Comment on 2ch’s Plagiarism Police Quite Amazing by Anonymous:

also one has to understand not all things are copyrighted even though people have the right from the start that its made, the thing is for a material to be considered to be copyright it has to go under some paper works that can be protected by the copyright acts if not then its considered either open domain or private use this can be said of the internet as mostly they can be considered as open domain per-se unless you uploaded something that you really bought for it… in which case can’t be exactly called as piracy… so 2 things one world


Anonymous made other comments on this post:

  • 2ch’s Plagiarism Police Quite Amazing:
    Drawing good with no reference is creative. Drawing with reference is creative. Copying images is not creative. You don’t understand the meaning of creativity.

  • 2ch’s Plagiarism Police Quite Amazing:
    I notice how all these big animation studios and male artists reference photos and no one seems to blame them for anything. But once Kazuaki (well, well, well, what do you know, a female) artist uses a reference, RAWR TIME TO GET OUT THE PITCHFORKS. >_> It’s all those jealous fujoshi out there who are pissed at Kazuaki for having her art appreciated while they just sit in their miserable lives. Amazing? Police-worthy? Detectives? How about a bunch of bitter faggots?

  • 2ch’s Plagiarism Police Quite Amazing:
    Fail, 2Ch is fail, more like.

  • 2ch’s Plagiarism Police Quite Amazing:
    Use references for drawings isn´t plagiarism ¬___¬;;; Do you think that Michelangelo or Leonardo Da Vinci were plagiarist? And they used rudimentary obscure cameras. Those 2chan guys has too much free time

  • 2ch’s Plagiarism Police Quite Amazing:
    yea, they’re probably using google’s “similiar image” tool.

Recent comments by Anonymous:


Popular

Recent Articles