Prom Sex Teacher “Preyed On” Schoolboys 16 Times


A teacher who enjoyed years of sex with her male pupils has been found guilty of granting sexual favours to 3 of them on at least 16 occasions.

The 41-year-old assistant teacher, married for 18 years with two children herself, worked at a Berkshire secondary school.

There she apparently took to sleeping with her male pupils, striking up relationships with at least 3 boys aged 15-17 and engaging in sexual activity with them on a regular basis from 2008 to 2012 (including performing a sex act on one boy a week before she appeared in court) , having admitted to 16 such incidents in total.

She was said to have had sex with one boy 12 times, also having sex with another boy and groping the third. She also sent one of them pictures of herself engaged in intimate activities.

Some of the trysts reportedly relate to a school prom where she engaged in intimate activities with one of her unfortunate victims.

Her relationships came to light after a colleague became suspicious about her close relations to certain pupils, one of whom apparently reported her to his parents and the school.

There is no suggestion the relationships were unconsenting (although the age of consent in the UK is 16, a raft of additional offences apply to those in “positions of trust” taking advantage of their charges).

She pleaded guilty to a variety of offences – two charges of causing or inciting sexual activity with a child, two of causing or inciting sexual activity with a child in a position of trust, three of causing a child to watch a sex act by viewing a sexual image, and nine of sexual activity with a child in a position of trust.

The prosecution accuses her of being a “sexual predator,” and despite her guilty plea the judge has told her she will not escape jail for her antics. She has been denied bail and remains in jail awaiting sentencing. Her much cuckolded husband attended court in her support.

    Post Comment »
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Comment by Anonymous
    09:36 31/08/2012 # ! Quality (+1.0)

    no pictures of this old whore? internet, you disappoint me.

    Comment by Anonymous

    You're just not looking hard enough:

    Avatar of Powerpuff Loli
    Comment by Powerpuff Loli
    12:53 31/08/2012 # ! Quality (+0.8)

    The first links says that she worked selling cars. The second indicates that, as of yesterday, she was tweeting. Also, no hateful attacks from conservative holier-than-thou parents. Doubt either one of them is her.

    Avatar of Erranty
    Comment by Erranty
    10:33 31/08/2012 # ! Good (+0.3)

    She's not bad looking for 41. Why'd these kids complain?

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:50 31/08/2012 # ! Good (+0.7)

    Don't think any of the kids complained. It was a jealous "colleague" that tipped off the parents (probably after failing to get into that teacher's pants I supposed)

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:14 31/08/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    8 years can be considered as child, 12 can't be anymore.

    And there is a big difference of strengh between
    girl/man assault vs boy15-17 yo/female assault.
    That's not a f***ing rape.

    Avatar of Mitchell
    Comment by Mitchell
    15:55 02/09/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    15-17 years old to a guy is up to them if they want to. FOR a female i would consider that abit young. Double standards and all :)

    Comment by Anonymous

    Because it's rape. Kind of hard to consider since most idiots on sancom are virgins, but a child cannot give consent.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:46 31/08/2012 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    would you mind telling me how a all recently jailed sex offender can tweet? Her last tweet is from yesterday (New-York time.)

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:38 31/08/2012 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    "Why would she be jailed? She's not a man."

    She was denied bail, meaning that she is correctly locked up.

    I don't think those links are for the right Emma Webb.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:35 31/08/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    Why would she be jailed? She's not a man.

    Comment by Anonymous

    Not bad, for an old broad. Her daughter looks like shit thou.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:11 31/08/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    Definitely not bad for England. She looks better than most young British women. I'm sure those High school boys have never been to Japan, so they wouldn't know they could do better.

    Comment by Anonymous

    Too chubby for my tastes.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:24 31/08/2012 # ! Good (+0.8)

    Her children must be proud of their mom.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:33 31/08/2012 # ! Good (+0.7)

    What the fuck is wrong with kids nowadays? Shut the fuck up and enjoy it. You might not get sex for the rest of your life.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:03 31/08/2012 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    It was the "colleague" that tipped the police, not the kids.

    Comment by josh
    Comment by Anonymous
    10:41 31/08/2012 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Kids are unbelievably stupid.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:01 31/08/2012 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    C'mon. One porked her a dozen times. Think it was him who reported on that?

    It's the jail sentence that shocks me. What she's doing is basically community service. Reasonable people shouldn't expect sex between two teenagers to teach a boy half the things that a few occasions with a hot teacher can.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:13 01/09/2012 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    She can community service my dick, if you know what I mean.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:12 31/08/2012 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    especially in japan, where the women are superfical, and then men are super creepy/workaholics

    Comment by Anonymous

    Would you say the same to a girl when it's a 41 year old male teacher? I doubt it.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:36 31/08/2012 # ! Neutral (+0.3)

    It's different because girls are emotionally retarded and boys just want to fuck. Now shove your double standards agenda up your ass.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:01 31/08/2012 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    Not sure if sarcastic or just doesn't know what double standards mean.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:04 31/08/2012 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    The one with double standards is you. It's not different in any kind of way except people like you trying to make it out to be.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:08 31/08/2012 # ! Neutral (0)


    The fact that they're boys doesn't mean that it's fine. Maybe some gradually felt more and more disturbed and disgusted by their relation with that teacher, maybe some felt obligated to answer her demands and became tired of it.
    Personally, beautiful teacher or not, I'd feel quite disturbed to see my teacher, older than my mother, making moves on me.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:01 01/09/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    i am pretty shure sancom wouldn't mind if it was a male teacher and girls

    Comment by Anonymous

    @12:36 you sir, are a legend. ahaa/

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:09 03/09/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    Sex is different for girls than it is for boys. Penatrating is a completely differnt psychological act than getting penatrated. If the boys are between 15-17 and she isn't horrible or threatening to give them bad grades if they don't it isn't even close to rape. If she was shoving Coke bottles up their ass she raped the shit outta those boys.

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:57 31/08/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    Im in my 40s, I date girls in their 20s~30s. Getting sex isnt that hard. I've seen fat guys with skinny GF, go figure.

    A friend is 63, his current GF is 18 and she is a hottie.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:15 01/09/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    "A friend is 63, his current GF is 18 and she is a hottie."

    Daddy issues much? You just know her father molested her or abandoned her at an important development point.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:02 31/08/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    Money and luxury always attracts greedy sluts regardless of age that's nothing new.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:02 31/08/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    With correct grooming 41 year olds can seem like one of those handsome and wealthy looking men in suits one always sees in soap operas. Note "wealthy looking".

    Comment by Anonymous

    Hello Japan, this is rape. Rape is bad. It's not because you're a virgin that rape is good.

    Comment by Anonymous

    Doubtful. They have so many more years after they turn 16 to get it up and get it in someone that chances are they'll get laid at least twice.

    ....oh, wait. You mean like you! Silly me!

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:26 31/08/2012 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    I don't see why the dumb law has to get in the way of people having consensual sex.

    Avatar of Miroku74
    Comment by Miroku74
    15:46 31/08/2012 # ! Good (+0.4)

    Because the people who complain about attractive female teachers having sex with their male students aren't getting their share of booty?

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:43 31/08/2012 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Because politicians want to have complete control over the sex life of minors.

    Avatar of Myballz
    Comment by Myballz
    10:21 31/08/2012 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Its sad enough a teacher had to lose her job because she had sex.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:05 31/08/2012 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    She didn't lose her job because she had sex. She lost her job because she had sex with her pupils whom she was had an authority position over and was supposed to teach.
    Would you say the same thing if you found out the 41 year old teacher of your daughter was banging her? NO! You would be screaming bloody murder.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:43 31/08/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    No. It is not. It is the opposite of sad, it is happy. It give me happy feel that dumb bitch got what she deserved.

    1) She violated the teacher/student relationship in almost as severe a way as possible.
    2) She cheated on her husband.
    3) She committed statutory rape.

    Oh, sorry, my moralfag-ness is dripping into your ear. My apologies.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:18 31/08/2012 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    British sexual morality deliberately missing the point again.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:09 31/08/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    This is the fucking culture that invented AOC and forced it upon the rest of the world what the fuck else would you expect from these prudes.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:51 01/09/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yup good ole AOC, designed to make it possible to prosecute weirdos who think 8 yrs is old enough, looking at you muslims, a dozen virgins indeed.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:19 31/08/2012 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    So let me Guess the principle got jealous and told the cops.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:24 31/08/2012 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    Probally, I really don't get why a male would rat on his teacher who is sleeping with him. I know I would sure as hell keep my mouth shut and enjoy the experence.

    Avatar of Shadow C
    Comment by Shadow C
    09:41 31/08/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    Good thing for you this article doesn't have a picture.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:29 01/09/2012 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Yet she won't be charged as a pedophile because she's a woman.

    Avatar of Shaolan-kun
    Comment by Shaolan-kun
    18:51 31/08/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    > sexual activity with a child
    > causing a child to watch a sex act

    > 3 boys aged 15-17

    I need to look up the definitions of "child" and "teenager" on my dictionary again...

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:12 31/08/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    In England, despite the age of consent being 16, you are still considered a child if you are under 18, meaning that if you had a picture of a naked 17 year old, it would constisute child pornography here as it depicts minors in a sexual way

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:54 01/09/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    Sorry to say it doesn`t, 16 is legal age, 18 only really applies to stuff like voting and gambling.
    No court in the land would push for child porn of a 17yo.

    Post Comment »


Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments