legal-mastermind-mugshot-mosaic.jpg

In a brilliant legal shenanigan, a teacher who faced rape charges for having sex with one of her pupils has escaped a possible 15 year prison sentence by divorcing her husband and marrying her victim.

The female teacher, now 42, pursued a sexual relationship with a 15-year-old boy at her North Carolina school. When her antics came to light, authorities charged her with statutory rape as the boy was a minor, charges carrying a possible 15 year sentence.

She somehow devised the scheme of marrying the boy, preventing him from being compelled to testify against her in court and causing the case against her to collapse.

North Carolina law contains the provision that the spouse of a defendant cannot be compelled to testify against them, preventing authorities from forcing the boy to testify against her and invalidating any previous testimony he gave police.

In aid of this, she divorced her existing husband (with whom she was married when she started her underage tryst) and 6 days later married the boy.

The boy, still a minor at the time of his marriage, could only consent to marriage with the permission of a parent, which his mother obligingly gave.

One of the local district attorneys was relatively gracious in accepting the loss of a juicy chance to inflict a massive prison sentence on a wicked sexual predator:

“None of the statements made in this case would be admissible without the victim. The defendant has a Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses against them.”

Unsurprisingly, the teacher still end up losing both her post and license, although the only legal repercussion from her antics was a misdemeanor charge of resisting arrest stemming from her original arrest, which resulted in a 30 day suspended sentence.

It was only through this trial that the full details of her devious escape were made public – along with the obligatory (and presumably unflattering) police mugshot:

legal-mastermind-mugshot.jpg


    Post Comment »
    135 Comments
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Avatar of Red
    Comment by Red
    19:18 22/01/2013 # ! Quality (+1.0)

    Poor kid..double penalty for him.
    First rape by that thing, and then being conned to marry it.

    Avatar of cats2
    Comment by cats2
    21:35 22/01/2013 # ! Quality (+1.0)

    It's the south, he's just lucky it wasn't his mom.

    Avatar of Daniel Park
    Comment by Daniel Park
    23:19 22/01/2013 # ! Good (+0.6)

    hey now, it's NORTH Carolina as in the winning side, the hicks are all down little further.

    I'm wondering how old the mother is that she would accept a 42 year old daughter-in-law?

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:02 23/01/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Actually NC, which is south of Virginia along with it was very confed.

    Comment by Black Mage
    05:30 23/01/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    It'll probably sort it's self out with a hunting accident.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:19 23/01/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Maybe she got permission from the mother cuz they went to school together?

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:05 23/01/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    North Carolina is right next to Tennessee so trust me your majority is hicks.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:29 24/01/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    lol
    hahaha
    asd

    Avatar of Powerpuff Loli
    Comment by Powerpuff Loli
    21:38 22/01/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    He's not related to her... as far as he knows.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:06 23/01/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Probably his cousin somewhere along the line.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:07 23/01/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    News flash! We are ALL related.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:02 23/01/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well...living in Alabama, most of that crap only happens in the mid states, TN, NC, etc....most ignorant people talk about the South cause of the crappy commedians that tell the same joke over and over.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:19 25/01/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    bunch of northern hicks

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:44 23/01/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    And I will have you know that it just doesn't happen any more often in TN. Don't try to shift the attention elsewhere. :-p

    While it's impossible to know for certain because incest is only recorded when it's an incident with many going unreported, it is true that in 2010 Alabama led the country in incest-related crimes followed closely by Alaska of all places.

    But just last year in 2012 who was leading? New York city, or more specifically Brooklyn. And runner-up? Washington D.C. I thought that was funny.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:36 22/01/2013 # ! Good (+0.7)

    A third one's coming too: she'll eventually divorce him and take his money, maybe his family's too

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:50 24/01/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Think of it this way: The kid can divorce her and demand financial aid since she earns more money than he does.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:34 22/01/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    "The boy, still a minor at the time of his marriage, could only consent to marriage with the permission of a parent, which his mother obligingly gave."
    ------------

    My question is why the fuck did the mother agree and give consent? It doesn't make sense. Her son was raped! Why in the world would ANYONE allow their 15 year old offspring to take up such a huge commitment. Plus, given the circumstances, the mother should be nothing short of enraged.

    I don't understand this world anymore.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:36 23/01/2013 # ! Good (+0.8)

    Statuary rape isn't a rape. It's a term invented by the moral guardians to vilify teenage sex.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:20 26/01/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    The problem is that because a 30yr old man having sex with a 15yr girl "IS" rape because his mental and experience can trick a child into sex, a 21yr old man having with a 17yr girl is also "CONSIDERED" rape, because the same things.

    That law about a kid being tricked is pure bullshit with girls (and boys) over 13.

    Avatar of Sylar
    Comment by Sylar
    05:22 26/01/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    A 15 year old girl. No fucking way. If you told me a 10-12 year old girl then ok, i will say her consent means nothing but a 15 year old no way. Have you seen some 15 year olds today?
    I believe the law should change already and go down to 14 for sex.
    Anyone with a little knowledge knows that true pedophilia is about children from about 13 and under and not teenage bodies and that in reality is quite biologically natural to lust over a teenage looking body.

    Comment by Anonymous

    Blame England. AOC would still be 7-12 in America if not for the influence of those damn Victorians.

    Comment by Anonymous

    Agreed... to a point. Two 14yr old "kids" having consenting sex is NOT rape.

    But a 30yr old man having sex with a 15yr girl (or whatever mixture of sex types) *IS* rape in that his mental and experience can trick a child into sex.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:16 23/01/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    Or the son wasn't actually raped. Notice how it said statutory? Teacher/student relationships aren't all that uncommon.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:20 26/01/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    I'm pretty sure that she only kissed him and that was all.

    Avatar of Pyrolight
    Comment by Pyrolight
    04:38 23/01/2013 # ! Good (+0.4)

    The mother was just glad her son was getting an education and not shooting cans.

    Avatar of NakkiNyan
    Comment by NakkiNyan
    06:27 23/01/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Bible thumping state. It says right there in the big book of multiple choice that the rapist must marry the victim and pay the father 50 shillings. Not sure on the shillings to dollars conversion rate now but it couldn't have been much. I figure since it was a woman who raped the boy the shillings and approval must have transferred to the mother.

    They can rationalize anything away.

    Avatar of Yamato
    Comment by Yamato
    23:43 22/01/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    probably overly conservative morality (both Carolinas are red states, aren't they?). The teacher took her son's virginity, so she has no choice but to take the teacher into her family and force her son to stay with her. Also, women aren't capable of rape, at least so far as she's concerned.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:34 23/01/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    I'm sure there was a decent 'dowry' paid to shut the mother up. Some monkeys will do anything for a couple thousand dollars.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:20 23/01/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Because as much as progressives refuse to admit it, men and women are DIFFERENT.

    A 15 year old is only technically raped, because the law says when someone in North Carolina celebrates their 16th birthday, THEN they have the fitness of mind to consent to sex.

    The kid Got Some. He didn't wanna bust the Mrs. Robinson for it. His mother didn't wanna bust her. The state, in its wisdom, chose to vigorously prosecute the case; the parties affected used the law to their advantage. Kudos to them.

    Comment by Anonymous

    Perhaps the only thing the kid's concerned about is getting a pussy. Judging from her appetite, he doesn't seem like he'll be resisted often either.

    Sadly, that kid's getting a whole lot more than certain regulars of this site. lol

    Avatar of Firaku
    Comment by Firaku
    23:24 31/01/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    who the fuck would tap that ugly bitch!?
    It's a mystery how she even convinced someone to stick their dick inside that.
    15 year old boys must have REALLY low standards in the USA imo.

    Avatar of 3rdEye
    Comment by 3rdEye
    19:04 22/01/2013 # ! Quality (+1.0)

    AHAHAHA, would they have ever allowed the same if it was a male teacher?
    I seriously doubt it.

    Avatar of Pyrolight
    Comment by Pyrolight
    04:37 23/01/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    In the South, they probably would have.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:55 22/01/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Bible protocol. Deuteronomy 22:28-29

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:13 23/01/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    If it were a male teacher in Japan, they'd cut his pay a little and he'd return to teaching in 2 weeks...

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:50 26/01/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    And to think that in South Carolina this wouldnt even be news worthy. Last I check the age of consent there is 14.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:31 22/01/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    They'd find another way to screw him over even if they couldn't get testimony. Or scare him into taking a plea bargain. They usually go for the latter.

    Comment by Black Mage
    05:33 23/01/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    They probably would have allowed it.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:42 22/01/2013 # ! Good (+0.8)

    I like how Sankaku is about anime, games, Asia and sexual deviations. It all makes sence somehow.

    Avatar of Soniko
    Comment by Soniko
    11:29 23/01/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's only about the latter, really.

    Avatar of Gitami
    Comment by Gitami
    02:50 24/01/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    So true. I have a explosion fetish.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:52 24/01/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    *an explosion fetish.

    Fixed.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:39 23/01/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    What can I say? Artefact knows his readership.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:38 22/01/2013 # ! Good (+0.8)

    So in the end it's the kid who got the prison sentence instead...

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:07 23/01/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    He fucked her, what horny teen boy just doesn't want to have sex?

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:35 23/01/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Doesn't matter, had sex!

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:26 22/01/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yeah, some fucking mother...

    Avatar of Yamato
    Comment by Yamato
    23:56 22/01/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    and the poor kid's wife has to be in her 40s. If her metabolism works like I think it does, she ain't gonna be shedding that fat any time soon. A sane man would go abstinent, but unfortunately for him, he's married to a woman that was capable of raping him before, so he doesn't really have a choice in the matter. And as one last kick in the metaphorical groin, she's close to an age where menopause starts to kick in, so there might be no (biological) children for him either (probably a good thing though; at least this unfortunate relationship won't leave behind a materialized form).

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:08 23/01/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Think of it this way: he has a free pass to off her any time he wants. What jury would convict a person for killing the person who raped them?

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:31 23/01/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    there are plenty that would sadly

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:47 23/01/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Uhm yeah.....seeing as this entire relationship is built on fail, he does not want to establish the kind of bond that would take at least a couple decades to break unless extreme circumstances kick in.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:38 23/01/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    You can't get married without giving consent. It's still the boy's signature that goes on the marriage form.

    Avatar of NakkiNyan
    Comment by NakkiNyan
    06:29 23/01/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Which his mother, and 250lbs of flesh in the pic, forced him to sign.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:35 23/01/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    nah, the boy was still probably too pussy-whipped to tell that this is gonna be hell down the road. >.>






    Post Comment »

Popular

Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments