Policemen Force Woman to Urinate: “We Didn’t Look”

Amen.

hell ya!

They probably gave her a diuretic or maybe just poked her in the bladder.

i'm in the same boat as phisaki... i end up stood at urinals, unable to pee because people are around

Indeed, I dare not to stand stand beside another man while urinating. I tried urinating beside my friend and ended up laughing uncontrollably.

This is why you don't stand at the urinal adjacent to one in use.

maybe they pumped her o_o

We call this... Bladder Shy!

you mean your penis.

If I had one.

liar

No. I'm not. I'ma chick.

Liar, chicks can't talk.

Can too. :P

I see what you did there.

Matrix Failed.

Matrix failed? Whaaa?

then make me a samwich

you are trying too hard. everyone knows thats how stereotypical weeaboo girls talk.

you have a computer in your kitchen?

How am I talking like a weabo. I don't even know one. :\

Who put the computer in the kitchen!?

Gee, it sure is samefag around here.

My anon, this weeaboo is what true warrors strive for!

Hmm, sorry to ask but what's the hell is a weeaboo anyway???

did someone say weeaboo? *pulls out ping pong paddle*

Before you start acting smart and calling others dumb, you should do well to read the article properly and think of all likely scenarios which may have happened at the scene.

Firstly, there is no mention of the act being performed "on the sidewalk" or in any public places.

In fact, in the original Japanese article, it is stated that she has been taken into custody, after which the police obtaining a warrant for the forced collection of the urine sample from her. So this is just routine order, and nothing out of line.

To put the point in, her urine tested positive for stimulants.

There is also a high possibility that the woman was refusing to cooperate and provide any sort of bodily fluid sample, ignoring the warrant and generally causing problems for the officers who are just performing their duties. When the suspect refuses to cooperate with officers of the law, they can legally use authorised force to ensure their duty is performed.

But that's in part what the lawsuit is about, whether or not the force they utilized was lawful or not, and if not, then the resulting evidence could be inadmissible, depending exactly on how their legal system deals with material like that.

Some systems allow for illegally obtained information to be used in a proceeding.

Example: a burglar breaks in somewhere and discovers a narcotics lab somewhere. He later gets arrested for breaking and entering elsewhere. He could then utilize his knowledge of the whereabouts of the narc lab to get a plea deal. And police could perform a raid upon the location etc etc.

His testimony would also be allowed in such a system.

With the higher ups having granted the policemen and woman incharge to perform this act of forced-collection, it has shown that this act is well within the routine protocol of the Japanese police force, meaning it is lawful in the eyes of Japanese law.

Had the police officers performed this act without the proper warrant nor a female officer at the scene to act as the witness that no unlawful acts were performed, they may have had a case to fight for.

But with all proof against her, and even her urine has proved that she was on stimulants at that time, this is but a desperate final struggle by the defense for a gone case.

*policemen and (police)woman

Just because the brass approves of something need not mean that something is lawful though.

I point to the whole CIA and Abu Ghraib torture debates for proof of that.

You realise that is regarding an Intelligence Agency(and not civil law enforcement) of a different country?

Here we are talking about civil law enforcement working directly under the law. If the act of gathering evidence in order to enforce this law, is against the same law, then there is no point for law enforcement.

Anyway, all in all, this is just an incident whereby a busted junkie arrested for a drug induced rampage tries to play the 'I am the victim!!' card as a 'get out of jail free' card.

It's basically just plain old bullshit. She knows it, her lawyer knows it, the police knows it, and the judge (should) know it.

She won't get away, it's that simple.

I can appreciate your idealistic views on this, do wish that more folks thought and acted this way.

Unfortunately, in the world that we live in, just because law enforcement is doing something, doesn't mean it's legal, even when they're ordered to do so by their brass.

And this is something you come across even in the "civilized" nations, like Japan, like the US, like in Europe etc.

There have been plenty of cases over the years, where the police gathered evidence, but done that in a way that made it inadmissible in a court case. The whole concept of someone getting off on a technicality hinges on law enforcement making mistakes during their actions.

And then there are the cases like the one dealing with the murder of Edward "Teddy" Deegan in 1965, where the FBI allowed for 4 "innocent" men to be convicted for the murder, even though they knew who'd actually been involved (one of those being one of their own informants).

And then there was COINTELPRO to name another example.

And yes, I know, these are all US examples, but that's just because I'm more familiar with US history, than with Japanese history. Doesn't change the fact that stuff like this happens everywhere.

Whether the American government did bad things 40 years ago has no bearing on the guilt of this person. You've read an article that has been convienently translated as so it's missing crucial facts that make the woman look guilty as hell and on the basis of that you claim some sort of conspiracy? I'm sorry but there is no grassy knoll in this case. It is what it seems to be.....a desperate attempt by a drug user to point guilt away from herself.

We Americans hereby secede from the civilized world because the civilized nations are class riddled mouth foaming fascist pigdogs!

Join us for independence!!

look morons, all of u are morons, they could of gave her a cup n made the female officer follow her into the public. NOT HELD DOWN AND ASKED TO PEE RIGHT THERE AND THEN.

obviously YOU SHOULD READ IT COMPLETELY, and use your brain.

meant to say "into the restroom"

She tried actually to flee from the test, according to another newssite. So that was the only thing to be sure to get her pee.

Of course it was..!
The other one groped his girls because of a breast cancer test, wasn't he..? ;)

Also, the costume thing could also been a drug test - if she do it, she's on drugs.. .. Or if she don't do it - depends on how the policemen are try to force her to do it.. xD