Sweden: Manga “Not Child Porn” After All

swedish-child-pornography-001.jpg

The Swedish Supreme Court has finally worked out that drawings are not people, and in a landmark case has acquitted a man convicted of possessing child pornography after the authorities found suggestive manga-themed imagery on his computer.

The case in question, previously covered in some detail, was that of a Swedish manga translator convicted of possessing child pornography after courts decided some of the artwork found on his PC depicted minors (a picture of two girls eating a banana, above, was one of the images authorities alleged constituted child pornography).

He disputed the ruling, but two lower courts upheld the guilty verdict, although his fine was lowered.

Eventually his case reached Sweden’s Supreme Court, and the judge there finally accepted his arguments that he needed the images as part of his job and that drawings should not be treated as child pornography:

“The criminalization of possession of the drawings would otherwise exceed what is necessary with regard to the purpose which has led to the restriction on freedom of expression and freedom of information.”

The Supreme Court insisted the images were pornographic representations of children all the same, but relented by conceding that as imaginary entities they were not in fact the same as real children.

However, they did insist one image was “sufficiently realistic” as to constitute child pornography (apparently contradicting the entire basis of their verdict in the process), but decided to acquit him for that one as well anyway.

The exonerated man later expressed his relief to the press:

“I’m obviously very relieved, in part because it makes life easier for me personally, but most of all I’m generally relieved for Sweden as a whole.

It would have been very hard for me to relate to Sweden as a country if it turned out to be a place that prohibited certain expressions of the imagination.”

Even his lawyer seemed happy with the court’s murky logic:

“It’s heartening that common sense has prevailed. The Supreme Court has an excellent way of cutting through the formalities and coming to the right conclusion. The ruling is very good in its entirety.”


    Post Comment »
    194 Comments
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Comment by Anonymous
    18:10 15/06/2012 # ! Quality (+1.0)

    Those drawings are as realistic as the assault accusations against Assange.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:51 08/07/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well that's Sweden down & only the UK to go (in The Western Hemisphere...

    Serious don't you UK'ers got Equal Protection under the Law or an "ACLU"? as a defense against selective prosecution in a Race Hatred UN "profililing" crime manner against Japanese Asians & their commercial publishing industry.

    Even the UK blinked (so they wouldn’t look like total Neanderthal Brownshirt Nazi “bonfire picture burning” art they don't approve of retards) and let the Western “Manga” by UK treasure Alan Moore of Watchmen fame & his Lost Girls illustrated & text “child porn” be sold & published just now in the UK. Contains sexually explicit "cartoons" Of Alice in Wonderland & Wendy etc down to age 10 & engaging in bestiality I'm told.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:20 10/07/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hey UK, since 90% of males are hetero, the Coroners & Justice Bill against "Dangerous Cartoons" is a profiling hate crime & gender discrimination & unequal treatment under the law as evidenced by it criminalizing male natural tendency toward youth & erotic visual material & visual needed stimulation compared to women & will subject men to arrests at 100X to 1000X the rate of womnen. This alone subjects all law officials to immediate civil rights lawsuits at all levels & jurisdictions by your ACLU types.

    Here's some legal ammo: Britain’s new National Treasure celebrated with all public fanfare & museum tours “The Warren Cup” the artifact recently purchased with the highest price (in millions) ever paid by the British Museum and fundraising groups for any ancient object.
    The 2000 year old Roman silver cup featuring on one side a 30 year old man hardcore ass fucking an 18 year old boy while an 8 year old boy watches them; and on the reverse side a 18 year old hardcore ass fucking a long haired 11 or 12 year old young boy slave (Roman boy slaves cut their long hair at 14 when they became a legal man). Wiki article.
    I guess it’s fine with UK femnazi Parliment because it’s the comparatively fully coddled Gay Right….
    and not a girl.. or a dick-girl for more or less Heterosexual males.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:49 16/06/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hey now, you will be hard-pressed to find a more solid banana in all of visual media!

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:01 16/06/2012 # ! Drivel (-1.0)

    TELL THAT TO THE KID WHO GOT RAPED SHIT HEAD!

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:11 16/06/2012 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    No kid was raped in this case. So GTFO.

    Avatar of Nano
    Comment by Nano
    18:48 15/06/2012 # ! Quality (+1.0)

    Oh no! Think of the exploited imaginary children!

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:39 16/06/2012 # ! Quality (+1.0)

    The phrase "Think of the children!" has to be one of the most annoying and irrational arguments in existence. Me, I prefer to say "Let the children think!". Oh well, people are idiots.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:26 16/06/2012 # ! Good (+0.8)

    There are occasions when, yes, children need to be thought of. It's just that when it comes up in politics, 99% of the time it's an attempt to shut down rational thought in hopes that you'll approve something that's at best only superficially about helping children. (Usually, the primary purpose is controlling adults - if children benefit even slightly as a result, that's merely a bonus.)

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:59 12/07/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    Why is it always picking on the Japanese? Whether for 3D kiddie porn possesion or 2D Manga?

    Other White Western Nations "defacto" legalize by non-legislation or fully legalize possesion of 3D kiddie porn such as Czech Republic & Russia... World Powers even.
    If it is not a crime there, then it is not a morally a crime ANYWHERE.

    Pussy "White Racist" femnazis are cowards, afraid of the KGB & Russian Mafia & desperately fearful that other Nations under their heel (UK & USA etc) may find out that other White Western civilized Nations don't consider 3D kiddie porn a crime.

    The femnazis just want their social engineering hatred of male sexuality mind control brain washing to suceed.

    Yakuza & Otaku & Salarymen get some backbone!!! These White Racists & man despisers think you small Asians are weak!

    No reason to pick solely on Japan for "simple possesion" when Western White Nations are even more liberal in allowing 3D kiddie porn.

    Obviously outlawing possesion of 3D kiddie porn is a cruel & unusual punishment unconstitutional violation, as anyone can secretly be sent 3D kiddie porn imbedded in any unrelated download.

    As an ACLU member my ACLU lawyer comrades are planning to overturn all 3D & 2D anti-loli legislation as unconstitutional laws & sue law enforcement by name at all levels under all discriminatory Human Rights & will make the Oklahoma City Tin Drum fiasco look like nothing by comparison.

    So long anti-loli moralfags you lost.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:38 24/06/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    Apparently Loli Manga DOES think of the children...

    "...There is a startling statistic, inconvenient to the people who want to censor lolicon: the number of rape victims of elementary school age or younger, has dropped over the last 40 years to less than one-tenth of what it was in the peak year of 1965. The decline correlates with the gradual rise in sexual content in manga and other media, including the availability of "child pornography" in the late 80s through the early 2000s (when such material was not criminalized in Japan) and, of course, lolicon. Although one can't say that the availability of lolicon caused a decline in the rate of underage rape, anyone who argues that lolicon causes sex crimes is simply engaging in fantasy...."

    (Source for the decline in rape over 40 years: The Japan Times Online, June 12, 2010, quoting Yukari Fujimoto, an associate professor of Meiji University who studies girls manga and gender.)

    Equality Now, U Mad yet?

    Comment by John Hayabusa
    05:33 16/06/2012 # ! Good (+0.4)

    Think of the lolis and shotas.

    I am glad that Sweden made the right decision. Maybe now, they will lift bans of some video games, like Dead or Alive.

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:34 16/06/2012 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    There were never any ban on Dead or Alive, Bergsala the local Nintendo company panicked when some forum trolls said they would form a complaint with the police, the police looked at it and did nothing.
    A few company sell imports of DOA and it's sold via them, nothing has happened to these company's.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:43 16/06/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    Flanders wife on the Simpsons..

    Always says

    "WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDREN"

    When it does not apply..

    ANNOYING TO SAY THE LEAST.

    triti

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:23 16/06/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    "Think of the children" is a parody. It's not irrational to the slightest.

    Comment by Anonymous

    Think of the children...when you fap at night.

    Comment by Anonymous

    Where the hell is my COMMENT\s !!!!

    Summary: I got loli ftw so go fuckyourselfs...

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:35 16/06/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    If it's not hurting anyone else then the "law" should just leave them alone. They should be focusing on actual threats to society.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:22 15/06/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    Isn't that how we got ourselves in this situation in the first place?

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:33 15/06/2012 # ! Quality (+1.0)

    Drawings are not people; who would've thought...

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:09 15/06/2012 # ! Good (+0.7)

    They must be non-American.

    Avatar of Karosene
    Comment by Karosene
    01:12 16/06/2012 # ! Quality (+1.0)

    America!

    Where drawings and corporations are people!

    Avatar of Erranty
    Comment by Erranty
    03:07 16/06/2012 # ! Good (+0.4)

    Sadly that's the way most of the "Women's Rights" extremists have been swinging it.

    I still maintain that all manga characters are merely portions of their creator's imagination. So any age based complaints would have to check the creator's age.

    Avatar of Sorrior
    Comment by Sorrior
    19:36 16/06/2012 # ! Good (+0.4)

    Actually after looking into it america is still one of the more lolicon friendly countries law wise.

    Worst part is that isn't saying much and they can still get you on trumped up charges of obscenity. BUT the supreme court HAS TWICE deemed lolicon legal.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:03 19/06/2012 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    I can't wait until they reverse that bullshit obscenity law.

    Punish the real thing and real crimes, but wtf can a pixel or drawing do to anyone?

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:29 18/06/2012 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Duhhhhh. All the Supreme Court said was that cartoons are not "child pornography". America is one of the LEAST friendly places for lolicon, along with the U.K, Australia, New Zealand, Canada - hey wait -- could it be something about Anglo-American culture?

    Yup.

    Go look at the Supreme Court decision (there's only one). Then go look at the obscenity law, 1466A, a special provision to punish lolicon, applying the SAME LONG JAIL TERMS as REAL child porn.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:23 18/07/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    The age "12" (LOL)lolis have nothing to do with so-called "pedophilia". They are the age of sexual majority in some Countries & just a year or two shy for most Countries making it barely a "crime" at all. American University Researchers (& others) in a large clinical & research study put penis gauges on many men's penises & showed them erotica of Adults, Teens & Children & discovered that 70% of ALL Adult men react bonerwise maximally (100%) to age 16 females into Adulthood... with 50% level of arrousal for 12 year old females.

    The Researchers discovered the other almost 27% of Adult men (Hard Gays excluded) their boner measuring device measured 67% to 100% arrousal for 12 year old females when showed erotica of 12 year old females (compared to the other 70% of men who showed 50% arrousal for 12 year olds.

    No, the REAL child abuser sick fucks are you White Gajin moralfags who dismembered, burned screaming in agony untold tens of thousands of little children at Hiroshima & Nagasaki... not the being nice to each other pleasure of orgasm - normative by design Japanese male (& Western male) sexual orientation - No Comparison.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:19 22/06/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    LOL nice try Equality Now trolls

    Sankaku Complex is for years hosted in the USA... along with thousands of other lolicon hentai pay member sites or free sites.

    They're all up aren't they?

    "George Bush banhammered lolicon, shotacon, and toddlercon in the USA during 2003, but in 2004, The Supreme Court unbanhammerd lolicon because censoring Art is unconstitutional."

    "...I'd like to ease people's fears.

    It has just been made official by the U.S. Supreme Court, once and for all, that lolicon (SEXUAL REPRESENTATION OF MINORS IN CARTOON, COMPUTER 3D RENDERING OR PHOTOGRAPHY) is LEGAL. Go to Wikipedia and look up United States v. Williams

    United States v. Williams
    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    United States v. Williams, 553 U.S. ___ (2008) was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that a federal statute prohibiting the "pandering" of CP [1] (offering or requesting to transfer, sell, deliver, or trade the items) did not violate the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, even if a person charged under the code did not in fact possess CP which to trade.

    The Court overturned a decision of the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals that the statute was facially void for overbreadth and vagueness, having reasoned that there is no First Amendment protection for offers to engage in illegal transactions[2] and that banning "the collateral speech that introduces such material into the CP distribution network" does not in fact criminalise a "substantial amount of protected speech."

    Important Notes/Dicta (THIS IS THE ONE THAT AFFECTS "LOLI").

    The Court further stated that 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(3)(B) would not be construed to punish the solicitation or offering of "virtual" (computer generated/animated) CP, thus comporting with the holding of Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, 535 U.S. 234 (2002).

    The Court assured a worried nation that "But an offer to provide or request to receive virtual CP is not prohibited by the statute. A crime is committed only when the speaker believes or intends the listener to believe that the subject of the proposed transaction depicts real children. It is simply not true that this means 'a protected category of expression [will] inevitably be suppressed,' post, at 13. Simulated CP will be as available as ever." (emphasis supplied) Williams at 17.

    United States v. Williams - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Some weren't exactly impressed by this ruling but nonetheless :

    Quote:
    It is unlikely that the Supreme Court will revisit the virtual issue, Robert Corn-Revere, an attorney with Davis Wright Tremaine, told TechNewsWorld. "One thing remarkable about this ruling is the consensus view of the Court that CP is restricted to actual children."

    E-Commerce News: Must Read: US Law Aims to Catch Up With Tech - and Misses

    The one in bold pretty much says that the decision will stand and that's that."

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:25 16/06/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    You just missed the punch line. In America.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:12 16/06/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    Swedish = non-American?

    So in other words:
    Swedish = Chinese?

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:28 22/06/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    Legal shmeagle

    Larry Flynt’s Hustler various Million selling Not the Bradys XXX, Not The Cosbys XXX series etc. The number 1 selling/award winning Adult hardcore flicks portraying Grade School age lolis getting tapped.

    In a recent United States Supreme Court decision (Ashcroft vs. Free Speech Coalition) the Supremes held (defacto in following) that thisform of pornography were protected by the First Amendment.

    What is the difference between the Americans or the Japs? They both portray grade school characters.

    No difference... ALL LEGAL.

    Equality Now trolls... U Mad ?

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:10 15/06/2012 # ! Drivel (-0.8)

    Haha random shot at America. Even though there has never been an issue about drawings being child porn nor a ban on that type of manga

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:17 15/06/2012 # ! Good (+0.8)

    You really think so? Do a little research and you'll find you're completely wrong. Just look on Wikipedia.

    Avatar of Kouma
    Comment by Kouma
    00:32 16/06/2012 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Loli is pretty much illegal in the United States. It's just not really pursued unless something gets caught up in Customs.

    Avatar of Sorrior
    Comment by Sorrior
    19:43 16/06/2012 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    @anon 04:27 he's right though. Look it up and read through the law yourself HOWEVER the way the new ones written treats it the same. Basically they get ya on obscenity and you can still fight it and IF a VERY big if say the supreme court got it they'd actually probably find it legal. i mean laws like the current one have been struck down twice before just that before they were going outright not obscenity.

    So yeah loli ITSELF legal as a concept illegal due to obscenity.

    Oh and you want backwards try england they have cameras EVERYWHERE and loli is ourtight illegal there if i recall right.

    Another good place is australia illegal there from what i recall and hell even women with a cups in porn is not allowed.

    How about new zealand where Puni Puni Poemi is illegal under CP grounds.

    Basically a who's who of "first world" nations actually can and usually does fuck you around more than the US. And this comes from a guy who thinks the US has lost almost all of it's freedoms and needs either to be remade as in laws REMADE or alternatively revolution and i;d STILL pick the US at least in it;s current form over said nations.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:32 18/06/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yeah, and then you get 20 years. You people don't know shit about American law. Look at 1466A and ask yourselves what fucking jury is ever NOT going to find hard core lolicon illegal. Then go look at the penalties. They're the SAME as for real child porn.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:41 26/06/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    Feminazis have been a pain in the ass for awhile.

    Their starting to leak into video-games and trying to push and pull things were everyone is dressed up to their eye-balls.

    The femininazi's want to destroy gaming because they hate it.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:37 22/06/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    The attempt to apply “child porn” laws to cartoon CHARACTERS is particularly insane as most Japanese art contains at least one or more characters either of an ambiguous age or characterized as under arbritrarily 18 times a spheroid composed primarilly of Iron & Silica molecules reaches the same point around a larger lit roughly spheroidal mass of Hydrogen & trace elements.

    What femnutzis are actually attempting is beyond so-called “crime control” or even “thought-crime control”…. it is tantamount to the control of the very thoughts and instincts of men – a lobotomy in fact.
    As Anime-Manga is a part of Man, owned by Man & originates from Man’s thoughts & hand… frankly women should not meddle in something which is not their property to begin with & just get busy with their own creative property.

    I have to question that the femnazis can do anything about youthful professional-commercial Japanese age 18+ Adult film stars (& other nationalities/Ethnics) for example Cocoro Igarashi in NWF-062 Acme Restrictive Confinement over at asiamoviepass… Or Hinata Seto, Noriko Kago, Nozomi Momoi, Azuki Tsuji, Aki Nagase, Shizuku Tsukino, Hatsumi Takaoka, Aoba Ito, Yu Aine, Misa Komine, Ohsaki Chiwa, Ran Monbu, Ai Nagase, Airi & Meiri etc. etc. Japanese are obviously the superior race as their women look normal for their age, not ageing too fast & wrinkling & deteriorating like for example Caucasian women

    Avatar of Gogetters
    Comment by Gogetters
    00:53 16/06/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's only illegal if it's considered "obscene"

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:27 16/06/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    @Gogetters
    You don't get 20 years of federal prison for mere "obscenity", not even in the land of the pretend-free.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:53 16/06/2012 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Actually, you'd think it's logical that you don't have to convince people of such a thing.

    What does that show? Humans are idiots.

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:38 19/06/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    Somehow that makes me laugh, somehow I understand these morons.

    See, I've been living nearby a couple, the husband of which would frequently perform domestic violence. I'd gladly testify if the woman were to ever file a complaint to the police, but it needs to come from her: her neighbors cannot go to the police and report 'something that's not their business'. And well, I guess at the end of the day it wasn't, indeed, my business. Kinda tiring when we had to open our door for her when she was seeking protection, but I could have just plain stopped opening the door. That wouldn't be too bothersome.
    What *really* bothered me was that that sort of abusive guy was leaving nearby. *That* is my business and I declare it unilaterally. I do not want him here. Kill him if you must, help him if you can afford it, I do not care, I just don't want him here.

    I think people who want to punish thoughtcrimes have the same reasoning: they don't care on what account thoughtcriminals should be punished, they just don't want them near their families.
    Of course the difference here is, that the person I didn't want nearby, was causing harm as a matter of observable fact.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:46 16/06/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    DON'T ORDER THIS THROUGH THE MAIL

    LOVE BODY AKI

    http://www.jlist.com/product/OMO311

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:07 19/06/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    J-List wants to FUCK YOU UP!

    LOL, don't order that shit or you'll get pwned hard for the rest of your life.

    Not that I care for that type of stuff but damn, paper, pixels, and rubber sending people to prison?

    Fucking retarded!

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:52 30/06/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    You lying sack o shit Equality Now trolls.. I heard from Law Enforcement personnel involved it was a pure railroaded setup. He didn't order from J-List.. and millions of Asian-Americans & Okatu Americans in most of the Red States & all of the Blue States, San Francisco order the same material off pay membership sites or thru the mail in DVD, digital or paper & nothing ever happens to them for decades.

    A redneck fundamentalist xenophobic racist hick MidWestern USA farmbelt community was carefully conservative redneck district shopped & picked because certain police anti-porn Femnazis & SNL church chat lady moralfags were so desperate that they all but lost the war on porn they needed a religious fanatic nerdy handicapped white unmarried male(Handley) who had to take care of his religious fanatic handicapped elderly mother... Thus he unlike anyone else could be tricked into pleading guilty to an unconstitutional admission of guilt & PURPOSELY TRICKED sign away the right to appeal, so he could get religion, "Yes I'm a bad person, erotica is bad not art, I will do what you say" blahh blahh.

    And a hick midWestern lawyer who didn't care about 1st amendment & thought it distasteful personally.

    Thus the ACLU & Comics Book Defense League lawyers & Arts & Publishing community leaders were hardly asked to be involved. Which they knew it would at worst have been overturned on appeal. As 90% of other provisions of Protect Act 2003 have.

    But Handley chicked out as they profiled him & planned it out cat & mouse for years... in order to take advantage of a handicapped Vet & his elderly handicapped mother he was caring for - they wanted a stereotypical "character" no matter who they could destroy in their desperate end of the rope plan to set a precedent.

    "See this Earl, this here must be some weird foreigny thingy like Japs or something that don't love godjesus & go to church"

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:38 02/07/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yea and the million of Americans who have bought pocket pussy onaholes with molded in arms, legs & head from US & Chinese companies over the decades are just fantasizing raping fetuses & newborn babies... hmmm never heard of an arrest, even for the seller.

    Most sexy lingeries shops in America sell to millions little sexual oriented racy Girl Scout, Brownie Uniform (early Elementary), cookie girl "Troop 69" lingere costumes, Liitle Bo Peep & frilly little girl lingere costumes, Bad Catholic Schoolgirl lingere costumes, Japanese sailor suit school girl "lingere" costumes. Or even "Kuma/Pedobear Seal of Approval" imprinted clothing for the minors in the family.

    All for dressing up a wife, girlfriend, prostitute while she plays the part of a little girl during sexual role playing.

    Millions of Americans buy this stuff for decades.... no one is ever arrested for "simulated childporn".

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:43 26/06/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    And Handley ordered stuff off from J-List!!!

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:38 26/06/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    I don't think this guy heard of Christopher Handley case in 2006.

    America is declaring a strange war on pencil and ink drawings and cartoon characters.

    Even the japanese/american companies like NIS are censoring their products out of fear of prosecution or lashbacks.

    Tera Online=Censored due to morons and blizzard idiots
    Mugen Souls= Censored to avoid AO rating

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:32 26/06/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    Alright buddy, YOU buy Love Body Aki.

    Send us your response by chicken-scratch mail and tell us all about it afterwards!

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:28 24/06/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    Troll

    None of that sends anyone to prison.

    Anymore than buying a Delinquent School Girl costume or Girl Scout or Brownie Troop 69 costume from Amazon.com for your wife to wear in sexual role playing does.

    Or buying a naked baby, naked Kewpie or naked child doll does.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:18 05/07/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    You're aiming toooooo low my Menopausal Friend..

    Just grow a pair & order
    The Asakura household 3 sisters story LADY-040 DVD
    and WA-139 Chiwa Osaki – Shaved Pussy Lolita Nakadashi CS DVD
    and Flat Chest Bible Super Collection 8 Hours DVDs
    and NWF-062 Acme Restrictive Confinement Cocoro Igarashi DVD
    and a bottle of Daughter's Parts Lotion

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:01 14/07/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    Don't you morons know that the NA is SPECIFICALLY attacking loli-type anime and entertainment now?

    SOMEBODY, PLEASE STAND UP FOR FREEDOM OF SPEECH OR WE WON'T HAVE IT ANYMORE!

    THEY CAN'T ATTACK HOMOSEXUALS ANYMORE SO NOW THEIR ATTACKING OTAKUS!







    Post Comment »

Popular

Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments