School Bans Skirts – “They Put Girls at Risk”


A school has banned girls from wearing skirts, claiming that they “put girls at risk.”

The mixed sex secondary school, located in North Yorkshire, has banned skirts completely lest innocent young flowers unknowingly attract the bestial attention of marauding males, naturally inclined to rape any alluring young girls they come upon.

Girls under 15 will only be allowed to wear modest black trousers, whilst older girls will be allowed navy blue skirts only if their hemlines are no more than three inches above the knee.


The headmaster patronisingly claims younger girls under his charge are “wholly unaware of the signals they are giving out” – presumably he is unaware, or, as is more likely, unable to admit that girls of this age are sexually active and sexually aware, as most clearly are.

The school admits that its inability to enforce a simple dress code on young girls has led it to ban skirts completely:

“We have been seriously concerned now, for a number of years, that girls as young as 12/13 years of age are placing themselves at risk by wearing skirts of a wholly inappropriate length.

We are also aware that parents are becoming increasingly frustrated that the school seems incapable of imposing its authority on such young children. In the end we could probably do so but the cost in terms of detentions and exclusions would be very high and disproportionate to the end we would achieve.”

The school also complains about the usual schoolgirl trick of altering skirt length based on the environment:

“Parents who have come in have been astonished to see the difference between the length their daughter may wear her skirt as she leaves home and what has happened by the time she is walking the corridors of the school.”

Just what the girls are at risk of is not specified – stimulating sexually repressed teachers perhaps.

    Post Comment »
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Comment by Anonymous
    12:09 17/06/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Why girls have to wear skirt to begin with?

    If the one who take responsibility for this is a man

    I can't think of something other than "it's easy to have sex". :P

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:52 25/12/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    I would say they prefer to wear skirts instead of trousers...but I can't proove it because we have no school uniforms here in germany and I can't ask anyone about it^^

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:19 18/06/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Young girls should have a right to chose what they want to wear. Instead of changing how girls dress, think and would be a better idea to target the men that make it "dangerous" for women.

    Look, if a girl wants to wear a short skirt, so what, let her do it. If a man or woman decides to sexually harass her because of HER choice, the harasser's choice is the wrong one, not hers.

    Hell yeah it's nice to look, but if you go touching without her consent then you should get hell for it, who gives a fuck what she wore?

    Comment by Anonymous

    Oh yeah, if a girl wears slutty clothing its ok, but if someone acts then they are the one in the wrong.

    Let be tell you something, girls are not any better then boys, children tend to think they know whats best for them, newsflash "THEY DON'T".

    Your hippy like philosophy is what has destoryed the very core of human ethics.

    By your standard if I wear the skulls of human children around my waste and wield a cane made from the bones of children, noone should be allowed to tell be not to otherwise becuase its "MY RIGHT".

    Avatar of tyciol
    Comment by tyciol
    05:49 19/06/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Yes, because like your skeleton clothing, producing skirts for school girls requires murdering dozens.

    Avatar of tyciol
    Comment by tyciol
    05:51 19/06/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Clothing is not slutty. People are, or aren't.

    Yes, if 'acting on it' means rape or molestation the perp is indeed in the wrong, not the victim.

    Adults also tend to think they know what's best for them. News flash: they often don't either. "Best" is also something completely relative.

    Furthermore, while I realize that producing plaid skirts for schoolgirls does require killing twice as many people as your skeletal wardrobe, we have to keep in mind that they are woven from soft fetus skulls so the net loss of organic material is less even if the casualties are greater.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:27 17/06/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Or in other words: "I can't control myself with all these young, bare legs pointing the direction to the juicy fruit! Cover them up or I'll rape them!"

    Another example of the old "It's the woman's fault she was raped because she was dressed provocatively!"

    Avatar of motherfuckingcomplex
    03:25 26/06/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    hes just pist cause he cant ware them hahahaha

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:38 24/06/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    is it just me or is the headmaster is saying that it is the girls fault if some guys cannot control themselves?
    is that guy living 100 years ago or something?

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:13 17/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    In my high school, girls weren't allowed to wear skirts either? And this was like 6 years ago...

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:38 17/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Shut up, pedophiles.

    It's disgusting how many of you are "outrage" that they're banning skirts.

    Why? You want to look at some underage girls panties?

    The whole lot of you should be castrated and put in jail.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:49 25/12/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    We don't outrage because of that...we do that because it's so completely and totally ridiculous of those people to ban skirts.And they discriminate males by saying we would want to rape those girls.Skirts were always normal girls clothing and those people just have an obsession of banning things like it seems.

    Avatar of Kei-chan
    Comment by Kei-chan
    20:33 17/06/2010 # ! Neutral (-0.2)

    Rofl, sounds like the cries of a troll. Go away troll.

    Avatar of tyciol
    Comment by tyciol
    05:46 19/06/2010 # ! Neutral (-0.2)

    Anon, u mad?

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:03 17/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    D'aww, why pants instead? Why just no skirts? Sadface.

    ( :P )

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:34 17/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I smell Islam at work...

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:47 17/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Lucky i just started colledge

    Avatar of neril_7
    Comment by neril_7
    20:31 17/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    What will they think of next? Metal under wears!?

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:15 17/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    There was a point in time when only courtesans wore panties... The fashion trend seems to be changing.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:29 17/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Remember back in the day when girls wearing trousers was a sign of "sending signals"?

    Avatar of tyciol
    Comment by tyciol
    05:43 19/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    It'd be interesting to find literature or posters and bring those back.

    Avatar of thisblindman
    Comment by thisblindman
    11:33 17/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    That picture of the headmaster is badass.

    Avatar of Abel Liegod
    Comment by Abel Liegod
    11:43 17/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    And those guys noticed that only NOW because....?

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:33 17/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    SO they can't wear skirts? Yay they'll be running around half nekkid. Time to go on a trip.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:22 17/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Letting children be born puts them at risk. Ban procreation.

    Avatar of Kei-chan
    Comment by Kei-chan
    20:30 17/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Careful, if the politicions see that post they might do it...hell they might go a step further and ban sex altogether.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:15 17/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    "North Yorkshire"

    Oh, it all makes perfect sense now.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:04 17/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    So what? We still have big butts and possible cameltoes! XD

    Avatar of tyciol
    Comment by tyciol
    05:34 19/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Exactly, skirts protect from cameltoes.

    Avatar of Bass
    Comment by Bass
    10:26 17/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well, I have to be against you in this one guys.
    Seriously, girls skirts these days are too damn short and they don't leave anything to the imagination, don't wanna sound old fashioned, but skirts too short often are too much, I mean, c'mon, you are still in middle school, think about the overpopulation and the fact that kids of those age are NOT going to take responsibility of whatever happens next.

    Just my thought at least.

    Avatar of tyciol
    Comment by tyciol
    05:38 19/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Kids have sex regardless of how much clothing they wear at first. The solution is education, not hem length.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:34 17/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Just more socialism. Everything is headed towards socialism.. what does wearing a seatbelt due to hurt anyone else but you? What does wearing a skirt do to anyone but you? It's more socialism and less freedom.

    Avatar of a bag of shit
    Comment by a bag of shit
    13:52 17/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Perhaps you were thinking of fascism. This certainly has nothing to do with socialism, but I guess now that communism is pretty much dead that certain political elements needed a new scapegoat word to push onto the populace to blame for all of the world's ills.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:05 17/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Stupid molesters... they had to push it to far.

    Avatar of Yuuki
    Comment by Wisteria Berlitz
    13:40 17/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Objection!Girls wearing pants in school is just...plain weird

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:08 18/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Nope. While the ban on skirts is odd, when I was young and didn't live in UK, most of my female classmates wore trousers. Especially in winter, as it was warmer. Trousers were better: it was easier to run in them, and if there were any uncomfortable hard chairs in a classroom trousers kept you less uncomfortable, and so on. But then again the teachers very much encouraged us to play active games during recesses, and the classroom usually had a few simple toys you could borrow. Such as bouncing balls, long elastic band, really long skipping rope, and so on.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:04 17/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    nazi school...

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:58 17/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    But I like it when girls show some skin =(

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:37 17/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    This saddens me a lot. Not only will the confidence of girls be affected negatively more than ever now due to the school restricting free choice of uniform, but this will lead to a robot-like society in the future. That is, dull, boring and all too similar.

    When you are asked to wear a uniform, you should be free to wear it how you want to. There is no guidebook in this planet that says a girl's skirt should not be worn higher than how you normally would wear one.

    They might as well change the uniforms to orange like prisons, shave their heads and mind-wash the students into fully obedient slaves.

    Avatar of Dia
    Comment by Dia
    23:09 17/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    "free choice of uniform"


    Comment by Anonymous
    01:07 18/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Saying that when you wear your uniform, you should be allowed to wear it how you want to.

    I was also trying to point out that changing uniforms to the newer ones only limit freedom even more.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:28 17/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's a church school we are talking about here(watch this video ) No wander suck a thing happened. From the other hand last time i checked church is supposed to be against trousers...

    Oh well new world order has done it's job well i guess.

    Avatar of 2DGIRLSONLY
    Comment by 2DGIRLSONLY
    12:50 17/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    That SOB, Just wear knee socks like K-ON its modest yet adorable, that SOB should watch some anime, maybe that'll reconnect his balls into his brain.

    Avatar of elemeNt
    Comment by elemeNt
    Avatar of Julius "Tom" Jones
    Comment by Julius "Tom" Jones
    23:24 20/08/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yep this is the way my country is going im afraid. Ugly black semi flared trousers... *Sigh* YUCK!!!

    Ive got an idea: Shorts or Jodhpurs? (Cmon give us SOMETHING to work with, Give us a little candy)

    Lifes getting tougher. :(

    Comment by Pyrus
    15:27 19/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Who's he foolin'? Those girls know the higher the hemline, the higher the reportcard grade when dealing with male teachers.

    Avatar of Mei Ren
    Comment by Mei Ren
    06:43 19/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    That man must be gay, because skirts are the best thing made. Seriously, they're sexy and stylish. UK makes the most annoying laws ever. Seriously. OFF WITH HIS HEAD =D

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:16 18/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I don't really care what the heck they wear. +-= Does Skirt really make you sexually attracted at the first place? who know, maybe the male in schools will change the targets to Trouser wearing girls.....

    Skirt is Fine, Pants are fine, just don't show your Undies to others =-=, and don't go around putting up your clothes(GIRLS!) =-=

    and the girls will also realize, when no males are attracted by them, she will feel bad...Example: thinking "Why aren't they interested to me? are they GAYS?"

    I like girls wearing skirts, but I also like girls with Pants, or Shorts If it SUITS them.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:33 18/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    trousers sexually arouse me.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:19 18/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)


    Comment by Anonymous
    23:31 17/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    This old person!!!! 3 inch is the soul of Japan!

    Post Comment »


Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments