'Cos from the way that they look, I think even war-haters won't mind having them. Heck, if nobody announced that this was supposed to be a military parade, I think many would mistaken this whole thing for some mega cosplay fest or something.

    Comment by Dark Mage
    16:09 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yah the do look like toys I wonder would they release lead tainted smoke when they're burning.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:04 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    中华人民共和国万岁! 全世界人民大团结万岁!

    DEATH TO AMERICAN IMPERIALIST PIGS!!
    DEATH TO 小日本!!

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:51 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    if you knew your chinese history, china's greatest enemy has always been themselves. The warring eras, the mongol invasion, the muslim invasion, the burning of ships and self seclusion during the 17th century, the boxer rebellion that led to japanese occupation which eventually led their invasion. All caused by internal factors.

    But its great to know that your making a difference right? rather than just mouthing shit off on the internet and going back to your mundane reality. right? right??

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:44 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Obviously you DON'T know your Chinese history. How could you force the dogma of Chinese unification on even history? For example, there was no "China" in your sense during the Warring States era, each state had different language, script, measuring system, culture etc. etc. The "unification" in the modern sense was first achieved under the brutal, barbaric and military rule of a tyrant who called himself "Shi Huang Di" (first emperor). At the time of Mongol invasion, Northern China (in a geographical sense) and Southern China have long been governed separately by different regimes such that in the discourse back then they were referred to with different names. So where was your so called "China"? Where was Xizang, Xinjiang and Dongbei in Shihuangdi's rule? Where do you draw the legitimacy? By now you should have realised the the current boundaries of China were taken straight from the Imperial Qin Dynasty, whose territory was obtained purely from conquest. So this "China" you speak of is really a geographic IMPERIALIST legacy, is that the sort of historic legitimacy you wanna draw from? So stop trying to mess around with "history" narrated in your primary school books, the only legitimacy China can draw from, and really needs, is its governance right here right now. China is not the only country whose borders were drawn by blood spewed from Imperialism, UK & US were no better if not worse. But it's silly to tweak history, not to face issues left by history straight on with a straight face. Let the legitimacy of a country by granted by the way it treats its people right here right now.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:02 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    true, true, agreed.....there were a lot of dogs around bak then, selling their home country...
    but then agen ppl like tat exist in every country

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:08 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You should be thanking the American Imperialist pigs.

    If it wasn't for them, China would be a colonial state of the Japanese empire, and would be in the same situation as Taiwan.

    On second thought, yes, death to the American pigdogs for allowing the Chinese to become independent.

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:18 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hahaha... You got your history wrong. Stalin didn't loan anything to the Americans. It was the other way around.

    Just think. If the US didn't volunteer people in both sides and if Pearl Harbor never happened, things could have been a lot different. But who cares now. What happened happened.

    Does anyone get tired of hearing "China has a long history"? Which China? As far as I know, it has constantly been burning previous dynasties and its own history down. And the current one is suppose to represent or have some resemble the past in some form? You mean like Napoleon and the french monarchy? Please.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:53 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The Japs have tanks fighting against bolt action rifles so no surprise there until the Russians bring their T-34 which is the best tank of the war and Jap tanks could not even penetrate the armour. But for some reason Stalin loaned some of those to Americans to kick some Axis ass.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:27 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    But any japanese victory in East China was like the British victory over the Amer colonies. Cities and population centers were taken but main political opposition spread throughout the chinese frontier that the japanese would never be able to hold on to china especially considering their wide expansion into other terroritories in the pacific. However, if japanese occupation mimicked the Brits in India there's something more plausible. However, Indian occupation came slowly over centuries through active cooperation with the Brits by India princes and warlords.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:14 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The only major setback Japanese suffered on the mainland was the Russian invasion of Manchuguo. At the time of Japanese surrender, Kantougun still held vast part of Eastern China. If it wasn't for the nukes, as far as the Chinese Theatre was concerned the Japanese were still far from defeated.

    Actually, considering the primary objective of Japan's invasion of Chinese mainland was raw material, and that there was rampant warlordism and limited sense of nation state in China back then, a Raj style exploitation could be very possible.

    I was born and spent most of my life in China and I've got to say honestly, if you stare down the barrel of history and try to assess it more neutrally, it was almost impossible for the various elements in China alone to defeat the Japanese militarily in the short term. But that is far from stretching it to say anything like "the Chinese should be thankful of the Americans", because they were in it to the extent it was because they themselves were attacked by the Japanese. WWII has always been praised as a war on Fascism, but really, the world did jackshit against Fascism and only knee-jerked when the shit hit the fan. It's more appropriate to say it was a series of wars by various countries in the world in response to the aggression from militant totalitarian states.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:11 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    LOL own'ed!

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:10 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    L2WWII History

    Go back to your class and fail some more.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:27 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Communists united with the Nationalists in a temporary cease fire and beat back the Japanese when Americans were island hopping in the Pacific.

    And the coalition being lead by communists the US didn't want supplies to go to them, so China pushed the Japanese out with "guns and cannons built by our enemies".

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:36 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    If by "beat back" you mean attempt to mount a defence by hiding in the mountains as the Japanese occupied the the entire eastern part of China, and were busy moving into Indochina and Burma, considering the Chiense beaten.

    The Japanese were not defeated on the mainland until the Russians blitzed into Manchuria, while the IJA were busy slaughtering Chinese guerillas.

    L2WWII History

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:27 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    sigh... why all of you guys just never see the real truth about the war.... every nation just have to work together to eliminate the enemy... didi Brits won the WWII alone? no.. can US stop WWII alone??? no!... u get the rest... even today, with US military's high-tech weapondary and funds, they still needs NATO's help, ISAF. and who's NATO? the EU countries... so... u guys understand? unite we stand, separated we fall... no matter how powerful your military was...

    and... PEACE!!! NOT WAR!!!

    Avatar of erochichi
    Comment by erochichi
    04:36 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    What about US debt to China? Don`t you want your money back? If you destroy USA, bye bye for your loaned money.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:32 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    We all know how China wants to be the number one in everything. Imo, China wants the USA's spot as the global super power.(No, I'm not an American and I do not even live anywhere near America.) For example, I remember there was once when they announced that they no longer wanted the green notes to be dominating the global economy anymore and want to replace them with their currency.

    And for the joint military exercises, just think of them as enemies keeping each other in check ^^

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:05 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    China hasnt even hinted it wants to even start a war with the US.

    Just remember in many cases the China and the US have actually done co-op military exercises. They set each other as the benchmark for military progress.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:02 21/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    As a Chinese, I very proud, then I want to say. See the comments of your I smiled. Don't know whether to laugh your ignorance. Or say you are S B. Junk Americans think things in it. In my eyes you birds are not only in China, not more than 10 years of economic in accordance with wood schedule can be you the United States of america. Like many Chinese technology technology. I think you are not even the United States of america. China slowly in China only 10 years beyond the United States economy beyond the United States only 50 years of military basic can be completely over the United States of America in the. Like you these American waiting to be slaughtered. With the global anti American appeal lay strong. I believe that the United States of America in the global military power, a year than a year

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:56 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    When was the last time China has ever won a war against a foreign power by itself? You know, despite its massive manpower reserves and resources?

    China is like a panda, big body, powerful muscles, and great potential. But all it does is sit on its lazy ass and chew on bamboo sprouts until something comes along and drives it to extinction.

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:22 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Stupid boy, didn't you remember China pushed you 17-country UN troops back to the 38-deg line in Korean war?

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:52 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    china kick americunt ass out of vietnam and north korean. ALLLLLL HEIL BRITANIAAA

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:27 16/03/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    SIEG HEIL! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
    ;-D

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:06 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It doesn't need to win any war u fag, war brings down the economy and resources. that is what has been pulling the US down and the pandas are laughing. look who's laughing then.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:12 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yes, China does not need to win any war. It will simplry build BIG BIG wall around China and keep evil western pig imperiarist out of China forever!

    Again, China will never be a major power. 5000 years of Chinese civilisation has failed to accomplish anything more then make Korea a puppet state.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:25 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You forgot that North Korea boarders China, even a little spill is going to cause major pains in the long run.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:14 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    North Korea is not a puppet state. It's a rabid dog.

    It'd show up to Beijing and ask for money and oil (dog food), and if you don't pay up it'll bare its teeth (reminds you that it's a nuclear nation now).

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:18 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    North Korea is like a rabid dog with no legs. Sure it might hurt if it managed to bite you. But it will never manage to get to you.

    And no, having a nuclear test is not the same as being a nuclear nation with at least 100 nuclear weapons ready for launch within 24 hours notice.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:04 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    wow that was actually easy to understand XD

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:14 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Err, if you didn't realize, the posts are by different people and naturally, they have different view points. They are not paid by anyone to get together and present some rock solid argument to flame China. So you are to see each post as an individual argument and not lump every single piece of info you see together into one argument. You'll go crazy if you try.

    Avatar of Tex_Arcana
    Comment by Tex_Arcana
    05:41 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    To be fair, holding Tibet down isn't exactly a herculean feat.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:30 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    So on one hand, we're saying they're getting ready to war (the article's last comment), and on the other hand we're saying the Chinese are a bunch of pushovers and can't hurt a thing with its facade of an army? A little contradicting, don't you think?

    Seems like everyone is just eager to fling mud that they don't actually care what arguments they're using to do so.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:24 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    china could never win a war their military is too busy oppressing its own people and holding the occupied nation of tibet. what could their military do when the people they are turning their weapons on aren't unarmed civilians?

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:32 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    +1

    dono,i just have something against them... then again, who dosent,

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:47 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    lol, that is the most accurate metaphor i have ever heard of china. And i would know, ive been living in this damned country for 6 years.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:19 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    lol... the old times maybe not that good in war due to lack of modern weapons and funds... but today... i'm sure any real military tactician would know that, it ain't gonna be good fighting with modern China..

    for all those US dudes out there.. China is more than what you see a decade ago.. don't be ignorant... and more importantly... don't say having a war with China... you guys can't even take out the poorly equiped Taliban... so... wanna go high-tech China?? ==' lol

    as for nuke.. if US can nuke China today, i'm sure they have done it longtime ago.. even in Afghan or Iraq.. wanna know why... go read some books about politics, then u'll know...
    *hint... politics is not just about military...
    *ps: i'm no China guy nor pro-China guy...

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:31 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You bomb your bank to steal all its money of course

    Avatar of erochichi
    Comment by erochichi
    04:31 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    USA don`t want to nuke China. USA need to loan money all the time from China. China exports & earn money, USA does not export but spends more then it`s earning. Why bomb your bank?
    Too many war-mongering idiots of every type in this thread. Nuclear war now? Are you really so tired of living?

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:48 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    if china ever falls, so does the whole economy, well unless the curry's can populate

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:19 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    And that's the whole reason the entire world is trying their best to tolerate China's "ME BIG! ME SMASH!!!" attitude and trying to get along with it. If the economy wasn't at risk in the first place, China may not even be here anymore with the way they are acting.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:22 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Don't be too sure of that..
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7058039.stm

    http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,22197362-954,00.html

    Don't underestimate the Panda, he might look cuddly, but he be a dangerous bugger that's for sure. *said in Ozzie accent*

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:50 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The funny thing is although China claimed they are just volunteer army, they used IS-3 tanks (best in the world until 10 years later)and some of these "volunteer peasants" are actually commandos trained by Soviet WW2 veteran commandos.
    Must be surprising when a dirty looking soldier took out a silenced SMG and shot everyone.

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:17 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Clearly another WTF moment for the US.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:01 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    in every war the US has been in, overconfidence usually undermines them...

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:46 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Some Americans did underestimated them in Korean war. Americans almost crushed Pyongyang until magically 1million volunteer with bolt action rifles appear in one night and crushed the opposition all the way into South Korea until the lines stabilized at the DMZ.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:55 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    +1 i fell for it.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:09 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Nuke China?

    I'm installing fallout3 when I see this comment.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:58 05/03/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    "Democracy doesn't work everywhere. Whilst you're at it, nuke Iraq since US's way of fixing wars is generally dropping big bombs."

    I unno, looks like china might have a similar mentality here.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:20 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    春哥纯爷们铁血真汉子!!!

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:33 23/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    春哥纯爷们!铁血真汉子!
    人民好兄弟!父亲好儿子!
    拳上能站人!臂上能走马!
    菊花开瓶盖!一拳套死牛!
    夜御十女枪不倒,菊花百战色仍红!
    春哥纯爷们,纯爷们中的战斗爷们

    Springelder brother pure men! Blood and iron real man! Peoples good brothers!Father good son! On the fist can the standing person, on the arm beable to gallop on horseback! A night of imperial ten female gun, thechrysanthemum hundred awe-stricken looks were still not but actuallyred!

    юди старшего брата весны чисто!Кровь и человек утюга реальный! Братья людей хорошие! Сынок отцахороший! На кулачке может стоящая персона, на рукоятке могл gallop наhorseback! Ноча имперской пушки 10 женщин, взгляды хризантемы 100awe-stricken были все еще не а фактически красный цвет!

    Hommespurs de frère aîné de ressort ! Sang et homme de fer vrai ! Les bonsfrères des personnes ! Bon fils de père ! Sur le poing peut la personnedebout, sur le bras puisse galoper à
    春の兄の纯粋な夫!鉄血の本当の男!
    人民の良い兄弟!父のよい息子!
    こぶしの上で人に立つことができます!腕の上で马を走らせることができます!
    菊の花が咲く瓶の盖!1グラブは牛が死にます!
    夜の御10女性の铳なんと、キクの花の百が色に戦うのは依然として赤いです!
    春の兄の纯粋な夫、纯粋な夫の中の戦闘の夫!

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:57 23/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Springelder brother will save the world.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:42 23/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    你们太糟糕了,要有爱
    you are bad-behaving guys,let’s be more cute~

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:52 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    纯粹为了顶春哥~!

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:47 21/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    推广春哥请自重

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:15 19/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    我遭不住了

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:50 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    look a female army. RAPE for EVERYONE ! ! !
    Roooaaaaaar!

    Would love to be in war with that. Kill one. Rape one. Kill one. Rape one. Endless spree of fun.
    That would be marvelous
    Stopping raping and abusing the civilians and start raping the army..
    teehee

    Avatar of CowExtract
    Comment by CowExtract
    15:39 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Actually, I thought they looked kind of like 8-bit, and pixily.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:56 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You know the scary thing is, i thought the exact same first thing. Lego tanks and men?

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:56 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I couldn't help but think Legos when i saw the multi-color blocky tanks and vehicles...

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:41 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Agreed, I guess they can't afford higher resolution graphics for their tanks :P

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:08 04/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    ah hell who needs better graphics when u have an army of women in pink suits! makes the 8 bit tanks totally worth it

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:30 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    They look awesome (blue tanks and trucks). Plus they're camouflaged when you drive them across the pacific :D

    Avatar of Overt
    Comment by Overt
    02:32 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    EroMango: so they're flying tanks? Amazing.

    Avatar of EroMango
    Comment by EroMango
    02:41 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    hell ya~

    i like post 02:30 :P

    jesus tanks~ ride em above water

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:56 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    blue tanks look fucking awesome. I also seriously fucking love the blue combat uniforms and the pretty colors in the parade. China seriously did a cool thing here.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:50 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Underwater combat, isn't it? No need for subs then.

    Avatar of Dirty_Dingus008
    Comment by Dirty_Dingus008
    04:09 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Fuck the Marxist socialist bullshit, and look at those pictures! It is clear to me that the Lego(tm) company has built 1:1 models that are on clear display here!

    Capitalism in action MotherFuckers!

    Check out all those same height bimbos too, wearing American styled '50s flight stewardess customs as well. That entire parade celebrates the Capitalism that has saved those little bastards from the same fate as Russia!

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:47 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    because blue tanks look pretty? lol

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:07 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    blue tanks are marines... =='

    Avatar of EroMango
    Comment by EroMango
    01:09 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    errrn, use your brains, blue tanks are for camouflaging in the sky, derr~~

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:19 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    anyways offtopic ontopic
    whats with the blue tanks

    Avatar of Tito-Machete
    Comment by Tito-Machete
    23:53 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    actually no. nukes are not explosive on impact like the old bombs. you can shoot it all you want but it wont go off. it has a chip that causes the explosion in a mili second when close to or on impact.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:53 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You sure those nuclear weapons were armed and ready to go? Even then i doubt you could set them of by shooting at them, hollywood physics don't work in real life you know?

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:38 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Is it just me wondering that it was dangerous to expose nuclear weapons? I mean if 5 or so snipers from a decent point shot few rounds into the head or whatever beijing would've been chernojing

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:57 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I bet they'd have sniped the snipers instead. even your average national day celebration would have troops deployed tactically, much less this degree of parade.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:59 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    China's military women don't compare to US.

    Avatar of Ken
    Comment by Ken
    19:08 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (-0.2)

    I wish China and every communism countries in the world got cured by US nuclears and make them democracy! Fair and PEACE!!

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:23 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    If we're going to bomb China for it's massive military power. Why not bomb th US too.

    Seems fair, doesn't it?

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:08 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    replying to an earlier comment, America has spent quite a bit of money on missile defenses that will never be used. Did we really need the lasers?

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:49 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Have you heard of the French Revolution? To be honest, if you scale the civilizations down to the same time scale, you'll find less stability in EU, and even less in NA.

    Aside from that... I find it rather silly that the Chinese decided to flaunt their military technology, considering how bad it could and will make them look in the eyes of the west. The west is trying to portray China as a dangerous nation to justify limiting China's economic and technological development, and the Chinese seem to only want to make things even easier for them.

    What I'm curious about is why people keep thinking it's correct for one country to have military capabilities and not the other? It's one thing to say weapons of mass destruction in Iraq could be taken advantage of by terrorist groups, but aside from that, it should only be fair that every sovereign nation be capable of defending and counterattacking, or none capable of them at all. To argue that only the US will use them for what's 'right' or 'good' is extremely egotistical.

    21:55 Anon has it right. China is a communist country only in name now. Majority of the corporations in China compete on a free market.

    On a last note, I think you'll find that the term republic actually fits the US better than democracy. Not much difference in actuality, just thought I'd point that out to all the democracy fanboys here.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:32 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    give it another 100 years, whats meant to be will be.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:29 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    China has a long history.

    That's about it. It hasn't had a steady government and it keeps getting overthrown internally or externally. The EU at least has kept it for over 500 years without major government changes like China. Heck, how many book burnings did China have?

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:53 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Maybe communism isn't so bad afterall. They seem to have a pretty colourful army, which says alot about communism.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:08 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    most ppl on sankaku dont even know wtf democracy actually consists of, they just assume its a good thing be cause it's whats been taught to them

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:13 23/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    嘛,我来说什么的呢,其实也没什么,有些同学你们的英语实在是太糟糕了,赶紧给我回家,还有上面的……你真的是韩国来的?你确定你不是火星来的?

    还有说道导弹防御系统……为什么有人会认为漫天撒网就能构造一个完美的防御系统……越大的防御系统,它的弱点就越致命,不如想想马奇诺防线的教训。

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:32 24/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    hey, english or GTFO

    ami clear?

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:48 24/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    什么东西,我想问问你们这些人的国家的军队是干嘛的?中国的军队是以和平为目的的,但并不是说不能给你打仗吧,中国打越南和印度哪个不是自卫反击,怎么,不相信么?那好,我问问你,中国打这两个国家后占领过他们的国土么,掠夺过什么资源么?中国打台湾,你们管得着么,台湾本来就是我们中国的;中国打西藏,同样道理,再说,那叫解放西藏;中国在朝鲜战争打败联合国军怎么了,凭什么你们几个傻逼国家就能代表联合国,就算代表联合国,你们凭什么就帮南韩棒子打北韩?不是为了遏制我们中国么,我们凭什么不能打你们,我就纳闷了,当时怎么没消灭光你们这群联合国的王八蛋,怎么,不同意我的看法?那中国把军队派到你们国家的边境上行不行?
    反过来看看,美国打伊拉克是为了啥?大规模杀伤性武器?你美国找着了么?没找着,那美国总统为什么不作为战犯被审判?你们打掉萨达姆政权后,为什么不滚,为什么占领人家的国家,你们不是侵略么,你们不是为了掠夺人家的石油么?
    这一切归根到底就是美国强大,告诉你们等中国强大了,就是消灭你们这些傻逼的时候

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:58 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Our great Korean nation can easily beat them, should not be so scared, Europeans and Americans would become our second-class citizens

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:01 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Most chinese people dont hate american, in fact they all like the american life style and the movies, I am one of them.

    And you american dont need to worry about that someday chinese will attack american first, cauze the chinese nation is not a attactive one, not like the japanese pig.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:22 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    +divideby0

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:52 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It would be good if Gundam Exia has stolen the show in the military parade. :D

    COMMENCING INTERVENTION BY CELESTIAL BEING.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:49 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    best comment ever!

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:56 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I for one, endorse this plan for American fascism. Can I be chief of internal affairs?

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:06 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    agrees with anon 19:56, I for one think China is a ticking time bomb, and Americans need more discipline. Look at hw much Germany accomplished by doing just that (not being sarcastic)

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:06 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well, the US isn't perfect democracy... if it was, a bunch of people (You and your friends) can just go up, and vote for this guy you hate to be executed.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:36 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    nipon banzai!

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:11 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    +inf.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:10 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    +1 i totally agreed!!!!!

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:24 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    How do you know? Obama has yet to fix anything he promised he would... then again he's a politician.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:31 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    +3 QFT

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:36 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    fu and your bullshit plus ones.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:39 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yes you should be glad I am not American.

    Assuming I was the American president I would openly establish a fascist police state. Nuke China and the middle east. Reintroduce conscription. Invade any nation that so much as says anything I disagree with and build up a thousand girl harem in a marble palace until I inevitably get assassinated or couped.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:15 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Democracy doesn't work everywhere. Whilst you're at it, nuke Iraq since US's way of fixing wars is generally dropping big bombs.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:15 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You know, China only has 300 nuclear weapon, of which only 16 are capable of reaching North America.

    We could nuke them to oblivion, and lose less then a few million.

    Japan will suffer a tad more, but not like they arn't used to it by now.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:17 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Thank god people like you aren't in the White House.

    Avatar of Myballz
    Comment by Myballz
    02:28 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    If I have to see Chinese Invasion force of attractive Chinese women then will see.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:45 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    毛浙东思想万岁!- lol fuk tat shit
    the onli thing i dislike abt china is tat self conceited asshole...
    i love china, i rly do.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:47 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    China wont be around in the next few hundred years or atleast be a threat http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2009/09/22/china-faces-crisis-where-will-we-find-brides/
    32million more male younger generation chiness than female.....do the math....

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:56 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    16 nukes would destroy the US and plus have you idiots ever heard of missle defense? America doesn't have shit on China.

    Avatar of Maikeru
    Comment by Maikeru
    03:29 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Lets launch the gundams ! =D

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:22 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    me is not hate chinese ... me hate china comunism ... yqu aer not ustand me ... yqu aer not in china

    Avatar of EroMango
    Comment by EroMango
    22:30 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    why didn't one of those nukes 'accidentally' go off.... i thought it was part of the fire work display? the magic mushroom cloud extravaganza

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:30 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Play Generals.. it happens..

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:25 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    nipon banzai?
    The Japanese average age is 60 years old 40 years later.

    how can you nipon banzai??m(_ _)m

    I am one of the Chinese people,simply living in Beijing.

    Once the war between US and China outbreak,
    not only we ,residents in China,must be suffering,but who attack us.

    You are tired of the age of peace,aren't you.
    you can play the TV&PC games of war but do not bring your stupid idea to reality.

    is the painful of the war not enough?

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:55 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    China isn't communist country. Socialist, maybe, but certainly not communist. A communist country cannot have free market, since communism assumes state property.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:50 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    16 nukes, that would still do alot of damage to NA

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:52 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    me is chinese .. me sufering in china .. me hate china comunism .. plaes change it to democray .. tfank yqu

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:12 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    LOL! NET RACISM AT IT'S FINEST.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:01 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I think max 5 years . They've manpower ,technologies ,theirs and stolen ;] aand rescources ofcourse .

    Avatar of GANTZ Playboy!
    Comment by GANTZ Playboy!
    19:22 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Not as soon as we get Obama out and our Military back in 2012!...sides, They'll fall into decadence and Capitalism...you'll see.

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:49 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    So they'll be like America?

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:48 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    china and russia have both surpassed the us in military. believing otherwise is sheer idiocy and ignorance.

    in fact... russia never surpassed the us, for the us never even came close to russia, be it on technology, quality of soldiers or hardware.

    of course, us people love to say it is otherwise because it makes them feel proud and comfy. They make lots of movies and games about it too. Its quite sad.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:36 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Dunno...

    Given China has been trying to steal outdated US hardware I highly doubt that. One US B-52 bomber drops a tactical nuke during that rally and all of China's military strength would have been cut in half.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:54 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Assuming it can get past the net of radars that would be undoubtedly be stationed in and around the country.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:34 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    yeah its going to get broke in few years with its ridiculous military budget , just like USSR

    watching retards wasting their money never gets old .

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:31 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    why US is in so much money problem???
    easy... all the money goes to the military... =) really retarded... lol

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:50 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    military expenditures
    $70,308,600,000 China
    $48,860,000,000 Japan
    $636,292,979,000 USA

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:10 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    funny how anon 22:50 said that.

    I'd be amused to see how much of USA's GDP is real. Its probably -120% real GDP since their nation is built off borrowing.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:12 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well as he said watching retards throw there money never gets old. By the way hope you are having a good time Bush.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:31 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I know that genius. That's why i wish him a good time where ever he is now.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:08 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    ^He's not in office anymore.


















    Post Comment »

Popular

Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments