Even the most moe-addled gamers have been forced to admit that newly released trailers of impending blockbuster Grand Theft Auto V show some of the most impressive graphics of any video game to date, even if it does seem they will be restricted to laughably low resolutions on the PS3 and Xbox 360.
The trailers:
This article feels off topic.
Rockstar can’t port their games for shit. San Andreas, Bully, and GTAIV ran terribly on PC.
Really? CryEngine 2 tech demo from 5 years ago looked better to me, as it did Unreal Engine 3 tech demo from a couple years back… to me it just looks like another game who overcompensates low-poly with high-def textures…
This looks interesting but far from best graphics. If you wanted best graphics on a console I’d recommend Uncharted games.
Better graphics so you can learn anatomy better. And to make b*tchslap even more realistic.
I laugh at the people who want this for PC. Rockstar North mentioned they’re NOT releasing GTA V for PC at all. n_n
They’re sick of pirates, but I’m sure some fags will find a way to get it on the PC.
I’m having troubles understanding how a console game has best graphics.
itll get a pc release a year from now. Hopefully its not as buggy as the gta4 pc debute was.
Rockstar North (ya know, the company who is MAKING this game) stated that GTA V will NOT be released on PC.
Ever.
It’s not the graphics who makes a good game, it’s the gameplay you assholes
Stop saying GRAPHICS people! Graphics is th word of past, we say “VISUALS” nowadays. And no, they’re not the same words
Graphics aren’t everything, though the game looks impressive and very detailed.
Can’t wait to get my hands on the game, ride some cars/bikes like I stole them, crush/kill some pedestrians, do some crazy stunts, being an asshole and enjoying it, etc etc…
Don’t care about graphics, happily will take performance over it anyday 😛 A beautiful looking game is still crap if it runs at 5 fps >.>
I’ll wait for the super-deluxe-upgra-hd ps4/720/pc editions.
I hope PC never gets this game, just to screw PC gamerfag community.
You people goes on INTERNET FIGHT about the graphics but Super Mario Bros. on the NES is still a better game than most of the games mentionned in the comments…
screw the graphic, give me good time worth my money
Its fun but you are just dumbfuck with nostalgia goggles.
Those who say this clearly haven’t seen The Witcher 2. PC version of TW2 had the best graphic ever seen in a game (assuming one had a computer powerful enough to enable ubersampling).
I’m a PC gamer, I have quite a rig and I play all games on maxed out settings…but god “PC gamers” piss me off. By which I mean the idiots here immediately dismissing this incredible looking stuff just because it’s on a console. You need look no further as to why developers and publishers interact with you assholes as little as possible. What’s worse is you make the rest of us look like dicks by association.
Best graphics yet? Lol
Not really.
Talk about overhyped.
Watch Dogs looks like it has more realistic looking graphics than this. Especially with the characters.
Show your love on the posts you like and keep your hate to yourselves. This is not about technical graphics and effects. Crysis is nowere near this graphics wise. You just complain and moan about everything….even godlike anime like SOA or great western graphics artstyle like GTA fall under this community HATE. Worst community ever, i must learn to read sankaku posts and refrain from reading the coments…its almost 2 years reading your crap.
bla bla bla bla bla
Try harder.
Screw graphics, I just want CJ and Woozie back…
But is it fun? The most fun GTA game was Vice City, and it looked like ass.
And it was full of fun glitches. Like the old “ram your PCJ600 into the bridge barrier” trick to get to the second island early.
The PS3, and 360 are already graphically appealing as need to be. And they employ multilayer/social-networking aspects on the FPS genre, which a lot of American/Gringoos(Americanophiles)enjoy.
What they really need are innovative games on the platform. Story and/or character intensive games with innovative features/side-quests to reward your gaming efforts(and no, I’m not talking about “tropheys or any of that sort). Very few American/Japanese/European games have this.
My Favorite games on the PS3 console are Blazeblue, Skyrim, Atelier Meruru/Rorona/Totori, Neptunia MK2, Red Dead Redemption, Yakuza 4, Mugen Souls, and L.A. Noire.
My PS2 Favorites: Arcana Hearts, Bully, Disgaea 1/2,
GTA San Andreas, Manhunt 1/2, Scarface, and The Warriors.
Y’know, I was about to say something like “aesthetics matter more than graphics though” or “graphics help with creating immersion, but they’re not the most important thing.”
But the best I have got is “this game looks marginally better than GTA Vice City did on the PS2.”
Really, Rockstar should skip straight to the Kinect demo of making humping gestures to satisfy prostitutes, followed by stabbing gestures to recover the cost.
Eh, they look great certainly. But no where near “BEST yet”
Not even close. Especially considering these are ALL BULLSHOTS running at higher resolutions than it will actually run on the consoles.
Not to mention all the rendering limitations they impose on it. It might look this good on PC. But that’s pushing it.
The only fun thing about GTA is crashing into random things and killing civilians enough to have a huge army going after you and lasting as long as possible. Everything else is so overrated and gets boring quickly with the ever so corny storyline… Besides, everyone I know who absolutely loves the game are all wanna be gangsters. Lol.
never liked GTA
still dont like it
and i dont think i’ll ever will
graphics, sorry i really dont care
my rpgs are better than that thing
Not the only one, I haven’t liked GTA since it went 3D. Thou strangely I LOVED RDR.
The moment anon realizes that GTA is, in most aspects, a RPG…
Then why bother reading? Oh wait. *gives troll a cookie*
“Even the most moe-addled gamers have been forced to admit…”
so now fans of moe = GTA haters too? poor sankaku. i guess if you can’t beat them, might as well make up lies about them.
Education: Just because someone doesn’t like something, doesn’t mean they hate it.
Internet: You don’t like it, you clearly hate it, troll.
>> Just because someone doesn’t like something…
so then fans of moe = GTA non-likers. poor sankaku. i guess if you can’t beat them, might as well make up lies about them.
wow the difference is like night and day.
It is all shit.
The textures are going to be shit.
The console rez is going to be shit.
The models are going to be shit.
The draw distance and res will be laughable.
The AA and filtering is going to be shit.
The framerate is going to be shit.
Everything in that clip is done with uncompressed prerenderings on a PC.
And your comment is shit
That makes your reply Diarrhea
wow i might actually play gta again for the 5th. was bored of it for long time.
not exactly best graphics, just has decent lighting and effects.
*sigh* Still in denial.
No, you are. Srsly, just go watch Trailers of other games.
Those vids up there have what I consider standard graphics. You you’re wow’d by that, have a look at Crysis, Halo4 and CoD BO2.
GTAV’s graphics are FAR from the best. I’m not hating GTA or anything, I’ve ordered it already, just being objective here.
In some parts perhaps the best, but the people certainly are not top quality graphics.
As per usual. Character animation and models generally are on the shit side with GTA games.
I hope this one’s not as boring as GTA IV was…
Doun you waun to see som beeg amerecan tiities, cousin?
Well it’s about damn time.
I had a smile thinking that this would be like 3 old timers coming back to kick it to the youth of today.
>Best grphics yet
>World is bigger than GTA4, GTA:SA, and Red Dead Redemption combined
>Console only
Im pretty skeptical, but if this is the case, the game is either going to lack in game play a hell of a lot, or it’ll be split into like 10 discs.
10 discs? Unlikely. While the load time may take a while, a BD’s limit is about 80gb, and no game has come close to it yet.
BS discs are 25 & 50GB, you pleb. And Uncharted 2 uses the entire disc.
Skyrim is enourmous,graphically astonishing and it’s 5 gigs
>Skyrim
>Enormous
No.
That’s “in other words”…
Graphics-wise, Skyrim in consoles != Skyrim in PC. Unless you: Bring down resolution, put “detail” down to medium, remove AA. In other worse, no longer “graphically astonishing”.
>run 30fps
>add graphics mods
>lose 5fps
>game still playable
lol no
If you can play Skyrim at Ultra High settings,8X AA and 1080p on a 5 years old PC,well you probably live in another planet…
Lol who the fuck would want to play skyrim at 720 on high with 4x AA. Oh people who didn’t buy a PC in the last 5 years. I’ll stick with 1080p and everything on high/ultra in my games MSAA/HDAA w/e available, etc.
For your information entropy”PC Megafanboy”13 Skyrim runs on 360 at 720p,high settings,AA 4x
Mods are on 360 too,you can put all the graphic ones and the game loses only 3-4 frame per sec…
Skyrim without mods is like plain rice.
“graphically astonishing”….
Whatever you say, man.
So what are you waiting for?Go play your unbelivable PS2 graphic japanese games like Xillia 2 & Neptunia!!!
It could be like LA noire, Bricks 360s everywhere and be across 3 discs
“best graphics” <— Console game. Laughable.
I’m pretty sure GTA4 looked better on the PC than GTA5 looks in the trailer.
Textures look blurry, models are pointy(look at the apples!), shadows are blobs, resolution is 720p, and yet the consoles can only manage 30 FPS.
Did anyone try Metro 2033?
I get the feeling that a big group of people just read the title and felt the need to post a comment based solely on that. While of course consoles do not match high-end PCs(and don’t say even cheap ones can get it done, because you’ll be spending over 700$), GTAV may be the best to date.
Now granted of course Crysis was a massive and beautifuly done game, I consider it a PC game first, but even there my 4-yo 700$ pc can only handle medium graphic settings, but at 1080res. Considering that Rockstar does a proper installment on PC, many will be seeing superior graphics on PC compared to consoles.
To end this, I will quote, “show some of the most impressive graphics of any video game to date.” This does not claim it the best, the title of this article was meant to catch the reader’s eye, which I believe it did quite smashingly.
Forgetting the obvious:
“PC will always be better looking unless it’s a crappy console port”
The whole dual release with the 360 and PS3 is just more of developers being lazy and not wanting to use all of the ps3’s power/blu-ray’s space..
Only in Sankaku an ignorant fanboy like you can achieve a positive reaction with a comment like this one,even Sony executives have stopped to tell this retarded crap that storage space makes graphic!!!For your information uncompressed texture are too heavy to be read from the slow speed of the PS3 Blu-Ray(even slower than 360’s DVD drive)that’s the reason because games need to be installed,so more space is totally useless unless you want to put in thousands of FMVs or a game plus film like it happened for Macross Frontier
Only in Sankaku CAN an ignorant glorified heater lover (XBOX 360) spout lies without even looking up the facts.
XBOX 360 DVD drive “maximum read rate of 15.85 MB/s”
PS3 Blu Ray “read speed maximum is 2x 72 Mb/s”
Yeah….can…you….feel THAT..UNGHHHNM!
Before you troll read the facts, that way you can come up with a legit troll next time.
1 you’re retarted fanboy
2 you’re not reading my posts
It’s impossible for PS3 to elaborate high definition texture in real time reading directly from disc simply because blu-ray is too slow(like your brain),so the only solution is to install everything on HD and also manage everithing from disc require a lot more memory and processing power!!!Please next time learn before instead of voting down what you can’t understand!!!
Games installed on the hard drive is a good thing. Hard drives are large these days, and reading data from an optical disc while playing a game is very old school.
More space means they don’t need to compromise some of the textures and details. 😛
Troll are you indecent and ignorant!If you are more informed you should already know that PS3 BD drive read at maximum 72 Mbps per sec so the equivalent of 9 MB per sec(cause Megabit are 1/8 of Megabyte)…So shut up your mouth stupid Sony fanboy ang go out to learn something!!!
Are you born yesterday?Better graphic is obtained by a combined work of GPU,Ram and CPU!!!Blu-Ray is only a storage device,like an HD,USB memory stick and a DVD!!!
@22:37
Not to mention a stable 60 fps 😀 That game is awesome and very pretty. But there isn’t much in it technically 😛 So the PS3 doesn’t have to work as hard
PS3 has 1080p native games. See Wipeout on PS3 for example.
Are you people dumb? Even if PS3 read Bluray movies in 1080P
it can reproduce games only 1080i.
Or to put simple i=interlaced…
this sucks, really
not compressing it wouldn’t make the PS3 any more able to process graphics faster. cut scenes would look better; that is all.
@12:01 Are you born yesterday? The point cats2 made was there wouldn’t be any compression putting an entire full HD game on blu-ray if developers would use the console the way it was meant.
>bluray space
lol you fanfoys are retarded. an extra dvd9 only costs 10 cents, disc size was never an issue.
MS has devs pay extra if they increase the number of disks too much. Not the same as 10 cents.
Also what can you expect from a console like x360 which has more than 7 years, 512 mb RAM, GPU ATI xenos with 10mb!
The only thing holding this junk is the fact that three core!
The PC version will be better if not in DX9 port. But while this generation of consoles is not scrapped, fans of better graphics will keep complaining until his death.
Probably this GTA will be a mix of the most popular options for older versions to please a bigger slice of players.
That or the franchise will end up dying ..
Say it to Crysis bro. (November 13, 2007)
Screw you all console fans.
You guys who say people are annoying are even more annoying. 😀
You fanboys are both retarded and annoying period.
Man you PC elitist fanboys are annoying. GOD ALL OF YOU GUYS ARE ANNOYING!
Maybe because they’re risc and dedicated chips,that’s,for your information,8X faster to the PC counterparts,an example:imagine to run Uncharted 3 or Halo 4 on a computer with the same specifics,you will play maximum at 3-4 frame ps!!!
You’re not serious are you? 😛
I laughed at how my classmate RUSHED to me while I was eating lunch then asked me to watch the latest GTA V trailer. Him saying that PCs are bad and controllers are better, I lol’d.
Funny when people use the “controller” argument against PC gaming…because I use an XBOX controller connected to my laptop gaming rig (full compatable with Windows of course). My laptop is connected to my HDTV via HDMI cable. It is the exact same setup as my PS3, except my laptop is smaller in profile than my gaming console, but much more powerful.
laptop, I lold.
i actually prefer a mouse and keyboard for gta games but to each his own~
Console = controller
Computer = monitor
“Computer = monitor”
This made my day.
@ Anon 1:08
Some games are just better when you use a controller. 2D side scrollers, mostly. Controllers are often better for fast-paced control schemes like Mario or fighting games, while keyboards are better for more detailed control schemes like MMOs, and especially RTS.
I bought a controller for my computer, but I only use it for old ports.
Computer = controller, monitor, and porn.
with DS3 tool I use my PS3 controller on just about every game.
what make no sense is that you can buy a controller on PC… soo console… what?… don’t have nothing better than PC.
Because computer = monitor + keyboard & mouse way too mainstream.
Think like apple. It’s just an apple.
That makes no sense since both needs to have a display, whether it’s be a TV or a monitor.
You’re going by controls, so this makes more sense…
Console = controller
Computer = keyboard & mouse
It’s nowhere close to the now half a decade old Crysis.
I don’t mind if they claim something subjective like “best gameplay,” but putting “best graphics” together with “console” is just unethical.
I think they mean, “Best GTA graphics yet!”
“Grand Theft Auto V show some of the most impressive graphics of any video game to date” – Artefact, Sankaku Nov 15, 2012.
I’m sorry, but in which does he state it’s only the GTA franchise?
But of course, he’s an idiot it’s probably only his own opinion.
Imagine adding an icenhancer 2.1 to this graphics… PC only ofcourse!
No infact Uncharted 2,Halo 4,Gears Of War 3,and Battlefield 3 are faaaaaaaaaar better!!!And my dear PC fanboy,Crysis has been ported on consoles too and,surprise surprise,has a better lightining and a lot better framerate compared to the best computer counterparts!!!
Did you actually ever look at a PC/console comparison of the Crysis port? They’ve massively scaled down the graphics in practically every way. The console port may feature some “altered” lighting effects, but they are hardly “better”, and in most cases the changes look considerably less realistic, with blown highlights and oversaturated colors attempting to oscure the lack of detail. The foliage is far more sparse and less detailed, and tons of objects are missing from the the environment or simplified. Crysis on the PC looks nearly photorealistic, while Crysis on consoles looks like its running on the old Far Cry engine. They look like totally different generations of games.
I suspect you haven’t actually seen any comparisons between the two, so here’s a video comparison between the 360 and PC. It’s probably best to view the video at 1080p, but even at low resolution the differences should be like night and day…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AcKLjgWl7tM
that’s because it’s running at just 720p
The Pc version is better then console version all the time
Yeah enjoy your pc best graphic on shitty port.
pc version WILL be an XBOX 360 port like it was in GTA4… you watch.
No pc version announced yet…
Wish they’d stop assuming things. This time they cant pirate it though. So Rockstar games must be laughing somewhere.
“GTAV Has Best Graphics Yet”
Well I certainly fuckin’ hope so.
Why is this on Sankaku?
To troll you japanophile weeaboo filth.
because Sankaku also brings games news or didnt you notice the top bar that has the word “GAMES”
?
I thought it only covered asian related games, I didn’t know it had to feature the news everybody else already covered about a random western game.
Halo 4 had better graphics than this shit. The people look like they are from the PS2. Lol.
Halo 4 has the best console graphic so far,but GTA V seems incredible
But I bet it’s still worse than GTA IV when running with some phote-realistic mods. Ah, you probably can’t get them on Console, bummer guys.
Are you sure its the same as San Andreas ?
It’s certainly better than San Andreas, but I was just playing Halo4 an hour ago, and hell, you can’t compare them. Halo4’s graphics are just in a completely different league.
To be honest, I didn’t expect Halo4 to be this good. Bungie was never top notch with graphics, but 343 Industries made Halo4 absolute eye candy.
GTAV looks fine, but nothing to write home about.
u cant really compare GTA gfx with Halo gfx. It’s like ur comparing an apple with a tomato. GTA has to load more Object and view distance is higher, more AI elements has to be loaded and and and… this all puts more stress to ur machine cos all of this the gfx has to surfer.
1st person shooter games can focus on eyecandy gfx cos the gfx load isn’t so high as in GTA
Perfectly agree with you Halo 4 has the best console graphic of this gen