Comment on 85%: “Japan Should Possess Nuclear Weapons” by Anonymous:

Tuor,

A bit of a one sided argument.

Firstly, the Pacific Fleet is in the Asian region mainly for America’s own interests. The U.S. (like any other nation) will put their own interests ahead of others.

- “If China ever moved into a position where an attack on Japan was likely”

Can you provide an example where China has moved their military towards Japan? Can you provide any examples of global powers fighting a war since WW2 even?

- “As for a nuclear strike: the first country that resorts to that is going to be in a world of hurt: the rest of the world wouldn’t stand for an offensive use of nuclear bombs.”

A bit of contadiction there. I don’t remember U.S. being in a world of hurt after using an atomic bomb. Possibly something to do with them possessing the biggest gun?

- “what we used on Japan was an *atomic* warhead; the strategic nukes of today are way, WAY more powerful than that.”

That’s your rationale for nuking so many innocent civilians?! So let’s say if we were to obtain more sophisticated weaponary in future, then what would stop the U.S. using this reasoning again for today’s Strategic Missiles?


Anonymous made other comments on this post:

Recent comments by Anonymous:



Popular

Recent Articles