“How Men & Women Rate Partners”
- Categories: International, News
- Date: Feb 4, 2010 17:56 JST
- Tags: Comparison, Dating, Marriage, Parody, Relationships, Science
The process by which men and women rate prospective partners has, by the marvels of science and simple arithmetic, been reduced to an equation of unparalleled accuracy.
This diagram of course yields the insight that a man possessed of great wealth, intellect, or affability can easily compensate for a lack of physical attractiveness, or indeed a deficiency in any of the other qualities, in the eyes of a woman, but even the most lovely of female geniuses is unlikely to have much success with suitors if she is less than attractive.
Via SF Weekly.
Top 10 Cutest Things Guys Do On Dates
Hirasawa Ui Tiny Bikini Figure
Zero no Tsukaima F Yuri Skinship Anime
Yozora Mikazuki & Sena Kashiwazaki Figures
To Love-Ru Darkness Totally Tentacular
Ano Hana Naruko Anjo Anal Dress Figure
Top 10 Most Followed Seiyuu
Wonder Festival 2012 Winter Wondrous As Ever
Ciel nosurge: “Your Date With Ion = $170″
Nisemonogatari – “Where Did All The Ero Go!?”
Police Hunt Ushijima for “Public Indecency”
Cops Bust Cop in Nude BDSM Club Raid
K-ON! “Causes Keionbu Girl Band Boom”
Vippers vs Vankers: 2ch Targets “Korean Propaganda”
Overflow Delays “Final” Game: “We Are Not Going Bankrupt!”
Ritsu Topless Manga Time – “She Has Boobs After All!”
Top 10 Most Boring Anime of Winter 2012
Behold: The ONACOUNTER
Future Diary Unveils Eye-Popping Scenes of Sex & Guro
K-ON! Pilgrims Invade London
Wonder Festival 2012 Winter Cosplay
“Post The Highest Level Cosplay Ever!”
“Share The Cutest Cosplay Ever”
“Dolls vs Figures – Which is Best?”
“Why Do Girls Always Have Such Cute Rooms!?”
Ranka Lee Wedding Dress Cosplay by Tomia
Shoko-tan’s Madoka & Ika-chan Cosplay “Excessively Cute”
Guilty Crown Yuzuriha Inori Cosplay by Sasa
IdolMaster G4U: “Who Needs 3D Idols Now?”
Anegasaki Nene Cosplay by Rinami
bad equations are bad... "how girls rate boys" equation completely lacks weighting of the variables, seriously, if intelligence rated the same as money or looks, geeks and unix gurus would get laid more than once every 10 years.
Shouldn't it be for girls:
Money x (intelligence + humor + looks).
Poor person: rated 0.
Rich person: rated 100.
I would wish to make a bit of adjustment to the equation on "How guys rate girls":
Looks x (Intelligence + Humor + AGE), where AGE = 0 or 1. 0 = unsatisfactory while 1 = satisfactory.
Note: I input age here because girls with good looks might be a child, young adult or adult. There's no way an old woman have good looks(Haven't met one yet).
As for "How girls rate guys":
(Intelligence + Humor + Money + Looks) x AGE, where AGE = 0 or 1. 0 = unsatisfactory while 1 = satisfactory.
~~
I took consideration on lolicons and shotacons. This is why 0 = unsatisfactory while 1 = satisfactory.
I think age affects us when rating the opposite gender.
Feel free to say anything. It's not perfect anyways :P
Well damn, I should be at least a 3 to most women! What the hell happened to me?
It's okay, kid. I'm sure the Tooth Fairy is real, too.
For how women rate men it should be:
(intelligence + humor + looks)^money
money being an exponent
why else would woman be with guys like Hefner at this stage?
This equation is wrong...women don't care for intelligence in a guy...if he has money and looks is awwwwright with them.
It's so dumbed down that even cavemen can easily comprehend this and agree with it too! :D
I have the intelligence, humor, and money, but lack looks.
That silhouette looks like Harrison Ford
More like Tom Cruise.
Isn't this implying that men in general would rate women 0 if they had a combined score of 0 on intelligence and humor? Since Looks*(0+0) = 0. I think that's a fundamentally flawed equation, since a lot of men choose women with good looks regardless of the two latter qualities as trophy wives.
I think it's sad that everyone thinks chicks are interested in money more than everything else. I was from a fairly well-off family and my husband was pretty much dirt poor with a lot of school debt. We're still happily married.
You girls don't realize that the fact that some of you don't care about money doesn't make it less truth. It's still truth because most women really to want money. We are talking about the majority here.
Exceptions are just that.Simply exceptions.
And this is how female anime characters are rated:
(1 - chest size)*(1 - age)*cuteness
He he! Yeah, right...
;-)
well by this equation they both want intelligence,humor, and looks. Girls want a little extra cash thats all. pretty true i guess. thought this was going to be one of those same stupid things where it says guys only want hot girls. i could care less about looks as long as they are intelligent and funny. they cant out weigh me though :P. big is ok but i dont feel right about someone out weighing me.
No if a girl has a nice personality we will settle if her looks are average but still if she's really ugly the personality is not enough to make the ugliness disappear.
They missed height, women find tall guys totally cool
In this post, virgins think they know what woman want. If you guys have habitual relationships with woman you know the equations are exact. That's why you see women with ugly men, with unfunny men, with poor men and stupid men.
While a guy only dates a ugly girl if he is desperate.
i dont mind being the one working while my husband does housework :) for me the equation is
intelligence x (looks + humor)
This explains everything.
so, what your saying is, girls standards are too high.
The equation is lacking dimensions. What is the scope of the man's regard for looks? The man could be completely shallow or could be attracted to what many find repulsive. Usually he's inbetween the extremes but leans one way or the other. There's statistics involved, what is the likelihood that a woman would fit into a particular man's category as good looking? What is the percentage of men who have a particular weight/scope on each category?
For women, those categories can fluctuate in weight/scope as fickle as women can be. Despite all the Women's Lib work by those women who'd prefer to be a man, there are still homemakers out there (which raises the money category in weight). Many women still expect the man to take action one way or another. The three heights/stacked things Japanese women still look for are height, education, and money. I'd say the category in least priority for most women would be humor.
Are those mathematical or logical operators....
And for ugly woman, there is always a plastic bag.
Uneducated + immature sense of humor + NEET + looks and acts 12 = my fiance.
Love tends to come unexpectedly, and not everyone's perfect mate equations are the same. I didn't think I'd end up falling in love with a 23-year-old who thought Japan was a communist country, has trouble spelling simple words, and whose sense of humor extends only about as far as people getting hit in the face (Looney Tunes, Three Stooges, America's Funniest Home Videos, etc.), but it happened. It's hard to conversate with him at times, and I get frustrated with his lack of money to do things we'd like to do that would require both of us to pitch in, but I do love him, and I know things will eventually get better. He's learning from me all the time, and while he may not necessarily ever catch up to my level of intellect, I know he'll at least be more educated and experienced than he is now. It's all about having the patience to deal with things until that day comes (like waiting for a loli to be of consenting age).
So yeah, this equation isn't really accurate for everyone. Some of us can see beyond conventional attractiveness or superb wealth, so that we can fall in love with the little things about people that others can't see...
Seriously you should dump him or you'll end up like my mother. I'm talking against myself but my father is a fucknut and he would be nowhere without my mom. She helped him to graduate from high school and always got him out of trouble. He's just lazy and stupid, my mom always do his work too.
If you want a life, you shouldn't date stupid men as they will just drag you down.
lol it seems like people's standards are far too high looking at this, but then again, both men and women are looking for much more than they let on. ALWAYS something.
That's quite an accurate equation.
Extremely accurate, but money should have a part in the female side of things too methinks.
For me, I'd say women's personalities also play a part, without being related to their intelligence or sense of humour, like outgoing vs more reserved.
Heh, I'm surprised at how acurate and simple it is...
But I think rich women are sexy.
Let's marry up.
not in their 60s, no!
http://binside.typepad.com/binside_tv/images/2008/07/17/helen_mirren_bikini.jpg
This is BS! For women it goes like this: Money, Looks, Humor, Cock.
Money can replace cock
not mine
you have none?
What, your cock is that bad, that even money can't replace it??
and here i was trying to figure out wat standards i used
DUH!
Mankind has known that since we could draw on caves and masturbate. Then later that night, the worlds oldest profession starts.
Trick is, how to work within those odd-ball rules.
Equation for me: tsundere x loli x (DFC + blond-haired girl)
Should be on the front page of Sankaku for truth.
@ everybody, specially Mikorio who cannot find a way to counter these equations.
Here's my equation:
2D > 3D
Short and simple. Period.
That's not an equation, that's an inequality.
WIN
the female equation is wrong. it should be:
money x (intelligence + looks + humor)
if money = 0 then rating = 0.
actually its: (m * (i + h)) + (L * (i + h))
You have to have money or looks, otherwise the equation is 0.
Two things wrong here:
1) You're not a woman (or just too butch-looking to tell the difference).
2) If you were, you'd fuck Bill Gates all the way to your fake orgasm, just so you could go buy that Louis Vuitton you've ALWAYS wanted.
anyway, regardless of what you say things have not been looking up for your kind of woman... congratulations....your a dieing breed...
This is an English speaking world standpoint (being in English). In Japan more women are looking for marriage partners so they can "settle down" - which unfortunately to them means "I don't have to make money for myself anymore!" most of the time.
marriageability = money/otaku * (youth + looks + .5*(humor+intelligence) - gambler)
...and you are clearly a moron. Not all women care about money. I'm a woman myself, and I couldnt give a shit if my partner was rich or poor.
Maybe if you actually knew more women you wouldnt have to resort to retarded generalizations made up by ronery otaku who just want to justify the fact that they have never met any real women.
Wrong. Money is everything to the female human, looks are the fifty heptillion candle-sized roll of cash on top of the money cake.
Indeed, that is the correct equation
The maximum rating for a guy is 4, but the maximum rating for a girl is 2? Us guys are screwed!
Max isn't 4 for guy, that '1 or 0' thing is just for women (i think it says).
"a man possessed of great wealth, intellect, or affability can easily compensate for a lack of physical attractiveness, or indeed a deficiency in any of the other qualities, in the eyes of a woman"
Like how women go all schoolgirl over hot/muscle guys even if they a brick, for a bit atleast.
Or funny guys even if they don't look the best or got munyz, or da smartest.
But the average score for either is 0, so worry not.
This is so true!
I don`t want to make love with ugly woman anyways, the child would look ugly. If you view it from grandfather/mother aspect(I`m not that old FYI), do you want to see an ugly daughter/son of her/his child?
It can be your fault if your child is born ugly. Have you ever thought of that? What reason do we have to believe you look attractive, without any proof? This site is full of other "attractive" guys who have all time to sit on the net. Why aren´t hey spending good time with girls, if they are so attractive?
Answer: they are only dreaming. In reality they are themselves ugly as dragons anus.
It's since long well known how it works:
http://www.laddertheory.com/
Here in my place, I always see old ugly male foreigners (white) who has an ugly brown wife which came from a remote poor area...
The thing that bothers me is that how come do they have ATTRACTIVE children? I mean, from all the people I've seen.. ugly white foreigner + ugly brown poor native = Attractive/Beautiful children... wth...
Anyone familiar with Jason Ivler would know what I mean...
Hey~~
Don't tell me you are from the Philippines?
what u never done math!!!!!!!!!!
negative X negative = positive
(ugly man sleeps with ugly woman they produce Attractive/Beautiful child)
see how easy ;)
(ugly + ugly)/2 = ugly
Sorry...
I'm only good with DFC...
ugly x ugly of same race, will be still ugly, but when you mix different races, no matter how attractive parents are, children always will have a best set of genes from both, just look at all the half-asian chicks, unlike 100% asians most of them are really hot.
In the review system, ugly games do not get negative scores...
I second the motion!
It's called hybrid vigor. It's used in farming to increase corn yields worldwide.
Simple. Gene diversity tends to create genetically strong offspring. Doesn't always end up as attractiveness, but it tends to. This is perhaps why so many asian/caucasian mixes can be so attractive.
Actually its rather inaccurate
Who looks for intelligence in a woman?
I do...
And I haven't found any
Which is why it is a multiplying factor
I agree with anon
I can't tolerate stupidity in a girl. Doesn't matter how pretty they are, I can't respect someone who isn't willing to better themselves.
It's just another factor in the equation... you might get lucky. But the equations look accurate...frigteningly accurate.
I do,stupid women annoy me.
but the problem still don't change, who actually possess any of those 4 things that women are looking for?
You mean you don't look for intelligence? Oh god, might as well get a retard to subt your wife.
I cannot find a way to counter these equations.
Korean women actually have hidden values for looks. What you see may not be what you get, and your children will suffer for it.
plastic surgery...
troll on.
This also means that a woman who is stupid and unfunny can be a supermodel and be rated poorly.
Then again, how many guys actually get to know supermodels rather then just see them?
Do any of you men look for Humor?
Not me.
For me it would be something like (Looks+Intelligence-Crazy)x Whether or not they are Asian.
No, the equations are pretty accurate. Apparently ugly women can seduce men as well...no less than 5 was it?
In any case, to anon 23:31, if someone has 0 for both humor and intelligence, doesn't that probably mean they're in a vegetative state/dead? Your scaling is flawed, not the equations
The equations are wrong.
The male one is close enough. A hideous woman is worthless no matter what else she has going for her.
The female one is wrong, though. In the female equation money should be the multiplying factor with an average income being equivalent to 0.
Bitches and whores, boys.
No Chris is right
These equations are flawed. Look:
1 x (0 + 0) = 0 x (0 + 0)
Girl with looks but nothing else gets the same score as girl with nothing at all? Of course not.
I am 23:21
My scaling is not flawed. Notice the theorist behind the equations invented the scaling.
"*These variables go from 0-1..."
Actually, you're on the right track. There was a snippet in New Scientist that suggested that, on average, men tended to be joke tellers, and women tended to enjoy laughing at said joke tellers, even when the joke was not so great. Women are not so much joke tellers (even though there are many highly successful female comedians).
The general theory was that it helped social bonding, and that a sense of humour conveyed certain positive traits about a potential partner that was of more interest to women than in men.
See, I'm doing science!
I can't disagree with anon's statement, because I can't cite any cases where a person did marry a supermodel. However, I dont think this is a formula for marriage material. But simply showing how one's mind works when looking at someone you would want to date (or marry).
Maybe we need a number range to show a possible max score on both sides.
Crazy should be a positive factor!!! Crazy girls are hot. Look at School Days. And Higurashi no Naku Koro ni.
What else says "I love you" more than a girl running at you with a machete in her hands?
Well, I'm not you, but I wouldn't marry a supermodel just because she is extremely good looking, equation looks pretty good to me, being a looker does not make you any less annoying, and there's nothing worse then annoying women out there.
Don't be dumb. Nobody marries a supermodel, they just phuck'em and brag about it.
ABC's Ugly Betty
Given the articles about Japanese woman I'd say that $ should be a multiplier put before the rest of the sum :P
I don't men care about intelligence particularly at all though
Not if all they're after is a cheap lay. I certainly wouldn't want to spent any significant amount of time with a complete idiot though.
It's just "1" or "0" for women or "Yes" or "No" if ya look at it that way.
Doesn't really say they got to be smart, just have a brain, or some people might look at it like "No, she isn't smart to me; Yes, she's hot; Yes, she funny/humor"
I certainly do. For me the chart would look like this:
(Humor x Intelligence) + Looks - (Nag x Bitch / Total Whore) = SUCCESS
Geinus! Dr.Evofoo the person who made this is brilliant!