The saving grace for k271 to me is:
(…compared to the Sony 7506 that I also disposed years ago)

- TIGHT bass… so no slop to be heard in the low end
- soundstage
- midrange
- efficient… didn't need amping at all and should sound real clean on most laptops (these days) with Realtek HighDefinition Audio output.
- ergonomics… this is the only brand i'll come back to if i have to wear a full sized headphone, but now that i own a UE Triple fi 10 IEM (bought 3 Turkey Day events ago at waaay below MSRP) I've yet to look back.

Kortaku said:
Koko playing on top of my new AKGs.

looks like AKG K271s

had that cans for only 2 months and I don't miss it at all since I went high-quality IEMs 3 yrs ago… the low end (bass) in that thing doesn't extend real down low at all and the leatherette cushions will make your ears hot & sweaty.

and many a Democratic strategist has said they need to stay away from the three G's:

- God
- Guns
- Gays

… because their view is not in line with the majority.
They know full well those three will bring out the opposition like no other issues, so they pretend to be neutral while trying to assure their liberal base they are still with them.

Rest assured that if Obama were to get a second term he will no longer keep his agenda hidden.

triniking1234 said:

Too early to say that yet. He's running a country where the gay haters far out-number the sympathisers. Also, we need to see what his opponent would do and I heard he's a Mormon so I'm not expecting much.

Romney not gonna do anything.

He's outsourcing that to other PACs and Karl Rove (the master of Swift Boat tactics)

danhibiki said:

just like slavery and jim crowe laws. sounds like THAT has a good track record of ending well.

false equivalency

if there’s ONE thing i’ll only agree from this POS… is him stating that gay marriage thing to be resolved at a local level.
… and i’d prefer getting it resolved at the state by state level

danhibiki said:

stunt? since when is it a stunt to state your view on an issue?

as much as i dislike this POtuS, Obama deep down in his heart does not like gay marriage, but he needs [url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/post/top-obama-donors-witholding-money-over-executive-order-punt/2012/05/07/gIQAPKsl8T_blog.html]gay money[/url] cause DEMs are waay behind in PAC money.

danhibiki said:

pandering? that's a pretty risky stance to take for "pandering". plus the president is not the king, he can't make laws.

He’s losing the economic front (see the jobs report a week ago), and
he and his party’s reduced to pandering.

You guys should've seen the media when POtuS pulled that stunt yesterday…

My analysis:

Big effing deal. He didn’t say that he’d do anything, more important, he DID SAY that it’s a ‘[i]local level[/i]‘ (understand STATES RIGHTS ISSUE) solution.

Dick Cheney, one of the DEMs worst persons of the world said exactly the same thing years ago

There’s no leadership from this POS. He’s not doing anything but pandering now.

Here’s from the ABC transcript:

[I]‘At a certain point, I’ve just concluded that – for me personally, it is important for me to go ahead and affirm that – [B]I think[/B] same-sex couples should be able to get married. And I continue to believe that this is an issue that is gonna be worked out [B]at the local level[/B], because historically, this has not been a federal issue, what’s recognized as a marriage’[/I]

well… that didn't last long

http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dailypolitics/2012/05/state-sen-martin-golden-high-court-says-viewing-child-porn-isnt-a-crime-but-it

[b]Golden's legislation, mirrored by a Joseph Lentol bill in the Assembly, would amend state law to say that "A person is guilty of possessing an obscene sexual performance by a child when, knowing the character and content thereof, he knowingly has in his possession or control, OR KNOWINGLY ACCESSES WITH INTENT TO VIEW (emphasis his), any obscene performance which includes sexual conduct by a child less than sixteen years of age. Possessing an obscene sexual performance by a child is a class E felony."

“I have introduced this legislation so that we can properly prosecute those who view child pornography here in New York State. Federal regulations are already in place to see that those who access child pornography face the stricter standards of the law. New York must adopt these same policies,” said Golden, a former NYPD cop.[/b]

Gogetters said:

This isn't the Japanese net.

even loli is used in 3D context… by none other than yours trully…

http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2012/01/01/comiket-81-day-3-loli-cosplayers-are-the-greatest/
http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2008/09/08/loli-fundoshi-matsuri/
http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2012/01/16/legal-loli-believe-it-or-not-she-is-22/
http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2009/08/25/loli-running/
http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2009/01/26/mother-loli-yuri-bikini-skinship/
http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2009/12/12/loli-beggars-of-china/
http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2010/06/03/linux-for-lolicon-ubuntu-loli-service-delights-fans/
http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2010/03/01/loli-hakurei-reimu-cosplayer-dangerously-cute/

the undeniable PROOF is here…
that loli can be 2d [b]AND[/b] 3d !

Gogetters said:
This is Lolita.
[img]http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-iHCOeMlx760/T0pfCeGtMfI/AAAAAAAABMA/ddJc8coh300/s1600/tf3sw1f_sweet2.jpg[/img]

This is also Lolita.
[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/57/Lolita_1955.JPG/200px-Lolita_1955.JPG[/img]

This is Loli.
[img]http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/3762/loli1zn0.jpg[/img]

This is little girl.
[img]http://www.queerty.com/wp/docs/2011/01/little-girl-phone.gif[/img]

the 3rd is is a　[size=6]三次元[b][url=www.sankakucomplex.com/forums/topic.php?id=12416]和[/url][/b]ロリ[/size]

dirtypair said:
Which is also a reason why I don´t post loli pics anymore, yes even going to the loli thread could send me in the prison.

so you're non-american

i bet you live somewhere where government mandated your ISPs to deploy deep packet inspection (DPI), and you're automatically alerted to authorities when you click/search-type something that raises red flags. I
t's best for you to just… disappear in this site.

danhibiki said:

we aren't japanese… most of us anyway. and i think it's important to make the distinction between the two.

Gogetters said:
^That.

what a cheap, intellectually-challenged cop out.

there was never a distinction until /a/ corrupted it end led generations to believe that lie.

To reiterate:

ロリ　encompasses not just 二次元 (the anime/manga and cosplay fashion kind) but also 三次元.

in jap internets (think 2ch and blogs) when you see them mention　terms like 和ロリ、 洋ロリ、　亜ロリ、 or even チョンろり　then they’re talking about the 三次元 kind.

Gogetters said:
The loli-master has spoken~

danhibiki said:

this, 2d are called lolis for a reason.
1. it sounds a hell of a lot better than anime cp
2) it distinguished it from real cp

nah, that’s just the corrupted version by 4chan

Here’s the genuine, real, and straight from the originator.

You see, Japan internets (think 2ch and blogs) makes no distinction like that. In fact, to them, ロリ can also include not just 2D but also　real JS　(小学生) that kimoi-ota crave

Gogetters said:
Drawings are obviously not child porn seeing as how it lacks a child.

There is no such thing as a 3D loli.

fail

loli as a term is NOT restricted only to 2d