Bandai Namco Shamelessly Lied to Xbox Testers

patty-fleur-moe.png

Bandai Namco has been caught in a rather embarrassingly brazen lie to upset Tales of Vesperia beta testers, adding further to the controversy surrounding Microsoft’s efforts to secure Japanese exclusives for its console.

tales-of-vesperia-deceit-2.jpg

The Xbox 360 beta version contained a mysterious room in which a girl’s pirate hat could be found in a drawer, “with the barely legible name Pa… written on it.”

When the PS3 version was announced to have pirate loli character Patty Fleur, Xbox 360 testers quickly remembered the room and its incriminating contents.

Confronted some months ago, Namco replied “There is certainly such a scene, but it has no connection whatsoever with Patty.”

Players visiting the room in Perfect Tales of Vesperia were however greeted with this sight:

pattys-room.jpg

Yuri: “Hmm… So you were staying at a place like this?”

Though nobody really expects them to come clean about the pile of money they received from Microsoft in order to develop what they secretly planned as a beta version of the full PS3 release, they might at least be expected to exercise more finesse in placating the understandably irate testers…


    Post Comment »
    270 Comments
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Comment by Anonymous
    21:09 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Show me your rage!

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:51 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    ^RRRRRAAAAAGGGGGEEEEE!!!!!

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:08 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    AAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRR!!!

    Blasted land dwellers!!

    Avatar of fatimmortal
    Comment by fatimmortal
    01:29 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    LLLLLLLLLLLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLIIIIIIIIIIII.

    NEED MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRR

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:38 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Rooooaaaaaarrr!

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:43 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Im angry.
    So angry.

    So angry that i cant see the faces of those whining 360 Otaku LIVE in front of me. :D

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:57 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    MEEEEEOOOOOOWWWWWW!!!!!!!!!!

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:32 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    BASTARDSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:08 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    >>LIVE

    I see what ya did there

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:45 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    N-Nyaa....

    :3

    Comment by Schrobby
    23:49 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Like I said already, return the game for a full refund because of fraud.
    If everyone does that or sues the shitheads at Bandai Namco will get in serious trouble.

    Avatar of Icy-nee-san
    Comment by Icy-nee-san
    00:01 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Did they ever say it was going to be a exclusive? All i remember them saying is that it was gonna be on 360 :\

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:32 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    They did. That's why MS could easily sue the shit out of BN in addition to illegitimate salemethods.

    Avatar of Dirty_Dingus008
    Comment by Dirty_Dingus008
    00:55 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Smoke it bitch, exclusivity usually lasts from up to 6 months or a year or so.. PERIOD.

    Namco is a THIRD PARTY company and like what happened to Metal Gear Solid 2, a year past after it came out on the PS2 and then showed up on the.. wait for it.. xbox! With a tons worth of EXTRAS!!!!

    Come on everybody, belated RAgE Against that company now!!!!!!

    You, no name, are a ReTard.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:15 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    "MS could easily sue the shit out of BN in addition to illegitimate sale methods." =
    first of all, what was so illegitimate about their sales methods? packaging more content in a year later version you don't get isn't illegal. if it were than every director's cut would apparently be illegal. You not liking something doesn't make it illegitimate.

    second, if losing an exclusive was so easily sue worthy than both MS AND Sony would have a field day making money back from devs.

    third, what would MS get from suing the shit out of Namco? MS can't argue harm. they got exactly what they wanted, a bunch of software moved, consoles sold. apparently all within the amounts they expected.
    so what would they sue for? also, then what? If the Vesperia saga has shown anything its that japanese devs aren't really expecting much from the 360 and are only dev-ing for it because of MS's "superior support"/"grant". MS starts suing, they can kiss a lot of the japanese devs goodbye as they've just gotten rid of the only reason they're working with MS.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:33 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Suing the companies developing for you is totally a good way of getting them to do more work for you in the future, right?

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:25 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Tales of Vesperia : Kingdom of Beta exclusively for Xbox.

    Tales of Vesperia : Golden Sword exclusively for PS3. (New storyline that includes a oirate loli.)

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:41 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    There is no fraud here, Namco Bandai didn't deceive YOU in anyway. They never promised the consumers that there won't ever be another version of the game with more content. So the buyers weren't tricked into buying the 360 version.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:58 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I sense a strong fanboy shield presented by you. Strong with the fanboy you are, yes indeed you are.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:25 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    For me it's still a fraud, the game was released as a brand new Tales game, people payed for a full game and good quality.

    They payed the same price of a full game... For a beta, didn't betas supposed to be free? (Or at least very cheap)

    Avatar of Chris
    Comment by Chris
    13:13 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's not actually a beta though. That's a metaphor used to describe the fact that the PS3 version has extra content.

    It is in fact a full game. So is the PS3 version. They just happen to differ.

    There is absolutely nothing fraudulent going on here, period. You might be able to make an objective claim saying otherwise, but nothing done was illegal.

    Nor was it not already done the other way around with other games. It's just how the industry works.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:24 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    "I sense a strong fanboy shield presented by you. Strong with the fanboy you are, yes indeed you are."
    seems like your Jedi sense is a bit off. you're detecting nothing but yourself.

    as for fraud, and how was it a fraud then?
    -"the game was released as a brand new Tales game" = and thats what you got, a brand new Tales game. was Vesperia released before? i must have missed it.
    -"people payed for a full game and good quality" = no, you paid for what they were selling. they never offered more than that, and you never asked for more. on top of which is thats fraud then sue pretty much every game thats released. want to take a guess how much material ever gets cut just to fit time schedules?
    -"They payed the same price of a full game... For a beta, didn't betas supposed to be free? (Or at least very cheap)" = usually, but as with all things, they are priced at whatever they choose to price them at. if i want to sell a loaf of bread for $100, i can sell it for $100. there's no fraud there. I just won't get any buyers. if you buy something and end up with buyer's remorse over price, that's not fraud, that just makes you a bad shopper.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:16 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    lol there was no fraud. They never promised the 360 owners any extra characters. Also, if anyone states "the game isn't complete", that's an objective standpoint. They could easily argue that they plan to "unlock" more as dlc later. Therefore, no refunds. You can, however, trade it in for the PS3 version ^_^

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:53 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    i am getting tired to all these coverages. no more rage left. Just let it go in peace.

    Avatar of Mr.Demon
    Comment by Mr.Demon
    00:56 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Confrmed 360's a BETA!

    However that money was only for a "Temporaly" exclusive...

    And be happy that now is completea nd play it at ps3...

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:10 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    SOMEONE GET ME MY BELT!!! *snap snap*

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:05 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Artefact, you sure knows how to ignite these nerds' war of the console. Ingenious entertainment i must say~! Troll moar! you're flaming them good! haha!

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:40 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    FALCON PAWCH!!!!!!!

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:17 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    How about renameing the "Games" section of this site into "PS3 fanboy playground" or something like that.

    Every single day I visit there is another of these idiotic "ToV Beta test bla bla" news mainly about a loli character nobody really cares about.

    It's been the same with Tales of Symphonia actually!
    It was released on the Gamecue first later on the PS2. The PS2 Version got some additional stuff because it came out later and the devs had more time to add it and were probably afraid nobody would buy the exact same game that came out for another console a year earlier.

    No will you guys PLEASE get over it already and just enjoy the damn game on whatever console you're playing it?

    Avatar of Chris
    Comment by Chris
    13:23 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Artefact keeps posting these articles because they keep getting a large amount of views and comments.

    If you wanted him to stop, the first thing you should do is not bother reading this article, or commenting on it.

    Otherwise you're just supporting more articles like these.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:03 23/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    This topic isn't exactly exclusively controversial on this site. It's been a subject of debate on 2ch, and other Japanese forums. "Anime, manga, and games, observed from Japan".

    And why not post more articles revolving around a controversial subject? People eat that shit up.

    Avatar of Y10NRDY
    Comment by Y10NRDY
    12:40 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:10 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Haha owned

    But, in all seriousness, Microsoft deserved it with the way they've been paying off developers to secure "exclusive" releases...

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:12 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You act like timed exclusives are something new.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:17 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Not necessarily. I'm just saying that we shouldn't be so critical/judgmental of/ Bamco for "lying" to Xbox owners when Microsoft were the ones who paid Bamco off in the first place. They (Microsoft/Xbox owners) should be glad they got the game at all, let alone a year before PS3 owners got it.

    and with that, let the flamewar begin.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:19 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    What? Those two things have little to do with each other.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:17 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yeah, let's stick it to those damn 360 owners because Microsoft had the highest bid in an auction of a product... those cheap, sneaky bastards!

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:42 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Let me make this easy for you. You paid a shit ton of money. You got fucked. HOW DO YOU FEEL? (baring slightly aroused)

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:43 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Loyalties and betrayals aside, I think the real issue is if there was any breach of contract on behalf of Bandai Namco. There might be major legal issues if there was a contract for ToV to be made exclusively for the 360. Then again, because of such a contract, that might be the reason the PS3 gets an upgraded version instead of a simple port (since it's a different version, it might be considered a different game).
    But that's just the opinion of the player. All legal matters will come out in time.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:26 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I don't understand why people are so negative about Microsoft giving money to Bandai. Would you really have preferred a closer release where instead of getting a "beta" version and a better version, you got two "alpha" versions?

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:34 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    That's not exactly a fair choice, as it basically means choosing between the current situation and what would only be describable as Tales of Pokemon.

    Avatar of EroMango
    Comment by EroMango
    22:00 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    no, microsoft thought they were on the winning side, acquiring a timed tales exclusive where they would be 1 year ahead of their competitor, not suspecting bamco to back stab them by releasing an alpha version for their competitor thus crippling and voiding all initial reasons for paying out large sums of money to hasten and perfect the beta version.

    so they were initially hoping that ps3 would just get a same release but a year later but instead they got screwed over, no ones really negative about microsoft paying out bamco, we just laugh at how they got owned and played over

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:34 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You shouldn't laugh at Microsoft, they got EXACTLY what they wanted. If they hadn't, there wouldn't be anger in the first place.

    The only losers in this were the Japanese Tales fans.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:51 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    What Microsoft is doing is illegal since they are trying to bribe developers so they can own the market. Doing that is usually considered illegal and immoral. The only reasons why they haven't been prosecuted for it is because they pay people off and because the games usually do come out for other systems in time.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:58 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    lol That's a completely ridiculous statement, especially since it's a practice that's followed by all console makers. Sony has done the same in the past as well, so don't blame Microsoft exclusively otherwise you're just sounding like a hypocrite. People really should stop these pathetic devotion towards specific console makers and start focusing on actual games with good gameplay.

    All these high graphic consoles have started to spoil everyone nowadays because "gamers" this generation tend to be nothing but graphic hogs now. I used to remember playing games just for the sheer fun of actually playing though the entire process, despite the fact games used to be low graphics but actual gaming content that could last a minimum of 70 hours to play through and it was still entertaining. Nowadays there are nothing but high graphic cinematics with short 10 hours of gameplay, and people immediately declare it as an amazing "hit". People should really stop caring about graphics and start focusing on the actual fun gameplay aspect again.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:58 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Umm.. Do you even realize that sony paid for exclusives as well in the past? In fact a lot of companies pay for exclusives just to promote their products in the beginning. To only judge microsoft for their choice in this matter is totally unfair.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:38 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    So I wonder how Sony secured the exclusiveness of GTA until the 360 got IV as well, to the crying foul of the Sony fanboys... Milk and Cookies, perhaps?

    I'm just happy we're getting a PS3 'exclusive' beta over on the 360 enhanced, with Cross x Edge. I'll take Etna over a pirate any day.

    Avatar of softbanker
    Comment by softbanker
    Comment by Anonymous
    21:11 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    would you please stop being a stupid PS3 fanboyfaggot? No one cares about those freaky JRPGs. What about Metal Gear heh? Fuck you otaku ps3

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:22 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    What about Metal Gear? If you're talking about that X360 port, you can have it. Raiden was a buttmonkey for a reason...

    Artefact posts articles like these to get a rise out of butthurt fanboys like you.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:30 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The irony is hilarious. How can some butthurt ps3 fanboy call someone else butthurt when they were the ones who whined so much, that namco was forced to release the game on ps3?

    Fanboys are so fucking pathetic. The same people who said Metal Gear Solid 2 was a shitty game because Snake wasn't the only main character. You fags don't know shit about gaming, go fucking stick your dick in your blu-ray drive you piece of shit.

    Avatar of the7k
    Comment by the7k
    06:43 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You really think Namco ported this to the PS3 because of PS3 fanboys? That's the most ludicrous thing I've ever heard.

    This had nothing to do with the fans, brand/system loyalty or anything. There is only one factor in all of this: Money. That's it.

    Why did Namco release it to the 360 first? Money. They got money from Microsoft that allowed them to fund the development of the game without digging into their own cash supply.

    Why did Namco port it to the PS3? Money. The PS3 easily has a greater ownership rate in Japan than the 360 does - it would be stupid not to capitalize on that.

    Namco doesn't care about PS3 fanboys, 360 fanboys or even Tales fanboys. The only people they care about are the stockholders.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:25 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    aww, someone need a booboo

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:29 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    would you please stop being a stupid elitistdouchebag? No one cares about those retarded games you play. What about Gears of War heh? Fuck you douchebag

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:52 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    gears of war II sucks. That game got boring within a day.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:25 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    True enough, to much muscle for my taste.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:40 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    too much till you can taste the armpit..

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:19 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    lol tears of bawww

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:10 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    SUPERMEGAULATR OTAKUS FUCK YOUR MOTHERS AND PLAY YOUR JAPANESE FUCK GAMES!!! PS3 SUCKS!!!

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:41 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    nerd rage phail

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:50 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    dude. this whole website is full of japanese culture/pron. what the fuck do you expect. of course most of us like jrpgs, fuken moron.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:03 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    + 1 to calling the first guy a moron

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:11 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    +2

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:33 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    +300

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:15 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    +9001

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:22 22/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    yes you're a freak, get a life

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:06 21/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    shit got owned








    Post Comment »

Popular

Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments