Schoolboy Gropes 4-Year-Old: “She Didn’t Resist!”

loli-haruhi-shimapan

A schoolboy has been arrested for sexually assaulting a 4-year-old girl.

The 16-year-old boy, in his second year at a Kyoto area high school, happened upon a 4-year-old girl at a wholesale store.

He soon succumbed to curiosity and lifted up her skirt. Encountering no resistance, he then removed her pantsu, and began touching her.

Her mother detected the crime and police were able to identify the boy due to the fact that he had apparently been in full view of security cameras.

Upon his arrest for indecent assault, he explained his crime: “I did it because the little girl didn’t resist.”

Via ZakZak.


    Post Comment »
    177 Comments
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Comment by Anonymous
    12:22 07/09/2009 # ! Quality (+1.0)

    if she didnt resist then that means she wanted it.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:22 27/09/2009 # ! Good (+0.6)

    So I heard you turned 4

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:13 08/09/2009 # ! Good (+0.6)

    The boy must have some loli-groping skills.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:06 08/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    obviously not or he would have got away

    Avatar of Ghostlyy
    Comment by Ghostlyy
    03:25 08/09/2009 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    No, the girl didn't even realise he was groping her.

    It was the mother and the cameras that caught him. If that was in an alleyway, he could have gone on as long as he wanted.

    Comment by Anonymous
    Comment by Anonymous
    16:35 24/04/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    PEDO FUCK SHIT!

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:11 08/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Resistance means she wants it *MORE*, remember, all women want strong men!

    Avatar of Exitium
    Comment by Exitium
    12:33 07/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I can only hope you're being sarcastic. -_-

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:43 07/09/2009 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    no no. He's on to something here...

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:07 07/09/2009 # ! Good (+0.8)

    I'd say so myself, I mean, she can't possibly get traumatized by something she didn't experience as traumatic. It's like

    Poor girl! You got scarred for life!
    What's "scarred"?
    Do you remember what that boy did to you?
    When he tickled me? That felt funny!
    No no no, he ruined your life! He caused tremendous, life-lasting suffering to you!
    But that was fun!
    Oh no, that was the most horrible day of your life!
    I wanna go play.
    Not until you tell the judge he destroyed your life.
    I don't wanna.
    I'll give you candy.
    Okay <3!

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:53 22/06/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    I agree that it was indeed wrong. Traumatic however? Trauma usually involves pain or extreme suffering, the girl in this case was most likely extreamly confused and rather scared, but someone having a traumatic experience is either screaming in pain, crying, or otherwise begging/screaming/running

    Children especially are designed to make noise when they are frightened or in danger, so we could prolly safely assume she wasn't in trauma

    Its still wrong though...
    Had they been in love with each other, i would have different views on the subject: I have serious doubts about the "too young to understand" arguments for anyone is over the age of three

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:04 08/09/2009 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!
    MAWRELPHAGG!

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:17 08/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I see what you did there

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:06 08/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    "I'd say so myself, I mean, she can't possibly get traumatized by something she didn't experience as traumatic. It's like"

    You guys have the making of a lolicon, or maybe you are one... not understanding she was being groped because she IS 4 doesn't make it all right to proceed.

    And the report said she didn't resist, but that doesn't mean shit. For all we know, she could have desperately wanted to run and find her mom.

    Comment by Busy
    20:05 07/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Dolls work fine too.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:31 07/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    next time they'll be asking for Xbox and PS3s.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:50 08/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    HAAAAAA!!!

    LOLICOOOOON!

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:49 09/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I would have to agree with the whole bunch of text there.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:16 07/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I loled at ''The 16-year-old boy, in his second year at a Kyoto area high school, happened upon a 4-year-old girl at a wholesale store.''

    Avatar of Chen-04
    Comment by Chen-03
    17:55 07/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Sad truth, candy always works in favor of courts. The lolicons out there think it will never work, because it's the oldest trick in the book, but they overlook that lolis don't know old stuff. Hence they will fall for candy anytime.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:41 07/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    WTF!

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:02 07/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    WIN

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:48 07/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    anon with lots of txt is WIN

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:34 07/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Quoted for TRUTH (goddammit that is just sad)

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:43 07/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I can only hope YOU'RE being sarcastic

    Avatar of sadron
    Comment by sadron
    01:55 08/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I'll take the Haruhi loli~

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:36 08/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    What a bunch of BULLSHIT. SHE'S 4!!!!!! Like she knows what's happening

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:03 08/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Willing or not, this is not something you do to a child. Barely a child mind you, just graduated from baby status.

    Comment by Nin
    04:22 08/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Obviously it's not a proper defense/excuse, but even a 4-year old has the instinct to resist something she doesn't like, and allow something she's okay with.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:03 08/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    obviously she didn't know what was happening. only a moron would fall for his defence/excuse.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:47 22/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    To me, this isnt even a matter of age to begin with. Touching ANYONE's body whom you dont know very well in that way is asking for trouble

    Avatar of tyciol
    Comment by tyciol
    06:10 22/11/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    You can know what's happening when you're 4. Being 4 doesn't mean you're not consenting (though clearly it's not legal, law labels minors as not given capacity). However, not resisting is not consent, because sometimes we do not resist out of fear.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:58 11/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    For most Otakus. The average Eroge age for Loli's is around 8-12. Though considering it's japan they can make even 17 year old's look like loli's *Lucky Star* so it's basically just how they look and not how old they are.
    This kid truly had the balls though. Can't hold him reliable since it is Scientifically proven that males run on hormones during adolescence and "proper judgment" is suppressed greatly in situations. Though it's still safe to say he should know better.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:56 11/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    so....what age is a 'ripe' loli?
    10?

    Avatar of kajunbowser
    Comment by kajunbowser
    13:34 10/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    ^Agreed. Not cool, the loli is not ripe yet.

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:36 07/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    *minus one We*

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:54 07/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    pr0n!

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:52 07/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    do you mean ironic?

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:34 07/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Don't we We all an ironic sarcastic being? AMEN!!

    Avatar of ChonnyD
    Comment by ChonnyD
    12:38 07/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You guys got trolled.

    Avatar of nocturne
    Comment by nocturne
    12:46 07/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I think it's okay to respond to trolls with spiteful vitriol, though.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:40 07/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    anon fails at detecting sarcasm

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:36 07/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Imbecile Anon 12:22 - a 4 year old girl doesn't even know what's the whole thing that is being done to her. It's like i'm letting you taste a salt as a 4 year old cause i know you don't know that much yet and you'll still gonna try it.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:23 07/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Moral anons should post on equality now forums or something. There's no place for common ethics in this place of the internet, after all this is

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:32 08/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    not implying that enslavement now cares about real females, i don't really give crap about it (not about females, about EN), just saying that those that pretend to care, and are posting in a forum that clearly wont sympathize with them, should better post in a forum that suits them better, but well, if they leave, i would miss for sure the pleasure of trolling them.

    Avatar of Chen-04
    Comment by Chen-03
    18:01 07/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Equality Noes and UNICEF don't give a shit about real lolis, all they want is attention for hunting the fantasies of men. They are totally unable to help real kids.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:46 07/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    they dont care about real girls :>

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:41 07/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    As eager as they are to protect the fictional ones, they DO focus more on the problems of real girls/women. Agree with them or disagree, but don't you dare say they don't care about real girls.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:43 07/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You're implying that Female Supremacy Now give a damn about 3D females.

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:12 07/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    That's a huge leap of fate... assuming that they care about real girls could get you killed...

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:36 07/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Poor little girl probably didn't know what was going on.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:44 07/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You're right, she probably didn't. And I'm sure eventually she'll be told when she can understand it and it'll cause irreversible mental damage.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:58 07/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    If the child isn't damaged, don't damage 'em then!

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:00 22/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    i disagree with the not knowing thing. Past the age of three, she would prolly on an instictive level know what was going on. Remmember what had happened however? less likely

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:42 07/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    ...by that point it is no longer really the act itself that causes the trauma (if there even is any) but the fact that you make the point to tell them and essentially say "dear, you are a ruined person" when issue could be avoided. The past need not hinder what the future has in store.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:56 07/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Or Enlightenment.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:30 07/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hmm...I would support that she actually wanted it LOL

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:31 07/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Or probably didn't know any better as a 4 year old...

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:20 07/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    damn lolicon , we should burn you

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:11 08/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    with the flame of passion of hot lolis

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:16 08/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    +1

    Comment by Ryuhouji
    05:23 10/06/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    everyone has their own tastes... I like loli's too. But only the ones that are animated... Real ones don't interest me. Thogh that Asuka Langley Cosplayer woman sure does..... yummmy.

    Comment by Anonymous

    If I accidentally kill you from behind, then steal everything of value that you possess.. and you don't resist it's okay right..?

    I mean if you didn't want to die or didn't want me to steal all your belongings, you would have tried to resist right..?? I mean the fact that you didn't probably meant that you wanted it to happen right..?

    :D..?

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:25 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    retard

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:37 07/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    That is such a f*cking retarded comparison I hope you are not being serious in using that as an argument against the boy...

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:38 08/09/2009 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    My feeling of any matter is "no harm done, no wrong done". If no one was harmed in the process, then there is no need for harsh punishment. You can say I'm defending the 16 year old. I don't care. I don't think a person's life should be made worse for something inconsequential, because that is what it is. Everyone can walk away from the matter with a slap on the wrist for the 16 year old, and life would just go on with no ill effects.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:59 07/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    And I seriously hope you aren't trying to defend the retard who brazenly molested a 4yr old kid despite being 16.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:57 22/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    seeing how sexual crims have become such a stigma in western societies and japan in paticular, i dont think any punishment was nessacary as soon as the boy came to his senses: he is prolly pissing himself in fear, and with good reason, a sexual crime record means your fucked as far as finding a job is concerned.

    And though it seems quite logical, im against people's lives being screwed over because of something stupid they did as a child or teenager

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:02 08/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    the 4 your was ok with it so maybe when she gets older she has a sexual experience advantage and become a sex god later xD

    nah i dont think the 16 year old boy should be punished to hard i mean when i was 16 i was horny like shit and i think i would ve exploited the situation too but only because i know that she would be ok with it and that she dont see it as an assault

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:51 07/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    If you accidently killed me I'd be ok with it, I'm dead right? Obviously it's not ok for a 16 year old to grope a 4 year old but shit happens.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:10 07/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    L2meme

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:59 07/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    L2detectsarcasm







    Post Comment »

Popular

Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments