Monk Seduces Boys with Wii

"It's party tiiiime~"

"No monk, noo!"

No, till now older people only bitched about morals, now we worry about their intelligence. Kids these days could turn out to be too dumb to maintain a society as we know. Not that it would matter, since everyone already lives like there is no tomorrow.

Wrong, Buddhism is not about getting closer to god or becoming a god. It is about ending the endless cycle of suffering that is existence.

since it is Taiwan it is Mahayana Buddhism where the goal is probably to become a Bodhisattva or just to enter nirvana.
and most likely, since its Taiwan, it is a form of pure land practice where the people chant and pray to the Buddhas and Bodhisattvas to take them to their pure lands where they may become enlightened and enter nirvana easier.

a Buddha is not a god because a Buddha is technically an entity that no longer exists because existence is suffering. although they "enter nirvana" nirvana is not a place or a realm, it is a state. there are also two states of nirvana where one can be in nirvana while being alive and one after death(parinirvana). the form after death is where the person will no longer be reborn into the world.

a bodhisattva is not a god nor a Buddha because the difference between a Buddha and a Bodhisattva is that the Buddha enters nirvana, while a Bodhisattva remains in the world in the cycle of rebirth to enlighten others.

at least learn something about a religion before spouting out nonsense...

freud believed we women had penis envy. I supose he never saw a trap way back..

Nah, Freud believes that humans are motivated by a desire for power and for reproduction. You forgot the 'power' part.

Many women do have penis envy. Not all--- but certainly a large enough portion to be noteworthy.

Some of it is purely biological envy--- men have a lot less troubles, biologically speaking, and an easier time reaching orgasm.

Some women's envy is purely power envy--- you know, envy of the patriarchial society. But that is always boiled down to "penis envy".

On the other hand, some women do not care in the slightest about either aspect.

And there is a significant portion of men with vagina envy. Some for the power of reproduction, some of the social power of women.

It all falls under "Grass is always greener..."

Oh wow! We have a fucking time traveler among us!!!! EVERYBODY!! CALL THE FUCKING MEDIA! THIS IS AMAZING!

Boy fucking dates back to the first human hunter-gatherers. When boys went out with the hunters, they'd get ass fucked and have to pleasure the older males.

Some for the girls and woman that accompanied the hunters out into the field. Girls would do it cause they wanted to see what was happening. Women did it for companionship, social status, and getting first dibs on the meat. Or so modern anthrology is currently teaching.

Anon@07:36: Because knowledge and science is REALLY thriving in those fundamentalistic arab countries, right? It's making leaps alright, to bad for you it's in the wrong direction, they've actually leapt back to the dark ages!

Speaking of the dark ages, that's one of those historical periods you really need to check up on. You know, the period where Europe regressed from the worlds cultural and scientific leader down to a stagnant cesspool. Funny thing, the this time period is also called "the age of faith", because the church was at it's peak power during this time...

Also, listening to what others have to say is a quite nice way to learn, you should have tried doing it during your history lessons in school. But then again you probably just labelled it as bullshit, seeing how it contradicted your fairytale book of absolute truth, aka the bible.

07:36, over the course of at least the last two millennia, and probably before that but it's hard to quantify, data on that period being somewhat scarce, scientific progress inversely correlates with religious influence.

Maybe you should actually read a history book, instead of listening to bullshit others spew.

Oh please, your killing me! I'm litterary ROFLing atm!

Those fundamentalist muslims are really the in cutting edge on numerous science fields, just looking at their research makes our western atheist researchers and scientist drool, "If only we had faith in a imaginary friend like they have! Then we could travel to Mars" they say.

But there is still hope! A group of rabid christian creationists are trying to save us, by trying to force our children to learn utter and pure bullshit at schools they will hopefully regress the nation by at least a few 100 of years!

Seriously, you need to look up some history. Start with the dark ages, also known as the "age of faith", when Europe went from being the worlds scientific and economic number one to a stagnant hellhole, funnily coinciding with the absolute peak of the catholic church's power.

Also funnily enough, Europe climbed back up to take back the number 1 spot afterwards, coinciding, strangely enough, with the church's power declining more and more. Purely coincident I'm sure!

Take the arab world, which took up the mantle of worlds leading area for science and culture during the time Europe suffered from the dark ages. Strangely enough, this also happened during a decline in religious power in the area. Pure coincident again, right? Oh and then their decline, yeah strangely enough yet again when religion rose in power. How strange...

Then we have those strange facts that atheism is more and more common the more education you have, where scientist and similar are in general the least religious people. Strange huh...

The Catholic Church started the Crusades, which helped Europe pull itself out of the Dark Ages by bringing ideas and trade to Europe, and by making the surviving leaders more powerful by the opportunity to seize the lands that were left by the rulers that were killed during the Crusades.

That's exactly why science and knowledge made a huge leap during times of religious influence.

Maybe you should actually read a history book, instead of listening to bullshit others spew.

Religion works better than anything else tried by man. Right now, religion is responsible for society, knowledge, science, and common foundation that we will take into the future and create new societies on.

Humans are hardwired to believe in outside forces working for and against them, so humans will recreate belief structures and superstious rituals to try and gain more postiive forces working for them and less negative forces working against them--- even in one millium years from now--- well, whatever humans evolve into by then.

Boy am I laughing so hard at you... trying to claim that religion is the reason we have science? Wow, just wow.

Please read up on your history, religion has through history been one of the mightiest forces combating and trying to prevent things like logic, reason, the scientific method, liberty, equality, democracy. Currently religion is a CANCER, a mental virus, that we OWE the world to try to rid from the society because it only bring HARM to the world.

You know what thing that's actually been tried and found working much much better than religion? Reason, logic and the scientific method, you know, the three things that actually give us REAL miracles, everyday.

What a load of tosh.
a) Secular societies tend to be nicer to live in than religious ones. In most civilised countries society isn't tied together by religion, but by thinks like clubs, families, friendships, neighbourhood spirit and whatnot. And where it really is religion that performs this function, it creates a very stifling atmosphere; maybe it's nice and tightly knit for the in-group, but for people with different world views (which in most civilised places is more than half of the population) things are different.
b) Over the course of the centuries religions have done anything within their power to impede the progress of knowledge and science. Understandable, since it in turn has been the main factor in the erosion of religion. Furthermore, religions are anti-knowledge and anti-science in basic outlook, since they preach that there are things for which evidence isn't necessary.
c) If humans really are hard-wired for religion, we're overcoming that remarkably well. Where I live (generic European country) over 80% of the population is non-religious, and you know what? We don't miss it. At all.

I'm atheist, so I gave up after your first sentence. =P

ah well I havent heard of all that stuff but I know it makes sense I mean the catholic church is the perfect set up, having people be celibate helps you control them for one thing.

Not exaggerations at all. The Vatican knew about this shit, but instead of providing full documentation to the police, they ran a massive cover-up campaign. The Catholic church deliberately shielded child-raping clergy from the law, for example by threats of excommunication, or by moving child-rapists to another parish when the ground became to hot beneath his feet. And the dioceses knew about it. And the Vatican knew about it. And the current pope knew about it. And now the common Catholic faithful know about, and instead of a mass movement to dethrone the pope and surrender him and his accomplices to justice, there's just weak excuses, tumbleweed and the sound of crickets.

Asshurt chuch haters in this thread, spreading gossip, tall tales and lies.

>I'm atheist, so I gave up after your first sentence. =P
Sorry, your post read like a whitewash of religious crime, hence my reply. I'm sure now that you didn't intend that, but I couldn't have known, nor could any other reader unfamiliar with your background. I guess the takeaway message is: be careful what you say.

@ Anon 04:27:
Not lies, but over-exaggerations.

The Vatican knows of the crimes done by priests, but they can't take care of ALL of the problems. The diocese and local parish should deal with it, as well as the proper legal authorities, but why should we blame the Vatican for something that they cannot directly control?

And all these assholes who claim to be "religious" are few. Majority of people who follow their dogma are normal people who want to live their life in a certain way that, as well, does not harm others. But no, one asshole from one group means that the ENTIRE group is just like that asshole. Non-religious folk talk about common sense, but I have yet to see them use it themselves when talking ill of the church.

Again, religion doesn't make one an asshole. The asshole makes himself an asshole.

there a lot of that shit in the middle east.

Are you sure it's not because religion suddenly became gay? For youngin's of course.

soo true i was wondering that

Barbarian, the thing about hiding fetuses under a convent is usualy urban legends. I remember a version from an argentinian convent in bs as..but who knows

How's about Lolicon Mikos?

i believe in the one asshole rule... alot of sick priests out there doing shit to kids they shouldn't be doing, and they get all the media attention, which would probably account for people believing that shit is urban legend. and then there are those that know that that shit is wrong, but then so is sex with an adult (for a priest), so i gather it would be in their reconing that having sex with a nun would not be quite as sinful as having sex with a woman who hadn't dedicated her life to her god. a priest can't be seen buying condoms, and thus, there are a lot of pregnant nuns as a result of one simple genetic disposition that men just can't seem to shake... they like sex...

@nightmare material: And not just for their looks. Have you read about the things that were going on in the various nunneries and orphanages? It wasn't just having the kids do sexual stuff, which in itself is horrible enough, but also a lot of mean-spirited down to earth sadism, perpetrated for the power trip and the sheer joy of it.

Haha back in the day they used candy, I guess Wii is now the way 2 go

I thought lolinuns = 10 year old nuns.

No, I really mean lolicon nuns. The shotas had enough attention from the priests and monks already.

Hell yeah! Thats whats up

Nuns IRL are nothing like the ones depicted in the media. They're mostly either graveyard material or nightmare material.

Lolicon nuns are old school...at least lesbo ones...!

Ever watch "The People Versus Larry Flynt"? His wife mentions as a little girl in a school run by nuns and having to lick their pussies as they just lift up their robes and are still 'wearing their rosaries' or what not...

And there was a convent, I think in Mexico, which the "Jack Chick" crowd ate like food to a famine victim... They found thousands of infant bodies in a crawlspace, essentially an "After Birth Abortion Mill", most of their heads crushed in...

Oh, last and certainly least, there were some Nuns that got busted when they were selling heroin. Yep, hidden in their robes, talk about "Bad Habits".

Well, the police got a scathing letter from the pope for it. Not for busting them, but they were vice cops so they dressed in the nun's robes to catch more junkies and dealers. The pope was worried about the good name of the Catholic Church.

Really, though, that's right out of "Heavy Metal" the movie... "He's never done anything immoral...unless you count all the times he sold Dope disguised as a NUN!"

They did this same CG stuff when the whole Tiger Woods thing Started.

Not quite. Your religion is your set of beliefs in the ultimate nature of reality and the practices that stem from those beliefs.

Believing in imaginary friends that tell you what you should and should not do is BAD, no matter if it's organized craziness, like most religions or if you're just bat-shit crazy on your own.

You are just stupid.

RELIGION is the organized worship and related society to that worship.

The first religions were based on the organized worship of spiritual beliefs. But these days, there are lots of religions that are not based in any for of the spiritual.

People can be spiritual without being religious.

It's religion's organed aspect that bring out all the bad aspects of "religion". As an organization, it seeks to protect itself from other organizations, and it seeks growth (although the means of that growth varies by the group).

Atheism says they dont belive in god and they are interestet in all kind of religions.They want to prove that a god doesnt exist.Some with no interest in religons is just one normal men

no, its only kids that want to prove god doesn't exist. well, kids and mororns.

god of some sort will always exist for those who fear death, are to stupid to understand that there isnt a man in the clouds shooting lightning, or want to know that all there good deeds, while unrewarded in life pay off in death.

and also, makes it a sin to just kill yourself. which i find funny.

Atheist DO NOT "want to prove" that god doesn't exist. You know why? Because they don't have to, the burden of proof is on the people making ridiculous claims about burning bushes and other inane crap.

You can't prove that the Easter Bunny does not exist, is that reason enough for you to start believing in a egg-laying rodent?