Time for a little logic , if someone is religious are they by necessity intelligent ? No . If someone is non-religious are they by necessity intelligent ? No . You can put anyone particular person in the equation the answer will never be Yes .

On a side note throughout most of science and religion's history the both have gone together more than apart , so it's weird to see these lines being drawn .

And hopefully when Judgement day comes, I'll be near people like mohammad, hitler or obama, and watch them get pwned by the mighty hand of God.

High IQ =/= intelligence, just like a low IQ doesn't always mean someone is stupid.

If only you realize how moron you look through what you typed..-_-

May the fail be with you,Fagawan.

Lol. Using sarcasm on a circular idea. Of course academics and scientists are left wing and irreligious. They are the ones making the conclusion, therefore, they obviously meet the criteria they are talking about, since they must be greater than or equal to the intelligence of those they are studying.

Morons.

And most of the known highly intelligent people in history are definately not atheists.

yes, it's not racist to point that people of other races or of a different sex score lower. I don't think you're racist because of that, not at all.

But you will be seen as racist if you insist these test are reliable, period. I just wanted to point out to artefact that if he feels iq tests are reliable then he must admit black people, hispanics (like me ) and women are dumber as well.

If artefact is fine with being labeled a racist xenophobe, so be it.

"although EXTREMELY high (160 is something like the top 99.99th percentile) isn't what made them special, it was their ability to think about the universe," which is my point, IQ tests aren't the only predictor of success and brilliance.

"I don't think you should disparage someone with a freakishly high IQ like 186 just because they're a columnist instead of a physicist,"
correct, but, if you're familiar with her work you will know that Mary Vos savant work leaves a lot to desire in terms of depth. I stand to my word, even though she has a higher IQ than Einstein, she is not better than Einstein.

like I said, IQ test aren't infallible. psychology is called a soft science for a reason.

I don't believe in badgers. Does this make me an asshat?

Why would it?

So yeah, I have much agnostic signs.

I think every religious person in the world follows the same supremity, whether we refer to it as the one Lord, as Mother Nature etc.
I heavily believe there simply HAS TO BE something that made this all and works behind. Well, it may not be sentient as we think about it in the classical beliefes.

Except fanatism, I don't think this has much to do with intelligence, a lot of atheist people are very dumb, and many religious folk are highly intelligent (same is true backwards ofc!), so this is nonsense.

So politics:

When will people realize all this right-winged and left-winged stuff is 90% empty words and losgans, and thanks to human nature it is only about getting into power, harass funds and hedge their lever?

Sure, the ways are quite different, but the result is usually very close.

oh playing with words.

It takes an idiot who is full of themself to announce how smart they are on the internet. xD

Argument from personal experience is the toughest logical fallacy to suck up.

I don't believe in badgers. Does this make me an asshat?

@TheBeast

So I herd u liek Jezus? I personally liek mudkipz.

@ any anomymous who posted

Get an account, dammit!

@ anyone else who posted

I couldn't read all you comments due to that married couple up there.

This is the whole reason you posted. Showoff.

This fight won't end until everyone stops acting pessimistically.

BTW, My IQ is 135 and I'm probably an atheist but i don't try to prove what I'm not sure of myself to other moron who is also too full of himself.

That's all i have to say.

Bye