Comment on Save Miku: Hatsune Miku YouTube Videos Deleted En Masse by Anonymous:

No, they are not. They are required to accept the request in good faith. If they refused to do so and the request turned out to be valid, they are legally liable. If the MAFIAAs can sue teenagers for millions over a few mp3s, think what they would do to Google which has been a thorn in their eye for more than a decade now.

Reference:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_Copyright_Infringement_Liability_Limitation_Act

[quote]“Good practice” or not, it’s bullshit, especially when they are deleting videos copyrights to which has the uploader, without even spending 5 minutes on checking it, just because some unrelated asshole decided to press the “report” button.[/quote]
One asshole pressing the report button does nothing. If enough assholes do, Google will investigate and determine weather the content should be taken down. However, they take user reports with a grain of salt just as they should.

This is a different thing. Google has a separate non-public system to file infringement requests. Copyright holders can apply to use that system, but they are required to sign a contract with Google. Using that system lets you takedown videos immediately, but the contract has provisions against false requests. If you deliberately file false requests that way, Google can turn around and sue you for sabotaging their service.

And by the way, it takes more than 5 minutes to determine weather a given party has the right to issue takedown requests. You can’t just go to wikipedia and look it up. The courts will eat you alive if you do something as naive. It becomes even more complicated when organizations often subcontract separate entities to do the takedowns for them. You need to verify the publisher really has rights to the content with the local government, and then verify the request with the publisher itself. It may take hours to go through the bureaucratic bullshit.
Considering the volume of infringing video uploaded on YT every day, it’s infeasible to validate all of them.


Anonymous made other comments on this post:

Recent comments by Anonymous:

  • Tetris “Now a Live-Action Movie”:
    He shall live forever more. He can start a NUCLEAR WAR!

  • Tetris “Now a Live-Action Movie”:
    Can he have a long one please?

  • Fatal Frame: “The Wii U is Finally Worth Owning!”:
    @21:48 – one bigot doesn’t represent all of Nintendo in the slightest… sure Nintendo didn’t promote it the way they’re promoting Bayonetta 2 right now (seriously, it’s hard to believe it’s still M rated after all the promotion it’s been getting, it’s like it’s a new zelda game or something), but the fact that they released it at all in the west was a huge step beyond anything they’ve allowed in the past (besides BMX XXX having nudity exclusive to a nintendo console). On top of that it opened …

  • Love Stage Ending “Most Gay”:
    I agree with you. It’s repulsive the way someone can try to defend blatantly homophobic comments. I realized a long time ago that a divide exists between those who are open-minded and those who are closed. It’s sad really. These comments should be reported. You all have not taken enough time to evaluate your own lives and how you would want people to treat you. Also, the hole you say is only for exiting actually contains a trigger point for ejaculation, therefore penetration is a quick way to …

  • Tetris “Now a Live-Action Movie”:
    Most people here would prefer a Loli edition of Tetris, the more lines you clear the more her clothes vanish.


Popular

Recent Articles