The maker of nondescript school anime Hyakko may very well be planning to pursue criminal slander charges against persistent online detractors who have been brazen enough to call the not universally well received anime “rubbish”.
Slander is a criminal as well as civil offence in Japan, with substantial prison terms possible.
We see the following exchange in a Hyakko thread:
“Hyakko is a crap anime.”
The response:
“In the Hyakko thread, some guy who called Hyakko crap looks to be getting hit for slander. It’s not surprising, as calling an anime ‘crap’ or ‘rubbish’ is completely slanderous, so if the police come knocking at your door, it’s your own doing.
Don’t blame the guy who reports you, ok?
The poster quotes this mail posted in another thread:
“Thank you for your report.
We think this one is the same person from the last case. They’ve been reported occasionally since around the time the anime started airing.
…
I get the feeling this malign commenter is operating on the principle of ‘if we call white black enough, eventually the world will think it is grey’. We’ve been in talks with the publisher since they started in December, and discussions with a lawyer specialising in these matters are ongoing. We’re requesting his details with a view to assembling a slander case against him if possible.
…
I’ve been extremely busy, so unfortunately I’ve not a chance to gather information myself – as a result I’m very grateful for your reports.If you see any further posts which look like they may be from this person (it doesn’t matter if you’re not sure) or are otherwise similar, please do report them to us. If they’re from the past, that’s ok too.
Thank you very much.”
This mail’s from the makers. You’d better get ready. It’s a real shame, but you went too far, as expected!”
This exchange took place in a Hyakko thread on 2ch. Plenty of astonished responses follow, along with a number praying for the arrest of more wicked Hyakko haters.
Hyakko itself has been the subject of substantial criticism for its mediocre production values, and has not been a substantial success, so the actual criticism of the show is unsurprising.
It looks as though determining the veracity of this apparent suit will be difficult at this stage. The company planning it (presumably Nippon Animation, the makers of Hyakko, or perhaps the production committee) clearly will not let slip that it has such action underway for a variety of reasons.
The actionability of the statements seems plausible enough, although it’s not clear whether calling a title “rubbish” is truly likely to sustain criminal charges – the posters certainly seem to think so. If it is, the 2ch anime boards are likely to become much quieter…
There are any number of incidents where comments on 2ch have led to charges of slander, with prison sentences of over a year reported, though it seems this would be the first case in which a publisher has attempted to silence criticism in the various fan communities present on 2ch.
Certainly, many thin-skinned anime producers would likely want to remove the frequently vitriolic criticism they receive in such venues, which seems often to be inappropriately interpreted, by those perhaps not familiar with the workings of online “debate”, as being akin to traditional calumny.
However, 2ch is not designed or managed with the interests of would be censors in mind, though it certainly does cooperate with law enforcement to an extent.
These kinds of issues are precisely why the management goes to great lengths to shield the boards from legal assault; 2ch founder Hiroyuki has justified this by saying “there is no free speech in Japan”, a reasonable assessment if we consider the effects anti-libel laws have on those not well equipped to defend themselves from such.
Even should this be a fabrication, it is perhaps just as interesting as it represents something of an escalation in anime otaku efforts to defend a favoured series – the battle between pro and anti taken to the level of spreading legal terror in order to quieten detractors of a series; not a positive development by most estimations, although Hyakko fans have been quick to shortsightedly urge the arrest of the anti contingent.
The latest high drama from 2ch, or a chilling effort by a publisher to stifle criticism?
That thick-skinned MF is thick-skinned.
I knew the Japanese have things backwards. But to create horrible animu and not be called out for it? These circus clowns who make that crap can’t take the responsibility when everybody believes that it IS bad?
I seen some of the first episode of this garbage. That’s way more than enough for me. Plus; I wondered why so many hacks get to be responsible for animu. Now I know.
I think the point here is that if enough people begin to listen to a random person it starts to spread to other people and in time everyone agrees just because it’s a cool meme to jump in on. So it IS true the more you say black is white the morelikely everyone will assume it’s gray, it’s a dangerous thing to let go without trying to fight.
lol he want try become gintama
hit the manga director because sux anime it air on
But whether Hyakko is crap or not is completely beside the point. The point is that if this counts as libel in Japan, then something is seriously wrong with their anti-defamation laws. Someone jumping on 2ch and making up rumours about so-and-so taking money from prostitution rings or being involved in a murder is libel, because it’s slanderous to that person’s reputation. Someone jumping on 2ch and saying “Hyakko is crap” isn’t libel, it’s some jerk posting crap on 2ch and should be treated as such. If anime producers can’t hack anonymous bitching from an internet message board, then they’re seriously soft, and I’d hope that the Japanese legal system knows that their time is better spent not responding to their every whim and entertaining them just because they got a bit butthurt.
So they can’t say “Hyakko is crap”?
What about “Hyakko is so bad, I crapped myself out of sheer boredom”?
I actually love Hyakko. First episode was weak, but it picks up after that. It’s a pretty niche title.