Comment on Titanic II = “Made in China” by λ-chan:

One of flaws of the original Titanic it was built of steel with a high sulfur content which caused brittleness in cold water.
Chinese steel generally has a high sulfur content due to poor QM and use of coke “not the stuff you drink” made from high sulfur coal.

I can’t believe he wants to use a state owned Chinese contractor to build a ship that had a few design flaws to start with.

Really anyone with some sense would have the Dutch,Finnish, or Koreans build the vessel and let them make whatever internal changes necessary to meet modern safety standards.


λ-chan made other comments on this post:

  • Titanic II = “Made in China”:
    Mostly likely they’ll use one or two large diesel engines from a container ship. The hull and drive of the vessel likely would be based off a container ship design reworked to look like the old Olympic Class liner.

  • Titanic II = “Made in China”:
    Hyundai ship yards has considerable experience at constructing large vessels probably more so then anyone in China. Though the best contractors for a cruise ship would be a company like Fincantieri in Italy or STX in Finland. A modern cruise ship internally is a very different beast then a oil tanker or container ship. I’m not even sure if China has the facilities and technology to build a modern cruise ship. Cargo vessels tend to have one or two very large engines with direct drive while …

  • Titanic II = “Made in China”:
    I guess they plan on carrying it on this ship. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MV_Blue_Marlin

  • Titanic II = “Made in China”:
    No you are not. I think it’ll probably catch on fire at sea.

Recent comments by λ-chan:



Popular

Recent Articles