dragon-quest-maam-by-hijiri.jpg

A Chinese article condemning the current state of Chinese martial arts as being “extremely low level” in the wake of a major tournament has sparked a great deal of controversy, with many Japanese of course only too happy to agree with the assessment.

The article, published on a popular Chinese site, soon found its way overseas to Japan. It can be read in abridged format below:

The SportAccord Combat Games 2010 recently concluded in Beijing. Chinese competitors took 7 gold medals in fights [overall Chinese results were 10 gold, 6 bronze - the event saw 13 "martial arts" tournaments ranging from kickboxing and judo to sumo].

However, real Chinese martial arts prowess is, far from being best in the world, actually exceedingly poor. The image of invincibility Chinese martial arts have is just a myth cultivated by movies and fiction.

Take a world renowned martial artist such as Bruce Lee. He is widely believed to be a first rate combatant, but in reality he was extremely myopic and hardly competed at all. People think he’s an American national karate champion, but in fact his real level is just a Hong Kong high school amateur boxing champion.

So what’s the real ability of our athletes now? In recent Sino-Japanese competition, and in competition between China and the rest of the world, China has indeed secured many impressive victories. However, these were just the result of bouts arranged with weaker opponents, and where the rules were biased in favour of our own fighters.

The Japanese fighters, supposedly Japan’s strongest, appearing in recent tournaments had fabricated career histories.

The China-Thai kickboxing bouts were even more cynically arranged. China fielded a pro-level police competitor, but he was fighting an amateur Thai policeman. And the rules banned the Thai competitor from using his knees and elbows [Muay Thai makes extensive use of knees and elbows - Thailand won no gold medals in kickboxing].

Fortunately, a host of martial arts experts spring forth from 2ch – who would have suspected?

Because they are gymnastic exercises.

With real rules:

I get the impression kung fu has no chance at all…

What’s the point of a martial art just based on learning the forms?

Basically, Chinese martial arts are just for showing off.

Kung fu is just for show, with no real practical use. Like taekwondo.

Fist of the North Star is a Chinese martial art too!

There are aren’t any serious karateka or aikido practicioners competing. Even so, joke styles like “praying mantis kung fu” are even worse than the ones competing.

Jackie Chan’s flashy stuff is no real use. In movies they never take any real damage anyway.

Kung fu is more showy acrobatics for moral discipline. Jackie is the former.

Muay Thai is the strongest, the rest are shit.

What about Shaolin?

A friend learnt Shaolin – since it has kicks and throws he said it was, if you spent years training, better than either karate alone or judo alone.

So why not learn karate and judo?

Shaolin is the real deal – I am going to keep believing this.

The Shaolin temples were all ruined in the Cultural Revolution.

Thai:

A bout between a Tai Chi Chuan practitioner and a White Crane Fist practicioner from 50 years ago – true Chinese martial arts at their best:

It’s just an ordinary brawl!?

That’s just tacky.

So this is what happens when expert fighters do battle.

Even in Japan the practicioners make up excuses like “the real killing techniques are not things we can just lightly show to outsiders” – I bet the kung fu guys are the same.

Mao feared rebellion and turned Chinese martial arts into circus tricks. With tournaments banned for so long, its decline was inevitable.

If you’re saying martial arts with no real use are rubbish, what about useless Japanese kendo, iaijutsu and so on?

Tai Chi Chuan is just dancing.

Karate is the strongest. You can’t win with a dance like kung fu:

Kung fu is like Japanese ninja – just people who have been imaginatively turned into supermen.

Rather than calling it a martial art, we should be calling kung fu a traditional folk dance of the Chinese.

Drunken fist is a total lie though, no way can you gain strength by drinking.

I asked a Chinese exchange student about that – he was seriously annoyed and said “Are you an idiot? They are just pretending to be drunk, isn’t it obvious?”

Let’s all just keep believing all Chinese are kung fu masters, all Japanese are samurai ninja, all Americans are former marines, and all Russians subsist entirely on three meals a day of vodka.



    Post Comment »
    348 Comments
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Comment by Anonymous
    21:03 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    4000 years of history.. down the drain.
    True martial arts exist, but its a dying tradition.
    Why?

    Nowadays, its too easy to find a martial arts dojo within your neighborhood. I lament that its all too easy to find some random skill to show off with.

    Take for example the following:
    - a taekwondo black belt can be easily gang raped and killed by 4 unskilled thugs.

    - 5 arrogant youngsters claiming to be kungfu practitioners challenged me (because I was looking their way), and lost.

    The reason is simple. (1)They aren't learning things right, and (2)not enough experience. Fighting with rules and fighting without rules.

    Before the techniques, you must have the right foundation.
    Before the right foundation, you must be right of heart.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:01 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    If you want to watch Martial Art at its best. Heres a video I found in youtube.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJhXbpPa1Uo

    Comment by Tenno Seremel
    21:04 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I'm not expert in real fighting matters but I thought Drunken fist (or whatever it is) does not mean you must be literally drunk (O.o)

    Comment by TC-man
    01:51 07/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well, it certainly helps a bit if you are really drinking some alcohol, since you won't probably feel any pain due to the alcohol while fighting, but you need to be a good drinker otherwise you will become dizzy and can't hit your opponent.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:31 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Elizabeth Bennet will not be the least bit pleased to read this post.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:17 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    The last comment wins lol.

    Honestly though, the comment about cultural revolution and the government cracking down on its arts is the reason why so many od its people are out of touch with their history and arts.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:05 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Regular ol' boxing, muay thai or kickboxing are all you need to learn. Anything else & you're a complete retard

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:36 07/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Ah, simple fist to the fist and a kick to your shins. I like it. So easy to learn and has application any time something goes violent.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:57 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    現代の"ルールと時間制限ありの良い子の武術、武道"が実戦で弱いのは当たり前。実戦じゃそんなもの無いんだから。WW2以前の武道、例えば剣道は実戦、つまり殺し合いを想定してたんだよ。だから戦前の剣道を習っていたおじいさんの気迫は鬼気迫るものらしいね。

    Moderne "beperkte martial-regel en de goede zoon, gevechtssporten," is van nature zwak in de strijd. Nou ik weet niet wat te bestrijden. WW2 vorige vechtsporten, kendo te bestrijden bijvoorbeeld, was ik ervan uit dat het doden. Grootvader was de geest van de vooroorlogse kendo lessen biedt het kwam zo dicht 鬼

    Modern "limitado militar pamumuno at ang mabuting anak na lalaki, militar sining," ay natural mahina sa labanan. Well ako hindi kung ano ang labanan. WW2 nakaraang militar sining, kendo labanan halimbawa, ako ay sa pagpapalagay na pagpatay. Lolo's espiritu ay ang pre-digmaan kendo lessons ito ay nag-aalok ay dumating upang isara 鬼 気. 気.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:48 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    "Take a world renowned martial artist such as Bruce Lee. He is widely believed to be a first rate combatant, but in reality he was extremely myopic and hardly competed at all. People think he’s an American national karate champion, but in fact his real level is just a Hong Kong high school amateur boxing champion."

    all of this are bullshit!

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:45 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    after watch those videos...karate just shit!

    Comment by YotaruVegeta
    23:42 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    On a podcast called Anime Pulse, the host, Ichigo, occasionally mentions the hate between china and Japan. Sankaku jus5t serves to illustrate this hatred even more

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:55 09/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yes, that's why I love SanCom sooo much.

    It's like tabloid DONE RIGHT - tabloid-like subjects (30% meta news, 30% galleries, 30% freak/sex), but done with journalistic integrity of The Times.

    I love how 'serious' news sources will never touch on self-appointed tabu subject like Japanese-Chinese relations and other genuinely interesting stuff issues in Japan (it's all roses and geishas down there) and their anime coverage is limited to providing worthless facts about release dates of new show and such (I could substitute half of month of ANN news with quick glance to Fall 2010 anime chart). SC on the other side will not just show you that XXX was released, they will give you blueray vs fansub comparsion to show if it's worth getting, or what reaction to it was.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:33 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    russian hand to hand combat is one of the strongest martial arts,don't show us your japanese karate, only kudo is usable

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:29 07/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    two words:

    Ip Man.

    Comment by TC-man
    01:53 07/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Three words:

    Wong Fei Hong

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:42 07/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    lol akkido can kick any asses if he combines any other striking sport

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:42 07/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    There are way too many staged and arranged "tournaments". Money buys the winner. Real martial artists, as in those that Live for the sport, would probably be all too happy to challenge some of those statements.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:17 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    who the fk said chinese were the best martial artist?

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:09 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Coming from a past mma back ground, I gotta say that I feel insulted about this post!
    I feel that no one here understand what martial arts are and are making a mockery out of the sport and using it as a weapon to stereo type a race!
    Being from a MMA environment most of my friends are Japanese, Korean and Chinese, Tai. Etc and all of which are not closed minded such the comments you guys made here!
    These videos show individuals with no skill in the martial arts. I mean come on the guys missed a shed load of openings to tackle the dude’s leg to the floor when raised for high kicks which is one of the weaknesses in karate, judo, aikido and jug jitsu but that does not make the art bad, it just means that the practitioner must wait for opening, while avoiding attacks and capitalise. The guys in this get hit and do nothing, if i was well and was still practicing as soon as the dude hit me i would hold the let drop and twist, dislocating it as that would stop the attack! You know some masters don’t even fight like in the moves, They can stare each other down rather than fight. It’s this generation of media that is spoiling people presumptions of the art. True practitioners and masters don’t show off as if they did then allot more people would be killed by the art. Most old school masters i know are even doctors as the art is supposed to show you how to defend and heal.
    NOTE to all that martial arts was not only for health and longevity but infect protection like the accent monks of old and generally a way of life!
    Do your research if you are even interested, and if not then don’t have an opinion about something you know nothing about. Just become the current media such as movies and tv shows stereotype it.
    The Chinese kung fu guy in this 1st vid has no skill and it would not surprise me if this was a ruse to make the art look bad, for one all are speaking Japanese, where other judges from different countries? Europe for example. You can’t take a stereo type like this and then try and rationalise it!
    I mean come on, these comments bastardising Chinese people have no place here in the world, yes Chinese (the country) has been doing allot recently which can be looked down upon, but these choices that the country is making is because of capitalism part of which is control of information via their government so to control their people, just like religion does in western society (note: faith is good, mans interpretation and changing of faith is bad aka “religion”!) Chinese people are not to blame and should not be ladled as you can’t generalise on a race, how would you like it?
    If so and i fort like some of the people here, then I’d be talking about how the Japanese raped pillaged and plundered Korea, china, and most of Asia in the past and recently say they have struck it from the history books, not quite learning from there past sins huh! Infect looking at past thence, Japan has a lot to answered for, but you know what. fook as its government pushed the people to do these things and the new generation and western Asians should not be put under the same scrutiny because of their ancestors actions in the same way that all Chinese should not be ladled as loud and interrupting, Does anyone here even know any Chinese people? I mean from my experience there curios much like Japanese are and other Asian, as they tend to treat people like they want to be treated, which if I’m not mistake as the whole world does!

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:01 07/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I mean I would really like to read your comment to see what you have to say because you are giving your views with a MMA back ground but... I gave up.

    No matter how awesome your views are, please learn to break up your wonderfulness into edible pieces; please PARAGRAPH.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:58 07/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    hehe, my bad! hope its not to late for u to read, if no then enjoy!

    Coming from a past mma back ground, I gotta say that I feel insulted about this post!

    I feel that no one here understand what martial arts are and are making a mockery out of the sport and using it as a weapon to stereo type a race!

    Being from a MMA environment most of my friends are Japanese, Korean and Chinese, Tai. Etc and all of which are not closed minded such the comments you guys made here!

    These videos show individuals with no skill in the martial arts. I mean come on the guys missed a shed load of openings to tackle the dude’s leg to the floor when raised for high kicks which is one of the weaknesses in karate, judo, aikido and jug jitsu but that does not make the art bad, it just means that the practitioner must wait for opening, while avoiding attacks and capitalise. The guys in this get hit and do nothing, if i was well and was still practicing as soon as the dude hit me i would hold the let drop and twist, dislocating it as that would stop the attack!

    You know some masters don’t even fight like in the moves, They can stare each other down rather than fight. It’s this generation of media that is spoiling people presumptions of the art. True practitioners and masters don’t show off as if they did then allot more people would be killed by the art. Most old school masters i know are even doctors as the art is supposed to show you how to defend and heal.

    NOTE: to all that martial arts was not only for health and longevity but infect protection like the accent monks of old and generally a way of life!

    Do your research if you are even interested, and if not then don’t have an opinion about something you know nothing about. Just become the current media such as movies and tv shows stereotype it.

    The Chinese kung fu guy in this 1st vid has no skill and it would not surprise me if this was a ruse to make the art look bad, for one all are speaking Japanese, where other judges from different countries? Europe for example. You can’t take a stereo type like this and then try and rationalise it!

    I mean come on, these comments bastardising Chinese people have no place here in the world, yes Chinese (the country) has been doing allot recently which can be looked down upon, but these choices that the country is making is because of capitalism part of which is control of information via their government so to control their people, just like religion does in western society (note: faith is good, mans interpretation and changing of faith is bad aka “religion”!) Chinese people are not to blame and should not be ladled as you can’t generalise on a race, how would you like it?

    If so and i thought like some of the people here, then I’d be talking about how the Japanese raped pillaged and plundered Korea, china, and most of Asia in the past and recently say they have struck it from the history books, not quite learning from there past sins huh! Infect looking at past thence, Japan has a lot to answered for. but you know what, fook it as government pushed the people to do these things and the new generation and western Asians should not be put under the same scrutiny because of their ancestors actions in the same way that all Chinese should not be ladled as loud and interrupting, Does anyone here even know any Chinese people? I mean from my experience there curios much like Japanese are and other Asian, as they tend to treat people like they want to be treated, which if I’m not mistake as the whole world does!

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:43 09/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Watch the whole video - at one point he does successfully grabs his leg, just to have fight stopped and have it go with SORRY SORRY DON'T DISQUALIFY ME expression.

    Anyway, the Kyokushin guy in the match is bloody worthless too. Watch some European championships kumite and you will realize how that fight would look like if fought against word class Karateka, (very little openings for leg grabs, and hits much much more powerful, I doubt he would be standing after single connected kick to the head).

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:47 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    MMA is the closest thing to a full-out fight that's legal and publicly available. There are no well ranked pros out there who do kung fu in MMA. Everyone uses kickboxing, jujitsu, boxing, wrestling, and sambo. Kung fu is art, but it's not a serious MARTIAL art.

    Also, it's surprising that there are no top ranked Chinese in MMA, even though they're so numerous. Maybe better nutrition and such is a factor, but there are many top rated fighters and champs from only moderately richer countries, like Brazil. This suggests that the martial art of choice is the problem.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:02 07/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    lol to this bud, as mma stands for mixed martial arts and coming from that back ground, wing chung was used. You heard of the rolling punches? hello!?!?

    do your reasearch before you talk!

    also kung fu is a martial art and a serius one, i can intro u to some guys that think the same and will be more then happy to show you some!

    all you guys are talking about here is wo shu and yes thats for show!

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:38 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I dont know if it's practical or not but I do know if they are not put into real practice, it's not going to work the way you dream it. Try practicing driving a car in a video game, then take it onto the street. I can assure you, you are going for a crash course. If I have to say which is the best "kungfu", I opt ultimate fighter. Cause one tackle like that, there ain't no chance in hell, your fancy crane praying mantis monkey fist of fury going to help.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:12 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Quote: Karate is the strongst.

    But isn't Karate a Chinese martial arts, considering that is was originally named "tang fist" (a dynasty in China during the time Karate was developed) and only named to "empty fist" (same pronounciation, different kanji) very later out of political reasons before the breakout of the 2nd world war?

    Comment by TC-man
    18:29 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Has no-one mentioned that "Karate" actually means "Chinese hand / martial art from China". Even the Japanese borrow Chinese martial arts to develop their own Karate style. I am not saying Karate is weak or so, but if you say Chinese Kung Fu sucks, then you are saying the source you used to develop Karate sucks.

    As for the Drunken Fist & Praying mantis youtube videos, they are obvious Japanese guys mimicking these styles (the ones in movies not the genuine style); a big mistakes they make are making turns/roundhouse kicks and loosing your opponent's position, loosing sight of your opponent is a no go; another is constantly retreating and being afraid that your opponent's gonna hit you. In a real fight you have to be in a better position than your opponent, just like in a war, if you retreat you loose. Real Kung Fu have solid stances (basic stance: horse/bow; Wing Chun: Goat etc.). Without a good stance you will be on the floor in no time. A poor kung fu practioner made often this mistake by having a poor/weak stance. Almost every beginners of kung fu (whether it's Shoalin, Wing Chun etc.) are forgetting the basics and are just willing to learn the fancy or the socalled killer moves (i.e. skipping the basics and just learn the advance level techniques; obvious they are not ready to fight).

    And for Kung Fu you really need to go to/watch in Hong Kong where Bruce Lee/Jacky Chan comes from (especially if you want to practise Wing Chun or Hung Gar etc.). And in mainland China, many claimed (even in China) that wushu has no spirit and is only for show. Even the Shoalin Temple in mainland China is for tourists only (with their acorbatic shows). So the Japanese actually means Wushu and not Kung Fu.

    And my impression is that a large part of the Japanese people think Kung Fu is Bruce Lee style (Jet Kune Do), while it's a collective noun for all sorts of styles of Chinese Martial Arts.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:31 09/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    You're wrong with implication.

    Japan took your shitty style and improved on it a lot, creating Okonawa Karate. Then Oyama came, took shitty Okinawa Karate and made new,this time awesome style from basis of generally shitty Okinawa KArate.

    Then come few dudes in Europe, who took Oyama Karate,realized that it's shitty and stared improving.

    Comment by snakechimera
    08:53 07/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    here's a correction for ya, Karate means Empty Hand. It was FORMERLY known as Chinese Hand

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:07 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    sounds like some shit head talking out of his ass.

    Comment by Anonymous
    Comment by Anonymous
    17:47 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    "Take a world renowned martial artist such as Bruce Lee. He is widely believed to be a first rate combatant, but in reality he was extremely myopic and hardly competed at all. People think he’s an American national karate champion, but in fact his real level is just a Hong Kong high school amateur boxing champion."

    This phrase is so full of shit I can feel the page turning brown.

    Comment by Dia
    17:52 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I don't follow Martial Arts, because they look boring and silly. When it comes to fantasy I prefer guns there too, because I got bored with melee while watching hercules on saturday mornings.

    Here's my imagine of MA, correct me if I'm wrong. MMA is the closest to a real fight (just missing hitting the tender parts), but it ends up like this: http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2009/7/15/

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:44 07/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    that comic is so true

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:54 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Im going to have to disagree about Bruce Lee.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:18 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Here's a much better video than all those boring old man fights.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cgFFivfkfgE&feature=related [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cgFFivfkfgE&feature=related]

    Well, this fight is a little unfair for the Japanese fighter because his opponent is much taller than he is, but they're both the best of their weight and age bracket in their respective countries.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:20 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    chinese can copy everything even trash

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:26 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's called Ulimate Fighting Champsionship.

    All styles should put up or shut up.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:40 07/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Chinese should just follow Bruce Lee's Jeet Khun Doo.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:50 09/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Ahahaha, that first Kyokushin vs. Chinese_wtf fight was golden.

    LEG GRABS NOT ALLOWED. Sure that chinese whatever isn't even considered to be martial art (not to mention serious martial art) anywhere outside of Asia, but not letting the guy to grab Karate guy's legs? that's like BEATING OUR KARATE CHAMPION NOT ALLOWED RULE.

    No surprise Japanese Karate is so fucking worthless nowadays, when they have to resolve to such tricks to 'win' a match.

    Truth to be told, European Koykushin school matched their japanese skills in 70ties and since 80'es till now Japan faggots are too afraid to invite anyone of renown from France, Holland or Ukraine to their tournaments.

    Real full-contact Karate match involves throwing straight punches at mindboggling speeds and lots and lots of lowkicks (the lowkick, lowkick, lowkick meme is actually very true in real life). It isn't Hollywood level of flashy, but when you consider speed and strength at which they throw their punches and that they take it on basically 'naked chests' it's really impressive.

    High kicks are very, very rarely used, since it's so easy to block, evade or deflect one.

    And if you're looking for self defence and general combat, instead of martial ART, you should simply train multiple martial arts, though boxing alone is awesomely useful in street fights.
    For example, boxing (for proper garde, no japanese crap even comes close), Karate for general punches/kicks and Judo for fighting on the ground and throws is extremly effective combination. you can add/remove Mulay Thai or some kickboxing to the mix, as long as you're training multiple fighting styles that complement themselves you're fine.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:52 07/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    That quote is absolute bullshit. Leaving aside that the guy clearly doesn't know ANYTHING about kung fu, he doesn't even know anything about the actors he cited: Jackie Chan, for example, was not a kung fu practitioner; drunken style isn't even a FIGHTING style, it IS just for show. And, god bless him, kung fu is NOT just about forms. Lol.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:34 08/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    The best kung fu practioner I've seen is an Afghani master:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0CIy9ZZEQE

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:30 10/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Real masters dont show off their years of training in front of people to declare fame.There are many styles in chinese Kungfu (now called wushu),each has their own weaknesses,so its up to a practioner to train to perfect his/her arts.Hence the name Kung-Fu means "results of the exercise/training".

    The deadliest martial arts in the modern times belong Israel--->its called Krav Maga.Its so deadly its devided into 2 types,the one for the public teaching and the one for military and intelligence community.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:53 12/10/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    The many styles itself had been kung fu's own terrible weakness. There shouldn't be too many styles having their own way/mannerism/movement to throw one simple punch, when a punch that a boxer does 10x better anyway. Too much unnecessary crap that you won't use in a fight anyway, that's why kung fu had been getting a bad rep from world class pro fighters.

    Kung fu guys are getting defeated left and right in the early Mixed Martial Arts scene, and the only successful Kung Fu fighter in mixed martial arts, Jason De Lucia, switched over to submission wrestling and found better success using submission wrestling techniques.

    Krav Maga, on the other hand, is indeed a better choice for typical self-defense situations, but the military Krav Maga is WAY better than the commercialized civilian version. Alternatively, military combatives and combat sambo are good for purely self-defense. Keep in mind that even if you know these "deadly techniques", it'll always be harder to pull them off against pros who actually fight for a living.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:33 02/11/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    The niche of ancient martial arts systems is not motivated by the need to survive, but rather by the need to keep memberships. Sports Martial arts serving the purpose of gambling entertainment and fitness were bound to extract the lethal techniques from fear of court persecution.

    In the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF), a superior Hand to Hand Combat Training System was developed and named Krav Maga. Its advantage was providing training methods with optimal self defense capabilities while maintaining strict safety during training. The key to this system is the correct hierarchy of prioritization!

    However, Krav Maga known to civilians around the world is not the IDF Krav Maga, but rather another form of Martial Arts marketed to civilians.

    Krav Maga – Use of the Human Body as a Weapon offers a complete Philosophy and Application of Hand to Hand Fighting Training System.

    It is the most efficient form of Self Defense and Hand to Hand Combat training method ever developed.

    Over one hundred and fifty techniques are presented with over one thousand film strip formatted photos with over sixty thousand words of advice.

    Boaz Aviram, Krav Maga Top Expert and Former IDF Fighting Fitness Academy Hand to Hand Combat Chief Instructor.
    http://www.amazon.com/Krav-Maga-Philosophy-Application-Fighting/dp/0557248469

    Comment by Zeick
    13:33 22/12/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    "Drunken fist is a total lie though, no way can you gain strength by drinking"
    What idiot thinks they actually get drunk

    "Kung fu is like Japanese ninja – just people who have been imaginatively turned into supermen."
    Ninjitsu is just displayed as such the actual thing uses proper techniques and is a good part focused on concealing various weapons on the body

    "Kung fu is just for show, with no real practical use. Like taekwondo."
    this persons clearly never seen taekwondo its one of the least flashy martial arts out he proabably mistook it for hapkido which is usually taught along side tae kwon do is actually usefull

    Theses "experts" on 2ch are idiots

    Comment by Sandalphon
    08:20 20/12/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hard Martial arts> Soft Martial arts> Grappling arts> Hard Martial arts

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:31 07/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I'm just going to leave this here. http://www.nononsenseselfdefense.com/

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:59 07/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Coming from a past mma back ground, I gotta say that I feel insulted about this post!

    I feel that no one here understand what martial arts are and are making a mockery out of the sport and using it as a weapon to stereo type a race!

    Being from a MMA environment most of my friends are Japanese, Korean and Chinese, Tai. Etc and all of which are not closed minded such the comments you guys made here!

    These videos show individuals with no skill in the martial arts. I mean come on the guys missed a shed load of openings to tackle the dude’s leg to the floor when raised for high kicks which is one of the weaknesses in karate, judo, aikido and jug jitsu but that does not make the art bad, it just means that the practitioner must wait for opening, while avoiding attacks and capitalise. The guys in this get hit and do nothing, if i was well and was still practicing as soon as the dude hit me i would hold the let drop and twist, dislocating it as that would stop the attack!

    You know some masters don’t even fight like in the moves, They can stare each other down rather than fight. It’s this generation of media that is spoiling people presumptions of the art. True practitioners and masters don’t show off as if they did then allot more people would be killed by the art. Most old school masters i know are even doctors as the art is supposed to show you how to defend and heal.

    NOTE: to all that martial arts was not only for health and longevity but infect protection like the accent monks of old and generally a way of life!

    Do your research if you are even interested, and if not then don’t have an opinion about something you know nothing about. Just become the current media such as movies and tv shows stereotype it.

    The Chinese kung fu guy in this 1st vid has no skill and it would not surprise me if this was a ruse to make the art look bad, for one all are speaking Japanese, where other judges from different countries? Europe for example. You can’t take a stereo type like this and then try and rationalise it!

    I mean come on, these comments bastardising Chinese people have no place here in the world, yes Chinese (the country) has been doing allot recently which can be looked down upon, but these choices that the country is making is because of capitalism part of which is control of information via their government so to control their people, just like religion does in western society (note: faith is good, mans interpretation and changing of faith is bad aka “religion”!) Chinese people are not to blame and should not be ladled as you can’t generalise on a race, how would you like it?

    If so and i thought like some of the people here, then I’d be talking about how the Japanese raped pillaged and plundered Korea, china, and most of Asia in the past and recently say they have struck it from the history books, not quite learning from there past sins huh! Infect looking at past thence, Japan has a lot to answered for. but you know what, fook it as government pushed the people to do these things and the new generation and western Asians should not be put under the same scrutiny because of their ancestors actions in the same way that all Chinese should not be ladled as loud and interrupting, Does anyone here even know any Chinese people? I mean from my experience there curios much like Japanese are and other Asian, as they tend to treat people like they want to be treated, which if I’m not mistake as the whole world does!

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:09 07/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Taekwondo is the best. Muay Thai is great too. Karate is only for weaboos.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:44 07/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's not the martial art; it's the martial artist.

    Comment by Manji88
    08:02 07/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Of course there are no really "real world" effective fighting techniques left any more. People don't go out and regularly get into life and death fights these days. And you can't practice real disabling or killing blows. A veteran foot soldier in the Sengoku Jidai would take out the best Japanese swordfighter today, because he's survived battles with people who wanted to kill him and had a three foot long razor blade to do it with.
    The problem is you can't practice maiming and killing people, because you, y'know, go to jail for it.
    That said, I've seen a few videos showing street punks getting snotty with people who are trained in ACS or MMA fighters getting taken out pretty fast.

    Comment by Pyrus
    07:39 07/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I'll admit my "official" MA training is limited to a few weeks of karate-like training, and any fighting skills I had before that was aquired somewhat like Terry Bogard's was (getting into fights on the streets as a kid and getting beat on 'till you catch on to how not to get beat on).

    Taking both into account:
    > Fighting is a graceless, ugly business: That smooth flowing of one move into another that you see in the movies and the training hall practice forms doesn't exist. What I've often experienced in fights was 2 or more people simultaneously trying to punch, block, dodge, kick & wrestle each other.
    > Those forms you practice serve at least 2 main purposes: To get you into the habit of properly executing punches, blocks & kicks; To ingrain at least some basic attack/defensive routines into your instinctive reflexes.
    > There's really only so much you can do strategy-wise: Overwhelm your opponent(s) with an attack/counter attack combining speed, strength & power all at once; Neutralize your opponent(s)'s ability to attack or defend by constraining & restraining the movement of his arms and legs; Employ some combination of the aforementioned strategies. All MAs should have basic moves & techniques for employing those strategies.

    The point of weapons, I'm told, is to attack from a safe distance or attack in a way that can't be countered easily. The way to have a chance at fighting an armed opponent unarmed is to get real close to negate the distance advantage.

    If martial artists are unskilled, they haven't been practicing their basics enough or showing bad judgement in how they use them.

    There's probably more that could be said, but I'll limit my underinformed 2 cents to this.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:35 07/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Mc Donald's i beating the crap out of everyone they are so fat now that no one is an oponent but besides who are we kidding nowdays almost everybody can kill a master with a gun, unless you have a really bad aim you are bound to win

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:58 07/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Actually, in martial arts, it is not the matter how superior is the other. it is precision, timing, speed, "clean" and power. Different martial arts have their own pro and cons. It is up to the fighter not the martial art itself.

    And also, chinese kung fu is lack of kumite/sparring.
    But, I can tell, if one truly understand the art of one martial art and perform well, it is considered to be very very powerful already.

    I am a former chinese kungfu and taichi practitioner, and currently my mainstream is aikido and taekwondo.
    I know how all of them works, but to able to use it in real fight, it is different case.

    So, I would say:
    none of the martial art is bullshit. If you (maybe just few years of training) try to fight with a master class of a different martial art, i think the chances of winning is not plausible at all.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:29 07/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    That Shotokan fight at the end was pure. I've seen what fighters are trained to do at higher levels - at first it's about learning the techniques, then it pushes focus strikes. I'm just kind of surprised nobody posted a Kyokushinkai fight in response, it's revered in Japan.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:58 09/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    You would say that with heavy Yakuza involvement, split into 5 organizations (no one of them having actual rights for Kyokushin trademark:P) Kyokushin in Japan would be a bit of hushed up subject.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:13 07/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I am a kung fu practitioner, and i've seen many of the flaws in the training and have tried to rectify them in my own training. One thing i know for sure after so long is that the style really doesn't matter, as long as you know how to apply it. There are more obviously applicable styles like Hung Gar and Wing Chun that focus on basic technique, and strength and speed respectively. But for the most part, kung fu needs to be applied correctly more than anything else.

    The flowery or acrobatic styles are applicable but only in a limited fashion, and too many people think that the flowery moves are the powerful ones. It's rally not the case. Real kung fu is not invincible; no style is. What it comes down to is the person fighting and how smart they are with their training. If they know how to apply it, it doesn't matter what the style is. They'll win.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:44 07/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    A lot of Kung Fu is impractical, but Monkey Kung-Fu and Drunken Fist do work, as they're not really all that fancy, and rely heavily on swift punches. Drunken fist can look fancy, but it can be used without all the dodging tricks too, since it really is fast.

    Wing-chun is definitely practical too, just not for competition, since it revolves around hitting pressure points and outright debilitating the opponent, rather than relying on brute force.

    Shaolin Kung Fu is one of the oldest forms of martial arts, and mostly uses very practical and efficient self-defense techniques, in addition to throws and throw escapes.

    Thins like Tai-chi and whatnot that require fancy stances and spins are definitely more for show, but there are definitely very practical forms of kung-fu that are much more different in style.

    Comment by Shin-Hikaru
    13:28 07/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Goddammit! What an absurd article!

    "Kung fu is just for show, with no real practical use. Like taekwondo."

    And then they "informed" that Jackie Chan and Bruce Lee are poor fighters? ... That's all about sensationalism or even the chinese people are looking too much into the "rule-limited" fighing competitions?

    It remounts the old discussion about TMA vs MMA(former "Vale-Tudo"). Very vague, lots of arguments from both sides. As a martial arts practitioner, my opinion is simple and direct:

    The MMA has an advantage over "normal" TMAs in terms of fighting efficiency(with empty hands at least). BUT if the TMA is SOMEWHAT involved with the military training(like Krav Maga,San Soo or even the original forms of some famous MAs), then this TMA has an advantage over the MMA. Perhaps not in the ring, but everyone knows the difference between a competition and a real fight situation...right? If you don't, think about it.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:03 07/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Believe it or not, most people who don't have much knowledge of martial arts outside of competition have no clue what they're talking about in terms of actual self-defense. Kung-fu was established as early as the warring states, so there has to be some practical form of it out there.(again, that goes back to Wing-chun and shaolin kung-fu, primarily.)

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:02 12/10/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    The practical form may have been diluted over time due to being the ancient equivalent of "McDojos". Praying mantis style historically wanted to adopt the most effective techniques and try and become the ultimate martial art, but as time goes on, it became divided, instructors each have their own thing going on what they think is effective, then it was all for the money... now became ineffective.

    MMA definitely has the advantage over TMA, seeing as MMA focuses on what's effective, not as a "form and proper attitude" training that won't help in fights. TMA held on to its own roots too much it didn't evolve - if they've evolved, they'd look like modern day MMA anyway.

    In a real fight situation, MMA and military self defense would definitely be more effective than TMA. MMA fighters and their techniques could double over and be about just as effective as pure military self defense due to the tough training involved in most MMA training camps (most self defense martial arts are more about learning techniques than they are training to be in good physical condition, and thus, even someone who's good at self-defense may consequently "gas out" or be overcome physically by a well-trainined pro), which happened one time due to Bas Rutten.

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:10 07/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    No Mention of Karv Naga or Marine Martial Arts? I am dissapont.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:59 07/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I find it odd how they can call Bruce Lee unskilled, then call out Kung-Fu for being "flashy and impractical". While it's true that Bruce Lee didn't compete much, Chuck Norris admitted that Bruce Lee was above his level, and he was an 8th-degree blackbelt at the time. Not to mention, they're right, Bruce Lee didn't compete much; he was getting in REAL street fights, not that MMA crap where you can't hit here and there or use this and that.

    These people are clearly idiots who can't tell the difference between competition and a real fight. In a real fight, sticking your head underneath someone's arm to try to take them down is just ASKING to get killed by an elbow to the spine.(most average-size people can kill someone instantly with a full-force elbow to the spine) But incidentally, elbows aren't allowed in competition. Neither are groin kicks, eye gouges, hitting pressure points, breaking bones, chokes, hitting the back of the head, etc. They talk about these limitations like they're very insignificant, but the fact of the matter is that the most efficient forms of kung-fu, aikido, etc. are completely useless with such rules.

    Do you know WHY there aren't many serious Aikido practitioners in competition? It's because Aikido is strictly self-defense. These guys don't screw around; they WILL use choke holds, they WILL break bones, they WILL hit weak points. Aikido is so dangerous that even in practice, they can't do their best moves, because those can accidentally lead to serious injury or death when misused.

    Don't even bother wasting your time with competition if you want to talk about serious martial arts. The rules are made so that plain fists and grappling are heavily favored over the most effective strikes and crippling the opponent.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:07 08/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Having done Aikido and Karate in the past, I say, Aikido, while strictly self defense, is far more crippling than Karate because of all those damned locks! Just a little force and you could dislocate the shoulders, break a couple of bones, BREAK THE SPINE, etc etc. Hell, we weren't even allowed to practice those spine breaking locks because the sensei deemed them too dangerous.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:03 09/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    My point exactly. I honestly think that if you want to talk about real effectiveness, I would say that boxing, kickboxing, wing-chun, and aikido are undeniably the most effective. Boxing and kickboxing are universally agreed upon for being so efficient, and wing-chun and aikido are too dangerous to use all-out in competition. MMA is useful too, but not the heavily distorted form of it they use on TV. But these guys who know nothing about REAL martial arts. All they know are the rules of competition and going all-out with punches and throws that are too slow to work on people who actually use their knees and elbows.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:45 12/10/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    They also have wrist locks, shoulder locks, spinal locks, leg locks and neck cranks in Brazilian Jiu Jitsu, Judo, Sambo and Catch Wrestling. Aikido is indeed strictly self-defence, but is still limited in terms of overall grappling and fight/self-defense application, given that they haven't really trained defending against proper attacks (it's a lot more common to see them practicing against telegraphed punches and kicks - real punches and kicks will be WAY harder to catch and deflect without actually training them yourself).

    Catch Wrestling guys are always practicing those dangerous techniques a lot, like spinal locks and neck cranks. You can even see the spinal lock being applied loosely in pro-wrestling (it's called cobra clutch/abdominal stretch). A certain neck crank variation is probably a lot more deadlier, since not only can you dislocate the neck and spine, it's easier to pull off too (easy in a way that there are more scenarios in which you can pull it off than a spinal lock).

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:01 07/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Kung Fu is bull anyway. More of a dance than a real martial art.
    The Chinese themselves arent believing this shit. Instead, the Chinese Army practizes Sanda, a non-spiritual form of Kung-Fu, that concentrates on disarment techniques and deadly attacks on weakpoints.

    If you want to find real Martial Art in China today, you must look for it in the PLA and not in sports events.

    Comment by brningpyre
    09:59 07/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Let’s all just keep believing all Chinese are kung fu masters, all Japanese are samurai ninja, all Americans are former marines, and all Russians subsist entirely on three meals a day of vodka.

    This one is the best.

    There is so much BS in martial arts, it's ridiculous. Half of the people in it are idiotic fanboys who will argue uselessly about "which style is the best" their entire lives.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:00 07/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    And armies.

    Country VS country fights.

    The shitload of BS from 15-yr-old wankers.

    I blame the youtube comment system.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:25 07/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well , the known martials artists like Bruce lee or Jet li , are strong , whatever poeple say , they practiced aloooot since they young time , and mostly lived for it . by these days you'll never find anyone who has been trained for fighting since he child age

    Comment by YotaruVegeta
    23:35 07/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    What are you babbling about? You think there are no more fighters who trained from a young age? Why do people think that hyperbole and sterotype are good statements to make?

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:39 07/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    The first Taekwondo trainers were originally karate trainers who had some basic knowledge of Takkyeon (a traditional martial arts similar to Capoera). Taekwondo is all about "shock at the right time" mostly with your two feet. So, Taekwondo in some cases are more dangerous than Karate. Bruce Lee's Jeet Kun Do is partly inspired from Taekwondo.

    Comment by moebius22
    12:57 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I don't know martial arts, but this article sounded like it was written by a moron.

    Go watch Pride and UFC and watch pure adherents to a particular martial arts get torn to shreds.

    Comment by snakechimera
    13:05 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    sports fights with rules do not count, most of the fighters there aren't that good -_-

    Comment by moebius22
    22:43 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    How about most martial artists- "period", are not that good.

    Comment by snakechimera
    08:58 07/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    that is true

    Comment by moebius22
    13:12 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Good point. Please point me to some real blood sports where people beat each other to death so that it counts...didn't think so.

    Comment by YotaruVegeta
    01:40 07/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I love opinion as fact. It's so funny! I wonder how many people here (or on 2 chan) actually were or are martial arts practitioners. Looks like a lot of blowing smoke in these comments.

    Comment by snakechimera
    13:18 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    plus, most MMA guys are wimps. Most of them take MMA in order to inflate their ego but overall, I've only seen a few MMA guys who actually had a good amount of skill

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:35 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    yes i agree! the guys who practice kata all day are the best fighters! they can easily flip people over and disarm knives and guns with their bare hands with no mistakes whatsoever!
    its whoever can do the flashiest techniques and make the best movies who are the strongest fighters!

    Comment by VillainousHanacha
    14:04 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    It is very true that Sport Fighting cannot be compared to Street Fights or Self-Defence fighting. But, the truth remains that Sport MMA currently has the most open ruleset of any Combat Sport today, while still being a controlled fight. It's the closest you can get to a street fight while still having a Referee and a gaurantee that the fight will remain 1 on 1 with no hidden weapons. It is a great forum to test one's OWN personal combat skills. Sport MMA has produced excellent fighters, like Anderson Silva, Georges St. Pierre, Lyoto Machida, Cung Le, etc..

    And besides, in when it comes to sparing in TMAs, you don't use the maiming or leathal techniques in sparring! For instance, Wing Chun has kicks to the groin and to the kneecaps, punches to the throat, eye-gouges, etc, etc. So do a lot of other TMAs, including more modern MAs derived from older systems, like Taekwondo. But you would never use these techniques in sparring, because that's not the point of sparring! Sparring is to better yourself as a Martial Artist and a Fighter, not to kill the person you are up against! So it stands to reason that Sport MMA wouldn't use these techniques, as combat sport are essentialy sparring in all but name.

    MMA is a great forum to test one's fighting ability, but unlike what UFC fanboys say, it is not the "be all, end all" of martial arts, nor is totally invalid because it has rules, like TMA fanboys would say. Afterall, one needs to learn a few TMAs before they can be "mixed" together for personal use. TMAs and MMA are just as valid as one another.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:54 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Some masters of other arts(any martial art really) often take Kung Fu later on. It really is the father to more advanced/aggressive styles which are practiced today.

    Comment by snakechimera
    13:04 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    its kinda funny how the Japanese forget that half of Karate is based on White Crane Kung Fu and Jujutsu is based off of Shuai Jiao, which is Chinese Grappling. Also, Taekwando was forced onto the Koreans by the Japanese themselves

    Comment by cantdothat fox
    12:54 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    That last comment, about just believing in stereotypes is so brilliant, you just don't see gold like that.

    Fucking incredible.

    Comment by snakechimera
    12:51 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Interestingly, if you ask masters of traditional kung fu. The flips and stuff seen in the movies and/or competitions are nowadays considered good basics in preparation of traditional martial arts. Unfortunately, the younger generation like most of us don't have to use Kung Fu anymore in order to claim territories and settle scores among different groups. Basically, we have it easy, people back in the day had to learn kung fu in order to survive. Nowadays, we have wushu, which is basically extremely watered down kung fu. Wushu practitioners usually sacrifice power for form in their techniques and they also do not learn how to apply those techniques in combat, which is why real kung fu takes so long to learn in comparison to other martial arts. I do modern Shaolin (or Commi-Shaolin), Choy Lay Fut and Hung Gar and though the first is relatively watered down too, the monks are pretty much the real deal. They actually know how to apply their techniques and how to put power in their techniques. The monks of the past may be better at fighting since they had harder lives but hey, most of the blame lies on America's influence on China.

    Comment by starsplash
    12:44 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    These people are retarded. They are mixing martial arts from the movies with real martial arts. However, its stupid to believe that martial arts from the movies are less damaging than in real life. The martial arts in the movies are based off of real concepts of fighting and are the same thing as the real thing. The only difference is that in the movies, its controlled, but Jacky Chens stuff can and will easily kick ur ass in real life.

    It does not matter what kind of martial arts it is. Done right, its a weapon and it will kill you. People need to stop measuring what is dominent and what is weak because its a waste of time and it brings forth these flamers that obveiously dont know anything about the subject except to flame or brag.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:49 07/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Jackie Chan stuff actually do damage
    even to him...
    he has brokend alot of bones himself, and i think if he actually figthed he could hurt his opponent really bad

    Comment by Strawdoll
    12:40 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    "Fortunately, a host of martial arts experts spring forth from 2ch – who would have suspected?"

    Line just made my day.

    What a sore sight- that while channers were just taking a cheap shot on China through this issue, their comments were half-truths as it doesn't apply to the rest of the world that's not China.

    *sigh* What chauvinists.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:12 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well, I'd guess that the samurai of Commodore Perry's time had poorer skills than the samurai of Musashi's time, who in turn probably weren't as good as their grandfathers who fought for Shingen, Nobunaga and Uesugi...

    If there wasn't any opportunity to use these skills in a real fight, skills would degrade and those guys who weren't as good would still live to see another day (or train students)...

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:38 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Cross training. It's the only way to be sure you covered all areas. Doesn't matter what you trained in. Doesn't matter nationality. As long as it's effective, and can get the job done while being brutal to your opponent.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:27 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Ironic, that's why Israelis developped Krav Maga as self-defense because they're surrounded by angry neighboors.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:50 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    styles train and condition your mind and body to be faster and stronger. however you cannot let a certain style dictate the way you fight. you must not limit yourself but let the flow of the fight dictate and influence your reactions. this is why bruce lee developed jeet kune do so he could mix, blend, and borrow from different styles to create something effective that had real world applications.

    Comment by TehBoringOne
    13:05 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    "Let’s all just keep believing all Chinese are kung fu masters, all Japanese are samurai ninja, all Americans are former marines, and all Russians subsist entirely on three meals a day of vodka."

    Oh man, I loved this one.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:16 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    The ignorance... just too much...

    Comment by Indofag
    13:22 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Martial Arts is obsolete anyway.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anEuw8F8cpE

    /joke

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:24 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I have taken Goju-Ryu and Shito-Ryu Karate as well as Ryu Kyu Kempo. Most of the Japanese Karate actually derives from China through Okinawa. Since Okinawan Islands are located in between Japan and China they were involved in many Imports. Then as Japanese Samurais started attacking the islands the people of Okinawa developed there own form of martial arts mixed with both japan and china.

    That is why I like Kempo because Kempo is like a blend of the two. It has the blocks and strikes similar in most types of Karate and the ideology of focusing on joints and pressure points from Chinese Kung-fu. But like most Martial Arts, It also has its disadvantages especially going up with a grappler. I hope to take Brazilian Jujitsu to cover that weakness.

    13:12 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Anatsuken is chinese? Says who? It's not even a real martial art! How can they say that about Hokuto shinken?

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:29 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hokuto Shinken is the ultimate martial art and you know it, even if its not real. I mean, just touching can kill...

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:08 06/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Before all the hate comes, know that their government had cracked down most religious activities in the mainland because they opposed the government.

    Many skilled monks and masters were beaten to death and their temples burned. Teachings were lost and what remains today is but a fragment of a greater era.

    China had many different races of people in the past, each with their own culture and beliefs. Modern-day Chinese (the Han Chinese) oppressed these minorities and took their land until they slowly disappeared. Although the modern Chinese government protects these people now since they increase tourism income, many have lost their heritage. I believe there were 60+ minorities in China in the past.






    Post Comment »

Popular

Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments