RSSChannel

Recruiting

Misty-Stix

Ota7


Low Leg Pantsu for 12-Year-Olds – Ero-Fashion Magazine



    Post Comment »

    Log In »

    76 Comments
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Avatar of Bokusatsu Tenshi
    Comment by XSportSeeker
    00:02 12/11/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    Must... not... fap...

    Reply to XSportSeeker
    Avatar of N-chan
    Comment by Nahata
    00:13 12/11/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    *fap fap fap* >D

    Reply to Nahata
    Comment by Anonymous
    07:39 07/12/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    What is "fap" suppose to mean?

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:12 11/12/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    Lurk more, newfag.

    Avatar of Zippydsmlee
    Comment by ZippyDSMlee
    05:51 16/02/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    fap=exacerbation of the pants

    sorry couldn't help it...posting that is.... :P

    Reply to this comment
    Avatar of TransistorGlamor
    Comment by ToastCrust
    01:12 12/11/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    Maybe "NG" means "not good"?

    Reply to ToastCrust
    Avatar of Artefact
    Comment by Artefact
    01:21 12/11/2008 # ! Empty

    It means "No Good".

    Reply to Artefact
    Comment by Anonymous
    19:29 31/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    i always thought it mean "no go"

    Reply to this comment
    Avatar of Wincest
    Comment by Sigh
    02:48 12/11/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    This industry must be run by pedo's, they still sell thongs for 12 year olds... sickening. And since parents let kids have an opinion as soon as there born, they don't learn anything and are taught by the dangerous media machine instead. Society is doomed.

    Reply to Sigh
    Comment by Tanasinn
    07:35 16/11/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    THIS IS WHAT PEOPLE ACTUALLY BELIEVE

    Reply to Tanasinn
    Comment by Robocop
    07:55 22/02/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    i believe in the toothfairy... she leaves 20 dollar notes in my wallet to find. or maybe i put them there and forget them until i find them again....

    Reply to this comment
    Avatar of Reaver21
    Comment by freedomforce29
    09:44 04/04/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    HELL RIGHT, the shit that goes on nowadays. it's just plain horrible. (I'm still a loli fan!)won't fap to an ugly anyways... OHHHHH im 13 too.

    Reply to freedomforce29
    Comment by Anonymous
    21:17 13/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I agree with whatever it is that this man is saying.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:30 31/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    just lol....

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:04 10/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I've always wondered, but if you're underage and into loli/shota, you're not a pedo are you? Since it'd mean you're more or less into girls/boys your own age.

    Just putting shota in there to be "correct"

    Reply to this comment
    Comment by Anonymous
    11:02 12/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    lol if you live in a capitalist society like i do thats exactly what they want. well not 12 year olds in thongs but younger generations learning to become consumers and buy into whatever companies are selling. i don't think we're doomed...i think its messed up but a lot of things in this world is messed up. all i can say is raise your kids right and hope for the best

    Reply to Anonymous
    Comment by Anonymous
    02:32 26/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    hey if theres grass on the field play ball and if not play in the mud

    Reply to Anonymous
    Comment by kenjiharima
    03:45 12/11/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    Jailbait. Iam out! legal 16/18/21 years.

    Reply to kenjiharima
    Comment by ……….
    04:04 12/11/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    I believe this industry is definitely run by pedos!

    Reply to ……….
    Comment by anon
    04:23 12/11/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    i love this industry

    Reply to anon
    Comment by Furin Kazan
    04:26 12/11/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    I think this "fashion" magazine is not for teens....
    may be she need to wear stripe pantsu for market's need.......

    Reply to Furin Kazan
    Avatar of AsakuraZero
    Comment by AsakuraZero
    05:26 12/11/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    where i have to sign?

    Reply to AsakuraZero
    Avatar of Gatsby
    Comment by maga
    06:56 12/11/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    I've never been more glad to be alive. Thank you Kami-Sama!!!

    Reply to maga
    Comment by Unseen BK-201
    07:37 12/11/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    sorry about the question in case its obvious, but what do you mean by "pedos"?

    Reply to Unseen BK-201
    Comment by julius
    07:46 12/11/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    they mean pedophiles or pedophilia.

    They use the term incorrectly though.

    Pedophilia refers to the mental dysfunction of a person to be sexual attracted to prepubescent children- that is Children around the age of toddlers.

    When they say pedo, they are just tapping into the social norm that anyone attracted to a person below the legal age of consensual sex is a pedophile.

    Reply to julius
    Comment by ETERNAL
    09:05 12/11/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    Thank you for clarifying this for all of the other readers, the term is extremely misused.

    Although, that said, only in Japan could something like this ever be possible >_>

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:22 14/01/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Actually, it's not only possible in Japan, although maybe fewer people go up in arms over it there. There have been cases of some catalog store (Argos or Index or whatever) in the UK bringing out string tangas for even younger girls (8, 9 years), but after (media and parent, I assume) outrage withdrew them from their offers.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:10 20/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    ...... You aren't much brighter a toddler is like what two? Puberty doesn't hit until like what 10 on average?

    So therefore it is any child who isn't a baby but hasn't started puberty. People do however keep using terms like "pedo" and "loli or lolicon" when they mean

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epepophilia

    Granted the lolicon term coined by the Japanese was probably based off the Russian book Lolita.

    That character(her name wasn't actually lolita but the guy obsessed with her called her that) was suppose to be like 13 or 15 so technically a loli COULD be an adolescent.

    Pedo keeps on being used just plain ass wrong however.

    Comment by Busy
    23:36 20/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Actually lolicon comes from "lolita complex" which describes the attraction to girls that LOOK underage, that doesn't mean they are it different do pedophile who is attracted to childs themself.

    Reply to this comment
    Comment by Unseen BK-201
    09:19 12/11/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    oh i see, and thanks a lot for clarifying that, julius.

    Reply to this comment
    Comment by Anonymous
    17:27 14/01/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Indeed, pedophilia is often used incorrectly. In some studies even persons above the age of consent can be considered children (e.g. anyone to the age of 18 even if AoC is 16) and as often as not the media will still happily claim the study is on pedophilia.

    Originally, the term was actually "paedophilia erotica" (since philias are not necessarily sexual/erotic, see bibliophiles etc.) and coined by Krafft-Ebing in the late 19th century. On the whole, thought, Krafft-Ebing's work should be taken with a pinch of salt, since masturbation was considered very bad and various ways to heal masturbators were suggested.

    Reply to this comment
    Comment by Lord Byegone
    11:50 12/11/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    Le voy a pedir prestada la revista a Pedobear (el seguro ya esta suscrito a ella xD )

    Reply to Lord Byegone
    Comment by Anonymous
    04:30 28/03/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    yo tengo cientos de "esas revistas" por si las quieres jaja

    Reply to Anonymous
    Comment by Average Joe
    12:32 12/11/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    Just curious... what part of the world are you all from?

    Where I live in the United States, that type of underwear (along with trousers and jeans) are described as being "low rise."

    "Low leg" for us means something else.

    Reply to Average Joe
    Comment by Trezaquets
    13:06 12/11/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    what's low leg in yours?

    Reply to Trezaquets
    Comment by Average Joe
    13:52 12/11/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's a little hard to describe without pictures, but it's basically the polar opposite of the "high cut" style.

    Reply to this comment
    Comment by Joe Average
    02:12 13/11/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hey Trezaquets, I just realized that the picture I linked to in my reply for Quen below describes what I mean by the "opposite" of high cut. (here it is again: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ja/8/8b/Designs_of_shorts.jpg)

    See how the high cut style has the leg openings go way up the leg, all the way up near the top of the hips? The low leg style I mentioned has a much smaller leg opening that doesn't go so high up the leg. The opening stays low near the thigh. I hope that makes sense, lol.

    Reply to this comment
    Comment by Quen
    13:19 12/11/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    "Low leg" is the Japanese katakana English loanword used to describe this, so you'll see it used a lot in Japan-related sites like this.

    Reply to Quen
    Comment by Joe Average
    22:19 12/11/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    Ugh, the comment that I made for you earlier didn't show up. Sorry.

    Anyway... "low cut," by the way, is also used in Japan. Also, check this out this nice visual to see the difference between "low cut" and "low leg": upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ja/8/8b/Designs_of_shorts.jpg

    If you read the Wikipedia article about the low leg style (at ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%83%AD%E3%83%BC%E3%83%AC%E3%82%B0), you'll see that the use of this term is actually incorrect. Apparently, some otaku publications called this style "low leg" when it's actually "low rise" and the unfortunate misuse spread to, among other places, Japan-related sites as you described.

    Leave it to men to screw up a description about women's clothing, lol. (Assuming, of course, that the said otaku publications were run by men, which I bet they were.) Hooray for the massacre of language. :D

    Avatar of Artefact
    Comment by Artefact
    22:52 12/11/2008 # ! Imperious

    Another classic wiki article. It seems it can all be blamed on 朝木貴行. Most interesting.

    I must apologise if your comment was eaten - I checked the spam filter for over enthusiasm and there was nothing, so it looks like an inexplicable disappearance.

    Longer comments may best be prepared out of the browser for this reason, on any site...

    Also, if you leave in the http your links will be properly hyperlinked (or you can use html in the post).

    Comment by Joe Average
    01:57 13/11/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    I just looked up 朝木貴行... I knew it, it was a man who was responsible! I am both disgusted by his misuse of vocabulary, yet aroused by the pantsu.

    Don't worry about the eaten comment. It was probably misdirected in one of the tubes that makes up the internet. I remembered what I wrote about anyway and was able to rewrite it. Thanks for being a courteous webmaster.

    Reply to this comment
    Comment by Trezaquets
    13:10 12/11/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    is low leg really useful for first year middle schooler???
    it's just for fashion, right?
    or they have some kind of advantage, like easy to undress...

    Reply to Trezaquets
    Comment by Coco the Bean
    16:10 13/11/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    They're useful if someone wants to wear low-rise pants/skirts.

    Reply to Coco the Bean
    Avatar of metatron
    Comment by metatron
    23:40 12/11/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    relevant to my interest lulz

    Reply to metatron
    Comment by Patriot
    01:22 13/11/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    At least I see pretty and beautiful pantsu here. Not these usual loose ones.

    Reply to Patriot
    Comment by Guardian of Ryu
    10:15 13/11/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    @#$$!! Of course it was beautiful pantsu, BUT look.. who's being the model, adolescent right? This is unacceptable. Scary to think what have become to human mind these days. Japan.. Japan.. :-(

    Reply to Guardian of Ryu
    Comment by Julius
    13:21 13/11/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    yeah right, 9 year old girls are traded as a commodity in other 3rd world countries

    Reply to this comment
    Comment by Jake
    13:04 13/11/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    Needs a higher resolution pic

    Reply to Jake
    Avatar of drastikhate
    Comment by Dee
    13:22 13/11/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    Too much graphic info for teens me think...but what the heck!

    Reply to Dee
    Comment by Coco the Bean
    16:33 13/11/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    I don't think the style of underwear is really that odd. Limited Too (a popular girls/tweens store here in the States) sells lowrise panties and the sides are basically thick strings. Girls just find them cute and fashionable.
    Before anyone asks how I know this, I use to shop there. :P

    Reply to Coco the Bean
    Avatar of 21149315
    Comment by unico
    02:40 15/11/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    Coco the Bean is correct.
    we has all kinds over here

    i believe these are similar to Lowrise Panties

    Reply to unico




    Post Comment »

    View comment rating statistics »

    Article Comments Feed »

    Kagami Miku Cosplay Figma
    Otaku Terrorist Threatens School Over Kuroko’s Basketball
    Locodol Christmas OVA Presents Much Festivity
    Top 10 Anime Genres Working Women Want
    3D to 2D Idols
    Goddess of Twitter Festive & Feisty
    Yuri Idol Gallery
    Topless Beaches Make for Hot Summers Indeed


Popular

Most Viewed | Most Commented

Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments