You are proceeding to a page containing mature content. Is this OK?

check Yes, show me everything
close No, hide anything sensitive

Top 10 Anime Bikini Girls


With the dog days of summer making their scorching arrival, anime fans are embracing the heat of the season by compiling their latest ranking of the anime girls who look the best in bikinis, swimsuits and other beachwear – with the 10,000 asked in no small part determined to see much more of Asuna it would seem.

The sultry summer ranking:

1. Asuna Yuuki (Sword Art Online)

2. Mikoto Misaka (A Certain series)

3. Sena Kashiwazaki (Haganai)

4. Honoka Kousaka (Love Live!)

5. Miki Hoshii (The iDOLM@STER)

6. Charlotte Dunois (IS: Infinite Stratos)

7. Kosaki Onodera (Nisekoi)

8. Nami (One Piece)

9. Mio Akiyama (K-On!)

10. Satsuki Momoi (Kuroko’s Basketball)

Leave a Comment


  • Anonymous says:

    Kosaki Omadingdong over Chitoge? These people must be tards. I can’t think of one person who likes Onadera more than Chitoge.

    And Honoka? WTF is up with the people these places poll and their fascination with MCs? There’s so many better options in LL. Though, at least they didn’t choose bland Haruka from IM@S…

  • borregoat says:

    Satellizer el Bridget, Rias Gremory, Kan’u Unchou, Tokugawa Sen, Rangiku Matsumoto, Queen’s Blade girls and many more have the “perfect bikini body”!!!!!!!
    The only good female from this list is Nami from One Piece

  • Anonymous says:

    Aika, Shigure Kosaka, Queens blade girls, Rias Gremory, Medaka Kurokami, Ryofu Shimei, Sakura Ichiko, Kimi Aoi, Tomo Asama. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>this pathetic fail list.

    • Anonymous says:

      EVERY SINGLE TIME a list gets posted people in here have to bash the OPINIONS of those asked in the ranking.

      Guys, top ten out of how many possible anime girls? The girls from current shows simply have a higher probability of coming to mind when you’re asked right now. And since there are no votes listed here it’s entirely possible that Asuna got only 500 votes of the 10k asked and Satsuki got 480 (which would be a 2 per mil difference). Neither Mean votes per character nor standard deviation was listed. For all I know the differences in the top 10 and beyond can be thought of as statistc noise with a hundred characters basically coming in the same spot.

      The list is fail, but not because of the content, but because of the lack of data on the poll, which makes the whole thing useless, and people becoming butthurt because of it useless as well.

      • Anonymous says:

        exactly, it doesnt even matter if they polled every anime fan in the world, especially when you consider that even in a poll of 100 enterants, the winner could come out on top with 5% of the votes but that just would mean that 95% of people disagree with that outcome and are in a position to complain. in the end it’s all always just a popularity contest and there can be no objectivity in the slightest. all these polls do is alienate the majority of people, especially among a group of people of which many probably already feel alienated enough as they are. what good are these polls? at the most we can just gauge the current general tastes of the group polled. if a loli comes out on top that doesn’t mean anything other than the posibility that most of the people polled turned out to be lolicon (probably due to where the poll was conducted). if most of the names are from recent anime it might mean that most of the people polled were from a younger generation. but in the end, whither aika is better than sena can only be an induvidual’s opinion. i rather look at the lists of induvidual people and learn that people who have similar tastes as i do exist rather than give a damn about popular opinion. it’s not only here… it’s no different from maxim’s top 100 sexiest women of the world where my personal favorite hottest female public figure of the moment never even shows up on the list.

        • Anonymous says:

          The main thing these polls do is create an opportunity for discussion. X character is the best character is entirely subjective. There is no control to compare against, no established standard, it’s merely a piece of information designed to gauge public opinion and create internet traffic.

        • Anonymous says:

          It’s abnormal because being attracted to those ages was considered strange and rare even back when it was allowed to happen, hence why attraction to certain age groups under 18 are classified under certain names. 18-21+ isn’t strange to the majority of grown men unless your tastes are particularly for the underaged. College may be practically mandatory these days, but the fact is it isn’t. The choice is there and many do not persue it in favor of starting a family and starting lower income jobs they’re fine with. You know what? I’d be actually fine with an AoC of 25. Not just because of the recent mental research but also because a lot of smarter kids these days are deciding to continue their education and not even moving away from their parents until their mid 20s. Society is changing and we have to keep up with the changes. Besides, the people who wait tend to be the smarter ones anyways and in return their children are more likely to grow up happier and healthier in more mentally stable households. Any changes in the law to help promote better families which raise better children is great in my book. There actualy aught to be a license for breeding, even more than there should be for driving cars. Honestly, all your reasoning just looks like selfishness to me in the end. Say any aged man was allowed to fuck a 13 year old, how many 13 year old would even be ok wity that? How many little girls would willingly engage in consensual, healthy relationships with someone twice their age? Whenever that happens these days, when has it ever been a case of two lovers who the law wrongly put an end to rather than justice for the 13 year old? This goes for ANY place in the world… where does this kind of relationship ever make the little girl happy? Personally, i have NEVER been sexually interested in women who aren’t adults, especialy since I became an adult. Virginity, innocence, and childishness have never been traits I look for in a mate. Even when I was a teenager, if I liked anyone at school it was because they seemed matured for their age, at least compared to me at the time. I’ve always wanted someone I could talk to and be a companion with, not someone who just exists to make babies for me. Hell, if we were designed to be attracted to girls fresh off of puberty what would we do when they stopped looking that young in just 5 to 10 short years?? Sounds extremely counter productive in the long run to me. So you better be speaking for yourself and not all heterosexual males. We’ve come along way from being cavemen, even if some of that progression just happened 100 years ago. And this is just a feminist conspiracy? How many good fathers do you know who would be fine with their daughters having a sexual relationship with a full grown man while their daughters are still teenagers? Even if due to some kind of regression or life crisis in my old age I’m suddenly feeling like a teenager again and feel aroused by my daughter’s friends, I wouldn’t even hope for a consenual relationship with them (which i’m sure would be impossible anyways) out of regard for their betterment, aswell as out of love and respect for the companion I already have, and respect for my children and especially my daughter. What you’re suggesting is that men should be allowed to be mindless, heartless leeches. That a man should seek out ripe virgins, fuck them however they want, then move on to the next one once she’s become useless, all without consequence or regard for humanity.

        • Anonymous says:

          @19:52 — I’m sure that 100 years ago, a legal age of 18 would’ve been considered unthinkable and illogical so I don’t think 21 is so far-fetched. After all, college education is almost de facto compulsory these days, and in the US, there’s the argument of “if you can’t drink until you’re 21, you shouldn’t be able to have sex either” available. Some brain research suggests that certain decision-making regions don’t fully develop until the mid-20s, laying the groundwork for a future 25ish AoC.

          For political ::reasons::, the AoC can only ever be ratcheted upwards — anyone who opposes increasing it gets branded with the “pedophile defender” label. That’s how it got raised from 12-13 to 17-18 over the last century, thanks to the unlikely alliance of feminists and fundamentalists. The net effect was to reshape society’s opinion of what ages were “acceptable” targets of attraction along legal rather than biological lines.

          Bottom line is that men have always been instinctively attracted to young, fertile-appearing females who’ve just recently reached childbearing age — youthful appearance suggests virginity and a chance for a man to mate with a woman who is not already pregnant, thus assuring that any offspring she bears will be their children and not some other man’s. Modern civilization and changes in educational practices can’t hope to change that. Older men may develop an appreciation for mature/older women in -addition- to older teenage girls, but they’re always going to be stealing glances at their teenage daughters’ friends, the girl at the cash register, high school cheerleaders, Disney Channel starlets, “barely legal” porn stars, etc.

          Afaik, Japan doesn’t attach the same pedophile or lolicon stigma to attraction to highschool-age teenagers as the West does. Being attracted to prepubescent children, in this case girls who haven’t reached menarche and cannot reproduce, is what’s truly “abnormal” and deserving of the label “pedophilia.” AoC laws can change who is legally able to consent to sex, but they can’t change who is biologically adult and is attractive to other biological adults. Increasing the AoC significantly beyond the average age of puberty + 1-2 years (to account for outliers and late bloomers) is less about protecting “children” than it is about shaming and criminalizing male heterosexuality.

        • Anonymous says:

          @12:34 – but, at least in the case of an age over 21, that would never, ever happen because there would be no logic behind changing the age of consent to an age above 21. probably even more than even biological, mental, or sexual growth reasons, the age of consent is what it is because it coincides with the age of highschool graduation and the end of manditory childhood education. among many other risks, an underaged girl having sex is jeopardizing her education and her future, especially due to the risks of pregnancy… if a responsible adult is selfishly taking part in that jeopardization then they deserve to face the law. also, it’s always ben a fact that most adults are attracted to other adults of a similar age and that being sexually attracted to anyone who is not an adult is abnormal and thus it is clasified by ts own terms. the meaning of ‘lolicon’ is basically the equivalent of the english terms of ephibophile, hebephile, and pedophile. the term was created to encompass both 2d and 3d. i’m not making up the rules myself here, i’ve read about all this from people who study it.

        • Anonymous says:

          So if they make “legal age” 21 or 25, will you be railing against those sick lolicons drooling over college girls? Just goes to show that to the pedohysterics, “loli” and “lolicon” are essentially defined as “whatever I want them to mean”, devoid of any biological or moral basis in their quest to smear any man attracted to any remotely young and fertile female as a pedophile.

        • Anonymous says:

          @17:37 – lolis can be post pubescent, and usually are, just like the original lolita who started it all was (and the protagonest was a hebephile). lolis just have to be under legal age. loli doesn’t only refer to a girl’s age anyways, but also the style. a woman of legal age can dress up in a lolita style, in order to appeal to those with a lolita complexion, which is basically trying to look and act as much as a female child as possible (usually using clothes that are normally meant for schoolgirls). basically it all comes down to ‘the thought that counts’, the intention of sexually prefering child-like female qualities/characteristcs over those of grown women.

        • Anonymous says:

          they basically all look like around 14 or younger except for maybe nami. i don’t care if they’re listed as 18 or 180 years old. also it doesn’t matter if they’re not flat, like sena, either.