yuu-mental-clinic-mental-health-through-manga-lolicon-vs-pedophilia-003.jpg

What is the difference between someone suffering from a “Lolita complex” and someone suffering from “pedophilia”?

Yuu Mental Clinic, an accredited psychiatric clinic, provides a full explanation of the difference in manga format with the aid of doctor Ryo Shinnai and nurse Asuna Kangoshi, translated below:

yuu-mental-clinic-mental-health-through-manga-lolicon-vs-pedophilia-001.jpg
yuu-mental-clinic-mental-health-through-manga-lolicon-vs-pedophilia-002.jpg
yuu-mental-clinic-mental-health-through-manga-lolicon-vs-pedophilia-003.jpg
yuu-mental-clinic-mental-health-through-manga-lolicon-vs-pedophilia-004.jpg
yuu-mental-clinic-mental-health-through-manga-lolicon-vs-pedophilia-005.jpg
yuu-mental-clinic-mental-health-through-manga-lolicon-vs-pedophilia-006.jpg
yuu-mental-clinic-mental-health-through-manga-lolicon-vs-pedophilia-007.jpg
yuu-mental-clinic-mental-health-through-manga-lolicon-vs-pedophilia-008.jpg

The original Japanese version.

Yuu Mental Clinic is by Ueno station in Tokyo – those in need of mental health services can visit their site here; they also publish a series of web comics explaining the treatment mental health issues through manga.



    Post Comment »
    322 Comments
    Comment by Anonymous
    22:14 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    TLDR:
    liking girls 13-17 = lolicon, but not mentally ill
    liking girls under 13 = insane pedo

    Comment by obro
    22:35 28/01/2010 # ! Quality (+1.0)

    why must pedos be insane?
    Also this manga needs more lolis.

    Comment by dvknight
    22:41 28/01/2010 # ! Quality (+1.0)

    what if im 17 and i like 14 girl im not bad right?

    Comment by Renegade Angel
    22:45 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    You would still be under aged and she is 14.
    If you were 18 and she was 13 then yes you would be a pedo.

    Comment by giascle
    23:33 28/01/2010 # ! Quality (+1.0)

    Not really, though if you're in school the gap seems much larger than it actually is.

    But just wait till your birthday! The second it hits midnight, bam! You're a pedophile!

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:55 28/01/2010 # ! Drivel (-1.0)

    Then you're the worst, being a underaged pedo is worse and a pedo of legal age.

    Personally I'd say you're a lolicon/pedo if you like a girl because her body is similar to that of a younger one. Like before they turn into teenagers.

    Comment by Cantido
    00:10 29/01/2010 # ! Quality (+1.0)

    My last gf was 14 when we started dating,I was 17 at the time.Men in a lot of cases are gonna find interest in a girl younger than them.I personally feel that if it's within a 3 yr range,you are good.A lot of guys have girlfriend 1-3 yrs younger.If more,I don't find anything wrong with you but It's just not my tastes.There is a say that I never forgot...because it creeps me out...

    "After 12,it's lunch"

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:28 29/01/2010 # ! Good (+1.0)

    If 17 with a 14 year old, it's not considered pedo. There's a "Romeo & Juliet" rule which allows it to be fine.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:12 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hmm Cantido that one reminds me of a danish saying which translates horribly into english but goes something like this "14=ok, 13=court" something like that...

    Comment by Deathstryker
    03:53 29/01/2010 # ! Quality (+0.8)

    "After 12,it's lunch"

    That reminded me of another one I heard:

    "If they can bleed they can breed."

    Comment by Eleriel
    04:27 29/01/2010 # ! Quality (+1.0)

    "if there's grass on the field, play ball".

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:36 29/01/2010 # ! Good (+0.8)

    Hey, if they're old enough to bleed, they're old enough to breed. Nuff said.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:00 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    Amen to that.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:15 29/01/2010 # ! Good (+0.6)

    old enough to pee old enough for me

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:33 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    wise man

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:49 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    If anyone has read the "Bro Code" there's a "rule" in there that states the youngest one can go. I think it was like half your age plus two.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:52 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's divide by two plus 7.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:01 29/01/2010 # ! Good (+0.6)

    Better hit it before puberty does.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:01 29/01/2010 # ! Good (+0.8)

    "When cherries are red, they're ready for plucking. When girls are (thir)teen they're ready for _______."

    Changed the age a bit :D

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:45 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    hmmm well at least in the us it would still be illegal to have sexual contact with a girl under the age of 17 because they are deamed unable to say wether or not they want to have sex. So if the parent wanted to they could charge you with rape. oddly the age is 18 for men to make that choice on there own legaly

    Comment by MasterYuke
    09:52 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    pedophilia in this is referenced as sexual acts with a person under 13.

    wouldnt that mean child porn would be legal, since it is not the person watching it doing the sexual acts to the child? I blame the feminazis.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:53 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    What the psychiatric association determines and what the laws determine are two different things.

    If you're 15 and she's 13 in some certain places that is grounds to brand you a pedophile. However as you are both minor your record would be locked up, unless there's some clause that say the perpetrator will be judged as an adult.

    If she's 16 and you're 14, chances are low they'll arrest her, but if they do then they'll throw you in as well for endangering yourself. (Unsubstantiated thought)

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:14 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    To quote David Spade:
    "You know the drill:
    18 is legal.
    17 with consent.
    16 with a note.
    15 if her Dad's in the room…LOW FIVE!"

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:27 29/01/2010 # ! Good (+0.6)

    @obro: Although there are "insane" pedos out there the pathology for pedophilia, clinically speaking, is nothing more than an attraction to pre-pubescent children. It doesn't infer anything else. In other words, just because you are a pedophile doesn't mean that you force yourself on children or are some kind of child molester or child serial rapist. It only means that you have an attraction to children. Think of it like this: If you are a male heterosexual does that mean that you are a serial rapist and that you go around forcing yourself on women? Same thing with male homosexuals. Just because they are attracted to men doesn't mean that they are looking to force themselves on other males.
    Of course, if you do happen to have violent pathologies on top of the pedophilia pathology, then that's a pretty bad combination...

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:23 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    lol?
    somehow i stopped following you, in the middle of this huge pile of words you were spitting there....

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:35 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    "if there is no grass on the field, play in the mud" lol someone told me that and i never forgot it

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:09 30/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    "After 12,it's lunch"

    Well, but I need breakfast before..

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:55 30/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    "hmmm well at least in the us it would still be illegal to have sexual contact with a girl under the age of 17 because they are deamed unable to say wether or not they want to have sex. So if the parent wanted to they could charge you with rape. oddly the age is 18 for men to make that choice on there own legaly"

    Wrong. The Age of Consent in the US varies from state to state. In at least half the states, the legal age is 16, and no not just in southern states :P Also, in the state of Hawaii, the AoC is 16, however, someone aged 14 and 15 can consent to sex with someone less than 5 years older than them. In other words, 18 year olds can have sex with 14 year olds and 19 year olds can have sex with 15 year olds.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:41 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    Well, I meant by psychologist's definition, pedos are mentally Ill.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:43 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    Not necessarily. Paraphilias are generally categorized into three levels of severity, a first-level pedophile wouldn't generally meet the definition of mental illness.

    Comment by dvknight
    22:46 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    16 and 17-year-old adolescents qualify if they have a persistent or predominant sexual preference for prepubescent children at least five years younger than them.[4]

    Wikipedia :S

    Im 17 and i go out with 14 girl,
    im getting 18 this year and she 15...

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:03 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Pedophilia is sexual attraction to prepubescent children. This is classed as a mental illness.

    It isn't, really, it's just another paraphilia, but it's classed as a mental illness nonetheless.

    Comment by Chris
    00:07 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    dvknight, it's not pedophilia. Not even close. Might be illegal though, depending on where you live lol.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:59 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    @dvknight

    Three years is in the gray area when your 18 and your girlfriend is 15. Depending on where you live it might be considered Child Molestation and you could be arrested for Statutory Rape for any sexual acts. In many places a 2 year difference is considered safe/legal, but a greater difference is not. It would be good for you to learn the legal language in your area since you might not be in the safe zone.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:45 29/01/2010 # ! Good (+1.0)

    Stupid Americans.

    In Sweden all 15+ action is okie dokie.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:55 29/01/2010 # ! Good (+0.8)

    ...
    *hurries and takes swedish lessons*

    Comment by TheBeast
    10:08 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (-0.2)

    oh god, i can't believe this conversation is happening. in my opinion, 13-15 is basically when you can tell if they are going to grow up and be good looking. 16-17 is like the engines starting up. you want it, but you gotta wait. then @ 18. BANG!! lift off. basically you think to yourself, "that girl's going to grow up and be a heart breaker." and when she is of age you get to tap that ass, assuming she will let you. lol. i try to get them at ~19-24. they are still young and you don't have to listen to the drama of highschool.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:10 29/01/2010 # ! Good (+1.0)

    In philippines a 14 year old can get married and have sex with her husband. Its not pedo if you married her.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:18 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I've gone with an 8 years younger girl in the past (she was just 18 though).

    Problem is that young girls are typically dramatic, silly, and inexperienced. Better to go with say 23 to 30. Women still look great then, and know what they want and how to 'give it'. You get much more out of it.

    In Netherlands we say (it sounds catchier): "You have to learn [to ride bicycle] on a old bike" ;)

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:58 30/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    "Stupid Americans.

    In Sweden all 15+ action is okie dokie."

    Stupid Swedes. In Angola all 12+ action is A-OK

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:35 31/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    And by okie dokie, you mean to say Sweden has the highest rape statistics in Europe. Those stats are driven by a changing definition of rape and more reporting. So the true number is probably similar across Europe, but still high.

    http://www.springerlink.com/content/qph2105740rt17r0/

    Comment by Gradius
    22:54 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    12 and up is fucking correct and right on nowdays. In 1990 I meet a fucking sexy & hot girl, everyone guessed she was 18yo, I give her at least 17yo, but in reality she has just completed 13yo!

    She even told me she was able to enter on any nightclub she wanted w/o any problem.

    I was too stupid back there to be able to make love with her, she offered me couple of times (in a light way of course). I regret this until now.

    Comment by Schrobby
    23:00 28/01/2010 # ! Good (+0.4)

    Were you able to enter her without any problem?

    Comment by dvknight
    23:01 28/01/2010 # ! Good (+0.4)

    i lol'd

    Comment by Kelvin
    01:50 29/01/2010 # ! Good (+0.4)

    Hey guys. I know some of us here have our ups and downs. Take a chill pill!

    And while you're at it, please enjoy this: http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2010/01/20/ladies-vs-butlers-topless-loli-nurse-raep-action

    Comment by Kortaku
    10:17 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    pictures...or...you know the rest.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:06 29/01/2010 # ! Drivel (-1.0)

    "why must pedos be insane?"

    Because it's a mental illness.

    Comment by kamanashi
    05:53 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    All the pedos I have met are pretty insane and are in prison now. 1 guy I know for sure will be a pedo has already raped a girl, so not much longer and he will be back.

    Comment by Aliaus
    07:56 29/01/2010 # ! Good (+0.6)

    and how many pedos have you met?

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:52 29/01/2010 # ! Drivel (-0.6)

    True, pedos are not insane, they know exactly what they are doing and should be treated with death.

    I thought lolicon was manga with girls under the age of thirteen?

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:20 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    lolicon/lolicom refers to "lolita complex" and typically refers to men (or women) who like girls under the age of 18 and with a flat chest.
    Not a direct definition, but one that's passable, regardless.

    Personally, I feel it's fine to like girls/boys that young if you are close in age.
    After all, it's natural to look at people like that when they're similar to you, and if they're just a bit smaller or younger, it's more of a natural preference thing than a mental problem.
    But if you're 30+ and you're looking at girls under 15 with a dangerous sexual impulse, you should at least critique yourself and try to consult someone as to why you feel that way.
    Some people like younger children mainly because they're innocent and pure, and they're not going to throw surprising fetishes upon you, so you can have casual fun, too.

    Besides, some people just like "cute" things, while adults usually have to act the part out and it's only natural for children to actually be "cute."

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:40 30/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    And what if you are 22, with interest in girls aged 16?

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:15 25/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I think YOU should be treated with death.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:42 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    Actually, people with sexual interest towards adolescents would be diagnosed with ephebophilia.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:02 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    Well, I'll admit it for a fairly large number of people here. I'm an ephebophile. Onii-chan, it's fairly legal.

    Comment by Chris
    00:11 29/01/2010 # ! Good (+0.6)

    "Diagnosed"? You assume that's actually a mental illness. The vast majority of males are ephebophiles, as in, they are sexually attracted to adolescents.

    It's completely natural for a male to be attracted to a female who has the ability to give birth. It's just how biology works.

    Now, someone with a sexual attraction to adolescents where they are -only- attracted to adolescents and it negatively affects their daily life, would be considered having the "mental disease of ephebo/hebephilia".

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:11 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    I have to fully agree on this. I my self am a Lolicon and proud of it. I enjoy the aspect of innocence and ignorance of the way of the world that most loli characters portray.

    So do i have a mental problem? Well i know i have other problems but besides that. I dont go chasing after kids in the supermarket offering them candy, or babysitting the neighbors kids then taking naked photos of them. Things like that i would address a mental illness along the lines of Pedophilia.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:23 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    so what would you call someone with no attraction to male or female, but an attraction to large machines? of food for that matter?

    Comment by Shigure
    12:29 29/01/2010 # ! Quality (+0.8)

    engineer/engineer-in-training
    and hungry, respectively

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:56 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    baby + blender = salsa!

    Comment by Yoshi-kun
    22:45 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    To avoid scrutiny from society, become a kindergarten teacher. Thats what Hanamaru has thought me.

    Comment by Shi nai weaboo
    22:46 28/01/2010 # ! Quality (+1.0)

    So it's okay for me to fap to school swim suit girls?

    Comment by Shi nai weaboo
    22:53 28/01/2010 # ! Good (+0.6)

    So I'm allowed to fap to 14+?

    Comment by OTIKA
    23:51 28/01/2010 # ! Quality (+1.0)

    You're allowed to fap to anything as long as you keep a low profile...

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:18 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    also your picture of your beautiful mom is allowed ??

    Comment by BlaqCat
    00:03 29/01/2010 # ! Good (+0.6)

    By societies current, almost hypocritical standards? No. By true definition and trending of the last several hundred years? Fuck yes.

    Comment by Chris
    00:12 29/01/2010 # ! Quality (+0.8)

    Several hundred years? More like, throughout human history.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:50 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    In ancient Greece, having sex with young girls and/or boys on the streets was part of their culture. Heck, they even married off nieces to their uncles.

    Mind you, they did adult women too, and anyone who had sex with a married woman was the right to be killed by the husband. But they sure didn't see anything wrong with what we call pedophilia. Nature AND history is more right than what these politicians believe.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:09 24/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    For the record, in ancient Rome a boy was only considered a man after raping an under 15 year old girl.

    The Chanterbury Tales [from 12th century] present a "less old" example. A story is told in which a 15 year old girl marries a 60 year old man, making clear that it was not an uncommon practice at the time.

    So I have to say BlaqCat is right on the "couple hundred years". "Throughout all human history"? not by a long shot.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:55 28/01/2010 # ! Good (+0.6)

    Wouldn't really call pedos insane. It's quite a leap from having a sexual intrest for something and rape / taking advantage. I don't really care if someone gets his/her jollys by masturbating to 2d pedo-porn.

    Btw. I'm more of lolicon / dfc lover myself..

    Comment by Ichiro Ino
    23:15 28/01/2010 # ! Quality (+0.8)

    You didn't read, didn't you?

    liking girls 13-17 = okay
    liking girls under 13 = okay
    having sex with girls under 13 = not okay

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:19 28/01/2010 # ! Good (+1.0)

    Having sex with girls 13-17 is okay now? Wat?

    Comment by Sarissofoi
    23:34 28/01/2010 # ! Good (+0.6)

    Ofcourse it is okay in many countries.
    In many countries it is okey if you are young. If you are adult this is wrong and you go to jail.
    Another reason why becoming adult suck.

    Comment by Tex_Arcana
    23:39 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Not exactly okay. Just within the bounds of sanity.

    Killing your neighbor because he's sleeping with your wife is a sane act, but still an illegal one. Same principle.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:17 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Actually that example of killing your neighbour defines you as being temporarily insane, which by plea makes the act legal and therefore lets you escape persecution.

    Comment by Tex_Arcana
    00:24 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    The insanity offense is infrequently cited, and therefore works only in rare instances. I take your point that my example isn't the best one, though.

    You'd have a hard time convincing a jury that a professional robbery was the result of insanity, though.

    Comment by Ichiro Ino
    01:00 29/01/2010 # ! Good (+0.4)

    Yes it is okay, my country states that the minimum age of consent is 12. It only becomes a crime if you compensate or in other words, there's prostitution...

    Comment by Myballz
    02:16 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    In some cases having an Affair with a 13 year old Boy or Girl is consinder by law in Texas Punishable.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:23 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    That's okay, though, Myballz. In Texas, they only have affairs with cattle.

    Comment by thanto_
    12:37 30/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yeah, and who would want to have sex with a 13 year old cow? Too old. Do not want.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:13 24/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    "Having sex with girls 13-17 is okay now? Wat?"

    Yes, OK in the sense of not being mentally ill, but it's still ethically wrong.

    Comment by BlaqCat
    00:07 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I think they mean sexual thoughts and desires is what's okay. As in it's natural. However, since most people just accept laws as governing what they should THINK as well as do, it won't be "okay" for some time.

    tldr; even if it says it's okay, keep your thoughts to yourself (or anon boards/sancon).

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:00 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    @ Ichiro

    "having sex with girls under 13 = not okay"

    Sorry but your avatar begs to differ.

    Comment by Ichiro Ino
    09:30 29/01/2010 # ! Good (+0.4)

    Truth hurts...

    It's not okay... I'll do it anyway...

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:49 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    That's the spirit, why denying our emotions that makes us human?

    Do it anyway, providing it's consensual. :p

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:19 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Dammit anon. You beat me to the punch.

    Comment by Juuza Sama
    23:25 28/01/2010 # ! Good (+0.4)

    I don't define it cause as a "fear of sex with adult" but I believe it's more like a desire or an passion, and this is caused to some people who are attracted by the beauty, innocence, and cuteness of little girl.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:02 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    To some people it's a fear of sex with adults, they only explained one possibility, and going by current Japanese trends possibly the most likely there, not necessarily here.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:01 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    I am forced to agree that the desire of innocence is present within some lolicons and such...

    Innocence is becoming more and more rare in this day and age and people tend to desire what is hard for them to acquire themselves.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:37 29/01/2010 # ! Drivel (-1.0)

    13,14,15 = undeveloped still , that makes you pedo . Stop justifying it, you sick perverts

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:37 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    tldr, im a tremendous faggot.

    Comment by BlaqCat
    07:49 29/01/2010 # ! Good (+0.4)

    Keep that kind of talk to Australia. We here on Sancon appreciate our lolis, and small breasted womenz.

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:54 31/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    ;( Don't remind me. Ausfag here. And there's nothing wrong with lolis or flat chested womenz, Australian government!

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:41 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    giri giri safe!

    Comment by Azaius
    02:56 29/01/2010 # ! Good (+0.4)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephebophilia
    There's actually a term that no one seems to know that describes the preference for mid to late teenagers. When it comes to legal issues, it's still always referred to as pedophilia even though it's not. Although still illegal, it's mentally normal to like said age range.

    Comment by T-Joker
    07:47 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (-0.2)

    I'm not lolicon neither pedo. I'll just hit the nurse :D

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:34 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    in Canada you used to be able to consent at 14 now it's 16. But my parents won't let me even at 19...

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:03 31/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    U12 is where it's at.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:15 28/01/2010 # ! Good (+0.6)

    Well, there's a change - a manga trying to cure pedophilia instead of causing it.

    Comment by Mercure
    22:28 28/01/2010 # ! Good (+0.6)

    It's not really trying to cure pedophilia, but defines what it actually is, as well as giving some ideas as to how it could be treated (irrevocably pointing strongly at the Yuu Mental Clinic). It does a good job explaining it though; I could think of a few people who should really read this.

    I must say I always like it people try to explain things with Manga. Much more interesting that way. :P

    Comment by BlaqCat
    00:09 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Don't forget the obvious visual aids it always presents ^_^

    Comment by Jakuryusei
    02:47 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    I did my math final in manga form and everyone thought it was the bee's knees!

    ..........

    ...did I just say bee's knees? < <;;;;

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:09 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    I haven't heard the phrase "bee's knees" since the 1920s. :-)

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:19 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    They do it a lot in Austrailia.

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:33 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well, my old high school library had a bunch of books published in the early 1900s that had stamps from some Florida Library (god knows how it ended down here on the other side of the world)

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:44 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Causing it? That's a bit of a stretch. It the same as the argument that video games cause violence.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:14 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    What are you talking about? Of course it's true. I read it everywhere on the Internet and saw a report on TV confirming it.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:36 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Thats def a sarcasm xD

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:01 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Kodomo no Jikan, proving you wrong since May 5th, 2005.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:22 29/01/2010 # ! Bad (-0.1)

    Of course it´s true, and i see a report on TV confirming the existence of the "chupacabras" in latinoamerica, and OVNIS all over the world!

    You can´t seriously believe everything you read or watch...

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:35 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    actually, according to some theories and research, violence in media can cause violent acts in the long run.
    It's not that simple as it may seem.

    With sexuality it's different. As far as I know it's widely agreed among sexuologists that pedophilia is inborn, life-long and incurable (as in, you won't pop a pill and be miracuously attracted to mature women instead of little boys).

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:45 29/01/2010 # ! Bad (-0.4)

    well video games do provide positive reinforcement of violent behavior .

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:18 28/01/2010 # ! Good (+0.8)

    No word of a lie, I found that pretty enjoyable, and informative about the strictness of the definition.

    Comment by Schrobby
    23:06 28/01/2010 # ! Quality (+0.8)

    "It's not an illness. It may be out in ethical terms, but in psychiatric terms it is save."

    Fuck yeah! Damn morals. The old greek fucked little boys. The romans had child sex slaves. Yet nobody calls them demented, they're called great cultures...

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:17 28/01/2010 # ! Good (+0.7)

    I agree. Sexual child slavery is what the world needs to fix the economy!

    Comment by Tex_Arcana
    23:42 28/01/2010 # ! Quality (+1.0)

    All hail the rise of the great Thai Empire!

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:42 29/01/2010 # ! Drivel (-1.0)

    Yea well the greeks were disgusting debased freaks with all kinds of insane ideas noone believes in anymore...like democracy.

    Comment by A_Moose
    01:10 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (-0.2)

    You're not very well-educated, are you.

    Just because the Greeks and Romans are highly regarded for the contributions to art, architecture, and philosophy doesn't mean that people don't take a step back and objectively recognize that they did a lot of fucked up stuff as well: slavery (specifically their treatment of helot slaves), religious persecution, the Roman Empire's extreme expansionist policies and treatment of natives in colonies, etc. etc. Never mind child abuse.

    Comment by Myballz
    02:36 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Expain to me why did they Bang Africans?

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:23 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Myballz, you are as stupid as your question or are you trolling.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:48 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    Let's have sex with kids. What a great idea. Let's go join NAMBLA.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:31 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    Not all the Old Greeks were like that. One city-state considered this typed of behaviour immoral. This was Sparta!

    Comment by Schrobby
    08:43 31/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yeah, those were all gay for each other...

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:19 28/01/2010 # ! Good (+1.0)

    Send a copy to the Australian government

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:23 28/01/2010 # ! Good (+1.0)

    i concur, its painful living in Australia sometimes.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:46 28/01/2010 # ! Good (+1.0)

    I hate this country (Australia). Can't wait to move somewhere more liberal.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:59 28/01/2010 # ! Good (+0.6)

    Sending copy of that will only get you arrested for possession and distribution of CP, as well as for emotional damage if the person who opened the letter happened to be female or gay.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:06 28/01/2010 # ! Good (+1.0)

    they can't do shit if I'm not in australia

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:21 28/01/2010 # ! Good (+1.0)

    Regarding the panel in 004 where she thinks holding hands with and receiving a kiss on the cheek from a kid constitute pedophilia:

    Future Equality Now member?

    Comment by Chris
    00:17 29/01/2010 # ! Good (+0.4)

    I like how when the creepy guy does it, the doctor's like "Yeaaaaaaah, that's pedo"

    Comment by H-Ero
    22:22 28/01/2010 # ! Good (+0.6)

    Why can't there be more educated people like that doctor in real life? Too many people use the word pedo without understanding what it actually means. If you say that you like a high school girl than there will be moralfags accusing you of pedophilia even though there's a big difference between a pedo and someone who likes jailbait.

    Comment by Chris
    00:20 29/01/2010 # ! Quality (+1.0)

    I've corrected people on this in real life.

    A girl I worked with (who was 17) was talking about how some old guy (30+?) was hitting on her, referring to him as a pedophile.

    "But pedophiles are only into little kids. I didn't think you looked THAT young"

    She just gave me a look and continued her story.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:13 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Well, it can be worse (and in fact, it is worse). A lot of people think pedophile = child rapist. So anybody who likes 15 year old girls is very likely to rape kids from ages 0-16, according to many people.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:42 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    LOL, true. By the same logic, anyone who likes women is a rapist, but they never think their logic fails that hard.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:32 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Everyone who likes women in general are considered perverts and if you try to ignore women you are considered gay. If you like 2D girls people think you're crazy. Its impossible not to be labelled anything. In society guys can only be either gay, a pervert or crazy.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:22 28/01/2010 # ! Good (+0.8)

    haha, great stuff. someone should send this to Equality now so they can learn a thing or 2.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:30 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Equality Now objects to the objectification of women and the "abuse" in games towards women, not just child pornography. This will do nothing.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:59 28/01/2010 # ! Drivel (-1.0)

    And I object to their objection to the objectification of women. Doesn't really matter though, nobody listens to what ugly women have to say... unless they are ugly women in parliament, in which case everybody pretends to listen/care.

    Equality Now can't do shit (unless dealing with Japan) because of the simple fact that they are women... and everybody knows that "w0m3n r fken st00pid" and can't drive and etc...

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:07 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    well it was more on the basis of them attacking japanese culture with nothing but mere assumptions. all those threats caused alot of trouble for the japan anime/game industry.

    love page 2, potrays the fact that alot of american - "otaku" have the wrong impression of the 2 terms.

    Comment by kuromatsu
    22:25 28/01/2010 # ! Quality (+0.8)

    hum so i like 12 years characters (2d, not 3dpig) ...

    however, the nurse is hot

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:29 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I like how they explain things in Manga format... makes life a lot easier to understand things.

    Not saying I don't know what pedophilia is but I learn more through Manga format.

    Wish my school had Manga formatted materials to learn from and Anime for video demonstrations :P

    I would remember hell lot more!

    Comment by Fonzer
    22:32 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    hm needs a new definition for watching 2d lolicon something in latin,so people wouldn't be so ignorant and call us pedophiles.
    And 2d lolicon is also helpfull.

    Comment by MaidNiac
    22:48 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    You should have seen the COMIC LO ad flier (or whatever it was).

    Comment by Fonzer
    22:53 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    i've seen it.http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2008/08/07/lolita-organization-ero/

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:33 28/01/2010 # ! Good (+1.0)

    The nurse is hot.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:58 28/01/2010 # ! Good (+0.6)

    The "A: School swimsuit high schooler" is much hotter.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:48 29/01/2010 # ! Bad (-0.2)

    A milf nurse in sexy lingerie, is hotter still :p

    Comment by CoreFlood
    06:31 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    nurse in a competition swimsuit and high school student in sexy lingerie with garters

    that works too :3

    Comment by MaidNiac
    22:34 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Amazing, I spontaneously choose the girl with elementary school backpack hence I passed the first test.. :3

    Comment by Chris
    00:24 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    In a lot of ways, that meant you failed...

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:43 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    when i was 16 there was this 9 year old girl that was totally sexual. she would just recline on that chair in such a hot way. She was asking for it... of course she was much hotter then than now.... it's almost as if she became less hot and only grew more fat and became less mature over time. My body wanted it so much. But because of religion.... and consequences... I turned her down.

    Comment by Penance
    22:35 28/01/2010 # ! Quality (+1.0)

    Best manga ever!

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:35 28/01/2010 # ! Drivel (-1.0)

    First interesting topic of the year in the page. Congrats.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:02 28/01/2010 # ! Good (+0.8)

    If you don't find the site interesting, why do you bother coming back.

    Failtroll detected.

    Comment by Sarissofoi
    23:37 28/01/2010 # ! Bad (-0.4)

    Becoze he is bored.
    And like to waste some time.
    As most of us.
    Like me.
    And most of topics arent really interesting.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:35 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    I'll take the nurse.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:52 28/01/2010 # ! Good (+1.0)

    I'd hit A,B AND C, plus the nurse.

    Comment by Fonzer
    23:13 28/01/2010 # ! Quality (+1.0)

    cheat activated

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:51 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    I lol'd

    Comment by a lolicon
    22:37 28/01/2010 # ! Good (+0.4)

    Did they just nuke hebephilia and instead increase the age limit of pedophilia?

    Comment by Jack H. Humbert
    22:38 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Liking girls without any adult female attributes = pedo = WRONG

    Liking cute girls with small breasts and some childish attributes = TOTALLY RIGHT!

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:42 28/01/2010 # ! Good (+1.0)

    Not in Australia

    Comment by Schrobby
    23:09 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Australian government = fags.

    Comment by Fonzer
    23:14 28/01/2010 # ! Good (+0.4)

    pussyfied manginas,remember this term.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:25 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Agree, May I add: whale whores.

    Comment by Jack H. Humbert
    00:24 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I am glad I do not live in Australia or GB.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:58 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    Have to stress that liking them and raping them are 2 different things.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:19 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Sex == Rape if either particapent is <18yo.
    Yes, that means you are a pedo if you fuck your girlfriend who happens to be one say shy of 18 on your 18th birthday.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:28 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    Maybe, but it would never be reported unless a) the parents found out and were moral fags. b) the girl called "rape" in which case it doesn't really matter what the circumstances were. Thus if it's consensual sex != rape.

    Funny thing about today's society is that laws are no longer meant to help people live their lives in safety. Instead they're there to prosecute innocent people who took pictures of themselves while actual criminals run free due to misguided efforts.

    Comment by a lolicon
    23:57 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    15+ are legal here.

    9+ are legal in Saudi Arabia, just as long as you're married to her, which you can get when she turns 6.

    Your "Sex == Rape if either particapent is <18yo" is made of fail.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:24 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    If I remember correctly Spain has an age-limit of 13 and France 14, here is 16.

    And, liking != sex either...

    Comment by A_Moose
    01:12 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Protip: There's a difference between rape and statutory rape.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:13 31/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ef/Age_of_Consent.png

    Wikipedia is your friend

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:13 28/01/2010 # ! Good (+0.6)

    Awesome manga, I wish more people would learn what pedophilia truly is so we'd get less people screaming "think of the children" in the name of censorship.

    @22:38:
    Where do you draw the line then?
    Your definition is very vague, especially to observers. Some adult women look very childish when wearing unrevealing clothing. The opposite is also true as some younger girls can look older than 18. So your definition, in this case, would be that it's wrong to like the adult woman just because she looks childish while it's totally acceptable to like the younger girl who has some adult attributes.

    I like to think that age has little to do with sexual appeal. Everyone has their own definition of attractiveness or sexiness. You'll simply find some people attractive, no matter their age. The thought that a child/young girl can't be attractive is a mental barrier put up by the norms of society. It's not wrong to be attracted to younger women, it is however wrong to use them or their naivety.

    And no I don't particularly like young girls but I would be lying to say I've never been attracted to them.

    Comment by Chris
    00:33 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    If you look at it as humans simply being organisms, pedophilia is wrong. Similarly, so is homosexuality. Being only attracted to pre-pubescent children or people of the same sex guarantees you won't produce offspring, making you an evolutionary dead end.

    This isn't to say that sexual attractions that exclude the possibility of viable mating are necessarily bad to the species as a whole. For example, these behaviors tend to increase in animals that suffer from over crowding in their habitat.

    If there's any animal that's overcrowded, it's humans.

    Comment by ----
    03:28 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    You know, there are cases of girls getting pregnant as young as 5yo.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:47 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    There are cases of those girls dying as well...

    Comment by Jack H. Humbert
    00:37 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    additional:
    I do not think, that there are any woman above the age of 16 totally look like a young child. Flat chest or SOME childish attributes do not let you mistake her for under 13 or younger

    Comment by Jack H. Humbert
    00:52 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    You can't draw a certain line there. It's not only the physical age that is important, but the mental age, too, I think. Rape is a NoGo anyway. But I think it is okay for an adult to have an sexual relationship to a teenager, if both want this. The adult have to be responsible though and shouldn't exploit the girl or boy.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:19 31/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Agreed... b+_+d

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:40 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    This owns tbqh

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:40 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    y goto police before commit a crime? isnt it after?

    *hides*

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:40 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    The rest on the Yuu HP was also quite amusing, not to mention well drawn. /Approves

    Comment by NoobsDeSroobs
    22:40 28/01/2010 # ! Good (+0.4)

    Liking girls or boys in sexual matter or not. They are both safe. You can want to do whatever you want to with any age or gender and it is still safe. The problem accurs when you act upon these desires. I do not think pedophilia is bad because the people 'suffering' from this illness can\t help it. As long as you do not act upon it, that is ok.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:45 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Look at this lawbreaker

    Reported to the police

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:55 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    No its bad when you interact with other peoples kids, with a ulterior motive to achieve something other than ask for directions.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:28 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    Evidence or gtfo.

    Regardless of what goes on in someone's head, as long as he doesn't do anything it's not a crime according to pretty much any democratic constitution.
    Unless you can prove that every pedo is a rapist, then there is no harm. Weather you consider it "bad" is up to your own subjective views, which is why laws exist in the first place.

    This is the 20th century. You can't just go around witch pitchforks and torches anymore.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:31 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    This is exactly what's happening though.

    All hail the age of thought policing!

    Comment by Fonzer
    00:20 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    isn't it the 21st century?

    Comment by Chris
    00:35 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    This is the 20th century. You can't just go around witch pitchforks and torches anymore.

    Yet this is exactly what continues to happen. Even in a 21st (lol) century democracy.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:25 29/01/2010 # ! Bad (-0.2)

    Since we can't go around with pitchforks and torches, let's use guns or bombs.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:41 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    I like more 4-8yearold girls than over 13...
    And Im conscious of myself as illness...

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:44 28/01/2010 # ! Bad (-0.4)

    Get help you faggot

    Comment by Shi nai weaboo
    23:06 28/01/2010 # ! Bad (-0.6)

    NO U!!!!

    Comment by A_Moose
    01:14 29/01/2010 # ! Bad (-0.4)

    2D or 3D?

    If 3D, get help.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:49 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    If someone turns himself in before he commits a crime, as advised by the manga, I wonder what is the police supposed to do with him.

    Punishment for thought-crime?

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:17 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Treatment? You know not everyone wants to hurt other people. Turning your self in (not necessarily to the police) can give you the help you need to get over your urges.
    It probably wouldn't change your sexual preferences though.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:02 30/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Big brother can hear you think. He can also watch you through your tv.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:52 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I love young girls, but most of all I love young boys, 10-14 y.o., with their tender bodies, sweet buttcheecks and newly-arousing pricks.
    Am I a lolicon? Perhaps sometimes, but not enough.
    Am I a pedophile? According to definitions, nope.
    Am I a boy-lover? YESSS, in the great tradition of Greek and Roman classic civilization.
    Therefore, don't bother me with your psychological classifications!

    Comment by SnooSnoo
    23:24 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Shinn is that you?

    Comment by A_Moose
    01:15 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    10-14? You are a pedophile if it's 3D.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:58 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Nope. I may be a criminal for the law, because it doesn't allow that 10-14 boys can have sexual impulses nor stimulate sexual desires. But pedophily is another matter of fact. The true problem is that laws don't respect facts, but only prejudices.

    Comment by SaruDa
    22:54 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Even when middle school is 7th-9th, most middle schoolers are under 13...

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:21 30/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Get it right...middle school is from 12-15, so most middle schoolers are over 13.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:05 30/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I think Saru means 7th-9th grade which is in fact true.
    Middle schoolers would then be under and over 13 almost equally.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:55 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    The manga get's several things wrong. But maybe there is something lost in translation.

    For instance the APA is the American Psychological Association.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:57 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Nah, APA also stands for American Psychiatric Asssociation, and since's the DSM we're talking about, it's the psychiatric one.

    Comment by Artefact
    13:32 29/01/2010 # ! Imperious

    I almost put Psychological, but double checking revealed the difference.

    Comment by Chris
    00:37 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    The DSM-IV is used by modern countries all over the world, including Japan.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:22 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    And this is the true problem....

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:56 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    smart ass :D

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:13 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    the problem is , real life 13yo looks nothing like the one shown in the manga...and i sure do not want to touch their hands

    Comment by Fonzer
    23:26 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    it says holding hands with a person under the age of 13 if you can't read.Try to guess which age it is.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:16 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    lol... no, wait... this isn't funny

    Comment by Altair
    23:30 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (-0.2)

    wtf that about comic strip? I think seeing or attracted by a cute girl 11-14 yrs old(below 10 I think you need to see a shrink) is natural for men as long he don't have sex with that age. 15-18 yes to sex! but not rape!(only in hentai manga & anime), Pedophilia likes to have sex with a very tender-age young girls while lolicon just like chibi anime character and figurine(maybe imagination). I think I may be wrong the difference

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:31 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Anon is only interested with 2D lolis.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:42 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Girl A is the best! fapfapfap

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:05 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Wow it's so cool. So I am a lolicon but not mental illness. (=3=)=b

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:29 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    You´re not temporarily insane if you deliberately do it. I mean, if you make plans for the killing, the escape, the alibi, etc.

    Comment by Chris
    00:38 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    At the very least, your lawyer would have a hard time claiming insanity at your court trial.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:35 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Looks like there is more on the original site

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:41 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well, the fact many 10yr old girls I know look like 15+ doesn't make the distinction easier.

    Seriously, they should cut on the healthy food and start eating crap, they develop too fast.

    Comment by Chris
    00:48 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    It's the other way around. All the shitty fast food is what's pushing early puberty. Delicious hormone-laden beef MMMMMM. lol

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:07 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Oh... didn't think of that... Damn, they waste money in research about how sleeping with women makes you stupid. They could have researched the whole pedo/why kids develop a bit too fast nowadays issue instead.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:01 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    It is the hormones, yeah.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:30 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    No, it's the calories. Extra weight speeds puberty.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:03 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Don't get the whole 'mental illness' slant on the 'A' choosers (self included). People are generally too dumb to realise that their ideas of normality are handed to them by genes and instinct, and they'll ostracize the lolicon because he just don't jive to their tune.

    I don't care if u is racist, homophobe, paedo, murderer, whatever. 'wrong' is just an opinion anyway...

    Yup, I'm Dangerously Liberal.

    Comment by A_Moose
    01:19 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    If we lived solely by instinct, we'd just be living like animals.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:41 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    But we are animals. Ones that have free will and self consciousness.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:03 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Sorry, we are animals. So, however we live _is_ living as animals.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:01 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I FUCKING LOL'ED

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:03 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Gives these people a meddle. A comic that's both fun and informative deserves some form of award. Do it right now.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:05 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I'll put it in Freudian terms as I think about my own mentality: The start of masturbation for me was around age 10. At this point with little to go on for visual aid, I imagined getting it on with the top three girls of my grade level based on their looks. My interests didn't dip in age level until I reached the end of middle school when I was noting the slender arms and legs of sixth graders. Now in my 20s, I still look fondly at teenage girls, but find it uncomfortable to go any lower. So, was I a pedo? Am I a lolicon? I suppose I could be considered a closet lolicon since I take interest and no action. If a girl of 16 then takes interest in me and gives consent for sex (which was the way I lost my virginity), where I live, she doesn't have the legal authority to have consensual sex (meaning I broke the law and profit). I found a map of the world with the age of consensual sex for each country and US state on futaba. Maybe I can post it on here somewhere.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:09 29/01/2010 # ! Bad (-0.4)

    This manga is not entertaining and educating.
    Need more examples of Pedophlila!
    More pictures of onii-chan and his sister doying wrong things needed now!

    Comment by Icy-nee-san
    01:12 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    WOOOOOOOOO IM IN DA CLEAR :D

    Comment by Anonymous
    Comment by Anonymous
    01:19 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I already knew this, it is just common sense, ok back to fap at girls in swim suits

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:33 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hilarious.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:34 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    It is quite hilarious how you get your crime record filled with just being with a younger girlfriend. I'm talking about <18 and their girlfriends <16. But it is fine for an 60 year old man to have sex with a twenty-something woman? Hypocrite I call thee.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:39 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    The FACTS:

    Pedophilia is the sexual attraction to PRE-pubescent children.

    In psychiatry it is not considered an issue to be sexually attracted to POST-pubescent humans, even if they are 9~17 years old.

    Puberty is something that hits everyone at different times, and no magical law or arbitrary number is going to account for that.

    The OPINIONS:

    When I think of lolicon, I only think of the "lolita complex" of fantasy that is in manga and anime. I don't personally feel a lolicon is a pedophile, because they are interested in fantasy, and can tell fantasy from reality. The whole reason they enjoy it is because it isn't real.

    Comment by Kelvin
    01:40 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hold your horses....so pedophilia is an illness and is illegal?? OH SHI-

    *inject self with androgenic hormone supressant drug*

    Phew~ made it in time.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:48 29/01/2010 # ! Good (+0.8)

    No. Pedophilia is not an illness or illegal.

    It is not an illness anymore than homosexuality. We do not understand it very well. It is simply one the quirks of the infinite complexity of human development.

    What is illegal is assaulting or raping someone that does not consent, no matter what their age. That is a violent crime, and is not sex at all.

    Do not seek treatment unless you are seriously tempted to want to rape or assault a pre-pubescent child. Otherwise you might have your genitals lopped off by a society that wants you dead.

    Comment by Kelvin
    03:43 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Oh ic, I almost called the treatment facility for confinement :P

    *inject self with androgenic hormone*

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:57 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I've been using the “half your age + 7” rule since I was 14. I'm 20 now, Should I turn myself in?

    Comment by Riiku
    02:00 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I personally believe that pedophelia is a result of a very fast individual sexual development. Let me explain: When I was 8, I already wanted to have a sex with a girl. A complete, penetrating sex. Is it abnormal? I dont think so, everyone has their own development pace. But can such diseres go away just like that when you grow up? Maybe, maybe not. Of corse a normal desire for sex with grown up girl takes a complete lead, but still, there is a mild desire brought from the past....

    Maybe I should write a book....

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:01 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I'd buy it.

    Comment by Tovansky
    02:02 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    the fact that the clinic go to such extent as making a manga to make it more fun and understandable is awesome :D

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:07 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    the fact that the clinic is making a manga makes me think they are targeting a specific group of people.

    Comment by Kelvin
    03:48 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Advertising their clinic to those "people' who need help.

    Comment by Doriinatrix
    02:10 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    THIS IS AWESOME
    Everything would be so much more entertaining if explained through the prism of manga

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:11 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    i think pedo is better than being a mofo

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:16 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    would u believe it i got arrested just because my sister cling to me

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:27 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Australian government should read this before they commit this senseless act: http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2010/01/28/australia-bans-small-breasts-as-child-pornography/

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:28 29/01/2010 # ! Bad (-0.4)

    Im 12 and what is this?

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:35 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well I'm seeing someone older than I am, but according to Australian law, I am a pedophile anyway, so I guess I better go to a clinic.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:40 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    It has been obvious for some time now that people don´t know a fuck of what they are talking about.
    At least this is educative.

    Comment by ----
    03:33 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Funny they don't mention shotacon at all, considering pederasty was (and may still be) common in Japan. Look at Boku no Pico, Jun Watarase, Bridget, and those RL male "junior idols".

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:46 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    This is the perfect rule for determining whether or not it's acceptable to date someone younger then you; Take your age, divide it in half, then add 7. That is the YOUNGEST person you can safely date. This rule applies until you're somewhere in your Thirties.
    Example: At 20, so the youngest you can date is 17.

    Comment by Kelvin
    03:55 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Er....8 divided by 2, + 7 = 11.

    Not that i'm 8. Just someone i know who is 8 y/o has a girlfrend about his age.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:47 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Good thing I'm only interested in the 2d lolis.
    I'd hate to be dragged off in a van like the nurse is trying to with the doctor.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:00 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Therapy sex with adults would seem a better treatment than isolation or medicating away natural needs.

    Comment by Anonymous
    Comment by RopeXPantsu
    04:02 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    People need to understand that sexual preferences are not a DISEASE, but a DISORDER. Also, "androgenic hormone suppression drugs"? Is that like how they forced Alan Turing to take oestrogen injections to cure his homosexuality? Lol.

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:59 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    yeah except it was way less advanced. In males to many female hormones lead to some very strange effects

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:20 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Wow, how reasonable.

    But isn't there a mistake in page 6, panel 2? "I don't think there is...anything wrong with men who..."

    That shouldn't be "don't", should it?

    Comment by Artefact

    No, she's admitting that men being attracted towards youth are not abnormal?

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:44 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I know it isn't the subject here, but who's the artist? He draws with simplicity yet he made me laugh and the artstyle is kinda cute (and doesn't help at all if you're attracted indeed to high-schoolers)

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:44 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Jealousy Toward Youth!!! Ha...that is funny but one must wonder how much of it is actually true?

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:47 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    VITALS DROPPING.

    Comment by Barbarian of Gor
    04:57 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I like this comic!

    Notably in that it subtly tackles the issue that "Pedophile!" is the modern replacement for the term "Witch!". Any statements other than pro "Lynch em, castrate em an burn da body!" are considered "What's he? A pedophile!?" or, in 'old school' terms "He doesn't agree with our Witch Hunt!? Witch! Witch! WITCH!!!"

    And like the "Witch!" accusation, leaders can use it to distract the public from how they are miserably failing otherwise. There's always an "Enemy!" that is doing all the damage. One to blame, to hunt, to burn.

    They over-used the "Witch!" against "Real" witches, and included it to "Heretics" or just political opponents, totally discrediting it. Jews, after WWII, became a protected species people actually felt for, so now "Behead the Jew Swine that feed off of Usury!" every time the country gets broke and they need to rob the bankers. And the "Cold war" broke down, the social pogrom against "Counter Culture/Hippies" was too effective, except in getting "Drug use" not pariah status...

    So, "Pedophiles" are one of the few groups left that are small enough to have little or no political clout, large enough to pretend they are a threat and easy to get people to hate. It's easy political "Points" to "Make it tougher on Pedophiles!" and a real attention grabber, but anyone who argues against it is "Defending Pedophiles" all the while they ignore any REAL problems and the solutions to this problem make things worse.

    I use the "Witch Hunt" thing literally. Combined with "Satanism!" and "Recovered Memory" abuse, it truly was a mass witch hunt in the 80s. People are still in jail now for imaginary crimes, like birthing babies to be sacrificed to Satan, abuse they never did, etc. And along the way, it was a good public distraction from boring, but very important stuff like the S&L scandal.

    Here's a neat article on that:
    http://www.loompanics.com/Articles/SatanSellers.html

    Comment by Ukonkivi
    05:03 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    AHAHAHAHAHAHA, OH WOW.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:10 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Imo Pedophilia is real life and Lolicon is 2D

    Just cause i like Lolicon doesn't mean i go around in real life looking at little kids thinking "Oh look at that 13 year old, i would do her"

    People need to quit thinking Lolicon=Pedo

    Just my two cents

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:23 29/01/2010 # ! Bad (-0.2)

    That manga is a horrible generalization of the topics it is trying to cover. It would be better if it was funny in that the nurses get the DR. who was talking in it committed to a mental asylum for 10 years for saying 'that one looks nice' in reference to the girl with the back pack, then have pictures of him with a smuggled in picture of that one with the back pack in his padded cell with some notes to something rapid going on down there. (nothing visual thank you).

    In any case, world wide including stoneage tribes of people who have never left the 40 foot deep cave in the side of the volcano --- Do Not Have Sex With Children. No tradition, no mental illness, no peer pressure, no 300,000 year old religious text, and no amount of money or prestige is going to make it an ok thing to do. I have spoken Straighten the hell up!

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:48 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Define children, and then maybe we'll have a starting point.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:21 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    That is part of it.

    Also, when you only live to 20-25 at most, who is a child?

    Up until the twentieth century, children were not anything special - they were just smaller, dumber people. This idea of "let the child be a child" is new.
    Just for some historical context.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:57 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    That manga is put together by medical professionals, and it is certainly not a generalization. If anything it is perfectly on target - and the target is the medical definition of pedophilia.

    It does not attempt to impose any moral codes, all it does is display the point at which something can be considered a mental illness.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:36 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    My Mom is 3 years older than my Dad, does that make her a pedo? Hehehe :P

    Comment by Barbarian of Gor
    05:37 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    "Friends, Romans and Arabs, lend me your ears!"

    Another issue, some have been talking about the Greco Roman thing, and on other threads joking about Islamic views.

    The "Great One" - Jon Norman, could do the job better, but I'll do a quick job.

    Here's an example of how widespread and vile it got in Rome, placing notable attention on the Emperor Tiberius and his successor Gaius Germanicus Caesar, more famously known as "Caligula".

    Tiberius, like a number before and after, maintained a "Harem" of sexual servants. But in da movie, they were adult women and a few young men. WRONG. Mostly young men, including children. He liked especially young boys (his "Fishes") till they got too old, then he'd kill them for fun.

    This was in no way unique. Anyone with enough money did similar. A later emperor, Commodus, who pretended to be a Gladiator, had a harem of about 400 underage mostly pre-pubescent boys. Outside of that issue, he's been seen as the most close to Dubya...

    Caligula was 'raised' by him, though more a 'hostage' and indeed was one of his 'fishes' though one he kept for both special good and cruel treatment. Still, he 'raised' him deliberately. Tiberius had saved the Republic, but the senate and the public hated him and he knew he'd be remembered as a villain, a criminal even though he really did deserve some good credit.

    So, he raised Caligula the way he did as a form of revenge... "I am Raising a viper, to bite the heart of Rome..." He also said of Caligula "He is a wonderful slave...and a vicious master..."

    Then when Tiberius kicked the bucket (hurried or not) Caligula was rapidly sworn in. His name meant "Little boots" for a tiny soldier's outfit he wore when he was a toddler accompanying his father who was a war hero. It had some parallels to Bobby Kennedy in fame/family association. But Caligula had only been raised to be a monster who lived for his own horrible pleasure.

    Now, like in the movie, he was more into anything, anyone and everything than kids. Whatever the relationship with his horse was, it was more a scandal that he appointed it a counsel, an insult to the human members. But he did kids.

    In Rome, abandoned children were left on the trash bin to starve, be eaten by scavengers or be 'adopted'. Some would want a slave and not be able to afford one, so they'd take from the trash and raise as a slave.

    Caligula would take these babies into his bath for unholy pleasure- killing them in the process then toss them back in the trash dead. He did this with friends, fellow senators, consuls, social leeches, etc. doing the same. They weren't bothered by it at all. But, like Caligula, he found ways to make it a shocker. He'd loudly at the top of his lungs curse the gods for making a being as "Perfect and intelligent as myself and you allow me such boredom!" and even though by then Caligula had made sure (bribin da priests) he was (technically) a "God" also, it really scared his friends. Tub of water, the chief god Jupiter carries lightning bolts with him...

    He'd later take some friends for more fun. He'd do unmentionable things, stuff history has omitted. He'd not threaten or hurt them in any way, but seeing the things he did, be it to animal, vegetable or mineral, would be so traumatic it'd sometimes cause his "Friends" to literally die watching. Then he'd say he was mildly amused...

    Now, going back to the first line, the "Arabs"...

    Rome had a great influence on the world, in culture and later laying the foundations for the Christian expansion which by definition later became Islam in Arabia. The "Underage" system wasn't as bad there as in Rome during the decadent period, but it was still far worse than now. Men could have unlimited wives, slaves, and could do a "Tiberius" act though they mostly just abandoned sex slaves when bored with them and there was no age limit.

    The Prophet Muhammad gets mocked as a "Pedophile Pirate" these days, especially in the west and AmeriKKKa in particular. That's just unfair. Setting the age at 6 for marriage and 9 for any penatrative sex was in his day and age actually VERY moral and forward thinking. And this wasn't "Sub human Arabs" they were actually more "Moral" than their "Roman" neighbors by far.

    Roman law is essentially super tribal. A man is the "King" of his own house, so what he does in his house is his "Law" and the state is supposed to think 10 times before doing anything to interfere in what a person does in his house, approve of it or not. They might stone homosexuals caught fornicating in public, but if a man has "Friends" he brings over for gay sex, it's his house, his rules they don't care and don't want to care. The state recognizes it stands on the shoulders of the houses in the form of taxes, service, etc., so it respects them their right to their domain and privacy. That's the theory behind a "Republic". Even a Roman Emperor would ask permission before entering a house, not doing so would be far worse than the (likely fictional I hope) behavior at the "Wedding" part in "Caligula".

    So, Muhammad, by making laws that violated that, went really far. He essentially stopped the using of infants as one-time disposable sex toys. He made it so while yes, underage sex and marriage were still possible, the 'owner' had to be responsible for them and the bare minimum of sane age limits. (well for that time) And he made a reasonable limit to polygamy, though slavery had a loophole still, and rules to prevent people from starving to death their slaves. (sexual or non) The real controversy he dealt with was "How DARE you say what a man can or cannot do in his own house!? It's one thing to make laws in public, any ruler can do that to the point of madness, but in one's own house?" and that was a strong by-product of Rome's influence.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:59 24/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Allow me to congratulate you on your excellent post, and I invite everyone else on this topic to read it. A ver long but difinitely worth the read

    +100

    Comment by comorbid
    05:41 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I'm almost surprised there was no mention of anyone on 2ch complaining about how a Japanese psychiatric clinic was citing an American book for the definition…

    …but only almost, since I would hope there'd be a global standard for defining any sort of medical condition, mental or otherwise, regardless of who updates the "rulebook," as it were.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:50 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well, the APA is pretty much the global source for the psychiatric field. they'd be fools not to accept it.

    Comment by ----
    05:08 30/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    2ch must be pissed because the APA rejects Japanese society's unscientific notion that "homosexuality is just a phase", meaning that those cute and sexy lesbians would never crave their dicks.

    Comment by Y10NRDY
    05:42 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    ok i LOLd.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:01 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I think you guys are forgetting the most important fact. You speak of ethics, yet you forget the human nature. Young women those who went through puberty. Technically is free game. Now we place 18 as an age to prevent unwanted pregnancies and the fact that people are retreded(that was intentional). But biologically men like young women because they are most healthiest hosts for children. And with the sheer number of hormones put into products like milk, girls are physically maturing a lot sooner than they used to, hence they look the part of a ready to mate female.

    Yes I am restating that most have posted earlier. Point is as long as you don't do it, its not wrong :P.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:09 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Half + 7 rule, guys.

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:08 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    hmm interesting
    not only is my girlfriend 6 years younger then me
    but my mom is 7 years younger then my dad

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:54 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    What should I do to be a pedo or lolicon or something like that?

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:00 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I may be mistaken on this, but from what I knew, lolicon was for 2D.

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:52 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I choose the girl with the backpack. :)

    Comment by chriselric
    07:56 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Although frankly the only one that truly matters is the legal definition for your country. I'd be much worse off in the states, for example. 13-20 is the range of girls I find attractive, and it rarely escapes out of that range. And if so, it's because they posess youthful features. In the states that would mean over 75% of my demographic is illegal =(

    It's really an inconvenience more than anything. I find myself envious of the people who are into the big tit pornstar mature look, because as I see it, that demographic is everywhere. That or everyone strives for it because it's probably the concensual standard for most males.

    Unfortunately, not I. Also for the record anything 2D is okay. That is why it is okay to fap to Fate even if she is really only 9 years old. Unless I was in Australia. Or possibly the States.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:40 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    ........to be sent to a treatment facility for andronenic hormone suppresion, also known as CASTRATION or Neutering. Those guys being put in the bus do not know whats coming hehehe....

    Comment by Tateha
    08:47 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    it's all good to me.

    shit.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:13 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    SUFFERING from a Lolita complex? Surely, you must be joking...

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:46 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I'm like 67 and I like a 13 year old girl
    am I a pedo?

    Comment by TehBoringOne
    09:57 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hey! This informative AND fun! Any idea if there are translations for more of these?

    Comment by Artefact
    13:41 29/01/2010 # ! Questionable

    There aren't, but we may make some more.

    Comment by TehBoringOne
    10:18 30/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Please do. Not like I wanna sound cliché, but spreading word of mental ilnesses is always a good idea. Especially if it is treated in a way such as this.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:59 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    To any moralfags out there:

    The Virgin Mary was 14 when she concieved.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:20 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Lol yeah she was raped by god without her permission XD

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:22 30/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    But once she was preggers she was no longer a virgin. Meaning someone drugged her and reaped her while she was unconscious, had the pain of 1st sex but no one was near to show it happened so she blamed it on GOD or one of the 793,393,599 GODS in existence during that time. There are 300 billion GODS in existence today ruffly 125 billion for the American Baptist religion alone (including snake worshipers).

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:19 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hmm... Still that doesn't make any radical point. Yeah liking 13-17 year old girls doesn't make you a pedophile, it makes you an ephibophile though. And you are still gonna be persecuted by the law in most countries i think if for example the parents of the girl accuse you of exploiting the "innocence" of their daughter.

    Comment by motaku96
    13:42 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Heh, that was an enjoyable read. I see that it's marked as "translated by sankaku complex". Who did the translating and editing?

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:51 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    art quality is actually pretty good for a awareness manga.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:03 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    The artist is ソウ, who is just all over the places. Constantly drawing various awareness/educational web mangas. But nobody really knows who he is.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:36 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    it seems tome that manga does more influence and education than those american-drawn comics

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:24 30/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Let's state the facts:
    We all have a lolicon, and just some of us are real pedos who should go to jail.

    Comment by ----
    03:25 30/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Saying liking lolicon doesn't make you a pedophile is like saying fapping to Tom of Finland's artwork doesn't make you gay.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:10 30/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Interestingly enough, men who are sexually attracted to girls between 14-18 are hebephiles. It's like advanced pedophilia, but isn't as frowned upon (most likely because a 14 year old either understands sexual pleasure or the whole "we're animals and animals want to mate as soon as they're reproductively capable.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:29 30/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    So if someone is sexually attracted to a person under the age of 13 they're mentally ill even if the person doesn't act on it? I don't buy it.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:39 30/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Even if a person DOES act on it, they are not mentally ill by definition. I talked with a psychologist who takes the stance that pedosexuals and 'child molesters' are not sick nor dangerous, and SHE (yes, it was a woman psychologist) had quite a bit of evidence, just as I do, that it is no more 'sick or dangerous' than homosexuality is.... and need I remind people that homosexuality was declared a 'dangerous' sexuality by some people!

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:38 30/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I'll bluntly state it again: THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH PEDOSEXUALITY! It is just a sexuality that the religioloonies and others (who have never met a pedosexual in their lives in most cases and rely too much on what the media says) bash upon because: 1. Having a wonderful sexual encounter with ANYONE as a child is the number one religion buster in the world and 2. They wish to think that children are 'lesser' than themselves and need their 'protection' (which, if pedosexuality was brought out into the open, those children WOULDN'T need any more protection than ADULTS having sexual encounters with other adults).

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:49 30/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Realy? Its cool to meet people like you here :D
    I am 34 but I am secretly in love with the 7 year old daughter of my neighbor.
    its true!

    I love her and would care for here - and i would only have sex with her if she wanted it too.

    Once she showed me her undies, so maybe that was a sign :):)

    Comment by TehBoringOne
    10:24 30/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I dunno if you are serious... ut if you are, I have a question:

    If that 7 year old grows beyond... childhood and into adolescence or even adulthood...

    Would that love of yours fade away?

    That's a question I've always had roaming around the back of my mind, since I don't get pedos...

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:00 30/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    This has nothing to do with religion, it is (in a humanistic sense) wrong. Sex with a child is both physically and mentally scarring and can lead to extreme forms of insecurity and depression. Nobody has the right to trash someone's childhood, simply because they are only attracted to children. They should either remain celibate, or ask for help commiting suicide. We can't tolerate every defect that nature produces.

    Islam for example is a religion that has no problem with pedophillia, Muslims men get married to children all the time, in Arab states. so this refutes your claim that it was religion that demonised pedophillia. It also refutes the claim that a Pedophilic relationship can work, as even in countries were it is acceptable, children run away.

    The difference between Homosexuality/Lesbianism and Pedophillia, is that both parties are physically mature enough to consent to each other and cannot be manipulated, or taken advantage of.

    The only person I can see defending pedophillia is a severely misguided person, or someone who is a pedophile themselves and I doubt theres a shortage of such types on this site >____>

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:00 30/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I think he is saying there is nothing wrong with being sexually attracted to children. It's when you cross the line and act on it that is the problem. Thoughts are not crimes, and until you act out you are innocent.

    No one should ever take the rights of someone else away, and rape does that. It is not consensual and not sex.

    I defend pedophilia, because it is harmless. I do NOT defend rapists or molesters. There is a clear line between thought and action.

    There are probably millions of pedophiles out there that know they can not violate someone, and live with it. By wanting to burn them at the stake you are taking away their rights, which is ironic.

    You act like you know what it is like to live with something as instinctual as sex with no outlet because you are only aroused by children. If you put yourself in their shoes, you'll see people that only want you dead, living in constant fear, alone and exiled.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:19 30/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I think I am in love with Dr Ryo <3

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:51 30/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    i went for b).... then what the fuck i'm? a pedophile or lolicon?

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:46 31/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    lolicon

    Comment by Reo
    22:33 30/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    "clinic or jail"?
    LoL this really make me laugh XD

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:37 01/03/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    does anyone know what that parody is on pic #2?

    Comment by Jorda Dav
    10:33 07/09/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    as a person who's had a d cup since the 3rd grade and sexual abuse victim, i think this sort of manga is a good idea and those creepy if they can bleed they can breed creeps out there need to wonder : what if they are just not mentally ready or aware of long term emotional consequences??

    Post Comment »

Popular

Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Forum Posts

Recent Comments