Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2 Xbox 360 vs PS3



A graphical comparison of the new PS3 version of Tecmo’s breast physics engine Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2 to the Xbox 360 original reveals the PS3 version to be spectacularly superior to the Xbox 360 version, just as some had suspected.

Xbox 360 screens are above those of the PS3 version:













Whether this is a case of Tecmo not bothering with the Xbox 360 version, or, as many will doubtless like to claim, the PS3’s capabilities being superior to those of the Xbox 360, is an interesting question.

It might be wondered why they do not highlight this rather spectacular difference in their marketing efforts…

The game is due worldwide October/September.

Via Hachimaki.

    Post Comment »
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Comment by Anonymous
    01:41 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Even thou I've been a console gamer since the 80's, I have to say, put this on a PC powered by a mid-range or top end video card, and it will consistently look better than any console. e.g. SF4, GTA VC, SA & 4, among others.

    Just add in an XBox 360 controller, cheaper prices on the games, portability if you have the $$$ for a gaming notebook...etc, etc.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:32 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    how much does a top end video card w/ complete tower cost? how much does a ps3/xbox cost?

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:06 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Depends on the deal you got, newegg offers some deals with video card and (good ones) LCD combos sometimes, which is 300 or so.

    Also you can get a upper tier card (8800GT, 9800GT, GTS250) for 75, 90, to 110ish USD.

    You can get a gaming grade PC with HDMI out for like 380 (especially with the motherboard, cpu, and ram combos on newegg).

    Plus you can do more than just game on a PC, like work?
    Plus PS3 doesn't have OS mode anymore, so don't try to pull that computer stuff other than horrible web browsing.

    Avatar of crabdog62482
    Comment by crabdog62482
    02:00 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hi, I'm a PS3, and I'm sick of this "my system is superior" crap. Let's be honest. The only reason either system's version looks better is because the makers put more effort into one version than the other or didn't know how to use one system's hardware better than the other. The PS3 version looks better, not because of superiority, but because like many XBOX360 exclusives, their version was a hastily acquired beta test.

    On another note, PS3 is the better of the 2 systems solely for the fact that its owner's don't have to buy a new one every few months or send out to have their repaired several times a year. Reliability is HUGE when the consoles are so similar.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:19 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)


    is there gore on this version for ps3???

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:41 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    My goodness, this topic stinks just as bad as fanboys. Can someone spray some Febreeze in the room, you guys are making my ayes water from your fanboy stench. No wonder booth babes hate their jobs, you guys smell.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:28 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    wtf did they take out the gore?, that makes the game look better

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:48 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Aside from fanboy faggotry, is it really all that big of a surprise that a re-made game looks better? You could re-make a game on the same system and it would look better. It's called progress.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:32 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    shiny ninjas are gay ninjas.
    also ayane looks like a pig in the 360 but the ninjas looks cooler in the 360. i choose ayane.

    Avatar of Ero-Kurage
    Comment by Ero-Kurage
    04:28 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    This kind of comparison can go on & on. I have PS3 only, so my decision is to get it if the PS3 version is good, doesn't matter to me how the 360 version is, coz I'm not going to buy a 360 for just this game. If theirs is better, good for them, my decision is whether it is acceptable on PS3.

    Avatar of maxchain
    Comment by maxchain
    03:04 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well, if nothing else, it seems they're consistent about that PS2-looking hair.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:46 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    With 2 extra years in developement,...It better look better! All I'm saying is this game is two years old. If you're just playing this game, you are late for the party!

    Avatar of Falk5T
    Comment by Falk5T
    23:41 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Wow, they really differ LOTS, while PS3 looks really good, the Xbochs looks really shitty compared to PS3 xD

    Comment by HyperKnuckles99
    22:49 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I don't really give a shit about the graphics, I just hope it plays good and that it's fun.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:48 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    i alwys knew that the new chairman of team ninja will rock, PS3 FTW!!!!

    Avatar of El Chaos
    Comment by El Chaos
    00:53 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Then the next, Itagaki-free Ninja Gaiden rolls in, it sucks balls, and everyone goes to buy the new game he's developing, which will probably be a Xbox 360 exclusive since the man knows his shit, just like Kamiya (the Bayonetta dude, FYI).

    And everybody wins. Lol.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:24 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    there is no Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2 on Xbox 360...only ps3


    Comment by Anonymous
    22:50 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Sir, you are a FUCKING IDIOT. Get off the Internet and don't come back until you grow pubes and a brain.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:49 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    there is only Sinja Gaide 2 on xbox, not sigma.... was published half a year ago...of course now PS3 version looks better, it would be stupid not to update graphics... go fuck yourself, you moron

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:52 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    sorry...not half a yer....more than a year...

    tear of your arm, pour out gas all over and burn

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:50 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    A retard who doesn't catch the joke D:

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:53 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    yeap, very funny,hahaha my stomach

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:35 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Owner of both Consoles Win. I got PS3 but Dynasty Warriors 6 and Virtua Fighter 5 are better on Xbox 360 then PS3 so i will rather buy it for Xbox.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:30 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    everyone knows that graphics don't make the game. if "the PS3’s capabilities being superior to those of the Xbox 360" just like this website claims. how come the sales in consoles have been low? or an even better question, how come xbox has an average of 7.1 games sold per console, versus 3.0 on the ps3?

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:29 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    once again, this site tries to belittle xbox.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:32 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)


    Avatar of El Chaos
    Comment by El Chaos
    00:55 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Are you posting this stupid crap on every single PS3 blowjob post Arte does, or what?

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:34 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)


    Avatar of El Chaos
    Comment by El Chaos
    07:41 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)


    Comment by Anonymous
    00:19 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Meh, the ps3 version is missing the blood. So it's not as cool looking.

    Also, another fanboy ps3 post on Sankaku. -_-

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:17 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The blood is still there only less of it (You know, more realistic).

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:00 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    PS3 = WINS
    360 = Enjoy the red light of death

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:52 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Dear all fanboys,



    Other readers.

    Avatar of Icy-nee-san
    Comment by Icy-nee-san
    23:59 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The breasts alone made the PS3 version better then the 360 :p

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:51 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It goes back and forth, one game looks better on the PS3 but plays better ion the 360 and vice versa, on and on, and on,......I tried both versions of Wet and the 360 versions clearly looks better(better frame rate), with gameplay also slightly better.The PS3 has games that are better on it to.Comparing games from system to system and getting heated up about it is something for the witless,immature, and fanboys.I have both systems and love them both for what they both offer.You won't catch me on Wii boards flaming Wii owners about how superior my 360/PS3's and their games are to the Wii's however.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:57 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Except Wet was shitty to begin with?

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:41 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)


    Avatar of Zophier
    Comment by Zophier
    02:20 23/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    fatimmortal said:
    Actually, my guess on the reason of why the 360 version sucks horribly is due to HDR being turned off.

    HDR is..

    " a set of techniques that allow a greater dynamic range of luminances between light and dark areas of a scene than normal digital imaging techniques or photographic prints."

    Basically, it just makes stuff look much more better.

    of course you have to consider PS3s already better graphics engine IMO

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:30 23/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Screenshot 1: PS3 version lacks depth of field effect. 360 wins.

    2: Boobs are far bigger in 360 version.

    3: Ryo has weird arms and eyes in PS3 version. WTF?!

    4: PS3 version suffers from jaggies.

    5: Jaggies on PS3 due to shiny plastic-wrap lighting. I thought PS3 owners hated these kind of effects?

    6: Lots more jaggies on PS3 yet again.

    7: Pictures 1 to 6 rendered null and void. PS3 wins!

    But seriously, no technical superiority has been demonstrated here. The PS3 shots are mainly just high contrast versions of the 360 ones, and the smaller details usually go in the 360's favour.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:29 23/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Neither one of them has very good graphics.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:36 23/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    letter from an honest man,
    as previously stated(but sadly only once or twice), an intelligent person, who doesnt let their fanboy status for any console numb their judgement, would own both consoles or at least recognize the ups and downs of all systems..PS3: at the end of the day is "capable" of putting on the big show for gamers, sadly,.. it rarely HAS. 360: lots of great games that no one else has, but it isnt as bright and colorful.. even the richness of dark colors is better on the PS3.. but again in an honest intelligent persons mind this is called balance and what makes gives the market a place to grow.. no competition leads to lazy development standards.
    also note neither system has samus, mario or link.
    final note. 14 months(give or take) had best make a prettier game.. console doesnt come into this.. would the 360 be capable of all the changes no.. many yes. ultimately who cares. buy what YOU want and let the rest of us enjoy what we want.
    PS. bouncing tits hardly makes a game any better. it might do something for a real girl.. but not a game

    Avatar of Bahram
    Comment by Bahram
    13:20 24/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Man, I disagree with you. Owning both systems is not always possible for ALL. Especially under these economic circumstances. Next, the pros and cons you gave are, in all honesty, dumb.

    Why? Sure, the PS3 does put on a pretty show, and there ARE games for it. The 360 DOES have a wider range, but there are also loads of crap. Kameo anyone? 99 Nights? Oh, guess what. That's subjective, so that doesn't even matter. What about the reliability of the systems? the PS3 is clearly more reliable, versus the 360's laughable life expectancy. And that's proven.

    Getting back to the economic limitations, in these times, WHY bother worrying about which system has more games? Just concentrate on getting the ones YOU like.

    And why the fuck would some people (like me) care about Mario, Link and Samus? They are NOT equal to "TEH BESTEST GAEMS EVAR".

    Those arguments you gave are shallow. We should just worry about WHICH system is the correct one for our interests. Fucking period.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:31 23/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    you people should get blind in the next few years.

    seriously, why is bloom effect so important nowadays?

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:34 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Whats with all the bloom effects?

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:19 23/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    wow pretty galz get chained xD

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:20 03/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    this is unfair 2 different games xbox came out a year before. ps3 has frame jumps anyways xbox doesnt

    Comment by Anonymous
    Comment by Anonymous
    03:38 12/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Wow, the pleasefixme got its ass kicked all up and down the block. The 360 looks better because the lighting is worse, textures are flatter and there's a lower polygon count as well as lower resolution? Do you morons actually hear yourselves? Bwaaa haa haaa go home and cry little xbot fangirls, your console is already out dated.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:24 02/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    They are not. God damnit Japanese developers admitted the only reason the do XBOX exclusives for a year is because Microsoft gives tham a lot of money. They then admit to, after a year, port the games to PS3 with a LOT more extras, revamped graphics and so on. Look it up, it's on an interwiev with a developer.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:35 30/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Who cares anout the graphics? As long as a game has good gameplay, I'll play it. That's why people still play old SNES and Genesis games.

    Comment by FoolyDooly
    11:15 26/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    do I want black armor or black shining armor... hmmm

    Post Comment »


Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments