uteki said:
I'm surprised they didn't tell you to take as many "soft" A-levels as possible and then do a degree in media studies at a university that was founded after the invention of the iPod.
[rant]
In British careers advice, there's a fundamental conflict of interest: what is good for the school is not good for the student.
Schools are judged according to exam results with little (at GCSE level) or no (at A-level) distinction between results in more or less difficult or useful subjects. The incentive is therefore to tell the student to take a useless subject they can get an A in rather than a useful subject they can get a B in. Top universities sometimes won't count A-levels in subjects like sociology or media studies when making their offers.
There's also incentive (at least, there was in my day) to push stupid subjects such as General Studies (IIRC, I got an A in general studies even though I only did the exam and never turned up to a single lesson). A-levels in these subjects are often completely ignored by universities, making it a complete waste of students' time. Of course, the school still gets credit for another A-level.
Pass rate is also important, meaning that students who look like they're going to fail a course are usually kicked out before they can have a negative effect on the school's scores.
They're also judged according to the number of students they can send to university, without any regard to how useful their degree is going to be. It looks good for the school's league table results and open days if they can say that 80% of their students went on to university, but those 80% might all have gone Dumbfucktown Polytechnic and got into £50,000 of debt for a degree no-one will accept.
[/rant]
imo, most A-level students are wasting their time with at least one of their courses, and most university students are wasting their time and their money. Not everyone needs a degree and not everyone is capable of getting a degree that's actually worth the debt.