Pupil “Miscarriage Club” Trys to Abort Teacher’s Pregnancy

Discipline means nothing if you value nothing.
They had no concern for the life of an unborn baby and had no problem endangering the life of their teacher over a meaningless event. It is evident that they neither hold empathy or value for life and the well being of others, and were willing to take action on their petty feelings of anger despite possible serious punishment that could (but didn't) take place.
Punishment means nothing to such people at any age, they only respond with the desire to act out in ways that will not leave them being caught.
I do agree that parents have an incalculable influence over the development of their children in both subtle and obvious ways. I do not, however, agree that empathy can be taught with punishment alone.

I was a child, and a teen. I was never a DIY abortionist, idiot.

Millions of aborted potential embryos, neh?

as if we needed their genes in our embryos.

No one is "pro abortion", that kind of propaganda is retarded.

All in all, I'll give that a 2/10 for trolling. Made me facepalm enough to post, so that has to be worth something.

http://archives.chicagotribune.com/2008/aug/19/health/chi-obama-abortion_webaug20

Facts Win.

Dude, what do you say about someone who wants to use US tax dollars to fund abortions. I would say that's PRO abortion!Obama recinded the ban on using US federal tax dollars for abortions last month. To say no one is "pro abortion" is propaganda.

alot of people are pro abortion.. including mr prez. not in this instance cuz it was attempted murder.. these kids should be in jail right now, not a slap on the wrist.. though apparently.. we don't have all the facts.. so we can't place judgment.. but with what i read.. they should be in jail for a long time for this...

Yes these kids would most certainly be facing long prison sentences if they were American. I was extremely surprised that nothing happened to them.

As far as the Obama/abortion comment: According to that article Obama is pro-abortion. Unless you are arguing that the term "pro-abortion" is not appropriate, in which case I'd have to say BS!

The term is not appropriate. To say pro abortion implies someone likes abortion. No one(of sane mind) likes the prospect of terminating a human embryo.

I could just as easily go the George Carlin route and say Pro Life people in reality are just Anti-Woman. They strip women of the right to decide what happens within their own bodies. Is that fair generalization? No, not really. Same applies to the pro abortion term.

This is such a useless debate. Pro-abortion means in favor of killing a living fetus. Anti-abortion means against the killing of a living fetus. Pro Life is simply anti-abortion and has nothing to do with having a nasty disposition against women. Pro Life and pro Choice are nothing but nice PR phrases.

@Vicious.
Here is a fact. "As originally proposed, the 2003 state bill, SB 1082, sought to define the term "born-alive infant" as any infant, even one born as the result of an unsuccessful abortion, that shows vital signs separate from its mother. The bill would have established that infants thus defined were humans with legal rights. It never made it to the floor; it was voted down by the Health and Human Services Committee, which Obama chaired." Go to FactCheck.org if you want a somewhat unbiased opinion. That other article was written with manipulative intent.

I prefer the terms "Pro-death" and "Anti-choice" myself.

Anon is a forced birth proponent. Anon does not forgive!

TL;DR: Obama is a hero to at least half the world's population. Thread over.

Wrong again idiot. The correct answer is ''too many''. If it's illegal it means there is no legal registration of how many abortions there are carried out across the -->world<--. Neither do the cause of death rates concur in reality with estimations. Even if it were legal, do you think there would be a plausible registration in Afrika or the Middle-East or Afghanistan? The fact that more people die of smoking doesn't belittle the situation either.

Oh and one more thing, there are 600 million estimated abortions per year of which 90 million die due to unsafe abortions. What am I basing this on? Nothing, last time I checked I needed a credible source.

So do tell Mister ''I know exactly with estimations''.

Apparently we have someone who does not know how to work the Google and check for facts themselves. Alright, I'll take pity upon you and spoon feed the sources. Would you like me to tie your shoes and help you go potty too? We can have cereal afterward, the more we practice, the more I am sure you will discover you should put the cereal in before the milk, I'll be so proud of you.

http://www.ipas.org/Publications/asset_upload_file257_2444.pdf?ht=100%20million%20100%20million [http://www.ipas.org/Publications/asset_upload_file257_2444.pdf?ht=100 million 100 million]

http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS014067360761575X/fulltext

https://www.who.int/reproductive-health/publications/articles/article4.pdf

http://www.populationaction.org/globalgagrule/asset_upload_file739_6251.pdf

The only thing you are proving is that abortion should be made globally legal, and not shunned by society, with better clinics, so the proper care and equipment can be made to accommodate for a safe and risk free termination. Given that ~97% of unsafe abortions occur within developing countries, fatalities are kind of fucking obvious, considering something easily fixable like a compound fracture of your damn femur can result in death in developing countries. Some of these places still circumcise women, after all.

finally something we can support america for?

You do know about the huge demographic problems Japan has with to deal with, right?