zgriptsuroica said:
I find that claim at best spurious. It's rather easy to point out a great number of incredibly stupid, good looking people, as well as pretty ugly, smart people. Nice assumption that I'm one of the basement dwellers on here, though. I've gone outside and met people too, and I arrived at different conclusions than you did. Neither of us really has a sound basis for our opinions, as conclusions drawn on anecdotal observations are typically pretty weak.
Well this area is a little too controversial for scientific surveys, so anecdotal evidence is all we have to go by.
And I've spoken to quite a lot of people about this, and every single one (other than you, and I suspect that you're being deliberately contrarian) has noticed the same thing. We must therefore ask whether these observations are due to a massive set of coincidences, or whether the observations really do reflect reality. The latter is more plausible.
But maybe I shouldn't have bothered responding. Your second sentence showed your impeccable retard credentials. If I said that men tended to be taller than women, you would probably find some photos of WNBA players and male jockeys and claim them to be conclusive evidence to the contrary. A few exceptions do not disprove a general rule.
shomonan said:
You can keep pretending that there aren't degenerates like these two running all over England, but they won't go away.
Someone's butthurt is showing.