Unsatisfied with the recently strengthened laws against underage pornography, UNICEF “ambassador” to Japan Agnes Chan, a washed up Chinese entertainer, has presented the government with a petition comprised of 114,624 signatures, demanding the law be revised to UNICEF’s liking, which in this case involves increasing threefold the maximum sentence for certain offences.
According to UNICEF, one of the pressing threats to the health and well being of the world’s children is in fact the legal environment facing underage pornography in Japan, not, as some ignorant souls might think, the problems of disease and malnutrition.
Confident of this, Agnes Chan submitted the petition saying “The people are expressing a strong objection to this pornography. We want you to overcome faction and realise a revised law.” She went so far as to demand the cooperation of a variety of minor opposition parties.
The revision being sought would eliminate a lesser offence of “satisfying one’s own sexual curiosity”, carrying a maximum of one year’s imprisonment, making all such possession of pornography featuring underaged participants a more severe case of “simple possession”, carrying a maximum sentence of three years.
None of these revisions have any actual effect on those who might have sex with someone not of legal age, as such offences are already well covered by a wide variety of other laws.
UNICEF and Mrs Chan have on repeated occasions spoken out against the fact that equally severe punishments are not available for those view material featuring imaginary, entirely fictional children, so it is not hard to see where she will direct her attentions next, should she have her way; then it will be three years for possession of loli manga.
Via Jiji.
The non-existent children of the world can rest easy in their imaginary beds knowing they are defended by so staunch a crusader against freedom of expression…
| 
Netoge no Yome Grinds Hard
King Of Fighters XIV Trailer Boasts Breasts & Brawn
Yuzuruha Figure Sexy & Sophisticated
IdolMaster: Platinum Stars Trailer Happier Than Ever
Top 10 Most Anticipated Anime of Spring 2016
Splendid Abuse Eden “A Heaven of Sorts”
Hatsune Miku Ero-MMD Fit & Tight
Dissidia Final Fantasy Arcade Recruits Garland
Godzilla Resurgence Trailer Unsurprisingly Monstrous
Odin Sphere: Leifthrasir Mercedes Trailer Super Cute
Suisei no Gargantia Pachislot Unveiled
Rin Hoshizora Nekomimi Seifuku Figure
Top 20 Ecchiest Shonen Jump Manga
Hatsune Mike Ero-MMD Stealthily Sexy
Star Ocean 5 English Battles Boisterously
Dragon Ball Super Quite A Hit
Gainax Selling Tomatoes: “Why?”
Black Desert Online Has Much Class
Shojo Tsubaki Trailer Brilliantly Bizarre
Gargantuan Saeko Sasaki Bikini Ero-Figure
Witch Craft Works Cosplay by Kagune Intensely Seductive
Kaine Cosplay by Yuricha Flawless
Kasumigaoka Utaha Cosplay Pretty Pure
Goddess of 2ch “Another Bathing Beauty!”
Tantalizing Hestia Cosplay Busts Out
Kashiwazaki Sena Cosplay Pure & Innocent
Minami Kotori Casino Girl Cosplay Takes No Chances
Shimakaze Cosplay by Ema Sakura
Harley Quinn Cosplay by Miyuko Colorfully Crazy
Sonico Ero-Cosplay by Yuka Hoshikage Super Sexy
Makes me wonder why I never hear any stories about people wanting to ban guro.
Obviously decapitating adult women and shoving insects up their vaginas before you kill them is a much better fantasy than fantasizing consensual sex with someone with a flat chest.
The sick pedos.
Wow, I must master the art of decapitating a woman before I kill her.
Onni, you're a retard.
You're promoting murder and you're against consensual sex with someone with a flat chest? Why a flat chest? Some women have flat chests. If I have sex with a flat-chested woman, am I a pedophile? You're a fucking douchebag. Next time, be specific. It's not like the imaginary loli girls would be traumatized. Go back to primary school, please.
You are the retarded dude LOL
Do you know what is an irony? Get a brain...
Clearly Jones is a lolicon and Esuher doesn't know the difference between irony and sarcasm. How ironic.
Obviously it's you who don't know the definition of irony.
i thought he used it appropriately, it is ironic that Esucher used a term to describe something he clearly doesn't understand, of all things sarcasm and irony.
anyway, when are women gonna stand up against gynophagia...
first of all you are all pedophiles. you may say you arent and you state you never touch kids well what do you think lolicon is. its created after child porn was banned in japan. its a way of giving pedophiles what they want. get it? they look like kids and are small compared to the men that rape them. its sick,. its legal way of getting your child porn with out going to jail. and its a cowardly thing to do. you pedophiles are sick and twisted. hiding behind art please you dont know anything about art(art major here). you get off by looking at a toon that looks physically like a child and that makes you a pedophile. get it. admit it already. lolicon equals child porn. and what about toddlercon is that acceptable too are you not sick fucks because they are toons. you are sick and no child porn is okay. junior idols are also not okay. you fucking bastards. pedophilia is nasty and you are all pedophiles. also the people that view this will be desensitized to the sexulization of children and offend later on. this is just giving the pedophiles what they want and they deserve nothing. if they wanna think fine but viewing obscene images like this is grotesque. im making it my duty as a good moral person to rid the world of lolicon and people like you all. i hope that my cause will make a huge difference. one day the laws will be better and youll only have your filthy thoughts to jerk off to.
You are entitled to your opinion, but please don't tar everyone with the same brush..
I feel the same way at Violence on TV.,
I wish you could get passionte about violence on TV and in cartoons.. children are at risk there too but no-one cares as kids such as teens love violent games and people like you probaly would buy them for the kids to kic the shit out of a fictional character and say its not real so its ok.
Money is made and kids get into knife crime, tackle that first before you shout at us!!
BiTCH get your facts straight
Nothing of consequence has ever come from ranting on the internet. The only reason you continue this charade is because you are too much of a lazy coward to actually do something productive in real life to benefit of children. So be my guest and continue raging until your voice grows hoarse, it will all be for naught.
Adding a dissenting voice to what would otherwise be the impression that we're meant to follow and take as evidence of what is right or normal is no bad thing - if, as you probably claim, lolicon is not something that effects peoples (or at least most peoples) real-world behavior, then the argument about its acceptability is cultural, and that exists partly in a context of debate and values.
On all my time on the internet, that has to be one of the most idiotic and ignorant things I have ever had the misfortune to read, gg "childdefender".
Let's get this out of the way first:
people who look at lolicon don't have to be pedophiles at all, because, *ghasp* lolis don't actually look like real children!
Someone can (and did) in fact draw a caricature of Hillary Clinton in manga style, and they made her pretty. Does this mean I get off to Hillary Clinton? Hell no! :P
Lolis don't even have to be underage, it is just a look for manga girls that puts emphasis on cuteness. And I like cute girls, don't you?
In real life I find women of legal age to be a lot cuter than children.
That is the difference between you and I. I get turned on by cute girls, and you think RL children are cute. By your logic that makes me a pedo. I however, don't think children are cute. In fact I dislike kids. I am not good with them, nor do I like being around them or spending time with them.
"No harm, no foul" is the only moral guideline this world has ever needed. In fact, if everyone lived by that principle, most conflicts would have been avoided. However, a lot of people feel the need to judge others based on their own twisted, illogical morals and values.
No one is hurt by lolicon, but it makes some people happy. Therefore it is a good thing. It is called logic, I suggest you use it before spouting shit like that.
I'd just like everybody to look at this link.
It's pretty eye-opening.
http://secure.wikileaks.org/wiki/An_insight_into_child_porn
lolicon rulz, i hate real children, how can i be a pedhopile?
UNICEF should mind their own business, which is feeding and clothing poor children. It shouldn't be butting into a sovereign country's legal affairs, much less be dictating them.
Busybodies.
Agreed, UNICEF sucks
just because they can't do their task well in Africa
then they meddling in other "gain popularity as child defender without spending much money" operation
and 100,000 for those petition? too weak
we can follow it with counter petition with 500,000+ easily
Yeah. Online petitions mean nothing. They're so easy to ratfuck by anyone who feels like it, it's just ridiculous.
Let's see them get that many signatures from the Japanese populace. Fat chance.
Im sure we can get way more than 500,000+
make it a more realistic number like over 900 thousand XD
But well it is great seeing that my imaginary children are well protected cause too much fap is decreasing my chances if you catch my drift *wink wink nudge nudge*
Don't be ignorant, consider it a pre-emptive war fought in the cultural sphere.
Which means I'm hopping in my pre-emptive-war cultural-sphere use Gundam. With a Doraemon MA for support.
first of all you are all pedophiles. you may say you arent and you state you never touch kids well what do you think lolicon is. its created after child porn was banned in japan. its a way of giving pedophiles what they want. get it? they look like kids and are small compared to the men that rape them. its sick,. its legal way of getting your child porn with out going to jail. and its a cowardly thing to do. you pedophiles are sick and twisted. hiding behind art please you dont know anything about art(art major here). you get off by looking at a toon that looks physically like a child and that makes you a pedophile. get it. admit it already. lolicon equals child porn. and what about toddlercon is that acceptable too are you not sick fucks because they are toons. you are sick and no child porn is okay. junior idols are also not okay. you fucking bastards. pedophilia is nasty and you are all pedophiles. also the people that view this will be desensitized to the sexulization of children and offend later on. this is just giving the pedophiles what they want and they deserve nothing. if they wanna think fine but viewing obscene images like this is grotesque. im making it my duty as a good moral person to rid the world of lolicon and people like you all. i hope that my cause will make a huge difference. one day the laws will be better and youll only have your filthy thoughts to jerk off to. and when that day comes, ill be the one sleeping snuggly in my bed knowing ive protected the interests of children by going against all you pedophiles and lolicons(another name for pedophile).
wow, defensive much.. got something to hide, ashamed of yourself, sure seems that way.. art major eh.. so what about literature.. remember a little book called Lolita.. you going to rag on that one as well.. art eh... hmm, don't get me started on the whole european art history with all it's disturbing imagery and naked children.. oh wait, my bad, that's not art is it.. no no no no, couldn't possibly be worth thousands if not millions of dollars, what kind of sicko would paint that stuff, let alone buy it.. get a grip (or maybe loosen it before your wang falls off)
You are officially retarded..
I don't get it, Lolicon IS in fact, much better than cp. CP is SICK but lolicon is DRAWN u assfuck, and the only thing being used is either pen and paper or just ur computer ram processor.
Besides, If they are banning cp, perhaps they should stop accepting bribes and shit, because after 10 mins of browsing through regular GOOGLE
You can find cp. Don't tell me otherwise, i've tried.
Anyway, lolicon is like a different kind of relief for those sick pedophiles, and, to bormal people this is by far better than torture of real children.
So I don't get it. Why THE FUCKING HELL ARE YOU SO CONCERNED ABOUT LOLICON, ITS JUST PEN TO PAPER FOR PEDOPHILES?!?!??!??!
ARE U SUCH A FRICKIN FUCK THAT YOU CAN'T TOLERATE DIFFERENT THINGS?!
AND YES Onni, YOU DO HAVE A POINT BECAUSE DECAPACITATING PEOPLE OR BITING OFF DICKHEADS IS BEAUTIFUL COMPARED TO SOME FLAT-CHESTED GIRL!!!
BUT U WOULDN'T CARE FOR THAT WOULD YOU, BECAUSE YOU'RE JUST SOME FAT GUY WHO LIKES TO PLAY AMERICA!!!
NOW SHUT YOUR McDONALD MOUTH AND FUCK OFF.
BTW: Being souch a major and everything, you should know about the world's horrors and shouldn't concern yourself with a few people who like pedophilia shit. I mean people put a HALF OF A FUCKING COW IN FORMALDEHINE AND CALL IT ART
now that's fucked up.
いやぁん、ベア子ちゃんはなくなちゃうよ！
The real tragedy here is how easily people give out their signatures. Like "Stop the pedos? sure I believe in that"
THAT sounds like a plan to me.
If you can... or anyone else in the area for that matter... make it happen. :)
It's time those pretentious stick-up-their-collective-asses fucks got back into the business they were originally charged with: FEEDING AND CLOTHING THE THIRD WORLD CHILDREN WHO NEED IT!
Ms. Chan 'demanded' the Japanese Government revise their laws? She's in no position to be dictating terms. Far as I'M concerned, she should be back in the kitchen making sammiches for those little kids who are going hungry all over the world. In fact, *I* demand that's what she (and UNICEF) do! It's all she's worth.
Believe it or not, this rage you see is outrage, not mindless yammering. But nothing will get done if no one's willing to step up to the plate to swing the bat, right? ;)
I can only hope more rational heads prevail over there on the other side of this Rock.
He swung the bat!!!
sorry, couldn't resist
they are helping children jackass. theyll always have time to do that. this lolicon is a threat cuz the more normal ppl make it seem the more pedos will be created and that means more victims. you dont think far do you. well it shows.
do you have proof that lolicon creates pedophiles? until you do dont make blatant statements like that.
Childdefender, I'm so proud of you. Not only are you making a fool of yourself, but you've dragged so many in your ditch with your lovely trolling. I'm so proud of how mature you fancy yourself; why, look at even your ill-tempered remarks, poor grammar and word choice, and lazy typing.
TROLL MOAR. You make us proud.
otakus just have to do a petition and ask signatures at the comiket entrance, demanding the ban of those unicef laws
Good idea.
wait... that is like 500,000+ signatures, talk about pure win.
The more I hear about things like this, the greater my rage. Not only does that mean less loli for me, but there's also the possibility of this coming to my country, and being lumped in with other sexual offenders who may have actually molested someone.
It's already somewhat here in the States. Gotta feel sorry to own loli manga. But if the guy was a pedo already, then by all means, but to draw the rest of us who appreciate lolis... *shakes head*
There isn't anything wrong with having sex with a child, seeing as how children are born with fully functional genitals and no 'force field' between their genitals and adults genitals.
If people REALLY wanted to protect children from truly forced sexual encounters.... they would legalize pedosexuality, bring it out into the open, and start teaching children that NO ONE (not even their parents) has the right to force them to do ANYTHING they do not wish to do.
Unfortunately, a lot of people don't want to give children that power because they think that they 'know better' than children do just because they are older than them and 'more experienced' (excuse me, but children are more well informed and worldly than most adults today) than them.
>There isn’t anything wrong with having sex with a child, seeing as how children are born with fully functional genitals and no ‘force field’ between their genitals and adults genitals.
you are an idiot
Agreed
Yes. We all know how mature most children are.
(Okay, I guess there are plenty of immature adults as well, but I dare say that's beside the point.)
>Yes. We all know how mature most children are.
One has to note though that this is mainly society's (and christianity's) fault. Take a look at ancient history (or countries without much western influence [some sporting an age of consent as young as 9]) and you'll notice that it wasn't always like that. Just to clarify: if we take "children" as in "pre-teen" than yes, I too think that it's nearly impossible for a (3D-)child to be mature enough for sex at that age.
Well to be fair it wasn't exactly benefiting the women though with the age gap. Look at Ancient Greece for example(actually Athens as Spartans married around their own age) where females had significantly less power in the household. Part of that can be attributed to the gap between males who were in their 60's marrying 20 year olds(especially after the Peloponnesian Wars when there was a good lack of males in Athens). A good person to look up in regards to Mediterranean gender patterns is a professor called Cohen who has published some good articles on this topic. Almost all societies that allow children to marry young(and by children it pretty much is female as the male has to support the female) it is pretty much a patriarchal society.
While this is true, I still think it's possible in a society that is not patriarchal. Will take a look at this Cohen professor's work, might come in handy for future arguments... Knowledge is powah.
You are a sick fuck and need therapy.
>>There isn’t anything wrong with having sex with a child, seeing as how children are born with fully functional genitals and no ‘force field’ between their genitals and adults genitals.<<
My mind boggles as how you can actually type that. There's absolutely everything wrong with having sex with a child.
For the greater part of human history- average lifespans were around 20-30 years old. The age of puberty marks sexual maturation, around the mid-teenage years for girls.
Even in Classic Greece, marriages were around 14-15 for the girl.
It really depends on the definition of what a "child" is~ based on strict or loose interpretations on what sexual maturation means for a minor.
and plus, toddlercon is just creepy shit ._.
I was just going to write the very same...
Forwarding the opinion "it depends on the definition of child". Age of consent varies from country to country. Can you all concretely tell me which country is right and which country is filled with "sick fucks"?
The other country is invariably wrong on this.
Btw I wouldn't really use Greece as a good example of this as they had their own problems especially in regards to equality in the marriage. The term Kurios(sp?) sums up all their views on weddings and households with the male pretty much controlling most of the household. Sparta had alot of homosexuality(mostly on purpose because it built better phalanxes) and Athens had a huge age gap. I'm sure the female rights movement would like to have a word with you. Also the average life expectancy was closer to 30-40 years even though there were cases such as Plato who lived much longer(like 76 years).
oh great...
See what happens when you legitimize HOMOSEXUALITY to the mainstream? Now pedophiles such as CHRISTOPHER now demanding pedosexuality to be legitimized.
Don't you mean there's nothing wrong with a child to explore their own bodies and maybe have some casual encounters with another child (which wouldn't be sexual but curiosity)?
Stating that a child is mature enough to understand the implications of sex is an excuse pedophiles use, sorry hon.
Agreed, Yaku.
They may be naturally curious, but that doesn't mean they're ready for the consequences of the act and what comes after it.
Plus, as much as I agree with one anon put it about toddlercon being creepy (it is), I have to argue about the age of consent through history by only one point: That was then, this is now. As the average human lifespan got higher and higher, so did society's (the majority of countries anyway) views on age of maturity and consent. Religion played a part in that, but that's another topic entirely.
UNICEF still needs a fucking muzzle and choke collar though.
Excuse me, but there are no 'consequences' save pregnancy... and guess what? If you are old enough to get pregnant, you are SUPPOSED to be getting pregnant, whether you are 30, 13 or 3!
That's blunt fact, and nature says it as well. What is the median age in human years for all other animals to be getting pregnant? Ranges from 3 to 7, with some animals being even YOUNGER THAN THAT.
You MUST be a sadistic necrophiliac with a bestiality fetish... 'cuz you're beating a dead horse here, Christopher.
And using the 'animals get pregnant at a younger age' line is pure and utter boolsheett. There's a reason why animals have offspring at a younger age: DIFFERENCES IN AGING RATES. Cats can become sexually mature at 5-6 months of age, and dogs at about 16-18 months. Are you advocating Babyfuck using *that* particular bit of reasoning? Because if you are, the next words you hear will be from someone offline in a nice suit saying things like, "You have the right to remain silent".
Jesus. Get some professional help before the Party Van finds you. Really.
Excuse me, but there are no ‘consequences’ save pregnancy… and guess what? If you are old enough to get pregnant, you are SUPPOSED to be getting pregnant, whether you are 30, 13 or 3!
You are disgustingly, shockingly, and scarily fail. Miroku's got your lower point. As for the first...
Okay, let me start here.
Child Sexual Abuse [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_sexual_abuse].
"Effects of child sexual abuse include depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, propensity to re-victimization in adulthood, and physical injury to the child, among other problems."
You know what those are called? CONSEQUENSES. TRAUMA. FUCKING-UP OF A PERSON.
Let's take this a little further. With some Copypasta.
Child sexual abuse can result in both short-term and long-term harm, including psychopathology in later life.[9][22] Psychological, emotional, physical, and social effects include depression,[5][23][24] post-traumatic stress disorder,[6][25] anxiety,[7], eating disorders, poor self-esteem, dissociative and anxiety disorders; general psychological distress and disorders such as somatization, neurosis, chronic pain,[24] sexualized behavior,[26] school/learning problems; and behavior problems including substance abuse,[27][28] destructive behavior, criminality in adulthood and suicide. [29][30][31][32][11][33] A specific characteristic pattern of symptoms has not been identified[34] and there are several hypotheses on the causality of these associations.[5][35][36]
Long term negative effects on development leading to re-victimization in adulthood are also associated with child sexual abuse.[8][27] Studies have established a causal relationship between childhood sexual abuse and certain specific areas of adult psychopathology, including suicidality, antisocial behavior, PTSD, anxiety and alcoholism.[37] Adults with a history of abuse as a child, especially sexual abuse, are more likely than people with no history of abuse to become frequent users of emergency and medical care services[24] A study comparing middle-aged women who were abused as children with non-abused counterparts found significantly higher health care costs for the former.[38]
Sexually abused children suffer from more psychological symptoms than children who have not been abused; studies have found symptoms in 51% to 79% of sexually abused children.[39][40][41][42][31] The risk of harm is greater if the abuser is a relative, if the abuse involves intercourse or attempted intercourse, or if threats or force are used.[43] The level of harm may also be affected by various factors such as penetration, duration and frequency of abuse, and use of force.[44][45][9][22] The social stigma of child sexual abuse may compound the psychological harm to children,[46][47] and adverse outcomes are less likely for abused children who have supportive family environments.[48].[49]
[/copypasta]
Wait, wait. So tell me again, children are NOT harmed by sexual abuse?
Hey, you guys all missed the points because of being a lolicon. Drawing is arts, creativity and much more important, it is a freedom of expression, a right that every human shall have and shouldn't be taken away.
It not about have sex with children or what, no real children are in it and no one are hurt in the process. In facts, it may reduce the numbers of real children getting hurt that ways by satisfying the fantasy of those perverts out there and set as a negative example to educate people.
Humans are interesting beings, the more you tried to control it and prevent them doing something, the more they will try to do it out of pride and curiosity. This would only lead to more real children getting hurt.
You can't control the thoughts of any humans, not even the GOD can do that. Censoring only causes people to become ignorant to the issues and end up doing the real wrong things without knowing it was wrongs.
What they needs to protect children is a right form of educations, not harsh censorship which made people stupider everyday, it look like they aren’t too intelligent themselves for doing this, for someone who think they are more superior than others. Just a bunches of hypocrites!
here here, well said!!
Hey, Christopher - you are one sick puppy.
By that logic, you should allow children to drink, to drive, to own firearms, to marry, to do just about anything that adults know "better than" children about. There's a reason that these kinds of rules are in place - to prevent people like you from rationalizing their PEDOPHILIA to the well-adjusted adults who castigate them.(look it up creep, there's a clinical diagnosis! It's considered a "paraphilia," which is a psychologically and socially inappropriate sexual attraction) Children are not mature enough to understand all of the ramifications of the sexual act, like numerous STDs, pregnancy, the fact that it can be used as leverage or emotional manipulation - there's enough trouble getting legal adults to treat sex responsibly, let alone six-year-olds! I don't know who the hell let you out of your jail cell, but you should be thrown right back in there. I don't trust college kids to make responsible, "well-informed and worldly" decisions, so I don't know what the fantasy land you're living in. One where you can rape little children, apparently.
As for adult experience - it's VERY easy for a person in a position of power to intimidate or manipulate someone into doing something that they don't want to do. It can be considered rape if a boss manipulates an employee into having sex with them, because the position of authority is used as leverage. Well, to a little kid, ALL adults are authority figures, and if creepy uncle teddy tells you to sit on his lap and stay still while he sticks his hand up your skirt, you're going to do it EVEN IF IT MAKES YOU UNCOMFORTABLE! You're taught to respect your elders, to listen to mommy and daddy and the nice neighbor next door, to be polite to strangers - well, the social skills that are ingrained and the logical processing that children are capable of is not up to the task of making a "well-informed" decision about whether or not sex is ok! God, you make me sick.
As for the cutesy little force-field comment (dripping with sarcasm, in case you're too fucking stupid to pick up on it) and the "fully functioning genitalia at birth" claim, you're an idiot. Really. It hurts me just how ignorant you are. You just CAN'T be that stupid, even if you ARE rationalizing. Have you ever heard of, get this - PUBERTY!? Your genitalia aren't "fully functioning" until either you begin to produce sperm or you get your period, depending upon gender of course. Sure, all the works are extant at birth (with the possible exception of the testes, which don't drop for a bit and can in some cases never drop, won't get into that,) but that DOES NOT mean that they are designed to be stuck in things or get things stuck in them until you START producing the necessary lubricants, which are hormonally controlled, you goddamned retard! You can KILL a child that's too young to have sex by literally ripping their innards and causing them to hemorrhage to death. Is that the part you think adults don't know better about? Maybe little children engage in what seem to be sexual activities out of curiosity, hell it's even possible for children to have orgasms. That does not mean that it is in any way ok for an adult to take advantage of their authority and manipulate, injure, and most likely emotionally scar an child that is TOO YOUNG TO GIVE CONSENT. What next, baby rape? "He's not crying so it must mean he likes it."
You disgust me.
If anyone like you ever laid a finger on one of my children or a child I knew, hell, even a child I don't know - I would personally make sure that you could never function sexually again. (killing you would be too merciful)
As an added note to the Loli lovers - fap to whatever you want! You can look at imaginary little children and think about anything at all, draw pictures of it, write stories about it - freedom of speech, and everyone has their fetishes. It's only when sick fucks like this guy talk about having sex with real children that it goes too far.
fuckin royally PWNED
And you sir, are a fken retard who does not know how to make a logical argument. GTFO the internet and take your self justifying arse somewhere where my ears dont bleed from your drabble.
Funny... seeing as how most of the adults who haven't bought into the religious moral bullshit AGREE with me about this... I think people like you are on the outside on this issue.
Most people are just unwilling to say something, because people like Anonymous yell them down, and use bullshit argument.
Personally, I was having sex with adults from the age of 7 and with other children from 2-3.... children are MORE than able to make their own choices about who touches their body and who doesn't. Period, done with, over: they are able to.
You just don't want to believe it, because you want to think that adults can make children do ANYTHING they want them to do... spend 10 minutes babysitting children, as I do on a regular basis (and the people in question KNOW that I am a pedosexual because I have told them that, and find NOTHING wrong with it).... you will find that children will not do anything just because an adult tell them to do it.
All of this 'protect the children' BS is not about protecting children. It is about keeping them from making their own choices and having their parents brainwash them into following their 'morality' that isn't very moral.
No wonder you're so fucked up.
I stand by my earlier statement: Get help. For your OWN sake as much as any child you'll come across in the future (pun unintended). :|
I'll do somewhat the devil's advocate here. I must expressly state that what I'm about to write might NOT reflect my own opinion... I just like to argue and the ''opposite side'' here is just too pitiful.
First, I won't try to excuse sex with children before sexual self-awareness and adults. That would be absurd.
But children, from the beginning of puberty, have the physiological - natural - possibility to have sex.
But does that mean it wouldn't be harmful to them to maintain such a relationship? No studies were ever made on this simply because of the absence of actual experimental subjects. So we are reduced to mere assumptions, unfortunately therefore biased by our conception of morality.
Conception which is in itself perfectly abstract; born from the collective unconscious of a society, and that evolves through time. A century ago, everyone would have reacted in such a strong way if we told that homosexuality might be normal.
Also, our own moral has one major flaw, and that is the denial of children actually having a sexuality. Yes, children masturbate and explore their sexuality, and are not asexual angels whatever you may think. The japanese seem to have accepted this better than the Occidental.
As a final statement (that can apply as much to this as to the loli manga case):
''The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation.'' - Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf
Christopher is a troll. Ignore him.
Remember DFTT
Azarius: Hitler sure knew what he was talking about with that statement there. Maybe UNICEF took some private lessons.
That sure reminded me that I wanted to read Mein Kampf sometime.
I draw the line at biological puberty.
Have you ever heard of something called RESPONSIBILITY? Adults don't let children decide not because they think that they 'know better’ than children do; they don't do it because they are the ones to bear the consequences.
Who the hell do you think is going to pay for the milk? Who's going to change the daipers? Who's going to put the new baby through school? The 12 yr old mother? I don't think so. Protection isn't 100% effective, and I have the right to decide not to take that risk, because I'm bearing the consequences of the brat's god-damned actions. And don't even get me started on the flak I'm getting from all the neighbours and relatives.
God, you need a bullet in the head. Maybe the extra ventilation can help you to think better.
That...that doesn't even make sense...
You mean you haven't? lol.