Sankaku Complex Forums » Anime

  1. pantsukudasai said:
    do y'all fine bunch of niggas think of Kuroneko as tsundere? just being a curious George

    Instead of tsundere types, I classify them on a scale. Kuroneko would be a mild tsundere.

    And don't call me a nigga lest you want to experiance firsthand 100% tsun.

    Posted 12 months ago # Quote
  2. I believe there was a *fine in that line. And its not just you, is all this fine community

    Posted 12 months ago # Quote
  3. Kuroneko isn't a tsundere at all really. She's more kuudere than anything else.

    And if you can't tell the difference between type A and type B tsunderes, just look at it this way: every female Rumiko Takahashi character with more than one line is a type B... yes, all of them.

    Posted 12 months ago # Quote
  4. Im more with Paltop on the tsundere thing, I dont go so much for A or B and more on a percentage scale

    Posted 12 months ago # Quote
  5. giascle said:
    You are now the third person to make that joke.

    It wasn't one.

    Posted 12 months ago # Quote
  6. Some Umineko tsundere though the examples shown also can be very yandere.

    Posted 12 months ago # Quote
  7. pantsukudasai said:
    Im more with Paltop on the tsundere thing, I dont go so much for A or B and more on a percentage scale

    Even though I am definitely in the camp of there being "Types" of Tsundere as TV Tropes says, I think that within the types there are levels of severity, a high-low scale within the broad classification of "Type." In my original post, most of the Tsundere I listed as my favorite were Type A but the extent each one was a "Type A" was different. Tsundere like Ryouko Ookami are higher up on the list than say Kurisu Makise or Kyou Fujibayashi. All three of them are Type A, but there is nuance within the classification as one could say Ookami is "more" Type A than Kurisu or Kyou (or in my later post, Kagami Hiiragi as well). And on top of that, Taiga Aisaka is even stronger a Tsundere than Ookami. Both are still Type A, but Taiga (along with the rest of the Tsundere Wonders) are "more" Type A than Ookami, and far more so than Kurisu, Kyou or Kagami. I don't know exactly what the low end of Type A would be, but I know that the "Most Type A" of the Type A's would be the Tsundere Wonders. TV Tropes has an article almost directly relating to them (and those similar), under the name "Shana Clone":

    http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ShanaClone

    do y'all fine bunch of niggas think of Kuroneko as tsundere? just being a curious George

    Relating to this idea of there being a scale of intensity within the classifications, I do not think of Kuroneko as a Tsundere, no matter the type. I think if her as a Kuudere, because of her generally mature nature as well as her approach, aloof and distant while barely ever even raising her voice. Her Dere is hidden with witty comebacks, aloofness and the silent treatment, which is par for the course with Kuudere. However, concerning scales I think she is a "weaker" Kuudere, by which I mean not super far off from Tsundere. I say this because her calm and collected facade is pretty easily shattered, and she gets flustered more easily than she is willing to admit. On the otherhand, someone like Senjougahara is a far stronger Kuudere, because she is nearly unflappable. Her sly wit and aloofness seemingly cannot be broken, not even if one was to take a stick of dynamite to it.

    So while I think there are concrete classifications, I think there is leeway within them and a scale within the boundaries.

    Posted 12 months ago # Quote
  8. Is it just me, or is OP more autistic than Char and Sorrior put together?

    Posted 12 months ago # Quote
  9. Just you.

    Posted 12 months ago # Quote
  10. maybe, but I'm enjoying this thread thanks to his detailed descriptions

    and to continue with them, how about analyzing Ogiue Chika from Genshiken?

    Attachments

    1. ogiue-pantsu-by-haruyama.jpg 12 months old
    Posted 12 months ago # Quote
  11. aneko said:
    Just you.

    I'm amazed that you found that out. Did everyone send you the answer by PM or something?

    Posted 12 months ago # Quote
  12. Just take a look at the activity in the thread, Scumbag. Has anyone ever contributed or tried to reason or even to talk with Char and Sorrior? Have they ever posted something that long and still consistant? They're quite... different. Especially considering other users' reactions.

    Posted 12 months ago # Quote
  13. kudichan said:

    I'm amazed that you found that out. Did everyone send you the answer by PM or something?

    It was a multiple choice question. Did you expect me to give a third, unlisted answer?

    Posted 12 months ago # Quote
  14. kudichan said:

    I'm amazed that you found that out. Did everyone send you the answer by PM or something?

    She has psychic powers... Whooo...

    Posted 12 months ago # Quote
  15. aneko said:

    It was a multiple choice question. Did you expect me to give a third, unlisted answer?

    If you didn't know the answer, one would expect you not to respond at all.

    Vegio said:
    Just take a look at the activity in the thread, Scumbag. Has anyone ever contributed or tried to reason or even to talk with Char and Sorrior? Have they ever posted something that long and still consistant? They're quite... different. Especially considering other users' reactions.

    The single mindedness adds weight to my "higher level of autism" theory.

    Posted 12 months ago # Quote
  16. I'm not sure I get what you mean by single mindedness.

    Posted 12 months ago # Quote
  17. It's also known as "staying on topic".

    Posted 12 months ago # Quote
  18. Vegio said:
    I'm not sure I get what you mean by single mindedness.

    The absolute devotion to studying a topic of little importance and unawareness of (or indifference to) the fact that no-one is interested in reading those long posts.

    Posted 12 months ago # Quote
  19. kudichan said:
    no-one is interested in reading those long posts.

    So you haven't bothered to read the replies.

    Posted 12 months ago # Quote
  20. kudichan said:

    The absolute devotion to studying a topic of little importance and unawareness of (or indifference to) the fact that no-one is interested in reading those long posts.

    I completely agree. In fact, it seemed to me this could have been one of the most pointless threads ever, and it would have been abandoned quite quickly. Then I thought of all the threads uncommon made, so 'the most pointless thread ever' was quite a stretch. Either way, apparently this guy is so good at writing people actually read the whole thing. And not just this time, but other walls of text by him were exceptionally well received as well. So even if I agree with the 'little importance', it seems I'm part of the minority, given all the attention and the on-topic activity this thread gathered. And you're just as mistaken, thinking noone is interested in tsunderes.

    Posted 12 months ago # Quote

Reply »

You must log in to post.