Comments on: Japan “Will Arrest” Japanese for Senkaku Landing

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 16 Sep 2012 17:24:11 +0000

Actually, the islands do have gas reserves. That's why Japan wants them. But I honestly don't think China cares that much about the natural gas, so much that they want the islands just because Japan does.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 28 Aug 2012 06:14:28 +0000

The entirety of Japan will be Chinese territory before long lol. It's within 50 years it'll happen... US is in decline, and ignorant red necks marines ain't gonna fight to defend no nips... Hell, U.S. might sell Japan off to China to pay part of its trillion $ national debt lol... Japan will cease to be a nation soon, mark my words...

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 28 Aug 2012 05:57:23 +0000

QFT, actually China is the reason North Korea exists atm.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 27 Aug 2012 04:48:28 +0000

The best comment I saw about this was on a Chinese blog. Complaining that while Japan arrested the Chinese Trespassers, and thus sticking to its claims on the islands. Chinese coast guard/navy didn't arrest the Japanese who went to the island, and thus didn't hold their claim.

I agree, the Japanese Govt. not standing up for its territorial integrity is laughable and appalling.

By: Reichi

Reichi — Fri, 24 Aug 2012 04:16:31 +0000

If China is saying the islands are part of Taiwan, I wonder what Taiwan thinks of all this? We'll probably never hear that side of the story though.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 21 Aug 2012 22:52:19 +0000

Both sides are united in the Diaoyu island issue. And who are you to say ALL Taiwan people doesn't want that?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 21 Aug 2012 22:51:30 +0000

One of the few sensible comments on Sankaku, for that I salute. I am Chinese and I hate politicians. A bunch of kids trying to save face. Working together brings much more benefits and quicker and would set precedence in the troubled South China Sea

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 21 Aug 2012 09:43:41 +0000

I really believe that China and Japan should put away their disputes over the domain issues, and develope this area together. France and German had done it, why can't Chinese and Japanese?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 21 Aug 2012 08:17:46 +0000

Since when Taiwan became part of China?! All Taiwanese doesn't want that.

By: Daiyousei

Daiyousei — Tue, 21 Aug 2012 05:21:47 +0000

You guys obviously don't understand the concept of martyrdom very well. China obviously wants arrests because it can strong-arm its people back as heroes, which encourages more of its citizens to pull the same stunt (at their expense, not china's) while making the Japanese government look bad at the same time.

Catching them as fast as possible and quietly shipping them back is, by far, the best way to deal with this kind of shit.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 21 Aug 2012 00:30:50 +0000

(Me reading the title) Why would they arrest someone for login Sankaku? ... Alright, landing Senkaku... Shxt I need a new pair of glasses.

By: Kiljoy616

Kiljoy616 — Mon, 20 Aug 2012 23:37:32 +0000

Japan has neither the balls or soldiers to take on China so of course they did nothing but let go of the Chinese protestors. Oh well that is life, now the better just hope Chine one days does not decide to take it because its not like they can do anything about it.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 20 Aug 2012 18:05:31 +0000

GUNDAM STYLE

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 20 Aug 2012 16:20:02 +0000

you idiot, NK goes ass over heels to applease PRC. They don't just shoot Chinese trespassers.

Also, China would love this kind of provocation, it would allow them to use the event as justification to seize Japanese holdings and businesses in China, pre-empt military action, etc.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:53:33 +0000

Yes, Japan should be like North Korea. Both want nukes, after all. Although in Japan's case, it'll likely be self inflected nuking.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:48:00 +0000

You're as [un]likely to find natural gas there as off any other dinky island. And fishing in the area have already been exhausted by overfishing in the surrounding region. Fishes move... There's nothing of material value there.

No. This is about nationalism. The fact that this worthless dinky piece of rock wasn't handed back to its former owner along with other Japanese overseas conquests via treaty at the end of WWII rubs Chinese nationalists the wrong way. Especially since Americans already admitted that it's an unintentional oversight.

Japanese nationalists think Japan has already suffered enough for WWII, and gets to keep whatever fell out of the loophole.

By: Bayonette

Bayonette — Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:35:44 +0000

The only thing the island needs is to remain neutral.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:35:23 +0000

It's cowardice alright, the politically courageous (and right) thing to do would be just giving back the island to China, regardless of what ultranationalists say. As Americans already admitted, the fact that this particular dinky island wasn't handed back along with other Japanese overseas conquests at the end of WWII via treaty was an oversight, nothing more. If you make a mistake, you fix it, you don't continue the mistake.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 20 Aug 2012 11:05:21 +0000

FUCK China. Arrest (or kill) all those dirty dog and cat eating Chinks, LOL.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 20 Aug 2012 06:27:32 +0000

Then fill it with AV models.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 20 Aug 2012 06:24:59 +0000

Thanks U.S. for your delicate handling of the regional politics.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 20 Aug 2012 06:23:44 +0000

The Yanks pretty much started this one.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 20 Aug 2012 05:19:29 +0000

This site should be renamed Senkaku Complex.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 20 Aug 2012 04:47:57 +0000

The island is still private property, it only makes sense that you'd arrest anybody who goes on it. What they did was no different from some asshole going into my backyard past a closed gate. It's trespassing.