Woman Teacher Gets Off on Pool Peeping: “I Like Breasts”

changing-room-peeping.jpg

A female elementary school teacher has been caught operating a hidden camera at a pool changing room, saying she “had an interest in the breasts of pretty girls,” although either because she is a woman or a teacher police and her school seem to have decided to let her get off with impunity.

The 24-year-old woman, a teacher at an elementary school in Tokyo’s Kunitachi city, had availed herself of the pool facilities at the Toshimaen amusement park in Nerima city in order to secretly install a camera in the female changing rooms there.

She was soon rumbled by a security guard who noted something suspicious and alerted police, who began an investigation.

They soon caught her, although for some mysterious reason reports omit to mention her being arrested.

She even admitted her crimes to police and school, pleading simple lust:

“I was interested in the breasts of pretty women, so I recorded them so I could watch them when I felt like it. It was inexcusable.”

Her school has apologised for employing a criminal pervert, but seems to omitted any mention of whether it will punish her:

“We think it is inexcusable that one of our staff has betrayed the trust of children and parents in this way.”

It has not escaped the attention of teacher-watchers that no mention made of her being arrested or charged, her name was not released, and the school did not specify what, if any, disciplinary action it took against her – a stark contrast to the arrest, public humiliation and sacking which would likely follow from a male or non-teacher undertaking the same course of action.


    Post Comment »
    107 Comments
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Comment by Anonymous
    02:25 22/07/2012 # ! Good (+0.9)

    And woman wants equal rights but gets off the hook just because she is a female peeping on female students.

    A crime is a crime nevertheless.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:34 22/07/2012 # ! Good (+0.7)

    - They demand equality, but refuse to voluteer for military service.

    - They demand equality, but when women receive bills they demand chivalry.

    - They demand equality but absolutely refuse it for others.

    Wait, something must be wrong somewhere...
    Unless, what they're really aiming for is: equality, but only for the things that will benefit them.

    Kinda strange concept of equality there.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:46 23/07/2012 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Yuri does not count.

    Comment by Anonymous

    how is it a crime ?

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:31 23/07/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    The real problem is not that itself is dangerous or anything, but there are 2 good reasons why it's a crime:

    1. you violate the personal rights of others (nobody likes to be peeped on until he's a pervert himself), unless you get their permission it's a crime to even take photoes of people on the streets...

    2. Perverts are mentally ill, so noone can predict if letting them peep could satisfy them forever. It could be like a drug addicts case where he needs even harder drugs over time, maybe this case of peeping could lead to rape if "just looking" isn't enough anymore.

    So it's best to prevent to initial crime to prevent the onfollowing ones.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:26 23/07/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    If you recorded it, its material can be given to your brother, father or even sold it. That's the crime.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:58 22/07/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    Congratulations on being the stupidest poster of the decade!

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:17 22/07/2012 # ! Quality (+1.0)

    who doesnt like looking at small girls breasts...

    Comment by Anonymous

    nothing wrong with looking. unless your a guy.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:41 22/07/2012 # ! Drivel (-1.0)

    Not only did she get off scott free because she's a female herself I bet she had to do ALOT of sexual favors to men in high places just to keep it from being a really huge uproar. Even now she's probably sucking some administration leaders dick to keep her job.

    Avatar of Powerpuff Loli
    Comment by Powerpuff Loli
    14:39 22/07/2012 # ! Quality (+1.0)

    I'll take "What would a person who's read too much hentai respond?" for $100, Alex.

    Avatar of Nash
    Comment by Nash
    02:14 22/07/2012 # ! Quality (+0.8)

    i initially read that as "Woman Teacher Gets Off on Pool Peeing"

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:28 22/07/2012 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Wait that's not what it said? I was expecting something involving peeing the entire time. Dammit.

    Avatar of ~Idiot Princess~
    Comment by ~Idiot Princess~
    02:22 22/07/2012 # ! Quality (+0.8)

    Lesbian voyeurism?

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:25 22/07/2012 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    She could be selling those videos.

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:07 22/07/2012 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    More likely. And to cover it up she said that she just like to look since no one cares about female pedos

    Avatar of Assassinister
    Comment by Assassinister
    03:16 22/07/2012 # ! Good (+0.4)

    or Lesbian loli voyeurism because its an elementary school.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:27 22/07/2012 # ! Good (+0.7)

    A woman peeps on little girls with a camera and gets off the hook...

    If a man did that, he'd get fired, loaded with criminal charges and have a permanent mark on his record.

    Stupid sexism.

    Avatar of Pyrus
    Comment by Pyrus
    03:42 22/07/2012 # ! Quality (+0.8)

    To paraphrase Ranma Saotome: "It's no big deal for me to see a naked girl. I mean, I've seen myself plenty of times..."

    I guess that's how it's being looked at.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:29 22/07/2012 # ! Quality (+1.0)

    So if a man looks at little boys it's not a crime?

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:01 22/07/2012 # ! Quality (+1.0)

    I agree. There is definitely a double standard in force here.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:23 22/07/2012 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    @ Anon 7:57

    Yeah, he should be a real man and look at little girls. Little boys are a waste of time.

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:57 22/07/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    However, a man looking at young boys is absolutely disgusting if you ask me....

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:55 22/07/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    Anon 4:29

    "So if a man looks at little boys it's not a crime"? Looking I guess is O.K. But touching is a NO NO!! Ask Jerry Sandusky from Penn State University....

    Comment by Anonymous

    Anon 7:57
    Because a women looking at little girls or a teacher undertaking these kinds of actions is completly ok.
    Are you an retard or something like that?

    Her actions are just as harmfull and dangerous. She's doing the exact same thing and should be charged the same.
    But apparently equality is just a one way road made up by a group to get more rights for themselves without giving up their coveted position.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:42 22/07/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    Just what the world needed; a legal precedent scumbags can use to defend child molesters like Sandusky.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:38 22/07/2012 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    No, a male teacher wouldn't be fires, we already had plenty news like this here and if you are a teacher you can do whatever you want in japan, no matter if you are male or female.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:54 22/07/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    No, plenty of the men over there DO get arrested for incidents like this. You should read an actual newspaper once in a while.

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:01 22/07/2012 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Just get a woman to make the recordings for you...

    Comment by Anonymous

    No, that would only get you arrested on two accounts.
    Peeping and forcing a woman to record it.

    Avatar of ナイジェリアの王様
    09:14 22/07/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    No, the guy gets within a country mile of a women's changing room he'll get arrested and charged.

    Fuck, it doesn't have to be a changing room, it just has to be a woman on the street.

    Avatar of BlaqCat
    Comment by BlaqCat
    00:52 23/07/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    The sexes will never truly be equal really, now with sex-crime related stuff anyway, though this seems to be more of the "public sector workers get away with murder in japan" style of unfairness.

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:54 22/07/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    Have you missed that when a man gets caught diddling the students he gets promoted [to position without child-based responsibilities but nonetheless]?

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:13 22/07/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    That's what you get when women are put in position of power (over men) and given all the favor.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:02 22/07/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    Double standards at its best!

    Comment by Anonymous

    its ok as long as women do it .

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:52 22/07/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    Blame it on our ancestors. Back then women had no rights, now they make us pay.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:00 23/07/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    Of course, a lot of people posting here are from America. In America, men had rights for about 350 years, could vote for about 200 years, and women didn't start getting rights until about 100 years ago. Granted, most of those rights were largely theoretical for men who weren't white and wealthy for a large chunk of that time, but the fact remains that there was a huge gap and it tends to color Americans' attitudes on the subject.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:23 22/07/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    1. Back then the vast majority had no rights. Even the whole "women weren't allowed to vote" is a hollow argument because for most of history neither were men.
    In most countries the time between allowing males and females to vote boils down to 10-20 years.
    So the whole "women were so mistreated" in the past thing is mostly ignoring a lot of nasty things men had to face aswell and positive things women had back then.

    2. That said what happened in the past isn't important to anyone living today. Did any of the women alive nowaday live back in the medieval? NO!
    Not a single one of them suffered from these "bad" things back then nor did a single guy profit from them.
    It's another hollow argument to make one group feel bad and get what you want.
    The only reason they get away with it is because people like you justify it and let them get away with it.

    Avatar of Ecchi-BANZAII
    Comment by Ecchi-BANZAII
    02:20 22/07/2012 # ! Good (+0.6)

    It's offending but... come on, tell me someone who DOESN'T adore cute chests.

    I approve to some extent.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:10 22/07/2012 # ! Good (+0.6)

    lets add something here...

    who doesnt adore cute loli chests?

    Comment by Anonymous

    people that arent pedophiles
    aka people that arent sick in the head

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:59 23/07/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    hurr durr, mad bro, hurr durr.

    Avatar of chengsta
    Comment by chengsta
    03:43 22/07/2012 # ! Good (+0.6)

    What an idiot. Did she forget that she was also a woman? She should've just jumped right in with'em!

    Avatar of Assassinister
    Comment by Assassinister
    03:56 22/07/2012 # ! Good (+0.4)

    If she wants an excuse then she should watch Maji de Watashi ni Koi Shinasai episode 4 Yamato's argument with Chris that seeing naked girls is righteousness.:))D

    Avatar of DragooNick
    Comment by DragooNick
    02:24 22/07/2012 # ! Good (+0.4)

    Ofc she said it's her own interest, but at home she sold the videos taken ...
    If it were a male teacher, he would have been arrested on the spot! ...

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:21 22/07/2012 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    oh shssh you, don't ruined my lesbian fantasies

    Avatar of Gekokujou
    Comment by Gekokujou
    23:03 22/07/2012 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Mine too. I hate to say it, but part of this story is giving me a huge nosebleed.

    Comment by Taylor
    02:40 22/07/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    yeah I didn't think of that she probably is selling it, that liar. Send her to jail!

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:04 22/07/2012 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    You meant "give her high quality recording gear that automatically uploads to an online server", right?

    Comment by Taylor
    09:22 22/07/2012 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    good point yeah sorry. what the hell happened to me. Idk What I was thinking.





    Post Comment »

Popular

Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments