That is the most childish way I have seen lately to try and instigate a unrelated argument. If you are going to even mention the word 'opinions' or 'discussions' then by all means please try and create a debate. Not a trolling attempt because you are being an ass.
And Evil, you are just as bad. This is a mature topic. Children shouldn't be involved.
I'll ignore that and go on to your other post.
I don't completely disagree with the OPTIMISTIC IDEOLOGY of what you're saying. In a perfect world with perfect humans porn wouldn't be more of a negative than it is a positive. But then again in a perfect world most wouldn't imagine porn being there. Which probably says alot. I get the idea of what your saying but that idea takes alot of faith in humanity. Here world...here is internet porn. Now be healthy and be safe. Don't help to infect hundreds of millions with disease, addict people, make people try overly dangerous things, desensitize people until the eventually think sex with children isn't bad, aid in child prostitution, make whores out of millions, give people an interest in drawings of children to masturbate to x), give men ED, increase divorce, adultery, animal sex, poop eating. I could do this all day.
Idealistically your point makes some sense but when you actually see what happens in reality, statistically every bad thing in the world has skyrocketed in our new internet porn age. Maybe you could argue none of these increases have anything to do with porn. But I think that would be a hard argument.
I somewhat agree with the idea of what you're saying, but I compared it to nukes because saying, here world take porn and be safe, is like saying, here world takes nukes and be safe. Nuclear warheards are ok for everyone to have if they just approach it in a safe and healthy way. Correct parenting and guidance will keep nukes healthy for everyone in the world to own.
People didn't always used to eat poop so much...is all I'm saying