Square Enix: Final Fantasy XIII “Last of its Type”

pensive-vanille.jpg

In what may be a tacit admission that the Final Fantasy series has become too staid even for Square Enix, CEO Yoichi Wada has said he thinks the company needs to move on from the established Final Fantasy formula.

In his recent Edge interview, he has this to say:

That period [the start of franchises like Biohazard and Metal Gear] really set in stone a certain style of Japanese development, which some might say has reached its culmination with Final Fantasy XIII.

How do you think these kinds of big-budget, long-in-development Japanese games stand up in the current climate?

I believe Final Fantasy XIII is going be something special, and that it’s going to be well received by the audience.

But whether we are going to continue to internally create this type of game remains to be seen, because I actually feel that the team that was involved with Final Fantasy XIII should next move on to create and generate some ‘next generation’ forms of play.

Internally and externally I feel there’s an expectation of Square Enix to offer something new, and I really think that the Final Fantasy team could create something completely different, but at the moment they’re strictly catering to the particular audience they have now.

Combined with his admission that he would consider having Final Fantasy titles developed overseas, and that he is personally a fan of western games, to say nothing of sacking large numbers of Japanese employees whilst procuring a western developer, it appears some big changes may be in store for both Final Fantasy and Square Enix.



    Post Comment »
    183 Comments
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Comment by cats
    02:10 09/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Put the effort into it like they did with 7 or 10 and it could work.

    Create crap like everything in between and after them, and you get the same results..

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:25 09/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    How long did it take them to realize this again?

    We've done the FF thing. Many, many times. When you try to use a franchise as a cash cow, you kill it, that's just how things work.

    Now then, remember those experiments you said you wanted to avoid? The ones like WEWY? Yeah, get back to them. Because those were actually good.

    Comment by shoranhimura
    01:31 09/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    western developers + square enix = doom?

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:26 09/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Wada says that they need to move onto something else with FF, people like Inafune says the Japanese gaming industry is dying, we're all saying jRPGs are getting stale, and those are reasons for Final Fantasy to change according to him?

    I have two words (well, three):

    Dragon. Fucking. Quest.

    Still the biggest seller in Japan. Still practically EXACTLY the same since the first game.

    Comment by ImBZppl
    04:20 09/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    well with XIII released before XIII versus combined with all the negative feedback from how it is too linear and a few other problems that currently slip my mind i hope they wont make the same mistake on versus

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:02 09/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Final Fantasy XIII was just a bad number is all.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:56 09/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    whats with all these 'how crap is final fantasy XIII' topics? no-one cares in reality

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:52 09/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    well i hope Final Fantasy doesnt change sides to the West, or Hollywood would probably buy it over first

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:34 09/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    IMHO they shouldnt have released xiii in just japan first, it would be better if they just simultainously released it, bad feed back from jap earlier is just going to kill the franchise all together

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:08 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Don't take this seriously, its just wada rambling.

    He's not a game producer, so he had jack shit to do with game development.

    As long as new FF games sell millions, there is no need for change.

    There is nothing wrong with tried and tested game design, not everyone wants a revolution.

    Not everyone wants to be a casual wii gaming twat.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:54 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    "Dear Square-Enix,

    Thank you for releasing Atlus' Shin Megami Tensei: Persona 4 in Europe (even if I don't live there). You guys could learn a thing or two about developing good console games with them, something it seems you have forgotten how to do.

    Best Regards,
    Anon."

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:49 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    The Final Fantasy series is getting stale, they have to move on to a totally new series.
    I personally enjoyed the FF series back in the PSX system (especially FF9), they come up with real neat FANTASY world and deep storyline..
    Ahhh.. Such a good old glory days.. :)

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:36 09/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Its not that FF is getting stale, i think it has something to the w/ the character design, i mean come on look at them, they dont look like anything you want to root for

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:11 09/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yeah that's what I'm trying to say, not to mention with the creative fun factor inside the earlier series. I don't get that feeling anymore by playing the later series..

    Comment by Severon
    23:51 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    no way 13 is a bad number

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:11 09/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I wouldn't mind if they ended the final fantasy series and started working on something new, but it can't end with this as it's final game. They should go out in a blaze of glory

    Comment by ntbxp
    22:43 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I think next FF will be full action based because turn battle is too much unreal and boring for western.
    (Despite for japanese, western FPS is boring clicking game. Too few FPS made success. And when the thing is too hard, they simply stop to play because they play for fun.)

    Maybe it will be a Legend of Zelda style with tons of muscles.

    ...Why western is wanting realism in fantasy?

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:00 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I'm not sure what to think here. Whether they change FF to a different kind of game or stop the FF series altogether to start something new, it would be a stupid move on their part.
    FF is one of the most well-known franchises that even people who don't play the games (or games at all) know what it is. And if they change the series to something new, it wouldn't be FF anymore. It would be just like Street Fighter 2010.
    If you don't know what I'm talking about, check out AVGN's review on it.
    Either way, I'm scared for SE.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:07 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Wada might as well be admiting hes about to get kicked off from SE....if XIII bombs word wide (or dont do as good as expected) his ass is fried.

    Comment by Amadeviant
    04:47 09/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    EVERYONE, they made the CONSCIOUS decision not to redo FF7. These people have no intent to bring FF back to glory. Everyone refers to the FF glory days of 7-9 and maybe 10. That's where it stopped, that's where the glory stopped. 11,12,13 show the direction Sqeenix wants to go. They received a server crashing amount of e-mails on the topic and they're not listening. FF13 wouldn't be better if they overhauled the character models, nor would any other if they kept the same standard for characters, while gutting what really counts, gameplay. Sidequests, missions, scandals (Aeris naked and not dead, sephiroth as a playable character etc...) And you intellectuals are crucifying the series based on character models??? The direction they want to head is action rpg (or just action) which is a travesty considering FF was designed and acclaimed as an rpg.
    I would personally pay 200 u.s.d. for a ps3 ff7 remake. Many people would. They don't care though. They are announcing that they plan to kill off FF as it once was.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:18 26/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Here's an idea. Anyone here play Valkyria Chronicles? Anyone else think a Final Fantasy in that style might work?

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:07 24/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    If FF is going to be made in the USA, sign me up for a job!!!

    Comment by OtakuNes
    04:46 18/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    IMO this doesn't sound too bad. They have been going at the rpg game for years and quite frankly destroying almost all other competitors. If XIII turns out to be an amazing game and receiving even half the acclaim that VII did it would be a fitting end to an era.
    I don't think they would give up on RPGs all together but they definitely need to focus on other projects. Square-enix probably realizes that they have a market that they haven't even touched and they could make into a beautiful thing.Also if their objective is just to put to rest FF and focus on other RPGs then that's cool too. Their RPG game is on point and they'll be able to show other games the same care that they've done with their flagship series. Hey maybe they'll finish Kingdom Hearts 3.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:53 21/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Square not Milking FF for all its worth? I find that hard to believe. I think such a notion would backfire, since I think we'd get more crap as a result of western development (especially considering how the aim to get purely western views)

    I doubt this would mark a return to the grand creativity that Square had in the Playstation era (which gave us various games like Einhander), since let's face it milking FF for all its worth makes more money than being creative.

    Maybe it's the partial realization that their attempts at mass marketing FF is starting to backfire.

    And to think FFXIII is an upswing in the series. It might be just as well considering how the original producer left square lately. All empires must fall after all.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:10 22/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Sounds good. Maybe they'll try making an ACTUAL rpg too, that would be nice.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:46 13/03/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    How about a new parasite eve? That series hasn't been touched for years.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:13 03/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Basically I'm going to say what a lot of fans have had on their mind for years but haven't gathered the courage to say what needs to be said....and that is Square[soft] undeniably has went downhill ever since merging with Enix. It has. The ultimate culmination of this fact is presently seen. You cannot, absolutely cannot, have a single, company-founding game in development for the better of 5 years and be THIS detached from the core of what your audience wants and what you ought to know what is required to make a masterpiece. It's embarrassing, delusional for all the factional teams involved in the development, and downright grounds for a serious internal review of design using 1997 as a ground zero template.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:03 29/05/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Essentially I think it meanswill go the same way as front mission series, what was once a good stratagy mech game they turned into lazy mans dumbed down kiddie action game. I think reading this FF will just end like a platformer or action game series from now on. Tbh FF13 to me imho felt more like action game than rpg was just too linear or more like you watching a movie where they throw you bread crumbs few minutes play between scenes before next part of movie plays imo.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:26 16/03/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Oh well it's about time, New franchises plz? no more sad ppl.

    Comment by ILoveSky
    15:31 16/05/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    What a shame, Final Fantasy is awesome.

    Comment by tyciol
    19:26 07/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    A big issue is that the characters are becoming too human-looking. I think we all thought they learned their lesson from 'Spirits Within' when they went to do stuff like FF9 or 11 (10 sort of had the same issue but at least had badass 1-armed hellions and furries) but then they resort to the whole pop culture pretty boy stuff that's just not memorable.

    We get more attached to odd-looking sprites like in 4/6/7 don't we? Then even when the graphics get tailored up it doesn't matter since they're in our hearts.

    But when it looks like Advent Children to begin with, there's not a chance.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:06 29/05/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    7/8/9 were memorable because they had good story and what the latest FF games lack... freedom. Personally i liked Advent Children though but disliked Spirits Within :P

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:54 11/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Final Fantasy + Wii sports = teh HORROR TEH HORROR!!!

    What can be done to save FF? well for starters GOOD PLOT Writers... I am fucking tired of cliches...

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:59 09/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    True FF fans would never say shit ! u guys are just too gay and pussy to play FF.go play ur master in gay helmet and gears of gaytard.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:31 09/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Dude, do you have any idea how retarded you sound? Read what you've just posted and reflect on your stupidity.

    Comment by Bronxdragon
    19:56 09/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Square should have stayed Squaresoft they started getting shitty when they became Square Enix......you may just need to fire half your staff.....

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:58 09/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I've never played Final Fantasy, and from what I've seen, probably never will. But those graphics, those girls, fuck! Want!

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:27 09/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Final Fantasy died after the mediocre FFX. Gone are the good old days...

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:43 09/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    "Last of its type"?

    That's a relief.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:24 09/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    well theres always versus xiii

    Comment by Bronxdragon
    19:58 09/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Square enix should have stayed Squaresoft....I don't remember who the joined up with and I don't feel like looking it up but they just need to break off.....who ever they brought with them screwed over Square.....

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:00 11/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    They should have stopped making this kind of FF 5 FFs ago.....

    Oh and square has destroyed the FF franchise already...well considering it takes them 3 or 6 games to make a good one these days....

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:32 11/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I thought FF was already going in a new direction with FFX.. And it was a direction I didn't like.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:15 11/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Amen to that.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:03 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hey, due to the production cycles, every subsequent FF has usually been done by a different team anyway (sorta like the interleaved production of Treyarch/Infinity Ward-produced Call of Duty installments).

    That's also why no two subsequent Final Fantasy installments are similar.

    Comment by Spiderkid
    14:05 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Mmmm.. brown on brown third person shooter Final Fantasy complete with exploding barrels and QTE's. Sounds delicious.

    Comment by Ukonkivi
    23:34 09/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    So I guess this means even less world maps, mogs, chocobos, medieval to Victorian era fantasy, Odin, Airships, Ultima and Holy spells, and every single other notable thing about Final Fantasy.
    And we'll never see the crystals, white mages, red mages and black mages again.

    And that means more belts and zippers, more childish main characters, sci-fi, ugly reptile races that look like the belong on Tatooine, boring political "plots", and every other thing that's been ruining Final Fantasy on further edge.

    Gosh darn it, why don't they just call it "Final Sci-Fi" now?

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:38 10/05/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    uh, the games are pretty bad right now(10-13), if they add more action but with open world it could be a good move, the linears japs woulnd buy it tough.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:34 11/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Amen, bro. (I actually liked the futuristic divergences of FF7 and 8 though, but after that.. Bleh.)

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:13 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    "catering to the particular audience they have now"

    WAT did he just call us linear?

    Comment by Riiku
    19:49 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    FIRST:

    SE, do what you want with the series, BUT JUST KEEP Tetsuya Nomura at the helm of character design, and FF will rule FOREVER. I'll never get tired of his work. No matter how gay (beautiful) his characters look, he is still one of a kind.

    SECOND:

    For fucksake, they said it themselves:

    "catering to the particular audience they have now."

    Just remake FF VII for PS3 already, you'll get fucking TONS of money! Srsly, are you morons to not see that, SE?

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:07 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    ~Final Fantasy IX is Hironobu Sakaguchi's Favorite Final Fantasy title, saying that "it's closest to his ideal view of what Final Fantasy should be".

    I think we should do what the man says

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:12 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    9 was all that was final fantasy. The music, the summons, the moogles and chocobos were the most present in that game, and it was just the classic story.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:13 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    http://finalfantasy.wikia.com/wiki/Hironobu_Sakaguchi

    for those who don't know him

    yes, he produced FF6, helped write the story for FF7 and produced FF9, as well as directing FF1-5

    y'know, all the good ones. . .

    so I think he knows how to fix the current Final Fantasy state of stagnation. . .

    Comment by Dvv
    07:22 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    You know after all those years of success isn't it kind of stupid for him to resign just cause one failure when he can make up the lost money with one good game?

    Comment by Black_Knight
    12:16 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I-III - were trial and error
    IV-VI - Perfected the original formula while adding their own charm
    VII - The My First RPG (For most people, okay game, but a lot of undeserved praise)
    VIII - Romance Drama (Whatever)
    IX - closest to what Final Fantasy should be as a whole.
    X - Mix and Match levelin'
    XI - normal MMORPG
    XII - There was a 12?
    XIII - Shouldn't this be called Spirits Within the game?

    You think having the word 'final' in your game title would mean something.

    Comment by AsakuraZero
    14:58 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    FF7 needs to be finished i will cling on that rummor (well not really a rummor there are a lot of missing/bugged shit on that game)

    Comment by AsakuraZero
    15:50 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    no, there are parts of the game that are not accesable or i just coudlnt get there (in the temple of the ancients there was an stair that i couldnt get into)

    Comment by A_Moose
    15:22 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    You mean hoaxes invented by people on the internet like the various methods of reviving Aeris and getting Sephiroth in your party?

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:49 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    ff IX was quite bad

    the story was decent but not that good. The plot was weak there was nothing that capture you. The ending boss battle was weird

    music was good

    all the character was horrible except the moogle they are awesome

    zidane was normal not horrible not great this make him boring

    Garnet probably my most hated heroine she never seem to able keep her word i.e hated her mother one moment to sudden cry at her death, never change her way of talking

    vivi was a bit too stupid but atleast his reason is her young

    Amarant his reason to follow party was dumbest in the whole ff ix

    there more but i am too lazy to write

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:48 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    ff IX was quite bad

    the story was decent but not that good. The plot was weak there was nothing that capture you. The ending boss battle was weird

    music was good

    all the character was horrible except the moogle they are awesome

    zidane was normal not horrible not great this make him boring

    Garnet probably my most hated heroine she never seem to able keep her word i.e hated her mother one moment to sudden cry at her death, never change her way of talking

    vivi was a bit too stupid but atleast his reason is her young

    Amarant his reason to follow party was dumbest in the whole ff ix

    there more but i am too lazy to write

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:40 09/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    my god, your grammar and opinion hurt my brain. . .

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:40 09/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    mu god, your grammar and opinion hurt my brain. . .

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:01 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    The fuckers should just remake the damned FFs from 1 but start from 7 lol! I'd give my money for them then.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:57 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    if Final Fantasy turn into western kind of games then it FAIL completely

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:15 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    unless it were a Demon's Souls knock-off

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:21 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    naaah, that wouldn't be right for Final Fantasy

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:55 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I juts want a classic style FF game again. Hasn't the horrid fan reception of XIII been a clue to Square?

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:14 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I for one still love JRPGs.
    I hope they don't just make everything action based now, which is what I'm getting out of this.

    Comment by Abel Liegod
    12:42 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Whatever
    Any game with Final Fantasy in the name is worth my money! ಠ_ಠ

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:57 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    People like you are the reason bad sequels sell.

    Comment by Barbarian of Gor
    12:56 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    What they should do is turn the game over to indie developers, philosiphers and storytellers.

    A fantasy RPG is, at it's purest a combination of mindless but if done right addictive "Dungeon Crawling" and some retelling of "The Hero's Journey". Losing sight of this, the dungeon crawling is tedious and the story is dry as dust.

    However, "The Hero's Journey" is an "Eternal Story", it's just a matter of how to tell it.

    Let's analyze what made some of the best ones work:

    1. Ultima IV Quest of the Avatar. The first three were just graphically good (for the time!) dungeon crawls and even for the creator were feeling like he'd reached a plateau of what to do with them. Lord British had essentially told the first tales of "Fantasy adventure on the Computer" three times, and wanted something more from the games.

    So he made "Quest of the Avatar" which was about moral and spiritual development. Technically it advertised at least 40 hours, but plenty of people I knew spent 400+ hours on it, mastering each and every aspect, going all over the grand world...

    It kept its popularity for a long time and as computer graphics improved, kept with amazing sequels. It also innovated itself, Labyrinth of Worlds used Doom-like 3D years before it was supposed to work, and challenged itself, "The False Prophet" and "Pagan".

    2. Final Fantasy. I'm no scholar of that series, but the one I remember the most was FF7. (in the USA) It was a graphical marvel, but perhaps as a coincidence the story it told touched the hearts of many people and helped the series springboard to mega hit status. Like all RPGs it was or about the "Hero's Journey" but it had a lot of "real" things in such an unreal world.
    a. "Growing Up", Cloud grows up during the adventure, like it or not, just as in RL. You think you are a big kid who's struggling to keep alive, get pussy and maybe a few extra bucks, but then people start referring to you as a "Man" perhaps even complimenting your progress and you go "WTF?"
    b. The cost of doing good. In RL you don't trip a bank robber stealing a million from a bank and get a reward of a million dollars. The world is harsh, ugly and evil and good is as often punished as rewarded. But that is the reason it is called doing a good thing. The characters are trying to save the world, but because of that are "Eco Terrorists" and no one minded that, I guess because they didn't interfere with anyone's "Whale Anus sushi" with a speedboat;-)
    c. Aeris's death. If you've truly lived, you've experienced the loss of another. If anyone whines "Spoiler" well again it should be common knowledge now. This element made the thing feel very "Real" to the player, there are even (way too much free time department) people who've made 'edits' of that game so Tifa can still be alive, her loss is so tragic.

    Furthermore, Final Fantasy had two more (among many) good things going for it:

    1. A visionary quality artist, Amano. His elegant illustrations probably made the company guys and less established artists angry and frustrated, but they really captured the eye and imagination. I forget which Final Fantasy it was, 2 or 3 on the SNES, but the one where that sorceress has the headband... The stand alone pictures he did for that really captured the imagination.

    2. The intro and iconic title artwork. That intro is a rather simple thing to do, but done right it really captures the users attention. The best "Real" stories have a simple saying as an introduction. You might YouTube "The Thief and the Cobbler" for a really good example, the intro to "Aquaria" is another. But the Final Fantasy games start out with that beautiful intro, then the title flashes in, then the artwork/screen shots. It's a "Like being born" feeling, of entering the new world, being projected.

    Now, the problem is that most companies that re-examine and look for what made previous hits work, usually end up with a "More of the same" that works well for just after but later becomes dry.

    I've made my own suggestions for other types of games, the "Littlewitch Romanesque: Adventure" but for a new "Final Fantasy" they should look into some more accomplished "Indie" publishers and give them a daring amount of "Free Reign". For instance BitBlot that made "Aquaria" and "Paper Moon" and are working on "Marian". Now that technology is catching up to the mainstream, Indie makers have a huge edge because they don't have to justify and pre-plot every step to a 'board of directors' until the creative process chokes itself and they just push garbage through to hopefully get their paychecks.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:43 09/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Wow, wall of text

    Comment by eksuterru-kun
    12:21 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    oh?
    imagine a 'western' designed final fantasy with lots of 'manliness'.
    'cos thats how i see western games testosterone loaded~

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:14 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I wonder how many Japanese gamers are frothing at the mouth over the his admiration of western developers and games. I'm sure their rage is delicious.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:44 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I have a better solution for their ailment:

    Square-Enix, just give us a new Final Fantasy Tactics for a console and everything's gonna be alright. I don't get why they confine the Tactics branch into handhelds when they could actually try to reach out to the consoles. The original Tactics was an underrated classic and Bahamut Lagoon was also an interesting RPG. I think SE are stupid and lazy as to not making a FFT for PS3; there's no excuse, so they better try to make one and we'll play it if the final product's good.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:04 26/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    The only way I want another Tactics game is under the following hostage-negotiated conditions:

    -GOOD STORY
    -NO EXTRA RACES
    -Stop diluting the class pool by splitting solid classes into sub classes
    -Multiplayer Co-Op and Versus a-la War of the Lions
    -Loads of side quests
    -DLC support for MORE QUESTS

    Basically, don't do anything like FFTA ever again and remember what made the original game good. Vagrant Story+FFT are the only Ivalice Alliance games I will ever accept to date.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:10 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Just don't turn into XII's gameplay... please don't

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:09 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I want a Final Fantasy with it's setting after a Hero has failed to save the world from destruction at the hands of an evil megalomaniac.

    Final Fantasy Fallout anyone?

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:03 09/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    In FFVI, the heroes did fail to save the world and in a sense the antagonist did succeed in destroying the world.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:31 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hope you have a lawyer because that sounds like a good idea.

    Comment by makkun
    22:37 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    That would be wonderful. If only someone could reach SquareEnix with this idea....

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:13 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Like the old-school SMTs? Hell to the yes, man.

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:58 26/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    SPOILER

    You mean Final Fantasy VI?

    It was great.

    Comment by Palmtop® Tiger
    11:02 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Square Enix is following Capcom's lead. As Megaman left the side-scrolling shooter genre, Final Fantasy will leave the JRPG genre.

    Comment by Dvv
    07:08 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Technically they never left it since they still do side-scrolling games, you get at least 1 a year from them.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:50 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    horrible idea, I think in these times every single game genre is basically headed in the same direction with series like Biohazard and metal gear solid both turning more action-orientated rather than keeping the parts that made them fresh and interesting to begin with. Although I understand that conforming to the times is something that is in the best interests, profit-wise, for the developers, losing these unique qualities will only serve to harm the original fanbase and though these new, westernized games will undoubtedly receive a wider audience overseas, it comes at the price of destroying what took years of dedication and imagination to build up.

    Maybe I'm just being too nostalgic but I don't feel any love for these new action-laden games. since when did having eye-raping graphics, gratuitous gunfire, and corpses of dark ethnicity strewn across the floor make a good game? I know games can be good without any of those things (though good graphics are usually a plus). I don't want to be given occasional chances to be stealthy in a stealth game, i want to be given occasional chances to shoot things up instead. sure it'll be difficult for certain people but then again those certain people have no place in playing these games if they don't have the patience or will power to get past those parts in the first place.

    /rant

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:11 09/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    unfortunatly, I see games on 50 gig blu ray disks, as being minigames to the internet... since my laptop hard drive has 320 gig, that means I can have 4 blu ray disk games on my hard drive....meaning I can play one that is actiony, one that is rpg, one startegy and one stealth, and inbeetween, talk about them on the net...

    meaning they are minigames to the internet, since I'm using the internet more than the games, to talk about stuff, and read about stuff.

    if we all see all the games like little instances of gaming inbetween internet sessions, instead of something to do instead of the internet, then we can call them essentially minigames, while we play on the internet.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:03 12/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    BWAHAHAHAHAHA... what?

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:13 09/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    you speak the truth dood.

    Comment by hiei
    13:04 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    well said man....well fucking said.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:21 09/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Shut up fucking micro pennis the yellow game industry is over so micro pennis deal with that hahahha asshole

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:19 09/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    America, land of the stupid hahahahaha.

    Comment by helba
    18:55 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    THANK YOU.

    Comment by Shi nai weaboo
    11:05 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Final fantasy racing sucked though

    Comment by AoCanada
    11:11 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Mega Man left the side-scrolling platformer genre? When the heck did that happen?

    Comment by ChaosAngelZero
    11:51 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    PT is talking about the Legends, Battle Network and Star Force series.

    Although, from the sound of it, Wada seems to actually be considering moving the whole main series to another genre, rather than starting a new series belonging to a different (sub-)genre.

    ... Or I don't know. His words are quite nebulous.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:04 10/05/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    uh, games that are too much linear are boring, open world with decisions afecting it might be the way to go.

    Comment by helba
    18:19 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    So, less quality, more manly fist-bumping and lasers.

    R.I.P., FF.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:17 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    They would fail if they switched genre since they have made non-rpgs before and they either fail outright or are nowhere near as popular as the rpgs. It is more likely they will mix in some western rpg concepts and create some new features and concepts of their own to try and change Final Fantasy. Whether they do a good job of it remains to be seen. One thing I expect is that future Final Fantasy will probably be less linear and be less of a movie.

    Comment by Kai89
    11:14 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Square just might be getting their shit together, this can be something great if they don't do anything to outlandish with their next Final Fantasy. People are tired of seeing the same game systems repackaged and calling it "ground breaking" material.

    Comment by AsakuraZero
    14:50 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    leaving the side-scroll method from the main series was teh WORST error from capcom and plus that they added the shittiest stories ever on that damn fucking megaman network series and whatever came out after those dammed games

    MMZ and MMZX were on the spot (ZXA was a bit bad imo)

    and i have played every damn MMX (i skipped the original saga exept MM3).

    Comment by helba
    19:35 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    You missed out; MMV and VI were sublime.





    Post Comment »

Popular

Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments