Comments on: AKB48: “We’ll Sue You If You Call This Child Porn!”

By: Erranty

Erranty — Fri, 24 May 2013 03:54:04 +0000

Yes, but when you break those down.

1. The child isn't engaging in sex, sexual intercourse, or imitating sexual intercourse.

2. Sex organs specifically are Genitalia. Breasts are not used in reproduction, excluding them from being considered Genitals or "Sex Organs."

3. The child appears to be wearing clothes. So the person that's attracted to the child would have to be using their own imagination.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 12 Feb 2013 15:32:33 +0000

have the boy cover up a mans penis #penn state. I like how the internet pervs of the world side with the wrong side. just because you like to fap to little boys and girls. This picture shouldnt even have been made because it makes no sense at all to ever do this or be in this situation ever. Its just dumb.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 10 Feb 2013 19:10:59 +0000

They should have just use another naked AKB48 member instead of that boy.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 28 Jan 2013 23:14:46 +0000

Lol this is hilarious how much AKB48 quietly paid the parents in order to get this shot in first place? Humorous at best but taken to extreme by zealots of course!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:10:07 +0000

It's not surprising, coming from the country that has "sexy videos" of what, 12yr old kids in skimpy swim suits?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 28 Jan 2013 10:14:54 +0000

She doesn't look anything special. Just because the name AKB is slapped onto anything she is related to, an averagely talented person becomes a huge idol. TBH, many porn stars look better than her.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 28 Jan 2013 09:47:40 +0000

13:35 nope, I was simply saying that the charge would have to be something else, complete with its own set of defenses, aggravations, and punishments.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 28 Jan 2013 04:26:54 +0000

I've actually seen films in Italian and others in Spanish where little boys have not only gotten to see completely nude women, but sometimes even grope breasts. Not even an eyebrow raised over that. They're considered the same as any other film in European and Spanish-speaking countries. Kids can see nudity sitting on the magazine shelves in some European countries. But none of those countries are ever considered problematic, no one ever wonders "how do those people raise their children?". Because their lives are still perfectly fine! Sure there's child-damaging child porn out there, but if it wasn't for the modern insanity over blowing up things like this in certain societies sexually confused (Japan, America, etc) a pic like this would be considered innocent, even humorous.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 28 Jan 2013 04:17:13 +0000

That would obviously be subjecting minors to a sexual act. This here, well if this can only be viewed as nothing other than a sexual act then it's the same with the Life magazine breast feeding cover.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 28 Jan 2013 01:32:38 +0000

What if a young girl was holding a nan's balls? Would that be porn or not? After all, balls are not always sexual like breasts are not always sexual.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 27 Jan 2013 22:15:53 +0000

bullshit. If it's CP if the genders were reversed then it's CP now.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 27 Jan 2013 20:45:24 +0000

The kid's mental and emotional development isn't being negatively influenced by that women. Is there an adult man present in the picture? No? Then it's not child porn. Nobody argues that it would be CP if the genders were reversed. But they ain't, so stick a sock in it.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 27 Jan 2013 18:22:15 +0000

when is her AV debut?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 27 Jan 2013 13:37:19 +0000

Agnes really has been too quiet lately...she's planning something for sure.

By: Gr8Sk8r

Gr8Sk8r — Sun, 27 Jan 2013 09:57:21 +0000

I seem to recall a similarity to a Dennis Rodman Rebecca Romijn (then) Stamos magazine cover, but the hands were painted.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 27 Jan 2013 09:52:51 +0000

Well actually they spend about $10,000 on boxes filled with CD's of shitty music all so that they can cum in their hands and shake hands with a 16 year old girl.

By: Gr8Sk8r

Gr8Sk8r — Sun, 27 Jan 2013 09:52:24 +0000

AKB48 can babysit my kids anytime.

By: Myballz

Myballz — Sun, 27 Jan 2013 08:33:29 +0000

For some reason saying that will only make it worse.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 27 Jan 2013 07:55:33 +0000

Good point you brought here. Maybe no side even cares at all if this is child porn or not, as long as both keep getting profit from all the media covering.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 27 Jan 2013 05:40:44 +0000

You mean
super-expensive-cameras +
really-expensive-anime-DVD/BR +
super-expensive-limited-edition-goods +
did-you-know-dakimakuras-are-quite-expensive? +
video-games +
high-spec-computer-rig

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 27 Jan 2013 05:08:53 +0000

Seriously, race doesn't actually matter.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 27 Jan 2013 05:05:29 +0000

what he said!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 27 Jan 2013 04:35:05 +0000

@12:24 So what you're saying is we can have a crowd of children watching some fisting and multiple penetrations being photographed, but it's totally okay because they're just watching and not actively taking part?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 27 Jan 2013 04:31:48 +0000

They aren't saying 'This is child porn.' They're asking 'Is this child porn?' Same words, it's the order that changes it from slander to investigation.