Index & BiriBiri Yuri Panchira CD


    Post Comment »
    77 Comments
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Avatar of Icy-nee-san
    Comment by Icy-nee-san
    Comment by pichuLV255
    02:06 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I thought they hate each others.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:08 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hate-sex is awesome

    Avatar of Morthoseth
    Comment by Morthoseth
    02:20 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    +1

    Avatar of Zomb1e13
    Comment by Zomb1e13
    02:24 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    +2

    Avatar of Shuu
    Comment by Shuu
    02:48 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    +3

    Avatar of Cubanoman
    Comment by Cubanoman
    03:08 15/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    +5 successful promo is successful

    Comment by Fonzer
    03:12 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    +4

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:11 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Combobreaker.

    Comment by Ash
    11:24 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    +1000 for the combobreaker

    Comment by HELL
    03:01 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Tsunderes.

    Do you even know what a Tsundere is?

    Comment by HELL
    03:01 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Edit: Well Mikoto is one obviously, but Index just for this relationship.

    Avatar of Solarknight
    Comment by Jarmel
    Avatar of relentlessflame
    Comment by relentlessflame
    02:15 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's not the OST, though; the OST is being released separately (one volume has already been released, the second is coming in April). This is a Drama/Character Song CD series (second volume coming in May). Similar CDs were released by Geneon for Shana.

    Comment by J List Actors!
    02:20 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    For some reason, the title picture takes me back to a time not so long ago......................................
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    ......................................................

    Right now I'm up in New Hampshire vacationing at a resort in the white mountains. Yesterday I saw a nice, young, small, and cute ~13 year old female with glasses. She seemed low key (at one time was watching cartoons with her younger sister, and at another asked her parents/grandparents for permission to do something) and had visible signs of being able to have children (breasts). She seemed like the type of girl that would make a good wife, and the time was ripe for her to get married to a man.

    If this were a man's country I would beable to marry such a girl. However this is a woman's federation of 50 police states: the feminist utopia of woman's freedom. I cannot marry the type of young and obedient girl(s) I wish to marry… unless, ofcourse, I also wish to die.

    Can someone tell me how we men continue to support this collection of some of the most socially horrid states ever known to man? We have assembled, into one conglomerate, a huge empire consisting completely of anti-man, pro-women’s rights lands and entities; which as we speak, type, and live our “lives” (which is not terribly fulfilling for the men of this feminist conglomerate) conquers the entire world with its promise of women's rights and the cowing of men.

    If our country, and it's allies, and those who agree with its work to destroy men and raise up women does not have a change of heart and idealogy then I hope it, in its capacity to war against men, is destroyed (that is: whatever it is that allows America and it's allies to spread feminism around the world be ended). The early enlightenment was about liberty for Men (not women) and the USA was the embodiment of that thought to some extent. Today America is the embodiment of the later enlightenment, that of equality superseding the liberty of men by extending such to women... and thusly nullifing any value that freedom would offer... as every Man's goal is to have a good sweet wife; which this he is denied. The money is great in America, but the perks non existent; for men.

    Why can not I, and other men like me, marry the type of young women we wish to marry? Where is our freedom to do that? Gone: our fore-bearers threw away the keys to the kingdom in 1920.

    Avatar of Shuu
    Comment by Shuu
    02:57 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    If this is actually not trolling but real propaganda and you are trying to acquire followers: let me tell you, it's not working.

    Avatar of DmonHiro
    Comment by DmonHiro
    03:44 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's not trolling. It's just MikeUSA and his inferiority complex.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:26 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    one hell of a complex he's got there

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:50 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hmm, well it is listed as propaganda on a certain website.
    Though it seems to be posted in a way to connect to the article at hand which would support the trolling idea.
    Propaganda and trolling?

    Avatar of Zelgadis4tw
    Comment by Zelgadis4tw
    10:57 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Why not both? Yes, yes indeed it's both.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:16 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Cool story, bro.

    Avatar of Artefact
    Comment by Artefact

    If you refrain from any attempts at copy-pasting totally irrelevant spiels, then I am not inclined to spam your comments (which I have been reluctant to do).

    Comment by Anonymous
    Comment by Anonymous
    05:32 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The troller again... He really have a problem with his sexuality!

    Comment by Zorenaol
    02:28 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I wonder, as I read your post, if the reason all look to these anime and henti and lolicon images is because you do not have the nice females you wish to have. Why? Women's rights, feminism.

    I also wonder: what were the Witch killings in the late middle ages/early modern period all about?

    The description of a witch was originally a mean woman who lived alone (with no man) and may have brewed poisons. In that time it was common for women to poison their husbands to gain freedom from him and to aquire his wealth and then possibly remarry to someone they wanted to marry. Further-more a witch was often depected as riding a broom, not as a rocket but like a dildo.

    The enlightenment thinkers who campaigned for Men’s freedom also supported the supression of witches.

    Could it be that witches were their feminists (before it became just a way to kill your neighbor) and the Men of the day, rather then allow women who hated men hand out poisons to other women for the murder of men (same thing that happens today, but women don’t need something as suptle as poison: it is defacto legal to kill your husband in America and the West), rather then allow women to have this power of life or death over men, or any power, or for women to get together at all to talk (which always leads to talk about how terrible men are (as women naturally hate men))… they killed these anti-men women instead.

    Perhaps we need our own witch trials, but without the mysticism, just the facts.

    Comment by Anonymous
    Avatar of Geerie
    Comment by Geerie
    08:01 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    i doubt that those "witches" were feminists. they were most likely some kind of pagan celebrating non-christian religion or maybe just non-protestant religion. naturally it just made those who didn't understand another culture or choose not to confused and frightened. i'm not sure where you were getting at that was just tl;dr nonsense.

    Avatar of DmonHiro
    Comment by DmonHiro
    08:12 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Actually, it didn't really have anything to do with religion. People back then were a lot....let's say simpler, and could not understand some phenomenons, like why after 3 years of cultivating the land intensely, did the crops go bad on the 4th year (soil was out of nutrients). Since they did not have a logical explanation, they needed to blame someone/something. So the unmarried women, became scape-goats, and the government used the excuse "the witch cursed the land" to keep the masses happy.

    Avatar of Bastille
    Comment by Bastille
    02:29 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Shouldn't she be wearing shorts?

    Ah well, who cares about character details when you end up with this as a result?

    Comment by D4RK-PH0ENiX
    03:01 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    she is. look closer

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:02 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Dear Sir, you're blind. Biribiri's short is visible

    Avatar of Palmtop  Tsundere
    Comment by Palmtop Tiger
    02:50 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Speaking of Index, did anyone get a picture of her dakimakura (without the secret/mysterious)?

    Avatar of Artefact
    Comment by Artefact

    It was a disappointment.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:55 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Wow. Index is such a naughty nun.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:39 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well, actually she's still a 'sister trainee', so there might be a chance for her to 'reconsider' ^^

    Comment by RawrFear
    04:10 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Does no one else think this is one for the fail galleries?

    Comment by Anonymous
    Avatar of Shuu
    Comment by Shuu
    05:08 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Seriously, why would you think that?

    Comment by RawrFear
    05:56 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Because of Index's legs. Apparently the anon that posted after me agrees.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:16 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    So no means yes in your book? Whatever floats your boat

    Comment by RawrFear
    06:23 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    No no no no no, you've got it all wrong. You'd be the anon that replied to my comment, not the one that commented after me. There's a difference. I won't bother explaining, since it should be obvious. Especially if you read the comment below this one (if no one replies to this in the mean time.)

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:25 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well the comment immediately under yours was my reply
    Should have made yourself clearer in the first place

    Avatar of Shuu
    Comment by Shuu
    06:30 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Ok, after looking at it for a while it does look somewhat odd, but I tried sitting in that position and not only is it possible, it's also quite comfy. And before anyone asks no I didn't get castrated in the process.

    Comment by RawrFear
    07:00 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Really? And, while sitting in the same position as her, how long was your right thigh, and furthermore, did it connect properly to your pelvis? After all, Index's doesn't seem to.

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:04 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You can't see any of that....
    It's a matter of perspective

    Avatar of Shuu
    Comment by Shuu
    07:14 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Without properly measuring anything and doing some calculations regarding perspective and projection I'd say what I saw in the mirror while trying looked pretty much like what you can see in the image. Maybe my ability to judge perspective has betrayed me, but I really do think her right thigh has the proper length and connects to her pelvis. I'm no expert and couldn't draw something decent if my life depended on it, but that's my judgment.

    Avatar of Artefact
    Comment by Artefact

    I think it looks about right too.

    Comment by RawrFear
    16:28 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well if Artefact thinks so too, then I stand defeated. Maybe it's me who doesn't know anatomy.

    Avatar of pedobear
    Comment by pedobear
    03:07 16/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    actually i do think that in index's pose, her left ass cheeck(as shown in the pic) shouldn't be seen. she should be sitting on it @_@

    so yeah it looks like fail gallery material

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:52 19/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well I feel dirty saying this, but you fail then pedobear

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:41 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Would be nice but the artist fails anatomy forever. Look at Index's legs.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:51 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I can see why you'd think it's drawn badly, but there's nothing wrong with it

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:13 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It looks like Index has 3 thighs.

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:20 14/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    ...no it doesn't =/





    Post Comment »

Popular

Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments