Schoolboy Gropes 4-Year-Old: “She Didn’t Resist!”

do you mean ironic?

Don't we We all an ironic sarcastic being? AMEN!!

*minus one We*

pr0n!

I'll take the Haruhi loli~

What a bunch of BULLSHIT. SHE'S 4!!!!!! Like she knows what's happening

obviously she didn't know what was happening. only a moron would fall for his defence/excuse.

Obviously it's not a proper defense/excuse, but even a 4-year old has the instinct to resist something she doesn't like, and allow something she's okay with.

Willing or not, this is not something you do to a child. Barely a child mind you, just graduated from baby status.

^Agreed. Not cool, the loli is not ripe yet.

so....what age is a 'ripe' loli?
10?

For most Otakus. The average Eroge age for Loli's is around 8-12. Though considering it's japan they can make even 17 year old's look like loli's *Lucky Star* so it's basically just how they look and not how old they are.
This kid truly had the balls though. Can't hold him reliable since it is Scientifically proven that males run on hormones during adolescence and "proper judgment" is suppressed greatly in situations. Though it's still safe to say he should know better.

To me, this isnt even a matter of age to begin with. Touching ANYONE's body whom you dont know very well in that way is asking for trouble

You can know what's happening when you're 4. Being 4 doesn't mean you're not consenting (though clearly it's not legal, law labels minors as not given capacity). However, not resisting is not consent, because sometimes we do not resist out of fear.

I loled at ''The 16-year-old boy, in his second year at a Kyoto area high school, happened upon a 4-year-old girl at a wholesale store.''

Quoted for TRUTH (goddammit that is just sad)

WIN

WTF!

anon with lots of txt is WIN

Sad truth, candy always works in favor of courts. The lolicons out there think it will never work, because it's the oldest trick in the book, but they overlook that lolis don't know old stuff. Hence they will fall for candy anytime.

Dolls work fine too.

next time they'll be asking for Xbox and PS3s.

I see what you did there

"I'd say so myself, I mean, she can't possibly get traumatized by something she didn't experience as traumatic. It's like"

You guys have the making of a lolicon, or maybe you are one... not understanding she was being groped because she IS 4 doesn't make it all right to proceed.

And the report said she didn't resist, but that doesn't mean shit. For all we know, she could have desperately wanted to run and find her mom.

BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!
MAWRELPHAGG!

HAAAAAA!!!

LOLICOOOOON!

I would have to agree with the whole bunch of text there.

I agree that it was indeed wrong. Traumatic however? Trauma usually involves pain or extreme suffering, the girl in this case was most likely extreamly confused and rather scared, but someone having a traumatic experience is either screaming in pain, crying, or otherwise begging/screaming/running

Children especially are designed to make noise when they are frightened or in danger, so we could prolly safely assume she wasn't in trauma

Its still wrong though...
Had they been in love with each other, i would have different views on the subject: I have serious doubts about the "too young to understand" arguments for anyone is over the age of three

You're implying that Female Supremacy Now give a damn about 3D females.

That's a huge leap of fate... assuming that they care about real girls could get you killed...

As eager as they are to protect the fictional ones, they DO focus more on the problems of real girls/women. Agree with them or disagree, but don't you dare say they don't care about real girls.

they dont care about real girls :>

Equality Noes and UNICEF don't give a shit about real lolis, all they want is attention for hunting the fantasies of men. They are totally unable to help real kids.

not implying that enslavement now cares about real females, i don't really give crap about it (not about females, about EN), just saying that those that pretend to care, and are posting in a forum that clearly wont sympathize with them, should better post in a forum that suits them better, but well, if they leave, i would miss for sure the pleasure of trolling them.

Or Enlightenment.

...by that point it is no longer really the act itself that causes the trauma (if there even is any) but the fact that you make the point to tell them and essentially say "dear, you are a ruined person" when issue could be avoided. The past need not hinder what the future has in store.

If the child isn't damaged, don't damage 'em then!

i disagree with the not knowing thing. Past the age of three, she would prolly on an instictive level know what was going on. Remmember what had happened however? less likely

+1