uteki said:
But in the UK, I find being classed as working class can be very difficult if you can work more than 35hrs at 21years old and above. The minimum wage is 6.31p/h, enough for plenty of luxuries and renting a house share per month. Thus I find it hard to believe that the people wanting a raise (especially in low-end jobs); actually deserve it. Even as a legal immigrant- that would be enough to satisfy you. This is especially a blessing for Amuricans since minimum wage over there is a bit of a joke (in some states).
Minimum wage is not considered a living wage for most people, especially if they want to have a family. This isn't just me talking; an awful lot of people want it to go up:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-20204594
If you're young, have no-one to look after, live in a cheap part of the country and have family who can support you, you can scrape by on minimum wage. But it massively limits your life choices and your standard of living will be pretty third-world. If you have a kid, lose your job or live in London, you're fucked. And you're also fucked when you retire.
I don't know how you could argue that most people earning minimum wage don't deserve any more. If you're saying that they don't deserve any more because they could theoretically survive on that wage, you could also say that most middle class people deserve far less. Especially when you consider that a lot of minimum or near-minimum wage jobs are really shitty to do. If someone scrubbing toilets doesn't deserve more than £6.31 an hour, then someone working in an office definitely doesn't deserve £10 or £20 an hour.
I remember when I was at uni there was some controversy because the maids didn't earn what was considered to be a "living" wage. The people calling for their wages to be increased were absolutely right, if you think of it in terms of how much the person deserved. The maids had a far more unpleasant job than the faculty (imagine having to clean Kudi's bins or pick his underwear up off the floor). But the faculty earned far, far more despite being pretty lazy a lot of the time. Who deserved what they were getting paid?
Hard work of any kind deserves a decent wage, imo.
uteki said:
Also rule of thumb, any employer would hire the cheapest employee (but not all are like that, some can be very generous which was seen from my last 3 employers) but mass immigration isn't main source of the problem. It's the capitalist society that wants to make as much profit as they can. Quality and cheapest worker = value the better.
Mass immigration gives them the opportunity to make a profit by hiring people at unreasonably low wages. If there are more unemployed people than there are available jobs, then employers can pay whatever they want. If there are more available jobs than people to fill them, then workers can request higher wages.
Mass immigration takes away working class people's ability to negotiate higher wages. Without it, they'd be forced to pay more, because they'd have to chase workers instead of the other way around. They'd have to pay more and improve conditions so that workers would want to work for them instead of someone else.
uteki said:
And I don't think you understand what bosses can be like in the uk (not implying all) because it sounds quite superficial.
More breadth means less depth. You can't look at the bigger picture without making a few generalisations.