Take your shit to any uyghur （idiot couldn’t even spell that right） …

• Tags: Animals, Bizarre, China, Mass Media, Obituaries, Politics, Senkaku Complex, Tokyo
  

Comment on Chinese Outraged: “Those Japs Killed Our Baby Panda!” by Anonymous:

Take your shit to any uyghur （idiot couldn’t even spell that right） in inner mongolia (aka our “conquerors”), and see if you get a pat on the back or a knife in the guts for it.

Same goes for Tibet. If you can’t speak their language just bring a portrait of Mao and try spitting on it in public, we’ll see what happens.

Be glad the chinese you usually talk to are civil enough to laugh off those idiotic fantasies and offensive shit.

Anonymous made other comments on this post:

• Chinese Outraged: “Those Japs Killed Our Baby Panda!”:
  

  18:34 You really do sound like a privileged 1st word idiot with little to no idea how much of what you just said applies to non-US nations about a hundred times more than what you imagine applies to US. Not many people are saying US is THE example to follow – only that those who accentuate its faults are often much more guilty of the same things a million fold, and thereby making their criticism a very childish excercise in shit talking, with themselves stewing in the low pit of shit hole while …

• Chinese Outraged: “Those Japs Killed Our Baby Panda!”:
  

  @23:15 1) Then what justification do they have for receiving payments for all Pandas in foreign zoos? 2)No other countries require bribes for their animals, even if they are endangered. ONLY CHINA DOES THAT. 3) Try changing your nationality (to that of another country), then go back to China and if they decided you are some kind of activist, see how they consider you to be a chinese national and throw you in jail to be tortured. 4) How can you send something back to China that NEVER was in …

• Chinese Outraged: “Those Japs Killed Our Baby Panda!”:
  

  @09:47 Obviously you read nothing I wrote, but I’ll entertain a reply anyway. 1.Chinese don’t claim to own the species. 2.”No other country requires an annual bribe to keep an specific species of animal in foreign zoos” – Because those specific species of animals are NOT ENDANGERED. Also China’s not forcing anyone to pay; in fact, most countries do not even consider renting their endangered animals to overseas zoos. 3.”…laying claim to all people of Chinese decent, which china claims to have …

• Chinese Outraged: “Those Japs Killed Our Baby Panda!”:
  

  You mean the CIA-funded priest-caste separatists with their holiness the dalai lama at the head preaching “peace and morals” to the world? Yeah considering their centuries of priviledged luxury living got royally screwed by Mao, you can bet they see things differently. Though I guess if it was America that did the “liberation” ppl would be singing to a different tune.

• Chinese Outraged: “Those Japs Killed Our Baby Panda!”:
  

  @02:43 Ya know, just because the Chinese have control of the habitat, doesn’t mean they own the whole species. No other country requires an annual bribe to keep an specific species of animal in foreign zoos, even though there are other species who’s habitats are only located within other countries borders. Proposing to lay claim to to all the species of animals is preposterous, like laying claim to all people of Chinese decent, which china claims to have such authority. What twisted …

Recent comments by Anonymous:

• Xbox One “Clearly Inferior” To PS4, Sony Stock Surges:
  

  what you talking about? Steam doesn’t charge for online multiplayer once you brought their game. Unlike Xbox live that needs constant renewal ($$$)

• Xbox One “Clearly Inferior” To PS4, Sony Stock Surges:
  

  lol, nice. Yellow journalism at its worst.

• Xbox One “Clearly Inferior” To PS4, Sony Stock Surges:
  

  seriously… where did you get those clock frequencies from? The rumor mill? It sure as hell wasn’t from the official announcements.

• Xbox One “Clearly Inferior” To PS4, Sony Stock Surges:
  

  … you fuck, resorting to blocking comments now eh?

• China Quality Crossing: “Cross 100m in 5 Seconds…”:
  

  The translational approach doesn’t work as well as the alternative. Which, in turn, is redundant.