Nobody’s mentioned Noein yet.

triumf said:
How about this question:
If you saw a puppy hanging on for dear life on the side of a bridge, and a kitty hanging on for dear life on the opposite side of the bridge – which would you save?

Kitty’s dead, I’m a dog lover.

omomo said:
I can’t even kill spiders…

I respect them in nature, and don’t just kill them, but if they’re in MY area such as my house, or a tent…well, there’s such a thing as wrong place, wrong time. Hell, even in a tent I’d probably give them the benefit of the doubt and show them the exit, but that’s just silly morals since I know damned well if they wanted to or could they’d kill me just for being there.

marcos67450 said:
i love cats way too much, so no.

if it was another animal, and I was in desperate need of $1000, and I mean DESPERATE life or death type situation then I would, but I would feel like shit.

Once as a kid I heard that if you poured salt on a frog it would die, so I tried it, I was like 9 at the time and I still feel like shit to this day when I remember that, because the damn frog suffered a lot, so I know killing some animal for $1000 would haunt me forever.

~pictured, creature I would gladly kill for free

I stepped on a snail barefoot once. I really felt like crap for it, tbh. So I know where you’re coming from.

mordahl said:

*shrugs*
Not meaning to be an ass, but relying on the law to make your moral choices is a bit of a cop-out :-S

It might be a cop-out, but that’s why the law is there. To support “good” decisions, as decided by the government and general populace.

Well, the law certainly answers that one for you lol Not sure what the law here is.

And to everybody saying that money is just paper, or in any way relating money to greed, we’re not living in a trade society. Money is whatever you NEED as well as what you want. Money is a place to live and something to eat.

Who said you were wrong on that one? That's why I said personally. We get our own opinions. But really, wishing death on a person for torturing or killing an animal seems over the top. We ARE the top of the "we run this globe" chain.

Yeah, I figure that would be the best way. I was thinking of the life in poverty, having to sell yourself out to survive way. Not the hey, I’ve got a bangin body and this is good money way.

ZombieMan said:

People should not torture any living creature for any reason,PERIOD! I can't see any gray areas in this matter. I mean… just looking at those pics, I almost cry for those poor animals, and to think that people masturbate to that@

I just hope that those girls and the people that enjoy that just get killed… they are the kind of people that I wouldn't feel bad to know that they were tortured and killed… they fucking deserve that!

People > animals. We gotta stick together on this one. I don't wish death on anybody for torturing an animal. Punishment, yes. Re-education, yes. And there's DEFINITELY a gray area if they have to do it to survive. Hell, I personally think it beats prostitution.

But yeah, it's sick that people get off to it.

There ya go, that’s more logical. Minus the jury taking their side. Mind you, the trial wouldn’t be whether your assault was justifiable, it would be whether you assaulted them or not.

And Zombie, if they’re just doing it to live a fancier life, I fully agree that their actions are wrong.

Char said:
No I'd just beat the living fuck out of the assholes who ask me to do it and take the $1000.

WTF are they going to do tell the cops and risk being arrested themselves?

Yep, and then sue you for assault, and you’d be charged for robbery. But thanks for living in your own little vigilante world. As well, my guess is they’re not just carrying the cash around offering it to everybody as this is a semi-realistic question.

Neko:Oh. Gotcha. Yeah, try peppermint or chamomile tea. That normally helps me crash.

DarkWisdom said:

well it would certainly be quicker but no, doing anything cruel for money is for souless materialists.

Have you seen Les Miserables?

Neko, pray tell why I’ve earned your disregard? I won’t assume why, but I’ve said nothing illogical or of ill nature. I’ve only asked that you stand by any logical statements you’ve made, or admit contradictions you’ve stated.

lol Gantz, I love that thought.

Neko, I thought you were leaving since you said you were going to rage? That’s why I didn’t bother answering your question.

As for defending killing a cat, I’m merely saying that we don’t know the whole story. If they’re just doing it so they can sniff coke then I believe that’s screwed up.

Mord, I gotta respect that dedication even if I don’t agree with it. For $100,000 that cat would be dead dead dead. My fam’s having some issues right now and I haven’t a clue where my dad’s going to be living. So I’m actually going to be volunteering for a deployment and leaving for a year to take care of things financially.

omomo said:

No. What I'm saying is that your reasoning for kitty carnage is silly. "Dur I could really use the cash right now" isn't viable justification. If you need the money that bad, I'm sure there are…less bloody ways of acquiring it.

Look, If you want to kill a kitten, just say that you want to.

Did you read my personal conclusion and answer?

indekkusutaku said:

I don't think there are many people who don't suck dick on morals, I don't find the act immoral; I don't do it because I don't want another guys dick in my mouth, but I highly doubt many people find it morally wrong.

Good point. While I shouldn’t do it morally, I do many things I shouldn’t do morally. The real reason is I don’t want a dick in my mouth…