Comment on Feminists Demand “Sexist” Makoto Aida Guro Art Ban by Anonymous:

@ 12:52

Nonsense.

Your argument hinges on the idea that somehow, people going to a public exhibition ought to be protected from seeing anything they might not want to see.

In a free society, you do not have such a right.

You either have to argue that suppressing things is good – in which case you had best be prepared for when something you like becomes offensive to another person, because what you like very well may be next to be banned – OR, you have to allow for people to say and display things you might find objectionable, regardless of what the majority may think, in order to allow for freedom of expression for all.

If you cannot get behind this concept, then you are not for freedom, and the terrorists win.

Moreover, making art safe and tolerable is the quickest way to make it irrelevant. You sneer at the ideas you think “degrade” art, but it is actually you who degrades art by attempting to tame it and make it conform to your personal ideals.


Anonymous made other comments on this post:

Recent comments by Anonymous:

  • Good Smile Company Factory Tour Highly Mechanized:
    Also, those they lose about 3% of those AI drones on each delivery run, and those costs add up. Plus they’re still paying for the great robot-revolt of 2010.

  • Big Order BD Bathing Bares All:
    Shit show, but I’ve been waiting to see this episode uncensored.

  • “Euthanasia” Stabber Slaughters 19 Patients:
    “Difficulty for the person to carry out household and social activities” probably covers a fair portion of the people who visit this site. And there are certainly those who would claim that anyone taking part in otaku culture must have one or more mental disabilities. So, what happens once you are deemed to be harmful to society?

  • “Euthanasia” Stabber Slaughters 19 Patients:
    I’m pretty sure most of those people weren’t contributing to overpopulation. If overpopulation is the concern, the more logical solution would be to go after people having lots of kids, not the other way around. The costs of taking care of the mentally disabled are likely minor compared to the costs of taking care people on government assistance who keep having kids they can’t afford.

  • “Euthanasia” Stabber Slaughters 19 Patients:
    It doesn’t sound like these people were “vegetables”, they just had mental and physical disabilities. And you seem to imply that orphans and homeless people don’t get any help, when they do. Just because their families may not have been willing or able to provide them with the level of assistance they needed, doesn’t mean these people wanted to die. And what happens when someone decides that those who view content they deem to be objectionable must have a “mental illness”. Will you be first in …


Popular

Recent Articles