Comment on Marriage: “Ugly Rich Man or Hot Poor Man?” by Sylar:

I don’t think you got my point Rena. If women weren’t in the workforce i will gladly accept that i have to share my money with her, but from the moment she was to be viewed as equal in the employment market as well, she should stop searching for me(or any man) taking care of her.

And since you are a woman i have to tell you that women made no favors to themselves by entering so aggressively in the employment market. At first it looked ideal even for their husbands, they worked got money and the husbands didn’t had to give as much at every thing their wifes wanted since they could buy staff for themselves. For women it worked even better. They didn’t have to ask their husband and they felt more free and their money worked like extra cash since the man payed for the family expenses and they mostly used their money for personal purchases. It also gave them more freedom to live alone.
Unfortunately for wifes and husbands world over the governments and corporations saw a golden opportunity to make more money out of the money women started earning and they even started to push the idea of women in the workforce but for anything else than their love of equal rights and freedom to women.

Resold?
The prices risen and taxes risen to a level that a family to get by, has to use both salaries. Do you honestly think that if women weren’t part of the workforce the price of life would be the same?
I assure that it wouldn’t, everything will have been priced under the assumption than a family has one and single income.
Anyway, today for the couple not needing money from both parties, one of the two must have a very high paying job. This resolds in women asking for rare men with very high paying jobs because a normal salary is not good anymore in supporting more that one person.

Don’t get me wrong i don’t think women shouldn’t have the right of employment and we should go back at men ruling all income. I just think it was badly and terribly executed. Our disgusting capitalistic system destroyed the dream of nice equality completely. The way it is now, it works against women and men and especially against families as a whole.

As about young women employment. I don’t know what you are talking about. Ether you don’t know what you talk about or i am blind, because i have todays city newspaper in-frond of me and only a look at the first page of employment adds i found 15 jobs asking for strictly young women and only 2 jobs for a man or woman. You logic about pregnancy is nice and all but it means shit when the reality is right here in my hand and seems different.


Sylar made other comments on this post:

  • Marriage: “Ugly Rich Man or Hot Poor Man?”:
    Even if we assume that men only care about beauty, isn’t that more noble that going after money? I don’t know about you but going after beauty seems a lot more pure than just going after cold harsh cash to me.

  • Marriage: “Ugly Rich Man or Hot Poor Man?”:
    And in the end the one who gets the money is the lawyer.

  • Marriage: “Ugly Rich Man or Hot Poor Man?”:
    Indeed. As a guy who changed quite a few jobs in different European nations and looked at quite a few job adds i realized that except rare high paying jobs with specific strict criteria of what experience and studies you must have(usually you don’t start most jobs with a high position), all the other jobs always prefer young women. Hell even just women are better for them than hiring a male. If you are a young male and you lose your job, even if you are willing to do anything you will still not …

Recent comments by Sylar:



Popular

Recent Articles